Race and power

2024 Author: Seth Attwood | [email protected]. Last modified: 2023-12-16 15:55

I am dealing with serious issues that should concern every biologically full-fledged Russian person today. Two decades ago, when I started my career, I was looked at as crazy and giggled. But everything falls into place.

Already on the central television channels, for example, speeches have sounded about the possibility of a civil war in the United States on a racial basis. To my credit, I have published two great works on this topic. Five years ago, my distinguished friend and world famous scientist, John Philip Rushton, professor of psychogenetics at the University of Western Ontario, passed away. At one time in the collection "Research in Biopolitics" I found his amazing work, with which my acquaintance with Rushton began. It was called the "Plan for the collapse of Canada and the United States on the model of the Soviet Union." The first time we published it in the Athenaeum magazine in 2001, then I reproduced it when I published Rushton's book Race, Evolution and Behavior. And two years ago, I published White Identity by my wonderful friend Jared Taylor. Jared was very helpful and helpful, provided many good books and copyrights to them. In White Consciousness, Taylor described all the structures of racial strife in the United States.

In the nineteenth century in the United States there was an amazing school of polygenism, that is, the origin of different races from different species - Samuel Morton, Josiah Knott, George Gliddon, and the Swiss-born Jean Louis Agassiz who joined them. It was the first serious scientific school, if only because at that time no European university had a collection of 1400 skulls of racial groups. By the way, we still like to say that Turgenev had a brain of 2 kg, while Anatole France, my deeply beloved classic of French literature, only had a kilogram. But this is a special case! Racology is a science of great magnitude. We are not doing research on flying saucers or the third eye at all. We are interested in the population. That is, the more examples you took, the more accurately you got into the topic. If we consider each race as a separate species, we recognize that it is a kind of whole that has a collective soul, collective psychology, its own methods in the struggle for resources, etc.

In the United States, by the way, the conflict is not brewing along the line: white - colored. Everything will be much more fun, because there are six centers of power. First, the WASPs (White Anglo-Saxon Protestants) are conservative white Americans who created this great country, “one-story America,” as Ilf and Petrov call it. Secondly, supposedly white, but with various fragmentation, adherents of all forms of sexual perversion, as a rule, supporters of the Democratic Party. Third, of course, the black population. Further - the Mongoloid race in all its manifestations, the Latinos and the Islamic sector.

Everything goes to the fact that the United States will fall apart in the foreseeable future. All great empires fell apart when the question of racial priority arose. The Chinese have figured out this moment for themselves, and now they are the most ethnically homogeneous group of large states. They have Han people - 97% of the population. This is what you need to learn.

***

Biological determinism, the concept that I profess, is not Avdeev's fantasy. It goes back to Darwin's student, the great German naturalist Ernst Haeckel. All social, cultural, political phenomena are explained on the basis of biology. In Soviet times, social Darwinian concepts were banned and accused of racism. The problem is that the Soviet Union, having adopted Darwin's theory, planted a bomb under itself. After all, they said "A", but did not say "B". They say that the evolution of species ends, this is where everything stops. Why on earth? If there are laws, then they work. And the line of biological determinism from the point of view of personalities never stopped. I emphasize once again: everything that Avdeev propagates is in its pure form Darwin's theory, which I once already spoke about in the prosecutor's office. I was summoned for some illiterate slander, I explained that I could not be a racist, firstly, because a retired Soviet officer, and secondly, because a Darwinist. The prosecutor's office threw up their hands: really, you can't. I just be able to read correctly.

Avdeev was not just the first on a sixth of the land to enter this, but published a bunch of classic works with scientific commentary, accepted in the world racological community, my book "Racology" has been translated into English. So I can die in peace. Although I am in no hurry to do this.

***

I am very grateful to the Soviet Union for teaching me everything for free. Including racial theory. The USSR opened libraries for me, gave me an excellent education. And due to my higher education, and I am an expert in military space, I figured it out further myself. Not accepting the communist ideology, I am proud that I come from the family of a Soviet officer, although by origin I have three-quarters of merchant blood and a quarter of nobility. And I am proud that I myself was a Soviet officer and would never have given a second oath. Being at the forefront of my people is my normal state of mind. Moreover, the cadre army for me is definitely higher than the same special services. There is no code of honor, but the army has one. The special services are much more susceptible to the value conjuncture than the army. They changed a line in the Criminal Code, and the special services changed their colors in an instant. Therefore, I hate films about scouts, spies and informers. I have always been inspired by tapes and stories about how an intelligent person came up with a new rocket or tank. The idea embodied in a piece of iron is closer to me than a poisoned umbrella prick in the ass.

The problem is that all modern analysis goes only at the level of the humanities. In the sixties, there was a fashionable topic - physics and lyrics. Now, it would seem, there has been a development of technology, listen to natural scientists. However, in the system of values, the humanities won completely. Technicians are not allowed to express their ideas publicly on topics of society and politics. On the TV screen, political scientists shrug their shoulders - we do not understand, they say, why the USSR collapsed. The Soviet Union collapsed for several specific reasons that are not explored using conspiracy theory, sociology, political science.

When Otto von Bismarck read Karl Marx's Capital, he said a simple thing: "An interesting theory, you just have to try on the country that you least feel sorry for." Have tried on us. Equality, which has been talked about all the time, from the point of view of the laws of thermodynamics, simply means heat death. Nature is based on inequality and struggle. One of the founders of philosophical anthropology, Arnold Gehlen, said a brilliant phrase: “The only truth lies in the fact that all life is nourished only by life. To survive, you have to eat someone. " By the way, this is why noisy programs for the protection of animals are incomprehensible to me: every day a huge number of animals, fish and birds are eaten, and they are ready to put in prison for a killed dog - in my opinion, this is schizophrenia.

I have read enough Soviet geneticists in my time. And I was amazed when I read outright stupidity - they say, with the victory of the socialist revolution, species selection in humanity stopped. Moreover, no justification was given. And that's all. How is it? It turns out that, being evolutionists, they themselves denied what they stood on.

In evolutionary genetics, it is generally accepted that the reproductive age of one generation is 25 years. For a sociological concept to take root, it needs to be professed by three generations of people. Famous phrase: grandfather planted a vine, father turned it into wine, and grandson tasted it. The Soviet system fell short of 75 years for several months.

The second point is population genetics. Since the collapse of Rome, Byzantium and other great empires, one simple thing has been known: as soon as the titular nation, which created a certain type of statehood on its territory, is reduced in number to the level of 50% or less, the state collapses. In 1991, there were less than 150 million Russians in the 300 million Soviet Union. Everything. The bifurcation point, it was necessary to find this painful moment, hit it, the whole structure collapsed.

There is a well-known visionary indication from Mendeleev that by the end of the twentieth century the number of the Russian people should have been about 500 million people. But losses in wars - world and civil, dispossession, natural demographic decline did their job.

I am an outrageous conservative. I absolutely do not like the idea of revolution under any sauce - not at the beginning of the twentieth century, not now. Russia, especially after what we have experienced in the twentieth century, needs a calm evolutionary path of development. I don't like swamp gatherings led by all sorts of "oval" ones. We must gradually, at all levels, remake the state for ourselves. Have you seen how water freezes? The first crystallization point appears, then in another place the second, the third. Similar. All this must be done slowly, politely, without shooting or stabbing.

And sooner or later, the state should develop an instinct for self-preservation, because it will not be possible to sit on an oil pipe indefinitely. In one form or another, we today need an oprichnina.

It is necessary to read Plato's "State" normally! There is the concept of meritocracy, that is, the power of the worthy. With the current level of psychometrics, genetic markers and the like, it is not difficult to select a normal public in power. Ulyukaev is a pure Gogol character, but on his face it is written that nothing good could be expected from him. And in general, from the point of view of physiognomy, the government is just a freak show.

***

Ivan the Terrible was a man of tremendous intuition. His physiognomy is not of an ideally Nordic type, but a genius politician, you can't say anything. When Peter the Great created the capital in a new place, he was already acting rationally. At the time of Ivan the Terrible, this did not happen yet. Only the tsar's intuition, the understanding that it was necessary to shake up the elite, made the Aleksandrovskaya Sloboda for some time the capital of the Russian state.

Once I came to visit my friend, the now deceased Pyotr Mikhailovich Khomyakov, he had a house in Aleksandrov. Let's go to the museum. And there we both fell off our jaw. We saw that the map of the Russian oprichnina completely coincides with the map of the emergence of the Russian superethnos. This is the genetic core. That's why Ivan the Terrible, from the point of view of racial theorist Vladimir Avdeev, needs to erect monuments! When there was a discussion about the erection of a monument to him, who was alarmed? Degenerates and mestizos. And, by the way, the map of the oprichnina in the museum was then removed for some reason.

We do not need comedies like "Ivan Vasilyevich is changing his profession," but studies of the legislative acts of Grozny, his wars and even marriages. We must consider this great historical person in the full variety of its manifestations with all the pluses and minuses.

***

Arthur Kemp, the eminent English racial theorist, has two killer formulas that every Russian should know. First: "If you want to understand what a racial war against the white race is, study the history of Russia." That racial theorists are against Russia is a myth propagated by semi-literate, biologically uneducated political scientists. And Kemp's second phrase: "All world history comes down to one and the same algorithm: the war of the white race with other races and its own genetic periphery." The Anglo-Saxons are the periphery. The center of the emergence of the white race in our territory.

Europe is a spit on the map. I will allow myself to quote the brilliant words of Professor Khomyakov, he said that you can be saved not only on an island in the ocean, but also on an island in an ocean of fire. Russia should be an island in an ocean of fire. Let both America and Europe burn. We played out our sacrifices in the twentieth century, in the twenty-first century we must build, raise bread, give birth to children, make airplanes, create canvases, write poems. I am for peace and evolutionary development. Not a drop of Russian blood. They try to accuse me all the time that I am trying to "kindle" something, that racial theories can undermine something. Not a damn thing like that! On the contrary, we want to strengthen the Russian state.

***

Ukraine is our racial periphery, hence all the problems. Its future is a collapse into five or six parts. The focus is now on the east of Ukraine. We need to make sure that the center of contradictions, including media coverage, is moved to the west of Ukraine - this is done quickly enough in modern conditions. We do not like Western Ukraine genetically, but, on the other hand, why do we need this territory? Let the Poles, Romanians, Hungarians get bogged down there and put things in order. Russia needs the east of Ukraine. And prostitute Kiev will come here sooner or later.

***

I spend my life debunking three myths - one humanity, one god, one truth. I am a categorical polytheist. As the ancient Roman historian Cornelius Tacet said: "There is no more disgusting idea than the idea of a single god." 7 billion people and one God - how can you technically imagine this communication system? Well, and an ethical theme: some cut others, but both of them worship the same god, how is this possible? And there is no single humanity. Different races are different biological species. And each race has its own ideas. Culture, art, religion are a form of conquering someone else's space.

How am I different from almost all of our intellectuals? Two fundamental things in my mind that I have been building for a long time as a bodybuilder muscle. There are two philosophical categories in German, but they apply to our situation. Our intellectual elite has no such thing as a worldview. What is called Weltanschauung in German philosophy. This is a very complex, multi-layered philosophical category. The worldview is like we have a meter, ampere, joule, etc. This is a clear, consistent characteristic. If you take our philosophical dictionaries, then they do not have a single concept of worldview. One verbiage. I have a racial outlook. In other words, logic and intelligence through the prism of a racial point of view. This is the first characteristic.

The second thing that makes me fundamentally different is the Weltsinndeutung. This is the term of the great philosopher Ernst Bergmann, a singer of the Nordic Renaissance, meaning attitude. Perception of the world through their own genes, through the prism of race.

This is where my philosophy differs from any of our remakes. In no one I see in its pure form either a racial worldview or a racial worldview. I have both. And all this can be read in my works.

***

Since the time of the Great French Revolution, it has been preached that a person can be remade through external influence. I always refer to the Nobel laureate William Shockley who invented the transistor. As a man with an excellent mathematical education, Shockley transferred these methods to population genetics and proved that everything, including the choice of the color of the tie, is 80% genetics, and only 20% is the cultural environment. Racial theory is not a vignette. This is a global theory that helps explain everything and everyone. If a tomato doesn’t smell like a tomato, it’s not a tomato. Or as in the Russian people they say negatively about a cat: "He doesn't catch mice." That is, everyone must satisfy their natural hereditary categories.

My respected sister, when I wrote A History of English Racology, joked that I had "changed my sexual orientation."However, if you are fluent in English, if you have a large library at home, and in the neighborhood is now burnt down INION, you have to be a fool not to do this. And Avdeev wrote what the Anglo-Saxons themselves cannot.

I am a convinced Germanophile. I became one when I was nineteen, when I read for the first time a two-volume book of German romantics. Then everything in my head shifted in the right direction - order and aestheticism. How much literature has been written that if Russia in 1914 had not been provoked into a massacre with the Germans, we would have surpassed everyone. There is such a funny book called "The Orange Book" - a collection of documents about how the First World War began at the legal level. The Germans perfectly understood that they could not fight the Entente on two fronts. Kaiser Wilhelm II wrote to Nicholas II: "Nicholas, brother, do not announce mobilization." Because in ninety-nine cases out of a hundred, mobilization means unleashing a war. I understand everything: Serbs, brothers, children … But if we simply did not get involved, the Germans would put the squeeze on the French with their brothels, and the British alone never fight. And it was possible to rebrand, as they say now, the great union of three nations - Russia, Germany, Austria. Yes, and a hundred years later, the Americans have repeatedly said in plain text that an alliance between Russia and Germany should not be allowed under any circumstances. After all, the world in this case will completely change.

Recently I watched a serious documentary about cancan and strip clubs in France. This also opens up national psychology. The Russians would make an instructive film about space flights, the Germans about the armed forces, and the French made a film for a few hours, how women lift their legs.

In the British, the worst thing is cynicism. I wrote a book about English racology in order to answer a simple question to which no one has yet given an intelligible answer - why does the whole world speak English? I answer: because of their cynicism that there is a form of simplification of mental operations. What is English. It was you who brought a bunch of goods to the other end of the world, sold it, got money, took a prostitute, went to a local pub, drank some of it, and took the rest home. There is no philosophy in English … The Chinese have philosophy, but there is no god there. Confucianism is ethics. There is generally no creator and no transcendental forces; everything is developed on another floor. Transcendence is India. A man sits, covered his loins with a dirty handkerchief, but he knows about gigantic worlds. In Europe, philosophy is Germany. Structuralists, poststructuralists - all this is bullshit, emptiness. And in Russia there is no philosophy, but we have genius Russian literature.

***

Race is not just skin color. The great Swedish natural scientist Karl Linnaeus in the middle of the 18th century clearly classified racial division: 1) this difference at the level of physical characteristics; 2) at the level of psychotype; 3) at the level of moral principles. Modern Europe and the States, with their cult of perverts, are outwardly white, but their insides have long been colored. For example, that is why they have caught us and will continue to catch us on the same sports scandals - we do not know how to lie, we have different genetics. I am currently preparing for publication a new book by Richard Lynn and Edward Dutton, Race and Sport. It follows from it that all achievements in sports are genetically grounded and determined. A separate part of the book is devoted to lies and cheating in sports. For example, they show the notorious Williams sisters, with their muscles unnatural for women. Without batting an eye, they deny everything: they say, no, they did not inject anything. And Russians cannot lie - it is hardwired into our genetic program. We prefer to lose the competition, but we just don't know how to lie. This is sewn up at the level of the spinal cord, we cannot remake ourselves. You can only remake the whole world - according to Dostoevsky.

***

Avdeev likes any Russian types. Because pull out one, and all Russian history will disappear. It's like destroying an element in the periodic table, it's impossible. But it is necessary to give an opportunity to the type that we consider the most valuable, to develop, reproduce, to provide him with social elevators. In the countries of Southeast Asia, entire government programs are working to ensure that students with high IQs create families and pursue careers. That is why they are developing so rapidly.

***

In 2012, I wrote the foreword to the book by Vasily Florinsky, the founder of Russian eugenics and the founder of Tomsk State University. Genius, clever, very light syllable, despite the fact that complex problems are raised in the book. And I met his direct descendant. Refined facial features, aristocrat to the core. We sit, talk, she throws out some phrases, and I understand that the turns of speech are like Florinsky's. Genetics at the language level. Her family also fell under repression, half of the family was cleaned out. But the linguistic formulations and moral assessments are like those of her ancestor from the middle of the nineteenth century. No mysticism is heredity.