Skeletons in the closet of Isaac and Kazan Cathedrals

2024 Author: Seth Attwood | [email protected]. Last modified: 2023-12-16 15:55

Reason in spite of and eternity in offense, And the clever girls laugh

Built, but it will not be a sin to forget, A pyramid made of dust.

Today, when much is known about the technologies of the past, it is more and more difficult for official historians to conceal the truth from the people. The unthinkable conclusions of these would-be specialists about the construction of the pyramids of Giza with the help of millions of workers are becoming a thing of the past. The discovery of geopolymer concrete, or rather its return to mankind, after centuries of oblivion, absolutely explains the entire technology of the ancients. All pyramids were not built by dragging and lifting megaliths, but as a result of the formwork method. Each stone of the pyramid is a block cast from geopolymer concrete right at its location. In such cases, neither the block size nor its shape affects the execution technology. Those who cost their own garage, or other building, know that three men: father, son-in-law and son, will pour out the foundation of any shape. And at the same time, they will not have to involve neighbors, guards to enforce slave labor, create social and sanitary facilities, housing for slaves. Everything is simple - I mixed the mortar with buckets, buckets, buckets …. You can use a stretcher, mat bags, in general: the need for invention is cunning.

What is geopolymer concrete and how does it differ from ordinary concrete? To obtain, familiar to us, industrial cement, special production with high firing temperatures is required, which the ancients clearly did not have. The concept of the ancients is relative. The pyramids of Giza were built in the 12-15th centuries, and the chronology of Egypt is greatly exaggerated.

To obtain geopolymer concrete you need:

A) compliance with the proportions of the solution

B) natural phenomenon of adhesion

C) grinding mechanisms or devices.

E) the presence of 100-200 low-skilled workers and a dozen supervisors-foremen.

To this day, geologists in the field receive dust from rocks for their analysis by a simple method. They simply rub stone on stone and get a powder. It is important that the stones are of the same breed or that the sample under study is softer than the one with which it is rubbed. In general, the principle of an ordinary mortar. Of course, the Egyptians were smarter than modern historians, ready to seize on this idea. Some are already seated in endless ranks of hundreds of thousands of slaves rubbing stone on stone to obtain ordinary dust.

What for? The Egyptians acted differently. The brought stone was laid on a slab with a depression. A device resembling a children's swing was put on top of the stone, where our boys ride on a board fixed and turned in its middle, alternately pushing off the ground. Down-up, down-up! Remember that childish hare?

Thus, a lever appears, which, according to Archimedes, is ready to turn the Earth, not like a stone.

It was the Egyptians who rode on a swing, and the stone rubbed against the stove and turned into the necessary dust. All this is depicted on the pyramids, only the swing is perceived as levers for lifting the blocks, although not one of them is depicted there either in the process of lifting or in the process of its grasping.

So, you understand how the dust was obtained. But why is she?

There is a law of adhesion in nature. It consists of the obligatory adhesion of dust. You can observe it in the form of mud after rain, when it is impossible to get your foot out of the construction ditch. True, there is clay, but it does not change the essence.

What happens to dust after rain? Have you seen dried lumps of dirt? Others cannot be taken with a crowbar.

But if you add silt from the Nile, containing aluminum oxide, to the dust, an interesting thing happens - an artificial stone is obtained, such a solid compound appears. Today this technology can be found in the cemetery, in the form of crumb monuments. If you want marbled, you want granite, you want diorite. It all depends on the dust.

Well, then, everything is the same as in the construction of the garage - they were kneaded, in bags, on their backs and dragged to wooden boxes. To save dust, sand is added - there is a lot of it.

The reader will ask, what about the granite look of the blocks? Dear Thomas the Unbeliever, today not a single cladding is made of natural stone. And at that time, a fur coat was applied to the concrete base, which was later polished. On it, the images were squeezed out, prepared in advance by matrices, so that there was no diamond cutter there, and even less a laser. This explains the "mathematical accuracy" of the master's chisel, about which Arab guides, who have long forgotten how to work with their hands, talk about it. It's easier to grind with your tongue!

I will not talk about the images of submarines and helicopters on the walls of tombs. The Egyptian Ministry of Tourism is not capable of such that it would lure rotozeans who decided to voluntarily celebrate the New Year in the dusty desert. The geopolymer concrete business is booming. They even erected a gate there, opening the entrance to the pyramids. There is a gate, no fence. Everyone walks and drives through the gate. At 21 o'clock the gates were closed, the people scratched their turnips - there is nothing to do, tomorrow we will come!

The country, which has nothing but the pyramids, has built modern resorts on the money of the rotozei and perhaps even one of them who is now reading this miniature.

I want to inform you that the pyramids are not tombs and there is nothing magic either in them or in the sphinx. Of course, there is a cemetery there, but it is away from the pyramids. And the pyramids themselves are the repositories of the imperial treasury, which stood in full view of everyone. Moreover, it was difficult to open it. Here and roll away the stone, here you need to print the entrance, and even kill the guards. It is unthinkable to talk about undermining or undermining. Out of the cannon, Napoleon stuck a couple of rounds in the forehead of the Sphinx, but only knocked his nose, and knocked the Coptic cross off his forehead. Everything! This is all that was enough for the imperial might of France.

An eccentric man, it would be better if you went to Baikal, to the Russian North, visit the taiga, hold your hands in the Volga, Altai saw the steppes of Transbaikalia.

In the mountains of the latter, as a kid, I washed a teaspoon of gold grains in a stream for an hour and a half. The price for it from the Cossacks-gurans is not great - "you think it's a grain, it's not a nugget" - a jar of stinking Chinese khanchi (rice alcohol) and waking you up. And you guys are not supposed to eat. Give your gold, for candy or halva, half a kilo. This is the kind of bookkeeping in Russia. We earn at home, spend with the Chukhonts. How so! They have better concrete - leaning backwards, beneficial for hemorrhoids. And also, if you put your woman on top of the pyramid, pregnancy is guaranteed. I would tell you where you need to put your wife, for the sake of children, but I'm afraid the feminine gender will be embarrassed. Remember, reader, there is no better method for procreation than the one that God advised, and have not yet been invented.

Perhaps in the future you will go to Stonehenge for this business, trample your bodies, but it is better to go to the hohlatsky farm, to honey and sour cream, to the hayloft closer, to a quiet pastoral, and evenings of the heart. Children, like hazelnuts, are obtained - strong and vigorous.

Eh, you are a tourist and an all-inclusive foodie! Take an example from the Egyptians. Place the gate overlooking Elbrus. Just have time to remove the foam and open the gates.

Freak man! You look for all happiness in other lands, but you don't see bliss in your own country.

Okay, waking you up, let's talk further about how foreigners in Russia are deceiving us.

I wrote earlier that Leningrad-Petersburg is a city older than Moscow. It was built not by Peter, but by Georgy Danilovich in the 14th century. That same George the Victorious, canonized by the Old Believer Church. Russian prince and khan. And he called this city Oreshek. He built it according to the Byzantine model, like the Constantine Forum, because he himself was born in the Roman dynasty of Byzantine emperors. Kazan Cathedral, St. Isaac's, Peter and Paul Fortress, in general, all buildings with colonnades and even the arch of the General Staff, these are buildings of the 14-17 centuries. The most numerous in this city were built by Tsar Ivan the Terrible.

Today you can hear from guides and read in books about the hard labor of Russian peasants to make columns of St. Petersburg cathedrals. Examples are striking in their sophisticated invention and unrestrained imagination of historians.

Continuing the story of the falsification in Petersburg-Oreshka, I want to tell you how all these columns were made. And we will draw a conclusion together with the reader at the very end.

But first, the official version.

In the fall of 1801, the wedding of the architect Voronikhin and the draftswoman Mary Lond took place in the palace of A. S. Stroganov. Today Voronikhin is considered the architect of the Kazan Cathedral in St. Petersburg. On their honeymoon, the newlyweds went to the Karelian Isthmus. Having visited these places, Voronikhin came to the conclusion that durable and beautiful Vyborg granite would become the best material for making columns in the interior of the cathedral under construction. Vyborg granite in Finnish is called rapakivi, which means "rotten stone". Apparently, it was named so due to the fact that its outcrops to the surface of the earth were often in swamps that smelled of rot.

The Vyborg rapakivi granite massif is the largest in the world. Breaking of granite near Vyborg began in 1803. People sent by the commission from St. Petersburg worked at the breaking. Basically, these were Russian peasants from Yaroslavl, Vologda and other nearby provinces. The number of workers at the Vyborg breakup reached 350 people.

Technique for breaking granite at the beginning of the 19th century it was not much different from the times of antiquity: metal wedges and rods for drilling, sledgehammers, collars, pulley blocks, log rollers. The excavation process required a lot of time, experience and skill of the stonecutter. First, the top layer of the rock was removed, which was exposed to prolonged exposure to the sun, frost, rain and wind, exposing the granite in its original form. Then, in the sheer rock, the shape of a parallelepiped was outlined in size, supposed to be separated from the rock. Then there was a long, painstaking and dangerous treatment. With the help of rollers and wagons, the blanks of the columns were loaded onto ships that delivered them to St. Petersburg. The long journey ended on the banks of the Neva at the Admiralty. After unloading, the columns were again moved with the help of rollers to a workshop on Konyushennaya Street, where, as a result of processing, they acquired a complete look. Breaking, processing and delivery of one column 10, 7 m high cost 3,000 rubles. A total of 56 columns were delivered and installed for the colonnade of the Kazan Cathedral.

Tell me, reader, do you have a de ja vu state? Change Karelian granite for Assuan, ships for Egyptian boats, Yaroslavl peasants who have become skilled stonemasons, for fellahs of the lower Nile, and the famous picture will appear - a woman on a pyramid awaiting conception.

In general, the St. Petersburg stonemasons are tough guys - for some ten years they have mastered millions of tons of stone and dressed Peter in granite. And everything is artel, and mercilessly dying out. Here you have palaces, here you and the Neva in granite, here and canals on Vasilyevsky Island, first dug and then buried. And mind you, it's all done by hand. By the way, the canals, and now the arrows of Vasilyevsky Island, were buried in vain. They were the ones who saved the city from flooding. It was such an anti-resonator of sea waves from the Marquis puddle and the Neva. Everything was extinguished there - no floods and troubles. In vain these irrigation canals fell asleep, oh in vain!

Here's what I'll tell you, reader. By the time the Romanovs came to Russia, Oreshek stood in all its glory, known to you by the panoramas of modern St. Petersburg. All these Voronikhins may have existed, but they either finished building something to the already built one, or they simply attributed this building. Perhaps it was restored.

Their contemporaries, just like us, did not understand how the columns of enormous weight fell into St. Petersburg and historians, by analogy with Egypt, came up with a version. Because the contemporaries of construction did not observe any construction. So they wrote whatever was horrible, creating new legends. "Smart" historians, trying to create a "golden age" of the enlightened Catherine, attributing nonexistent great deeds to her reign.

I will return in other works to the "genius" of Catherine and explain why an incredible for Russia incident happened to her: the habit of throwing mud at the previous rulers did not work with Kato. Here such a trick was invented that to this day, many do not understand how this cup passed it. I will not consider various gossips about her female problems - she was a healthy woman and gave birth to children like no other. And her moral behavior is also not a subject of discussion. Each person is the master of his own destiny. The government is another matter, during which massive falsification affected all aspects of Russian life. It is to the rulers of Catherine's that the lies that have been turned into centuries belong. But the fact that Catherine, all her life, trembled with fear for her life, I have no doubts. Gloomy Pictet, supposedly her bodyguard, was in fact her guard, ready to kill the queen, for violating the commitment she signed to the Vatican in Sanssouci. This Swiss was assigned to Kato for ever and ever, and all the close guard took place with his knowledge. I know who Pictet is. But about this anyway another time.

In the meantime, to the columns of Kazan and other cathedrals.

In accordance with the strict canons of religious construction, the altar part of the cathedral should be located on the east side, and the entrance - on the west.

Today there is a version that Voronikhin supposedly conceived not one, but two colonnades. But the funding failed. In this case, the colonnade, conceived by Voronikhin, would have appeared from the side of Bolshaya Meshchanskaya (now Kazanskaya) street. It was then that Voronikhin had a brilliant idea: to build a grandiose four-row colonnade on the side of the northern facade of the cathedral overlooking Nevsky Prospekt. Historians regret that the project was not fully implemented. According to Voronikhin's plan, another colonnade was to decorate the opposite, southern, facade of the temple.

All this is speculation, Voronikhim may have restored a certain temple that was already standing behind the colonnade, but did not build the cathedral. And for the second colonade there was not enough money, but skill. In the time of Paul, the construction secrets of the ancestors who built Nutlet were already forgotten. Perhaps they tried to cut down the columns, as in Aswan, the researchers of the "antiquities" of Egypt, but they understood the whole pointlessness of these undertakings.

The cathedral also lacks another essential detail, conceived by Andrei Voronikhin. The colonnade from the side of Nevsky Prospect, according to the project, was to be decorated with two powerful figures of archangels, stone pedestals for which can be seen today. All this suggests that earlier on the colonnade there were already sculptures that were thrown off by the Romanovs, because they depicted what should not be depicted and contradicted the Romanov version of the city's history. This colonnade and cathedral are only part of the spiritual forum-complex built in the city. The colonnade was built with a clear intention - to perpetuate the name of the Virgin. Obviously, the sculptures were also associated with this intention.

Until 1824, plaster statues of archangels stood on the pedestals. On bronze, as the architect suggested, they could not be replaced. A legend was born among the people that the archangels themselves do not want to take the places offered to them. And so it will be until, as the legend says, "a wise, truthful and honest ruler will not appear in Russia." The folk echo, sometimes, conveys real events of the past. Orekhovskaya residents remembered very well who had stood there earlier. The place is not visible to the archangels, but to those to whom this triumphal colonnade was built.

In the drawings of the approved version of the Voronikhin Cathedral project, an obelisk is shown in front of the temple building. On the one hand, he, according to the architect, determined the center of the entire composition, on the other, according to some sources, he would indicate the place of the dismantled church of the Nativity of the Virgin. In the book "Kazan Cathedral" A. Aplaksin noted that, oddly enough, “in the affairs of the construction of the Kazan Cathedral there is no case or mention of the construction of the obelisk, and only its plan is shown in Voronikha's drawings. On the canvas of F. Ya. Alekseev "View of the Kazan Cathedral from the side of Nevsky Prospect", created in 1811, and on the watercolor by B. Patersen with the same name and the same time, he is present, and on the famous "Panorama of Nevsky Prospect" V. S Sadovnikov in 1830, he is no longer there. Today there is a fountain in its place. By the way, on other engravings there is also an obelisk and a colonnade. But they are dated earlier than the beginning of the construction of the Kazan Cathedral, that is, they stood there a long time ago.

What is an obelisk? Today it is translated as a spit, a blade and an obelisk itself. In fact, this is Longinus's spear, not a simple pike, but a cavalry spear, since Longinus was precisely a cavalryman. That is, the obelisk is a cavalryman's weapon.

As you know, the spear was the cause of Jesus' death, not the crucifixion. When we say that Jesus died on the cross, we understand this literally, forgetting that he was KILLED on the cross with a spear - an obelisk.

I already wrote that the cross on the church is depicted as follows:

- the cross itself

- in the center of it is a star with the inscription Jesus Christ

- below the base there is a small circle, and at the very base there is a crescent. I suspect that this is not a crescent moon, but a sign of the mother's womb. That is, the stages of Christ's life are depicted on the cross: conception and birth - an inverted crescent, a small circle or oblique bar - Longinus' obelisk or death, a circle or a star in the center of the cross - crucifixion and resurrection (if a circle, like that of Catholics, then only a crucifixion, and if circle with rays, then crucifixion and resurrection).

If you draw a straight line from the obelisk (fountain) of the Kazan Cathedral, then you will definitely find yourself in the very center of the Peter and Paul Fortress, built in the shape of a star. The spire of the Peter and Paul Cathedral, bursting out like a ray from the sky into the center of this structure, means the Resurrection of Jesus. Thus, the Kazan Cathedral of Our Lady and the Peter and Paul complex is a single whole structure and Voronikhin has nothing to do with it. Strictly speaking, this is a cross lying on the ground.

By the way, in Orthodoxy, the ends of the cross are marked with three rings - two together, one above them. These are bezants - coin signs. Today, their meaning on the cross is partially forgotten, although in the coats of arms they mean good luck, joy, wealth. Let's start with the fact that today it is forgotten and that the one hundred crucifix is also a coat of arms belonging to one or another Christian church. Catholics have their own coat of arms, the Orthodox have their own, Adventists and other sects are designated differently, the Old Believers do not know about the crucifixion at all, only the cross itself. The real meaning of bezant is different. The coin is an artificial non-heraldic symbol that has received limited distribution in territorial and clan heraldry. The coin represents wealth, less often a test of faith. Three coins on each side of the cross are nothing more than 30 pieces of silver - or a test of faith.

The above proves that Voronikhin did not carry out the construction of what was built there long ago. And he could not make the second colonnade due to the fact that the peasants of the Yaroslavl province did not manage to deliver the columns, cut them down, let alone polish them. Didn't know how to do it simply.

And how the colonnade was built, the obstinate reader will ask. The shrewd one, has long understood from the epigraph to this miniature, the architect Nikolai Lvov. Here he, unlike Voronikhin, really built a lot in St. Petersburg, for example, the Main Post Office. Not only did he build, he also solved the problem of building the pyramids of Egypt, massively constructing copies of them in his estates. And all with the hands of 5-7 artisans with the application in the sizes of the number Pi and the Golden Section. With the help of patterns created on the basis of these rules of mathematics, any peasant is able to build an ideal pyramid oriented to the cardinal points.

I will not go into details, those who wish themselves will find the answer to this question in Pythagoras, in the well-known theorem: "Pythagorean pants, are equal on all sides." By the way, Pythagoras is one of the many reflections of Jesus Christ in world events, along with Buddha, Charlemagne, Osiris, Isa, Andrei Bogolyubsky, Andronicus Komnin, etc. Andronicus is a real person and a prototype of Jesus.

So, the columns are built of dust, like the pyramids.

And they were built like this. First, parts of the columns were cast. Have you seen how in the Greek and Roman stumps, stacked one on top of the other? I don't see it clearly? Then it's easier to explain. In childhood, everyone had a pyramid of multi-colored rings. I hope you remember this - the base, and from it a round stick sticks out? When you fold the rings correctly, you get a herringbone, if not correctly, then a baluster. So, my mother bought it for you, what would you think, reader, and develop your thinking.

The base of the column was made in advance. A wooden stick was inserted into it, which was controlled by a plumb line. Further, a pre-prepared template was placed around it, tapering towards the top. The pattern designer was given the following conditions: the lower and upper dimensions of the circle. How? But how! "Remember the one who remembers tightly: Pi Er square, is the area of a circle."

The pattern was installed on a stick and poured with geopolymer concrete. It turned out the first cut of the column. Then he froze and a new pattern was put on him. For Russian people who made barrels for cabbage, such a job, one spit - the technology is more complicated there. This happened until the column rose to the desired level, where its head was crowned. To turn it upside down meant topple the column. By the way, cut or uncircumcised (with head) columns still stand in cemeteries. They mean that a person has not finished his life's work - at the circumcised or broken columns, and crowned with heads, that a person has passed away, having paid off all debts. For example, a cut-off column over the remains of Kutuzov's embalmed body says that he died on the campaign and did not take Paris, and the broken column speaks of a violent death.

Finally, the column was stretched to the desired height. However, it had the appearance of a recruited product, such as we see in the Athenian structures. I think that these are not ruins, but most likely just unfinished temples.

And then plasterers were taken for the column, who applied a fur coat made of artificial stone to it. As in a modern cemetery. There was no actual grinding, obviously, templates were again used, which were rotated by hand around the applied material. However, there are many options, but the perfect fit suggests that it could not do without adaptations. I think that if among the readers there are builders who are familiar with the plaster of curved or convex surfaces, they will comment on this process better than me. Professionals always know better. Unfortunately, I am not a builder, although I have some experience.

Well, then overlapping on columns and other subtleties of the craftsmanship of architects, who, unlike modern builders, had a conscience and responsibility for their creations. This is how many were built to last!

What was the binder in Russian geopolymer concrete, instead of aluminum oxide from the silt of the Egyptian Nile? I think chicken eggs, because of their massive use in construction. However, this is only a version. Perhaps something else. Analysis will show. By the way, the fact that this is exactly plaster is known from numerous photos of the natural destruction of the columns. This is how concrete flakes off. There is a photo on the screensaver for the miniature.

I want to tell the reader that geopolymer concrete is visible all over the world. Artificial stones in US parks, huge monoliths thrown on the beaches of Brighton into the sea, the US Library of Congress, a mass of structures that were supposedly taken out by millionaires by Americans from Europe, where they were dismantled and then collected in the USA, all this is geopolymer concrete. Algae do not grow on such monoliths thrown into the sea. They cannot grow on an artificial stone - we push them out by adhesion. There is no moss for the same reason in US parks on "ancient" rocks. All this is an activity left over from the legacy of the Great Empire of the Slavs, Great Tartary, Russia, the Horde, which previously lay on 4 continents. The Russian Federation is the pitiful remains of the once huge empire, the common homeland of mankind, which the Western separatists pulled apart into small pieces to please their ambitions. Each bastard fancies himself a prince and seeks to circumcise the foreskin, believing that this will make him God's chosen people. Back in the 17th century, there was Russia in North and South America, which the Anglo-Saxons conquered at the time of the fall of the empire. There were no European states either. They will appear as a result of the Peace of Tilsit, during the wars of the Reformation. The Great Troubles in Russia is hidden under this name. And finally, the Romanovs will come to Russia, who will begin to destroy the very memory of the empire, instill legends about their achievements and successes and plunge Russia into a state of confusion that continues to this day. The Slavs from the masters of the world will turn into slaves of their cunning lackeys, forgetting who they are and why such structures as the Kazan temple, Isaac, Peter and Paul's were built and others. The Russian Nut will become St. Petersburg, Longinus's spear will become an obelisk, Mary the Mother of God is a Jewish girl, and Christ himself from the Byzantine emperor will turn into a complex combination of fiction and superstition. The faith of the ancestors will follow in exile, the best books will be burned, the archpriest Avvakum will die in prison, the noblewoman Morozova will be tormented, the schismatics will burn in their sketes, and we are the descendants of a great people, we will believe the fables of historians about our past. And watch, like rams, at the colonnade of the Kazan Cathedral, amazed at the skill of Voronikhin, invented by the favorite of Catherine II, Sanya Stroganov. And we will believe that the impostor on the throne of the empire named Isaac, replaced by Peter Romanov, is the man who founded the great city, the Northern Palmyra of the empire, without suspecting that the Bronze Horseman was remade from the monument to George the Victorious, by welding a new hands and a new head.

Remember the reader: in 1380, the Russian prince Georgy Danilovich, he is canonized by the Old Believer Church, George the Victorious, he is the Great Khan (Genghis Khan), he is Alexander the Great, he is also the brother of Ivan Kalita (the king-priest (caliph, not the purse) of the khan Batu) founded a pantheon city, based on the prototype of the forum of Constantine the Great in Byzantium. All the sculptures of the cathedrals and of St. Petersburg himself are executed in the Roman style, and even the sculpture of Minin and Pozharsky in Moscow, these are monuments taken by the Russian tsars from Byzantium. Tsars - relatives of Jesus Christ - Andronicus Komnenos by his mother, the Russian princess Maria theotokos.

Forum of Constantine had an oval shape: from the north and south it was surrounded by a two-tiered semicircular colonnade, and from the west and east there were two large monumental arches made of white marble, connecting the square with the main street of the city.

In the north of the forum stood the first city building of the Senate. According to the description, it was a rotunda with a portico resting on four large columns. The famous bronze quadriga was kept here, which originally included a statue of the Invincible Sun (Sol invictus) driving the horses. During the annual processions timed to coincide with the city's birthday (May 11), the quadriga moved to the city hippodrome, and the rest of the year was in the Senate building. When this ceremony was abolished, the quadriga was finally placed on the hippodrome, from where the crusaders took it to Venice in 1204. The seat of the Senate was soon moved to another location, and this building was not used later and probably survived until the great fire that destroyed the Forum of Constantine in 1204.

In the left portico of the forum was the chapel of the Most Holy Theotokos, built by Emperor Basil I in the first years of his reign. Church utensils were sold next to it.

In the center of the forum stood a large porphyry column 37 m (now 34.8 m) high. It was crowned with a golden statue of Apollo. In 1150, during a strong storm, the statue and the three upper drums of the column collapsed, and soon Emperor Michael I Comnenus (pr. 1143-1180) erected a cross on the top of the column. During the sack of Constantinople by the crusaders, the column was severely disfigured. In 1453, when the city was captured by the Ottoman Turks, the cross was immediately thrown from the column. In 1779, after a severe fire, the blackened and cracked column was reinforced with additional iron hoops.

The forum was decorated with numerous antique statues: among them figures of a dolphin, elephant and hippocampus, statues of Palladium, Thetis and Artemis, as well as the sculpture "The Judgment of Paris". Perhaps there were statues of Poseidon, Asclepius and Dionysus. However, today it is almost impossible to determine their appearance or exact location. According to the official version, in 1204, all of them were melted down by the crusaders who captured the city. This is not so, they were all taken to Oreshek, and later passed off as the work of a certain Shubin. Look at the sculptures of St. Petersburg, the reader and yourself find everything described above. It was not difficult for me. And take the Alexandria Column as a reference point, on the Palace Square of St. Petersburg. The one that Apollo crowned.

It was not difficult for Russian craftsmen to restore the structures of the forum dedicated to Christ. But the sculptures brought by the Russian squads, they kept the same spiritual values and put them in their places, with accuracy maintaining all sizes and proportions, relying on the Golden Section and Pi number known to them. Do you know why you feel free and good in Russian churches? They are built to the living dimensions of their architects. Before the construction site, they measured the person who led the construction and made the mold from his fathom, elbow, yardstick, step and other things. In any Russian building, the real dimensions of the master who created it. Therefore, there are no two identical huts in the village and two twin houses in the city. Even the Moscow Kremlin is made in elbows. Because he is so pleasing to the eye.

But the size of Voronikhin in the Kazan Cathedral is not. There is only appropriated, someone else's creativity, an act that is not legal in essence.

Finally, I want to say one more thing. I didn’t come across a photo from the modern Turkish square emberlitash.

There is an interesting structure there. Imagine a certain concrete depression from the middle of which a column of thick copper or bronze trunks rises. There are either three or four. It looks like a spring, only very powerful. I’m thinking, isn’t this the same “wooden” stick on which we used to wear rings in childhood? Such a stick will be a shock absorber and will withstand a lot. The armature was invented in our time, more recently. However, one should not think that our ancestors were more stupid than we are. That would be to probe the columns of the Kazan Cathedral with a mine detector. It would not be bad. Perhaps a discovery that will turn the world's views on construction. Hey, people from St. Petersburg! Tear your priests off your chairs and your eyes off your computers. Ring these columns of Isaac and the Kazan Cathedral, and write to the author. I give my word to tell your honest names to the whole world. Something tells me that I'm right.

The fact that the columns of St. Isaac's Cathedral are hollow in the middle today can be checked by everyone by bringing a metal ruler and thrusting it into the numerous cracks that have appeared at these columns. I give in the screensaver and a photo confirming this. Perhaps they were made in two, crown variants, depending on the bearing load. For example, decorative - just hollow pipes tightened to look like granite or marble. Load-bearing, with a spring in the middle, and auxiliary ones are just casting. In any case, we are dealing with geopolymer concrete and neither Montferand nor Voronikhin simply saw in their eyes how the Kazan and St. Isaac's churches were built, just as the nobles of Catherine, who composed stories about numerous slaves turning huge megaliths, did not see it either. These are ordinary liars who covered up the crimes of the Romanovs and invented the Golden Age of Catherine. History is not science, but mythology, and we are only convinced of this with the reader. But to consolidate the material, may I offer you one more short study?

To attribute the authorship of St. Isaac's Cathedral to Montferand, in my opinion, is stupid. Here is an excerpt from the assignment for the reconstruction of St. Isaac's Cathedral in Vigel's Notes: “In words, the Emperor asked Betancourt to instruct someone to draw up a project for the reconstruction of St. Isaac's Cathedral in such a way as to preserve the entire old building, perhaps with a slight increase, to give a more magnificent and good-looking view of this great monument."