Green religion is a destructive ideology hostile to Russia

2024 Author: Seth Attwood | [email protected]. Last modified: 2023-12-16 15:55

West … Of course, green religion is on the rise there. In many countries, greens are involved in the formation of governments, and in all Western countries, the majority of the population in one form or another approves and supports "measures to combat carbon dioxide."

Why? What for? How can obvious delusion be so aggressively introduced into life?

And like any global ideological movement, the answer is multifaceted and complex.

Let's start with the easy part. To understand why this became possible, let's look at the cult figure of the "leader" of this movement - the bastard girl (C).

Does anyone doubt that the girl Greta sincerely believes that “her childhood has been stolen from her”, that “the planet is poisoned with harmful carbon dioxide”, “we will all die in ten years if we don’t stop using coal and gas” and other nonsense (sorry, not familiar enough with the full range of her bastard slogans)?

I think everyone understands that she is very sincere. She really believes it. Just as she really believes that “she sees carbon dioxide molecules” (this is not a joke, it is), and I won’t be surprised if she sincerely “believes” that the earth is flat.

Why does she know believes the planet needs to be saved from carbon dioxide? Maybe she worked as a climatologist for decades? Developed and proven mathematical models of climate change? Calculated the economic implications of phasing out fossil fuels? Proven not affected by solar cycles? Yes?

- Not!

She sincerely believes in all this, because she is a fool (let the politically correct lovers of tolerance forgive me). Poor bastard girl with autism. She is not able to assimilate, comprehend and understand complex entities. She is not capable of drawing independent conclusions, she is not capable of Thinking. She has extremely low intelligence and is only able to Believe.

Let's now look at the Westerners in general. Not on agricultural Ukrainians from the Eastern Kreses, but on the population of Western Europe and America.

In the West, there are two types of Western education:

• - lack of education - typical for "poor" areas, with a predominantly black, Arab or Latin population;
• - pragmatic education - typical of wealthy white areas. They give a good education, but aimed at the subsequent "success" in life.

What they have in common is that scientific knowledge and logic give at a minimum. In the first case - because all knowledge is given at a minimum, and in the second - because they are not considered important and priority.

Objectively, in the modern world, with rare exceptions, a person cannot be fully developed. There are areas in which a person has great knowledge (or at least some knowledge), there are areas with minimal knowledge.

The level of intelligence (reason) is rather determined by a person's ability to think logically, draw correct conclusions, the amount of knowledge and / or the ability to quickly find them, and a set of areas in which he has a level above average.

At the same time, a person can write a book of genius "How to breed a sucker", be a talented dog hairdresser or even the world's best designer of processors for smartphones, but in the narrow field of natural science, his "intelligence" can be equal to that of Gretta. The only difference is that Gretta has such a level in all areas, and this average Westerner has (may be) areas where he has a large or sufficient set of knowledge. But that's just not in the natural sciences.

I am sure that if you take Gretta and any dozen of her "average" neighbors, then, communicating with them via chat on natural science topics, it will be impossible to understand which of them is Greta. You will receive the same set of stamps and the same lack of "intelligence".

This is all the more important in relation to people who specialize in politics, and even more so in modern Western, pederasterized politics.

Here, in her own way, no less bastard girl, a famous fighter for all good, against all bad - Alexandria Ocasio Cortez. The amount of nonsense that she carries on the topic of economics and socialism is simply off scale. She is also the so-called "author" of the popular "New Green Deal" - the political program of the Socialist Democrats, heavily mixed with green religious nonsense.

I am sure that she sincerely believes in the green blizzard that she is carrying. And again - is she a specialist who is not only able to competently understand the topic, but even just to critically understand what is at stake? No, no … A girl with experience as a bartender, in terms of intelligence - the same Greta (maybe without such a pronounced autism).

Does Alexandria Cortez stand out among the crowd of her fellow politicians? The fact of the matter is that no! Just a more charismatic, luckier, more visible bastard girl. Many of those who in the West make decisions about politics and / or about the allocation of funds, these are the same "Gretta girls" in the field of science. The term "moron" in relation to them will not be an insult, but will be a statement of fact, if we specify that "like a moron" in the area where logic, critical thinking skills and scientific knowledge are required. At the same time, this is, of course, a completely successful person, who competently understands how to make a career, when to lick the boss in time, how to be an “effective manager” correctly. This is by no means a drooling idiot … But his decisions "to save the planet" are dictated by anything but knowledge and understanding of the situation.

It would seem that everything is simple and clear. Americans are "nuuuuuuupye" and therefore believe in various moronic nonsense. But then another question arises - If they are just stupid, then why do they believe in "carbon dioxide poisoning", but do not believe in "solar activity"? Dumb people don't care what to believe, and the average American will have a hard time explaining how "solar radiation" differs from "carbon footprint". But for some reason they massively believe in "harmful carbon dioxide".

And so it is necessary to consider what makes a person believe in anything. A person easily and without violence believes in two cases:

• - if his salary or income depends on it;
• - if faith is superimposed on his phobias or complexes and allows them to be stopped.

According to the first version, there is a well-known aphorism - "It is difficult to make a person understand something if his salary depends on not understanding it."

According to the second, one can recall the “emigrant complex” - when a person is sincerely forced to believe that he has come to a country-paradise (to preserve his psyche), well, or belief in the afterlife.

I will not go into detail about this now, but from individual faith we easily pass to mass faith - that is, to religion or ideology.

Society wants to get an ideology that allows society to earn and maintain public peace. And, as a rule, without external influences, self-regulating mechanisms in society are such that they allow such conditionally useful ideologies to develop and spread. It was said "conditionally" because ideologies that allow solving (or stopping) short-term problems of society are not always "useful" in the long run.

At the moment in the West, but primarily in America and Britain, there is a transition from the socio-political formation "Capitalism" (in the form of "Imperialism") to the formation "Parasitism". My articles have previously discussed the reasons and the inevitability of the transition.

For people, the main thing in this process is that under capitalism, the main source of welfare (accumulated materialized energy) of society is capital (ownership of the means of production) and, consequently, the extraction of energy, resources and their industrial processing. Whereas under parasitism, the main source of income for the masses is the receipt of resources and energy from abroad and its distribution among the unemployed and / or fake-employed population (pseudo-useful professions).

This transition began in the seventies, from the moment the frenzied dollar printer was turned on, intensified after the destruction and plundering of the Soviet Union, and became irreversible from the beginning of the 2000s.

During the transformation of society from capitalism to parasitism, the following processes objectively take place:

• - production of energy resources [in the country] is constantly falling;
• - mining [in the country] either falls or is unprofitable;
• - industry [from the country] is leaving;
• - agriculture needs constant subsidies and protectionism.
• - as a result, the effective employment of the population is constantly falling, and the pseudo-employment of the population is growing.

Since these processes are based on the operation of the laws of political economy, society cannot resist or somehow stop them. But since these processes exist, society objectively needs an ideology that will provide a justification for the ongoing processes, explain their reasons and necessity.

At the same time, a truthful explanation, including an explanation of the role of the printing press, the matrix of energy flows, the relationship between the trade deficit and the standard of living, etc. most of the American population in relation to human civilization, perform the function of worms.

And then, suddenly, someone pays attention to the "green religion" - the nonsense of marginal scientists-freaks, who in the eighties began to prove that we are all going to die, because there is a correlation between carbon dioxide emissions and global warming. (Later, however, it turned out that all the models are incorrect and the planet is rather cooling down. The problem was quickly renamed into "global climate change" and the fight with it continued).

But the fact that the nonsense of the freaks immediately proved to be unfaithful, no one bothered anymore. It turned out that the green religion ideally fits the needs for ideology for the society, which is moving to the Parasitism formation.

It suddenly turned out that the degradation of industry and energy production can be explained by the fact that all this is evil, these are impure, damned entities that are killing the planet. Therefore, getting rid of them is an unconditional blessing.

It turns out that if you used to work as a miner, and now you are a dog stylist, then this is good! Since you used to destroy the planet, and now you are saving it!

Oil is not the most valuable source of energy, but the despicable, filthy "dinosaur shit". Of course, you can't pay dearly for it. After all, it is oil that is killing the planet and, at best, it can be bought for next to nothing: then you have to spend so much money on subsidies for clean energy!

Well, from here it is only half a step to proving that only good people deserve a good life, that is, those who use solar panels, drive electric vehicles and work in progressive areas with a low carbon footprint. And those who extract and process resources are bad people! They are destroying and poisoning the planet, so they need to be punished with fines, environmental quotas and taxes on CO2 emissions.

And now the homosexual bartender from California gets the legal right to live on those means (real resources), which his government democratically squeezed from the backward countries for polluting the planet.

Green religion is an ideology that allows in the short term to preserve the "health" of Western society, to give a suitable explanation for the growing crisis phenomena in the real economy of society, and, at the same time, to lay the foundation for justifying the need and justice of the withdrawal of resources from "unclean" nations that refuse to save the planet …

Based on this, we can say what Green Religion is NOT:

• - this is NOT an attempt to save the planet, since climate change always occurs, without significant human influence. And carbon dioxide is a useful gas that allows you to increase the greening of the planet and the yield of agricultural products;
• - this is NOT an attempt to prepare for resource hunger, since the green religion leads to an ultra-high inefficient use of resources, the efforts of civilization are diverted from solving real problems of resource conservation and energy efficiency;
• this is NOT a way to survive in a nuclear war, since all green energy is high-tech and its repair and replacement in the conditions of post-nuclear degradation of the economy is absolutely impossible.

The correctness of the relationship between the phenomenon of green religion and the process of society's transition to Parasitism can be verified by the following fact:

Conventional Trump (that is, America's conservative forces) is an opponent of the green religion, or, more precisely, he tries not to support it.

Why? Is he much better than the bastard girl in climatology? Are Republicans, on average, smarter than Democrats and have a good science education? No…. On average, they are the same degradants.

But they do not need an ideological theory explaining and justifying the destruction of "old America", the destruction of industry and the economy of the country as a whole. They naively and powerlessly cling to the wreckage of rusty America.

With a fairly clear division of the country into republicans (people focused on national capital, production and sale of their products in the country abroad) and democrats (oriented on transnational capital and the purchase of other people's products for printed dollars), there is also a rather noticeable division into supporters and opponents. green religion. At the same time, the level of climatic hysteria on the side of the Democrats is perhaps an order of magnitude higher than that of the Republicans.

But here you need to understand one extremely important thing. The Republicans in America have already lost. They are already a minority in the population, they are a minority in the power elites, they constitute the overwhelming minority in the metropolitan areas of California and New York, and even more so, a small minority in the extremely pederasterized environment of American "British scientists" and in the so-called "intellectual elites" country.

That is why a real scientist cannot tell the truth now, as he will lose grants and work. A politician cannot tell the truth, because voters do not need it. A journalist cannot write the truth if he does not want to receive the title of “Russian troll”. Even the Republicans are forced to very gently oppose the green ideology, just as they already cannot really oppose the ideology of pederasterization.

Subjectively, the Green ideology in the West has already won. Only physics will work against it … That is, an objective inability to integrate moronic principles into real life. But who cares about physics in matters of faith? Physics interferes with walking on water, but it does not interfere with believing in this fact for almost 2000 years.

Yes, physics will prove that it is impossible to build energy on intermittent renewable sources. For example, using the example of Australia. To which the believers will say (and are already saying) that the stupidity of the “hand-assisted descendants of convicts (C)” is to blame, who could not build a primitive and simple elven energy.

Physics will prove the impossibility of building elven energy in Germany, to which the believers will say that the Russians and Gazprom are to blame for everything, using energy resources as weapons (regardless of the arbitrarily low gas price).

But the principle "rob a neighbor under the banner of the Paris agreement", which is not refuted by physics, will be quite viable and efficient. This principle, of course, is quite applicable, and the technology of its use has been worked out for a long time. Search and promotion of useful idiots, saturated with liberal ideas; seizure and bribery of power; the imposition of international agreements "to save the planet."

We see all this in real life. We see these people campaigning for the introduction of greenery in our country and sawing money on this, we see a slow drift towards recognition and surrender to the Paris agreement.

As the ideology of the new green colonialism, the green religion is not just a destructive ideology, it is an ideology directly hostile to the entire industrial-resource cluster of civilization. And, therefore, it is primarily a religion hostile to Russia. Ideology aimed at the next round of robbery of our country. With new sauce, but old faces.

I have already had several articles in which I tried to understand the essence of this ideology. I noted a huge difference in the mass acceptance and rejection of this religion in Russia and in the West. In addition to the influence of the remnants of Soviet education, the unconscious understanding of the usefulness / harmfulness of this ideology certainly plays a role. If for any Californian homosexual from Hollywood, this ideology is useful, and a homosexual, even being stupid like Greta, understands this at the level of grasping instincts, then for the average Russian this religion is harmful and unacceptable. Again, even if a person is not particularly versed in physics, logic, mathematics and economics, he feels that once again our Western partners want to fall in love with him.

And this instinctive understanding of the anti-Russian orientation of the green religion makes it a must-have for any liberal in Russia. Any person who reasonably or unreasonably hates Russia feels the need to preach this destructive religion in the country.

What have I got to the bottom of global warming and the fighters to save the planet ?, What do I care about the level of wind energy in Germany?

Why don't I want to “do something for the planet”?

If the ideas about the human influence on global warming remained only the ravings of freaks from science, then they would interest me a little less than nothing. But I understand that in terms of the degree of destructiveness, anti-humanity, and anti-Russianness, this ideology is superior to German fascism. Let me influence public opinion a little, but maybe it will be useful for someone to rethink the danger of green religion.