Table of contents:
Video: Trojan horse as a virus that leads to brain frost in the torch
2024 Author: Seth Attwood | [email protected]. Last modified: 2023-12-16 15:55
The essence of the following has been ripening in me for a long time. She was ripening, wandering, and at the same time, somewhere deeply new thoughts were born, and now they huddle, interfere with each other, trying to break free, so it's time to laugh at the tales of traditional historians, and make room in my head to move unencumbered further.
Does it happen that a person confuses the floor, or even the entrance? Undoubtedly. It even happens that a person confuses cities, like Zhenya Lukashin in a film, which everyone missed very much, and can't wait until December 31 to watch and watch this "masterpiece" on all channels. I personally know a person who, like Zhenya Lukashin, ended up in the wrong city.
Once a group of friends gathered in Moscow to accompany one sailor on a voyage, whose ship was leaving the port of Odessa the other day. And so they noted that they forgot about what they had gathered. Then one of the people seeing off gathered their brains in a heap, and, pretending to be sober, said: - "It seems today one of us should get on the Moscow-Odessa train, but definitely not me."
- Who is our sailor?
- He … Arkashka we have a Moreman, so he needs to go to Odessa.
For some reason, at that moment everyone forgot that there were two Moreman in the company, they lifted one of them and stuffed it into the carriage of the departing train. For a long time Arkady could not understand why he woke up in the train compartment, and the one that was supposed to go to sea went on the next train.
What am I doing? And to the fact that not a single fairy tale is born from scratch. No matter how a person tries to come up with something new, something always comes out that was actually somewhere, once. So it happened with the writing of history. The writer was given the task of writing a chronicle of a non-existent country, and he writes, but not from scratch, but relying on some real events. And then, the followers, often illiterate and ignorant, breed and multiply lies, and they are already referred to as classics, and no one cares that the source of the chronicle was one grandmother. In our country, it is called OBS. Those. "One grandmother said."
This is how the myths about the Byzantine, Tatra-Mongol, Ottoman, Roman empires were born, and about Tartary as an empire. It never occurs to anyone now that we now understand the term "Empire" only by drawing knowledge from the definitions given by the course of Social Science and Theory of State and Law. But just a couple of hundred years ago, the word "Empire" had a slightly different meaning. An empire is a territory inhabited by tribes that pay taxes to one foreman-ruler. And the emperor is just a ruler, as follows from the Latin-Russian dictionary.
But if Tartary actually existed, although not as an empire with a metropolis and colonies, it was. As a voluntary union of clans and tribes, united not by a single currency or language of communication, but by the fact that now in vain they are trying to find new intellectuals who call it the "Russian idea", the rest of the aforementioned empires never existed at all.
It so happened that people began to confuse not only addresses and cities, but entire countries.
So Albania for some reason moved to Europe, although according to old maps it has always been in the Caucasus.
And Belarus, mysteriously migrated to its present place, from the territory of the Vologda Province.
And what can we say about cities! We are told that Rome is an "eternal city", they say, it is countless thousands of years old, and it became the metropolis of the Roman Empire. Aha …
And why, in fact, Roman? Where is Rome on the map, can you tell me? No, I don't need to show a map of the 20th century, you will show me to find the eternal city on medieval maps! If the whole world calls him "ROM", "ROMA", then where is this "ROMA" on the maps?
As you can see, there is not even a hint of Rum on the Mercator maps, much less Rome. The Apennine Peninsula generally looks like a backwater, in contrast, even, from neighboring Bulgaria. By the way, do not tell me how it happened that they forced us to call B - U - Lgaria B - O - Lgaria, eh? The same joke as in the case of Rome. Well, there was no Rome, and now there is not. There is Rum, there is Bulgaria, there is Romania, which is also not R-U-Myniya, but R-O-Mania.
As there was no Ottoman Empire. There was O-TT-Oman, but it appeared quite recently, like Istanbul. What … Say it's not funny, went too far, huh? Nothing of the kind, see for yourself:
Where is Istanbul (although it is Istanbul, actually)? He is not here! On the site of the second, greatest city in the history of the city, the capital of the "Byzantine Empire" of Istanbul - Constantinople - Bysantia - Constantinople are just a few villages! So where did the Russian princes love to nail their shields, on which gate, which village?
When I realized the scale of the historical idiocy in which everyone is now arriving safely, I felt scared. And then it's funny, so much so that on the verge of hysteria.
I tried to reason and this is what I got:
If the legend of Troy (Ilion) has survived, then such an event undoubtedly took place in history, only when and where?
As you know, "a holy place is never empty," therefore, even if Troy was ground to dust, its place was doomed to the prompt settlement and construction of a new city. Why? Very simple. Because of the tightness. Yes, the earth is a small planet, although there are also smaller ones, but there are not so many convenient places for life on it. Indeed, according to the description, Troy was a sea city, well fortified both from land and sea. Such cities appear only in specific places where there are prerequisites for this. The first prerequisite is geography.
It is now possible to install air conditioners and live tolerably in the Palestinian deserts, but for another 100-150 years large port cities arose only where there is a good protected bay, where there are enough material and human resources, and where there are well-established communications and trade routes.
In what places do you think a person would have built ports in Crimea if he were in the wilderness for the first time? That's right, in the same places where they are now. Likewise, Troy could not be depopulated in principle, which means that on the site of the legendary Troy there is now a large trading city with a powerful naval base. This is how the range of searches is significantly narrowed! In fact, the candidates for the honorary title can be counted on the fingers of one hand: Istanbul, Burgas, Constanta, Odessa and Sevastopol. There are, of course, studies that provide real ground for assertions that Troy could have been on the eastern coast of the Black Sea, but I only keep these versions in mind, because for a number of reasons (I will not bore you with the listing) I am convinced that Troy could only be on the west coast, and only on the Black Sea, and not on any other sea.
Very well suited for the role of Troy Burgas. From the point of view of a military man, he is simply magnificent, not much inferior to Sevastopol. Moreover, at 30 km. in the west there is the town of Troyanovo!
I begin to plunge into the history of Burgas, and here again nothing remains but laughter:
It's incredible, but Burgas has no history at all! Are you able to believe it? Me not. Any normal person understands that such a geostrategically advantageous place is simply not empty! Simply, the history of this port-city was erased completely, without even bothering to write something about the poor, who do not have a written language and Bulgars culture. And why bother, the Bulgarians are not Russian, so explain everything, and explain everything. But the Bulgarians are good fellows, they plow for Pope Carlo, without straightening their backs, for a bowl of gruel, and they don't bother, they don't ask questions. What they were told they believe in. And it’s no time for them to ask scientists how, when, and for what reason their history and empire were stolen!
Clickable
See for yourself, Romania, which is now bashfully called Romania, was a real empire, according to the concepts adopted in the Middle Ages, and it was not in its current familiar place, but was located on the territories of present-day Greece, Serbia, Macedonia, Bulgaria and Turkey. The ideal geographic position led to a fantastic rise in the development of the country of the ancient Romanians! Go back now to the map of Italy from the same time, and feel the difference. Italy was on the outskirts of the developed world, and it a priori could not become the greatest empire.
Clickable
But Romania could! And not only could, but also was! This is the true Roman Empire, and not what traditionalists with the degrees and titles of "IN" are trying to sell us, that is. "historical sciences". No Byzantium, no Roma empire, no Ottoman. Only Italy, Anatolia, and … Bulgaria! Funny. but not laughing. How it could have turned out that Romania and Bulgaria have exchanged places with each other remains to be seen. But in the Balkans there were only two empires, and these were Romania in the South and Bulgaria in the north.
To make the whole alignment clear, here is a modern map.
As you can see, Burgas and Varna used to be Romanesque, and Constanta, on the contrary, was Bulgarian. And Bulgaria included Kosovo and most of Serbia, bordered by the lands of the Rusyns, Scythians (Scythians) and Wallachs in the north. And the ruler Trajan was Bulgar, and Troy must be looked for in the lands of ancient Bulgaria. Here's how everything turned the storybook! But that's not all. It turns out that what is now Romanian, and what the Romanians themselves consider theirs, originally Roman - Romanian, it turns out has more to do with the Bulgars than with the novels.
Think it's the capitoline wolf in Rome? You are wrong.
This is Constanta. Romania.
And this is not Italy either. The purebred "Roman" Ovid worked and died in Constanta. Iztoriki invented a fable that he was supposedly exiled from Rome to a remote province. Aha, of course! They are not exiled from Pevek to Moscow. It was not worth working on fictions. Ovid was a citizen of Constanta, which is most likely the "mythical" Constantinople.
It is logical after all that it was Constantza that the Russians called in their skete manner "Constantinople"? Well, how is Andreapol, or Gulyaypole, Kargopol, finally? Then the task of the princes who traveled to Constantinople is greatly simplified, and Constantza is quite near at hand! And not to be confused with Constantinople! Tsaregrad is also on the maps, and as it was a metropolis, it still exists today, although it has moved to the right bank of the Volga, and is now preparing for the return of one of the historical names of Stalingrad.
Well, it does not happen that cities and peoples arise only to write one joke, and then dissolve without a trace! And Troy did not dissolve. She was called "Troy" only figuratively, after the name of the ruler, who is most likely the Emperor Trajan. This is how poets write "I love you, Peter's creation …", and they wrote about the Trojan War, but for some reason the historians decided that since Troy means Troy, and that's it. And so that the people do not mess up, God forbid they get to the bottom of the truth, they passed off another joke as the truth, with the "discovery" of Troy by Schliemann. Well, the layout is for suckers, since Troy is found, then there is nothing more to look for. Yes, my dears, there is !!!!
This is the Trojan War depicted by medieval authors.
Pay attention to the same details. Trajan's pillar, which is now in Rome:
I wonder how he got there?
And the aqueduct is clearly visible … But how could the artists know about the structure of the city, if the city, and the Trojan War in general, were considered just a work of art, until the "discovery" of Schliemann? Moreover, do the details in the paintings of different artists coincide so strikingly exactly? Maybe the whole point is that the Trojan War was, and was not a hundred thousand million years before the new era, but quite recently? Maybe artists back in the 17th century perfectly understood what place they were portraying?
Knowing that the entire Roman empire is just a joke, you begin to feel sorry for the reporters. They really deserve sympathy, because they were given the impossible task of creating confirmation of the existence of the Roman Empire, and at the same time erasing the history of Russia, Turkey, Greece, Bulgaria, and Romania (in our case).
In general, arguing in this way, I came to the conviction that Troy did not disappear anywhere, and all this time it was located in the territory of modern Romania. Indirect evidence of this is quite enough for the version to have the right to exist and develop. We will proceed from the fact that:
- the cultural heritage of Troy must be preserved to this day, - Troy is a large port city near the Danube, - the sought-after city is originally Slavic, and is located not far from modern Russia.
Almost ideally only one city meets all the requirements, and its name is CONSTANTS, aka Constantinople, the patrimony of the poet Ovid and Emperor Trajan, who is buried in the city of Kiliya, divided by the Danube, one half of which ended up on the territory of Romania, the second on the territory of the Odessa region of Ukraine …
Remember what Virgil wrote about the Trojan horse? He said: - "Fear the Danes, who bring gifts." It is he about the mysterious donors of the Trojan horse, in which there were such a horde of people that they de seized the city from the inside, when the stupid Ilionians dragged a wooden horse into the city for some reason. Well, isn't it nonsense? Of course there could be no horse. Obviously a translation error. And it never occurred to anyone that this was a complete absurdity! Not in the horse, the point, but in the similarity of the spelling of some Latin words:
A. T. Fomenko, respected by me, decided that the enemy special forces entered the city with the help of an aqueduct. Ay-yay-yay … Nothing, all periodically, they drive me to the wrong steppe. The guess is correct, but only half.
Most likely, the Danube sent the water to the besieged city, and it was their gift, and not a horse at all. But no aqueduct special agents crawled into the city in even columns, this is also complete nonsense. But if we assume the use of chemical, or rather, biological weapons … Yes, Yes !!! Here is the most logical explanation for what happened. The Danube people let water into the dry aqueduct leading to the city's territory. Yes, not just water, but poisoned water. The garrison of Ilion fell from disease, that's how simple it is.
Homer wrote a poem about Constance, not a chronicle, and called the Trojan War not by the name of a specific settlement. If we had the Great Patriotic War, then do not rush to the cards to find the city "Fatherland"!
And the Aqueduct in Constanta has survived. And oh, what a curious aqueduct!
When I saw this, I almost fainted. No, Romanians roam in droves there, nobody told them about the history of stone-cutting art, but I have an eye for such things. See, do you see the difference between columns and gutters? A???
What a gift this is!
The level of performance of the supports and gutters differs like a smartphone from an adding machine. This is not our achievement. These are artifacts inherited from our predecessors. We have not yet learned how to use stone in this way. Constanta, as befits any normal city, arose on the ruins, and some of the ruins have survived to this day.
You’ll laugh. They don't even know where to put the wreckage of their former luxury.
Most of these objects have survived in Antalya. Greece with its acropolis and next to it did not lie with Turkey in terms of the quantity and quality of the surviving fragments of antediluvian material culture. But there is something in Romagna too. I am sure that you can find in Bulgaria enough evidence of a once powerful united country, from which we got only fragments that the history books appropriated to our civilization, and to explain where this is all, they attributed everything to antiquity …
And then I started reviewing all the materials on Troy on my computer, and suddenly my attention was attracted by a photo from pedivics. It's amazing that he himself drew attention to her so late! But the photo is a real sensation!
Ruins of Troy. Figure 1835. Author unknown. Clickable
Nuuuu ???
Do you see it, or suggest? Native, the landscape is typical of the Black Sea, but the main thing is that the ruins are against the background of the pyramid! The artist did not know this, of course, he just painted what he saw. They draw from nature, right? And if we assume that quite recently people knew the true story of Troy, then it could easily be that the artist painted exactly at the scene of the incident! Then the matter is small, and you need to look for a view with a similar pyramid. Of course, this can only be a coincidence, an accident, but take a look at the next picture …
I know, I know … But remember what the pyramids were turned into in Nakhodka and in Krasnoyarsk? They were just as mercilessly ripped off! By chance, of course … I even know what the local ethnographers will say. They will tell how "after the Second World War, the city was in dire need of building materials, and the stone was taken from the nearest mountain. It is just from natural sandstone, and it was not a pyramid at all."
We have heard all this more than once, so I believe, I believe, I believe … But it does not let me go … I believe that the artist painted his picture, being on the other side of the bay, on a hill, the top of which is level with the last floors of a white skyscraper that can be seen on the perspective. Only there was almost no city, but the pyramid, on the contrary, was.
Well, like that, roughly.
Now ask me what this place is … Take a breath … Ready? this is CONSTANZA!
Of course, I am not asserting anything. These can all be coincidences. But you must admit that the density of these coincidences exceeds the usual limit set by the theory of probability.
And finally, three series in a row, from the cycle "History" Science or Fiction.”The first part is about Three.
Low bow to everyone who has finished reading!
Recommended:
"Trojan horse" - what is the meaning and origin of this meaning?
Ancient myths lie at the origins of many aphorisms. The expression "Trojan horse" is no exception. To determine the meaning of phraseological units, we turn to the ancient Greek legend, which tells us the story of the fall of the great city of Troy, the cause of the death of which was a certain mysterious gift
Trojan horse of technology: what is the threat of digital colonization?
Like most countries in the world, we have long been a colony of America. At the same time, we still have a lot of our own, so the situation is not the worst in comparison with other countries. The essence of digital colonization, which began to be carried out in the late 80s of the last century, is that quite a lot of domestic developments were abandoned, we actively began to master American software and densely entered the Internet
The rise in carbon dioxide leads to poor quality food on Earth
An article about the works of a Georgian scientist who, having arrived in the United States, in addition to mathematics, took up biology. He began to observe changes in plant life depending on the quality of air and light. The conclusion was ecological: the growth of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere accelerates the growth of plants, but deprives them of substances useful for humans
Who are you? Horse Trojan
The second part of a wonderful study by the author of the blog "Kolymchanin's Notes". This is the so-called Emperor Trajan in traditional history. Once again, we are faced with a forgery, when the Slavic past of Europe is smeared with "ancient Roman" events
How the brain works. Part 2. The brain and alcohol
In the second part of the article, the author continues to analyze the work of the brain from an unusual point of view for many. How much energy is released during the oxidation of alcohol and what does acetaldehyde have to do with it? What is its toxic concentration? Why is cultural drinking being promoted everywhere?