Computed tomography and mammography leads to oncology

2024 Author: Seth Attwood | [email protected]. Last modified: 2023-12-16 15:55

People do not hesitate when they agree to a medical examination. But they can be harmful to health when it comes to radiation exposure. CT scans pose a greater threat than even X-rays …

CT scans increase the risk of cancer

Most people don't even think about it when they agree to the recommended medical examination. But diagnostics and subsequent control scans can be extremely harmful to health, especially when it comes to radiation.

A computed tomography scan, also known as a CT scan or tomography, is just such a procedure because during this diagnosis, a shock wave of ionizing radiation is directed at the human body, which can significantly increase the risk of developing cancer later in life.

A 2013 study published in the British Medical Journal found that a single CT scan was associated with an overall 24% increase in diagnosed cancer cases.

This percentage declines slightly over time after a single scan, but the opposite is also true: the more CT scans a person undergoes, especially at a young age, the higher the risk that cancer may develop later.

Why are CT scans worse than X-rays?

Why is CT scanning a more serious threat than even X-rays in terms of radiation? Rather than simply capturing a two-dimensional image of a person's viscera, a CT scan collects a series of images that are then combined into a three-dimensional matrix image.

As a result, such a three-dimensional image provides a better diagnosis of the presence of possible anomalies in human health, but at the same time it assumes significantly higher levels of destructive radiation, and potentially leads to the formation of exactly the very diseases that are intended to be detected.

“Unlike a single X-ray, a CT scan is the equivalent of a series of individual X-rays taken by a powerful computer to capture a high-resolution, three-dimensional image of our body’s contents,” writes Lori Alton for NaturalHealth365.com.

“After a single scan with a CT scan, you are exposed to dangerous radioactive radiation, which is the equivalent of multiple x-rays, and therefore increases your risk of developing cancer,” she adds. "In fact, the exposure is so great that it can be compared to a tenfold increase in natural background ionizing radiation."

A single CT scan exposes a person to radioactive radiation that is 10 times higher than the average natural background ionizing radiation for an entire YEAR

To designate a certain coordinate system, we will take into account that, on average, a person in natural conditions is exposed to background radioactive radiation in the amount of approximately 3 millisieverts (mSv) per year. And for comparison, in the course of a single CT scan of the head, a person is exposed to an average of 2 mSv.

And this figure rises significantly with a full CT scan, for example, of the entire abdominal cavity, during which a person is exposed to radiation of about 30 mSv, which is about 10 times the average natural background ionizing radiation for a whole year.

"Radiation doses between 5 and 125 mSv are already considered 'statistically significant' because they increase the risk of cancer," adds Alton.

"But people who already have a detected malignant neoplasm receive even higher doses of radiation than healthy people, due to frequent scanning for diagnostic purposes and during the observation processes accompanying treatment."

Women should be especially careful with CT scans, as the chest area is the area where CT scanned cancers are more likely to form, along with the abdomen and pelvis, as found in a study at Harvard University.

Researchers at Harvard Medical School also found that a person has a 1 in 2000 chance of developing cancer after a single CT scan of the abdomen, and they further describe the significant hazards associated with this procedure.

This is why many alternative medicine practitioners are suggesting to their patients instead thermal imagingor digital infrared thermographybecause instead of irradiation, this method uses infrared imaging to check for abnormalities inside the human body that may indicate a disease.

Computed tomography raises the risk of developing brain cancer

An international team of scientists led by Michael Hauptmann from the Netherlands Cancer Research Institute announced the results of a new work. The researchers said that computed tomography may increase the risk of developing brain tumors, writes Science Daily.

Recall that computed tomography (CT) is one of the most commonly used imaging methods (by the way, its creators received the 1979 Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine). CT sanitation is used by specialists in various fields: biologists, archaeologists and, of course, physicians.

This type of scan significantly expands the diagnostic capabilities and, accordingly, increases the effectiveness of treatment. However, there is an important point: studies of human internal organs are carried out using X-rays.

This fact has long caused certain concerns among doctors. By itself, computed tomography assumes minimal exposure compared to other types of radiation diagnostics. However, there is speculation that children and adolescents who receive higher doses of radiation become vulnerable to developing cancer. In particular, we are talking about malignant neoplasms in the brain, as well as leukemia.

To test this hypothesis and assess the risks, Hauptmann's team conducted a study involving more than 168,000 Dutch children and adolescents under the age of 18. Between 1979 and 2012, they all underwent one or more CT scans.

Scientists analyzed the medical records of all of these patients. They were interested in cases of cancer, as well as how many people died during this period and for what reasons.

As a result, the overall cancer incidence among the participants was one and a half times higher than expected. Experts have indeed found a link between CT scans and the development of various types of brain tumors. So, the higher the radiation dose, the higher the risk of a terrible disease. In patients who underwent tomography several times, the risk of developing oncology increased two to four times.

But with regard to leukemia, the assumptions did not come true: irradiation, apparently, does not have a significant effect on the development of tumors and disruption of blood and bone marrow cells, the authors of the work clarify.

However, they also note that some of the children were forced to undergo CT scans because they already had a suspicion of cancer. In this case, it is not entirely clear whether the procedure could somehow affect the development of the disease.

Doctors insist that work in this direction be continued: they want to determine all the existing risks associated with the widespread method of radiation diagnostics.

“Our assessment of [this] data and data from other studies shows that radiation exposure associated with CT increases the risk of developing brain tumors. In order to minimize the risks, it is necessary to thoroughly justify [performing] computed tomography in children and optimize the dose, as is done in many hospitals,”concludes Michal Hauptmann.

His team's research paper was published in the specialized medical journal JNCI: Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

Mammography is a brutal medical hoax

Shocking research shows mammography is a medical trap - more than one million women in America have been disfigured by over-treatment for non-existent breast cancer.

Article in the online edition Kopp-Online from 06.12.2012

The oncology industry is fraught with a "dirty little secret": the same oncologists who make women fearful by making them think they have breast cancer are making huge profits selling these women chemotherapy drugs.

Conflicts of interest and lack of ethics are an absolutely terrific situation in the cancer industry.

Now a new scientific study has confirmed that the majority of women had a “diagnosis” of breast cancer, obtained by primmography, was incorrect!

93% of "early detection" cases do not benefit patients.

This is the conclusion of a groundbreaking study published in The New England Journal of Medicine (NEJM).

“We found that after screening was introduced, the number of women diagnosed with early breast cancer increased by about 1.5 million,” wrote co-author Dr. Gilbert Welch. On the surface, this is good news. You might be thinking, "Well, early detection saves lives," just as Komen (the Breast Cancer Association) and the various non-profit cancer counteraction societies tell us.

But that would be a false conclusion. Welch's team found that this increase in additional “early” diagnoses did little to reduce the incidence of advanced breast cancer, which means that most women who had mammograms were lied to about having breast cancer.

Dr. Welch explains: “We found that the number of women diagnosed with advanced breast cancer is about 0.1 million. This discrepancy means that there was a lot of overdiagnosis, that is, more than one million women who allegedly had cancer at an early stage and who were then treated mainly with surgery, chemotherapy and X-ray - because of the "cancer" that they never have did not have".

Yes, that's it. If 0, 1 million women with real breast cancer per 1.5 million “diagnosed”, then 93% of the “early warning” results were false, that is, they do not develop cancer in the following stages.

Chemotherapy, radiation, and cancer surgery are pretty much a scam on the part of orthodox medicine

According to the study, over the past 30 years, 1.3 million American women with "breast cancer" have been overdiagnosed (ie, tumors that were identified during screening would never cause any clinical symptoms). These are 1.3 million women who had to believe their oncologists: “If you do not agree with the prescribed treatment, then you will die in six months (or within two years),” which throws people into the abyss of horror and fear.

From this fear, most women give up and agree to start "treatment" - often on the same day they are misdiagnosed. The so-called "treatment" consists of highly toxic injections of truly lethal chemicals, from the sale of which the same oncologist gets a small fortune when he "sells" the wrong diagnosis to a patient. Yes: Cancer clinics and cancer treatment centers make huge profits from the sale of chemotherapy agents they sell to their patients. Once again - to the same patients whom they previously frightened with a false-positive mammography result and thus forced them to treatment.

Although mammography is a scientific failure, its propaganda continues unabated. However, most women fall for the statistical hype in the media and agree to toxic chemotherapy for "breast cancer" they don't have.

Quackery of modern oncology

When women start chemotherapy “against cancer,” which they do not suffer from, they get what they call “cancer symptoms” by charlatans-oncologists - their hair falls out, they lose their appetite, and their muscles weaken. They become physically weak, mentally lost and chronically tired. Then the doctor says to this woman, "You have to be strong to get through this while the medicine is working."

Pure quackery! Maybe the effect would be better if you rely on feng shui or voodoo, at least nothing toxic is infused into the body. Because in modern medicine, everything related to cancer - diagnosis, "treatment", medical apparatus - exists with malicious intent to generate profit for the onco industry.

"Improved" technology leads to more false positives

There is no better example for modern quackery than the cancer industry. With the advent of more accurate mammography machines, the number of false-positive diagnoses increased by leaps and bounds. Once again, Dr. Welch in the New York Times: “Six years ago, a long-term follow-up in a randomized trial found that about one quarter of all cancers found on screening were overdiagnosed. And this research was related to mammography, which was used in the 1980s. New digital detection devices give much more abnormal measurements and, accordingly, overdiagnosis has increased to one third - half of those found in cancer screening.”

You understand? Many cancer diagnoses on mammography are simply not correct. But this is in line with existing tactics of intimidating women, which can only be described as a "cult of cancer" that manipulates women into further chemical poisoning. Of course, there are survivors of this undeclared war, in which most die not from cancer, but … from treatment!

Cancer cult

Today people are perplexed at the massive suicide of the Jimi Jones cult in 1978, when they think "how could these cult members be foolish enough to poison themselves?"

Look around you folks, because the onco industry made its own Jimi Jones recipe, only multiplying it a million times. The "Cancer Cult" is a kind of modern-day suicide cult named after Jim Jones.

One of the hallmarks of this cult is the worship of self-mutilation. And it's not just women who are manipulative to remove ("preventive") breasts, but there are women who can be manipulated to sell them injections of lethal toxins for the kidneys, liver and brain. By the way: the most common side effect of chemotherapy is … cancer itself.

Like any other cult, the onco industry is spreading its heresy through emotionally charged propaganda and impressive symbols (pink ribbons). Millions of women participate in charity events (Run for the Cure fundraising), seemingly without realizing that most of the money raised is used to purchase mammography machines, which only leads to more false positive diagnoses, and that more and more women are becoming victims of fraud.

The entire cancer industry today, in fact, can only be described as a crime against women. There is also a form of "cultural mutilation" similar to what we have seen throughout history in the Aztecs, Mayans, and various African cultures.

Is the "cancer cult" a criminal enterprise? With a great deal of confidence, yes. Is it scientific? Forget about it. There is nothing "scientific" in the modern cancer industry, except for the scientific manipulation of the fears and feelings of people, not just women, in the case of breast cancer. Parents whose children are "diagnosed" with cancer, most often leukemia or lymphoma, are very susceptible to manipulation. In the cancer industry, ethics, science and facts go missing, replaced by tactics of verbal and non-verbal influence, pressure and publicly presented lies about the overestimated benefits of mammography.

The oncology industry, after all, is not going to cure cancer. Instead, she promotes the cult of cancer. Dr. Welch explained: “Proponents of mammography are presenting things to the public that are simply not true. On the one hand, that supposedly the life of every woman diagnosed with cancer with the help of mammography can be saved (I think from the survivors of the "treatment" of breast cancer with their pink T-shirts - "Mammography saves lives, and I am proof of that."). In fact, these survivors are very likely the other way around - the victims of the diagnosis."

So it would be fairer to tell all women with the slogan "mammography saves lives with a pink t-shirt" that they are unsuspecting victims of a "scientific" campaign against women who have been misled by fear and given a "treatment" they did not need. and then maimed them with toxic chemicals or a surgeon's scalpel. These pink T-shirts should be telling the truth, and this should read: "I survived the war with the cancer industry."

With all this, a big question arises: how long will Western civilization be held captive by the cult of cancer? How many more millions of women must be sacrificed to the quackery of mammography and the psychological treatment of modern oncology?

Modern Oncology Presents the Dark Ages of Medicine

The day will come when the modern practice of chemotherapy will be condemned in books on the history of medicine, as, for example, was the practice of inhalation of mercury and surgical removal of organs for the treatment of mental disorders.

Until then, countless innocent women will be maimed by poison, radiation, or scalpel through doctors who simply don't care how many women they mutilate or kill if paid by the insurance company. You will not get this truth about the onco industry from the followers of the cult of the "pink ribbon".