Two strokes to the question of fictional ancient Rome

2024 Author: Seth Attwood | [email protected]. Last modified: 2023-12-16 15:55

Bavarian researcher Gernot Geise published in 1994 the book "Who were the Romans really?" to Latin culture. Among the evidence is the very name of the city of Rome.

G. Gaise discovered that in Europe "any more or less large city, somehow connected with the" Romans ", was called Rome."

Aachen: "Second Rome" and also "Aurea Roma renovata". Mainz: "Another Rome" (XI-XII centuries), and earlier "Aurea Maguncia Romane". Trier: "Belgian Rome", "Second Rome", "Little Rome", "Northern Rome". The German city of Bamberg was directly called Rome, and on the Swedish island of Gotland, where the Italo-Romans did not even go, there is still a city called Rome. And so - without end, all over Europe!

The current capital of Italy, as G. Gaise found out, only in middle Agesbegan to be called Roma quadrata, that is, Square Rome (Square Kremlin, Square Fortress), and before that Rome was known under the name Palatium.

Hence the main conclusion: Ancient Rome could stand anywhere, but not in Italy, to which the history of ancient Rome cannot belong in principle. Simply because the village with the name Palatium for too long did not have this addition in its name - "Rome". And without him - nothing!

It is clear that this is not enough for a complete understanding of this, and G. Gaise began to look in what language the word "Rome" or its derivatives have a meaningful translation, and it turned out that, in addition to the meanings "Kremlin", "fortress", in the ancient Greek language the word "Rome" means "an army, an army, a military unit, an armed force, a column." This means that the "Romans" are not residents of the city of Rome and not citizens of the Roman Empire, but first of all military, members of the community that the Greeks called "Rom", perhaps the very garrison of the ancient Kremlin, or fortress - any in Europe.

There are more than a dozen Romes on the lands of Europe, and not one of them is Italian. The Italian Palatium, aka Urbs, began to be called Rome only in the Middle Ages. Signs of ancient Rome are found, in particular, in Carthage, which ruled no one in Europe

How was the Roman Empire created? Here are just the most famous consignments of books and manuscripts taken to Italian Rome - sometimes for money, sometimes by military force.

There were hundreds and hundreds of such parties. It is believed that in 1565 the pope for some reason collected in the central archive in the Vatican all documents of the Church. Isn't that how the history of the Church today came about? And isn't that how the two 1000-year-old Roman empires closely associated with it were born? And most importantly … to create such an empire, you do not need to reshuffle all the archives: just order the Inquisition to destroy heretical dictionaries (there weren't many) and write a new dictionary entry where it says in black and white that "Roma" or "Romane" in the name of the city means that the city was part of the Roman Empire. And that's all. The rest will be created in the minds.

Line two

In 1926 it was completed, and in 1935 the book was published Wilhelm Kammayer « Universal falsification of history »About forgeries of legal documents of the Middle Ages. V. Kammeier, as a lawyer, began the study of charters with a trivial rule: any donation legal document (and donation deeds are the most common type of medieval documents) must contain information about who donated what, when and to whom, and where this deed was drawn up.

It turned out that the letters stored in the libraries often do not meet the original legal criteria. There are letters without a date or with a clearly later inserted date, with an incomplete date (there is no year or day) or a date written in a manner that does not correspond to the specified time of writing. Often, letters dated one day were “signed” by the donor at different points on the map.

The last point is the most interesting. When analyzing the places and dates of writing the letters, W. Kammeier came up with the following picture: the rulers do not have a capital in which they more or less constantly stay, they continuously travel from place to place - sometimes lightning fast and over great distances - with the aim of endowing more and more new subjects with diplomas. And they do it all Germanic emperors, regardless of age, state of health and ordinary human logic.

The German emperors more than once managed to be at the same time in different cities far apart from each other. For the emperor ConradFor example, for 50 years, almost every year 2-3 different cities are listed as the location for a Christian holiday.

The main goal of a large-scale campaign to falsify historical documents, - V. Kammeier considered, - was in hushing up pagan history, lengthening Christian history and attributing to it all almost the achievements of civilization … There was also a demand for legal confirmation of ownership rights on the part of the new rulers, who had only recently taken them away from their legitimate rulers. Fake donations were supposed to testify to the antiquity of rights to possessions and go back to one of the former Christian kings, who, if necessary, were simply invented for this purpose.

Kammeier was convinced of the following: original documents of pagan Germanic history were destroyed and replaced with falsified documents of Gallo-Roman history.

The existence of Catholic popes before the so-called Avignon captivity was completely fictional.

The history before 1300 is irreplaceable, since all earlier documents were destroyed and replaced with fake … The wars between the national churches in the pre-papal period of church history were subsequently presented as a struggle against heretics * and apostates.

Read also: 5 seditious facts about the Roman Empire

Video on the topic: