Who are you? Horse Trojan

2024 Author: Seth Attwood | [email protected]. Last modified: 2023-12-16 15:55

The first part of the study: Trojan horse as a virus that leads to brain frost in iztorikov

I have a friend who does not have his own corner on this resource, but who regularly visits me. In response to his commentary on the connection between the old Russian tradition of celebrating the day of Troyan (Yarilo is wet, or Tribogov day) on May 22, and Emperor Trajan, it suddenly dawned on me.

I think, how is it, everything lies on the surface, there are hints all around that no one hides. Take it, use it, but no! It is more convenient for us to open a textbook or reference book, or rather "click" in an Internet search engine, and believe what is written there. So, thanks to Nikolai Kuznetsov, I once again returned to the personality of Emperor Trajan (In some sources, his name is spelled with "O" - Troyan, which is undoubtedly closer to the truth!).

Mark Ulpius Nerva Traian (lat. Marcus Ulpius Nerva Traianus). Iztoriki gave him the following title: "Emperor Caesar, Son of the Divine Nerve, Nerva Trajan Best Augustus German Dacian Parthian, Great Pontiff, endowed with the power of the tribune of the people 21 times, Emperor 13 times, Consul 6 times, Father of the Fatherland."

This man was born, allegedly in 53 in Italica,

and died in Gazipashi, which is in Cilicia (Anatolia, Turkey), and is already 3300 km from the "place of birth", and even then, if you fly by plane.

Despite the fact that no one saw his grave, a column in his honor stands for some reason in Rome.

The monument to him (the very first photo) stands in general in Xanten (Germany), not far from the current border with Holland, and crowns the top of such a triangle:

And where is the place for Rome, whose emperor he supposedly worked from 98 to 117? But pay attention to the outline of the Black Sea coastline, to the right of the right side of the triangle. Only I can see the profile of a man, or is there something in it?

Lenin or Trotsky? Maybe Trajan?

Okay, jokes aside.

I propose, as many times before, for a while to forget everything that the scholars have told us, and with the spontaneity of a child, not burdened with useless knowledge, to be guided by intuition, logic and common sense.

FIRST: Let's start by clarifying the main question, was there even such a character in history? The answer is yes. Of course, once in the history of the Slavs, the memory of the terrible battle that took place on the Danube a long time ago has been preserved to this day (how long is a separate question).

The information about this battle is so real that even its exact date is known. February 18, 5609 according to the Slavic chronology, from the creation of the world. In our opinion, it will be 101 years old. And after all, mind you, slavs did not officially exist then! (link)

Well, if so, then there was still Trajan, there was no doubt, even though the dating agrees with the official one. But was Trayan a Roman?

SECOND: Earlier, I already mentioned the phenomenon discovered by Andrey Stepanenko, which has the name "Catherine's shift". (link)

So that's it. A long time ago, I noticed strange coincidences in the history of Russia and Western Europe, only what happened in the Middle Ages, exactly like a carbon copy, happened in ancient Rome. Coincidences have been seen in the biographies of Diocletian and Alexander Nevsky. After Stepanenko's discovery, it became obvious that it was at the time of Catherine II that the Iztoria of Ancient Rome was written. And in order not to bother with inventing non-existent events, the storytellers simply changed the geography, gave the characters new names, and transferred them more than a thousand years into the past.

Realizing this, seemingly insoluble contradictions also become solvable. For example, it is now clear that all "antique" statues, which are entirely "copies from copies", depict elderly people already, with clean-shaven faces. Take the date of the invention of tool steel, and it will become clear to you that before the 18th century, there were no adult men without a beard in nature, just as the Macedonian could not control the battle, giving orders to commanders by mobile phone.

Therefore, all Trajan's images are fake. He did not look like that, and this gives reason to believe that his entire biography is the fruit of the labor of one of the storytellers of the 18th century. Then how to determine where Trajan actually ruled? It's very simple. Where he ruled, he inherited the most. Where did you inherit it? Yes, just where the Black Sea coast so strongly resembles the profile of an unshaven man.

So, according to the thoughts of an unclouded child's brain, we come to the conclusion that everything we know about Trajan is a lie. The truth can be restored bit by bit, albeit partially, but for us it is much more valuable than the existing injustice. Let's go to the place where the memory of the "Roman" emperor has been preserved to this day …

This, my friends, is not something, not "hukhry-muhry", but the real thing, whatever is ROMANIA, and the marks on it are just what remains of the "Roman" emperor. All these are walls, roads, fortifications, fortresses, etc.

But someone can clearly explain to me why in all languages this country is called ROMANIA, and only for Russians did they come up with the word ROMANIA? Especially so that no one would guess?

At this point, involuntarily, you will think, but did Gaidai know about this trick with Rum-Y-niya !?

So what do we have? The birthplace of the accused is linden, the place of death is linden, his whole life is linden, but if it was a Roman ruler, where are his traces in Italy? They are not there! Where are they? Yes, in ROMANIA, it is not clear that !!!

It turns out not much easier. On the territory of present-day Romania, lived - was the king of the ruler of ROMANIA, and he had nothing to do with Rome, and could not have at all. Open your eyes, as they say. Would Ivan the Terrible, for example, Build fortifications on an industrial scale in the British Isles? Of course not. He built where he had a permanent residence, and did not rush from continent to continent without having a flying carpet. So with what fright did Trajan rush from Antalya to Spain, to the north of Germany, and at the same time set up so many objects of a giant scale on the territory of some sort of Romania?

In general, I believe that Trajan's place of residence, as well as his birth and death, has been established more than reliably. This is Dacia, which bordered on the lands of the Antes, i.e. with our ancestors, Russians. And what kind of family do we have Trajan? Let's see the encyclopedia? Don't bother. Looked for you already. It says that his family was called ANTONINS !!! You get it, right? ANTHONIDES! And Trajan did not build the Troyan Shafts,

namely anty. Look at the map of ancient Bessarabia, compiled in 1827. staff of the captain of the Russian army Veltman. In the center of the fortifications, called by the name of Trajan, it is clearly written: - "ANTY". Now read what Veltman himself wrote in the explanations to the map: -

It turns out that back in the 19th century, it was clear to a normal person who and against whom were building defenses.

It was not the Romans who built it, for protection from the barbarians, it is, on the contrary, the "barbarians" of the Wallachians, Rusyns and Antes built to protect against the troops of Tsar Trajan.

Trayanovy shafts on stamps of Moldova.

And if Trajan himself was a native of the Antes, then why build defensive structures of Cyclopean dimensions from him? Unfortunately, it happens. Relatives often quarrel. Trajan, having created a powerful state, and this was undoubtedly a kingdom very strong and rich, judging by the remaining traces, he decided that he could impose his will on his relatives from the north. It was not there! Received in the muzzles, and calmed down. But he was clearly one of ours. Let's take a look at the topographical names of Trajan's kingdom today. It's super addicting, honestly!

What do you think about this? Impressed? It is not so incomprehensible, it turns out, the Romanian-without a slavish language, it turns out!

Most of all, I liked this:

But I had a real shock when by chance, on the edge of the monitor, I came across this:

Not understood?

Let me explain. Some of the uneducated historians, or maybe completely deliberately, decided that the resting place of the great king Trajan is Selinus, who is in Cilicia, on the territory of Turkey. But he either unknowingly or deliberately ignored the fact that very close in the Odessa region there is a town called Kiliya!

Not KILIKIA, but simply KILIA !!!

And the state border, which runs along the Danube, through the city center, is completely artificial. Russian Kilia and Romanian Kilia Veche are one city, and I am convinced that this is where you need to look for the tomb of Tsar Trajan!

And studying the map of Tomka Saska Janos 1750. I understood where Trajan's title came from The Best Augustus of Germany. See for yourself:

Hor (n) o M (i) EH. That is, just people of the mountains! Well, of course, the Carpathian inhabitants are HOROMIENIS, who were mistaken for GERMANIS, some kind of storyteller of a dropout, or a bastard. Although it is possible that the name "Germany" owes its appearance to the Hutsuls.

By the way, "mythical" Huns with Bulgars were also found there:

A little higher gaze, and you will find the Khazars, and even the Ukrainians (B (V) ichors) with the Avars. And how can you not remember about this man, supposedly brought from St. Petersburg?

I agree, this is a daring idea, but it's easier for me to believe that there is a real monument to Trajan in Odessa. than the fact that this is some kind of Duke Richelieu …

Okay, now is the time to remember the fact that Trajan is not always Trajan. His name can also be found as Troyan. It seems to me that this is much closer to the truth. Trojan, does not cause rejection. Troyan was, without a doubt, a pagan, and he could get his name precisely in honor of the Tribog, or Trinity. We all know a lot of words with the root "TROY", but not "TRAY", although in English this is exactly what it sounds like: - "Trident" (Trident). But Troyan and I are not American! We are slavs, and yet, most likely, you need to write and say TROYAN correctly!

And then … Oba! Couldn't Troy be somehow sideways here? And, in fact, why not then! In those days, presidents liked to call their cities by their own name, there are few examples? Why not assume that the legendary Troy got its name in honor of a good man? If Trajan was in fact a Troyan, then the capital in which he lived and worked could well bear the name of Troy! And if so … Is it really Odessa ?!

The idea is seductive, of course, but we have to admit it is too unlikely. The very location of the Troyan Shafts suggests that Troyan never made it to Odessa. With a sword in hand, at least. And if we are not talking about Odessa, then there is only one thing left … Constanta!

Its strategic position is not so advantageous. of course, but she is quite drawn to the role of Troy, which was called Troy only in books about the great war. And so in life she was Constance, or Constantinople, which was in the custom of the Scythians, Sarmatians, and Vlachs with antes. In those territories where they lived, this is the most common phenomenon: Tripolye, Melitopol, Boryspil, Nikopol, Andreapol, etc.

Greek cities - city-states are inventions of historians. And Schliemann dug up a small village in Turkey, but not a city. The fact that Troy in Turkey believes 15 and a half of the official stories, the rest smile and say: - "Well, yes, well, yes!"

Now let's remember where we have a monument to Troyan in Germany? In Xanten! Repeat this word many times without stopping, and you will understand how such a name could have come into being!

I, directly, see how a person who has just woken up, someone asks: - "Hey! Dude! Wake up! Where are you from?"

- Is Constat … but …

-A? What? Xantn? Let's write it down! And … This … Come on without "fucking", otherwise the children are here, women, you know …

In general, I get a simple story about the Troyan king, who ruled Constance, and who was paid tribute by the Huns, Dacians, Bulgars, Goromanians, etc. vzasha, they did not let him into Ukraine, and he died of insult and Kiliya. And he has never been in Turkey, nor in Spain, nor in Germany. I have not even visited Estonia from the DPR. As he was born in Moldova, he died there. You need to take a corpse seeker, a shovel, and go to Ukraine, to the Odessa region.

And the mythical Aeneas, from whom Troyan had previously recaptured Constanta, rushed to the Apennine Peninsula with the lads, many of whom spoke quite Russian, but among whom were those who now speak Moldavian. This is how Etruria appeared, which gave rise to the emergence of modern Italy, and the modern Italian language, which did not go far from Moldavian - Romanian. And it was Romania, which ROMANIA, even gave the name to the city ROMA, which means, for some reason, "ROME", although they are Romanians and in Africa Romanians, what is not clear here?

This is how the Italians appeared. And the Austrians with the Germans appeared from the Goromanians, the Magyars came from the Huns, any Hungarian will tell you this, and most of the Bulgars lived there and still live there. And today they bear the proud name BULGARINS !!!

That is how many historical puzzles we have solved today clearly and simply, without pseudoscientific balancing act about the great migration of peoples and blah blah blah. Nobody died or moved, except that the Etruscans, and even then, there were just a couple of buses, no more. On the spot, they have already made new etOrusski. And by the way, the Moldavian language in those parts was a rarity right up to the 20th century. Now everyone thinks that the late dialect of Latin has been spoken in the Apennines for a hundred thousand years. In fact, it turned out that at the beginning of the 20th century only 3 THREE spoke the modern Italian language !!! % of the population!

That's the whole version. I would be grateful for your comments and corrections, as always!