Criticism of Zadornov

2024 Author: Seth Attwood | [email protected]. Last modified: 2023-12-16 15:55

The well-known LJ blogger fritzmorgen (according to his passport Oleg Makarenko, in the blog of Fritz Moiseevich Morgen) at the end of January posted a post on his blog about the satirist Zadornov, in which he called him a Russophobe. He actively promotes the idea of "Zadornov-Russophobe" with the help of his information project Rukspert. According to the blogger, “we owe it to Zadornov that the reputation of an armless and thieving people is firmly entrenched in the minds of a huge number of Russians themselves.” And as arguments, he gives examples from his satirical performances. Let's emphasize again - satirical.

When after the release of the film “Rurik. Lost reality "Mikhail Zadornov began to smash to smithereens scientists - everything is clear here, they have it professional: the satirist intervened in their field of activity, and they could not keep silent. It seems that even before this film, Zadornov, on the Gordon Quixote program, quite skillfully fought off the traditional kagal historical gang-leyka, and it even got to the point that Mr. Blanca and "that g … but in which we live" (quote).

These are the official historians, they have a lot of reasons, and “this is the job” - not to allow the self-consciousness of the Russian people to rise. But when a paid (known on the Internet fact) blogger calls Zadornov a Russophobe after the release of a film on a Slavic theme and in the wake of widespread interest in it, this is nothing more than harassment. And this persecution, given the reputation of Fritzmorgen, is clearly of a custom-made nature: Zadornov has been performing on stage for more than a dozen years, but for some reason accusations of Russophobia fell after the excitement around the documentary he had shot.

In his extensive article, consisting mostly of explicit or implicit quotes from the satirist's monologues, Fritzmorgen forgets to mention that the Russophobe Zadornov in Riga opened a library with Russian books for the Russian population at his own expense. He financed the construction of three monuments to Arina Rodionovna (the authors of these monuments are Russian architects). He constantly helps young Russian artists, brings them to the stage. Mikhail Nikolaevich Zadornov organized the release of discs with Russian military songs, which he then sent to Russian cities so that volunteers would give them to people during the Victory Day celebrations. For many years already, by May 9, he has been sending the Russians to Germany the ribbons of St. George, which they cannot get there. In the nineties, when the persecution of Russians began in the Baltic countries, he took 3,000 Russian veterans to Russia.

The notorious "Russophobe" Mikhail Nikolaevich has already published several dozen books by various authors writing on the Slavic theme. Constantly draws attention to the Slavic theme, makes films on this theme ….

Of course, you will not read about this from a well-known top blogger who does not hesitate to write custom posts and receive 20 thousand rubles for each (those who wish can be curious, search for information on this topic in Yandex or Google).

Whose order is fulfilled by "Karina Maskvist" Fritzmorgen is difficult to say, such people are not particularly picky about the smell of money, but the fact remains - the work is underway.

Consider other opinions.

Among the Internet audience, closely familiar with the Jewish question, it is not news that Mikhail Zadornov was born into a mixed family: Russian father, Jewish mother. A photo of him with his mother has been circulating on the network for a long time. Photo from the official website of Zadornov.

This greatly reduces the "coefficient of trust" of this audience to Zadorny's film, given that those who are enlightened in the Jewish question, as a rule, are well enlightened in the history of the Slavs. It is no secret for them that these two issues are quite closely related, and the main emphasis of the ancestral legacy is not in what nationality Rurik was, but in the incessant war of the White Race with the Dark Forces, the interpretation of which varies widely among different authors. And, accordingly, even at the beginning of this epic with a folk film, a "Letter to Mikhail Zadornov" circulated on the network, in which Prince Svyatoslav was proposed as the central figure as the winner of the parasitic system of that time - the Jewish Khazar Kaganate.

Accordingly, this audience is not too shy in expressions, and the satirist even recently made a blog entry with the eloquent title "Am I a Jew's face ?!"

The main claims of these people boil down to the following:

The composition of the film participants:

There is no bosom friend of Mikhail Valery Chudinov, Zharnikova, Tyunyaev and other scientists who could at least reveal to the viewer the facts about Slavic civilization, as the Cradle of ALL civilizations. The presence of Bezrukov also raises a question, the appearance of which does not make sense in the film on this topic.

Distortion and confusion:

The Varangians are salt miners, although even according to Dal it is a “defender, a warrior”. Academician A. Tyunyaev speaks about the same.

"Rejuvenation" of the Slavic civilization:

Not a word about artifacts testifying to hundreds of thousands of years of history of the Slavs - Chandar map, tisulsa find and others. One could put in a word about the Great Pseudo Wall of China, or about the Chinese pyramids. Even a skeptic will think about the latter - why are the Chinese hiding it with all their might and not letting anyone in there? After all, if it was their merit, they would have trumpeted about it all over the world. Even listing these few mosaic fragments would tell the truth about the greater antiquity of the Slavic civilization than is described in the film.

Very controversial quotes:

Firstly, Kievan Rus, like Moscow later, was just a part (kaganates, provinces, regions, territories) of Great Tartary - the Vedic Orthodox Empire of RUSS with the last capital in Tobolsk. This is confirmed by the large number of references in encyclopedias and stories of travelers, and even more on old maps - anyone can download a collection of 350 maps with a mention of this Empire, and see for themselves.

And Kiev was already the third in a row - in the quote it is called “the oldest”.

Orthodoxy is also known to many who are interested in the history of Christianity in Russia. Let's do a little test - what comes to your mind when you read the word "disgrace"? Meanwhile, in the Old Church Slavonic language it meant "spectacle, theatrical performance." This form has been preserved in the Serbian language, and even official linguists admit that it was the Serbian language that retained most of the Old Slavic archaic.

A similar substitution of concepts occurred with the word "Orthodoxy" - Christianity took on the guise of a Vedic worldview. Even a cursory analysis of Russian Christian traditions and holidays reveals their Vedic roots. And the Christianization of Russia by fire and sword for educated people does not require explanation - this is even in the surviving chronicles, which was recently demonstrated by A. Nevzorov.

Moreover, the earth did not dress up with Temples simply because they were already there, the temples were simply taken away - the top of the head was changing, and even then not everywhere.

Well, with the fact that the Slavs did not like to fight, one can agree - they did not like it, but they knew how. Even the Orthodox now agree that no one could ever defeat the Slavs by force, and their only objection - the Tatar-Mongol yoke - is crumbling under the onslaught of new data about the Russian-Horde Empire.

And if we remember the campaigns of the Aryan Slavs in ancient India - Dravidia, and the victory over China, noted in the Slavic-Aryan Vedas - Rurik's vocation and the phrase "the Slavs did not like to fight" takes on a different connotation. With this concept, it can be described exaggeratedly as follows, for example: the Vologda region has asked for a chief security officer (if such a need arises) from the neighboring region, since it makes no sense to ask from Siberia.

Copyright:

One of the questions to Zadornov sounds like this: why the film, filmed with public money (about three million rubles), could not be copied and uploaded on YouTube? Immediately after the film was released on TV, enthusiasts made copies of it and uploaded it to YouTube. However, after a few days, all these copies were removed due to copyright infringement. There is only one left - the official one. Perhaps now there are already new copies, or slightly modified (so that there are no YouTube claims), but "the forks were found, but the residue remained." And there are no December copies, which means that it was impossible to make a copy for at least one month. There may be many reasons for this - but it is quite fair if Zadornov had revealed this issue a little, with his regular blogging it would have been easy.

Nevertheless, one cannot fail to note the enormous interest that arose thanks to the film “Rurik. Lost reality among ordinary people, completely far from historical research. They begin to search further, to ask, to be interested, to shake off a false sense of guilt for skins and clubs before the arrival of Rurik.

Maybe the wrong style of presentation, the presented facts is explained by the censorship? Hardly anyone will deny that there is a certain censorship on TV. Perhaps Zadornov's film would not have been released in prime time on one of the country's central channels without the ubiquitous Bezrukov, without bowing to Orthodoxy and christian churches. Of course, it could only be posted on the Internet, but still the resonance would have been different then.

Maybe this is due to Zadornov's special style, his personal considerations? He's a satirist who started doing these rather specialized things. From the nineties to the present day, you can hear from many ordinary people that of all comedians they like Zadornov the most. This is natural, because Zadornov spoke about “ours,” about Russians, which you rarely hear from comedians with a non-Russian surname.

After all, humor in our country, not only now, but before, was not Soviet, but rather Jewish. Moreover, the Jews themselves wrote about this: Marian Belenky, a pop playwright, author of monologues by Klara Novikova, Gennady Khazanov, Yana Arlazorov wrote an article "Jewish domination ended", in which he laments such a title when only one appears! Russian satirist - Mikhail Evdokimov. Evdokimov then "joked" so much that he became the governor of the Altai Territory. Like any honest person in such a post, he was immediately killed.

It turns out that it would be much more difficult for Zadornov to achieve fame in this satirical environment without his pedigree. But now he has the opportunity to move from satire to serious things that restore the self-consciousness of the Russian people, and use his fame to educate people.

Anton Burmistrov.