For lovers of migrants - newcomers to the bedroom

2024 Author: Seth Attwood | [email protected]. Last modified: 2023-12-16 15:55

As an Armenian, I have an acute dislike for people who are shaking and destroying Russia: Russia's problems are haunted in Armenia tenfold. We can say that if Russia has a runny nose, then Armenia will immediately have pneumonia …

Therefore, when Aleksey Bessudnov, a researcher at the Institute for Basic Interdisciplinary Research at the Higher School of Economics, discusses the great blessing of migrants in the Russian economy -. People like Bessudnov have absolutely no understanding that THE COUNTRY OF RUSSIA IS THE SAME HOUSE OF RUSSIANS AS THE APARTMENT OF BESSUDNOV - THE HOUSE OF THE FAMILY OF BESSUDNOV.

Not wanting to turn his personal apartment into a communal apartment for Uzbeks and Moldovans, Mr. Bessudnov for some reason believes that the house of the Russian people can and should be turned into a communal apartment. He will certainly say, pin him to the wall - they say, the country and the apartment are different things.

Why different?

Why the hell are they different ?! Do people live in both of them? They live! Are they both measured by the area? Measure! Is the entrance to them locked? Yes, locked, so as not to plunder material values - both from the apartment and from the country. So why is the place of residence of a certain area, locked from outsiders - in one case inviolable (the home is inviolable), and in the other case should be open and wide open to all visitors ?!

Migrants are people, sorry for them, my heart bleeds to look at them; Well, and the Russians are not a pity? Are they not human? Why is such a one-sided pity only for the dark-haired (I myself am dark-haired, but the truth is more expensive), why do not blondes deserve pity?

Why is it necessary to settle the person you have pityed not in your house, but in the house of the Russian people?

Why is the Russian people such "happiness" - to pay the bills for your pity?

Well, let's say you met a homeless person at the entrance, and took him to your place: it's your business, wash, feed - God will take it into account! But if you took him not to yourself, but to your neighbor Uncle Vanya, and, annoyingly ringing at the door, explained to the neighbor that now his first duty is to share everything with the bum whom you regretted, and you yourself have no time, you ran to the lecture in HSE … Probably, your neighbor will send you, and he will be right.

But it’s not even like that, but exactly the same thing happens when liberals, most often even non-Russian in origin, drag migrants into a Russian house and tell them to learn tolerance in a Russian house that is being turned into a communal apartment!

Why on earth ?! Don't you think that here the questions of general humanism have been replaced by quite concrete getting into someone else's pocket ?! As an economist, and also, by the way, a non-Russian person, I consider it my duty to explain: ALL Wages CONSISTS OF TWO PARTS.

The fact is that every people in the process of historical development carries out the so-called. "Ethno-accumulation" - the accumulation of benefits that serve as catalysts for the subsequent stimulation of labor.

This includes natural rent (the land that the people defended in a feat of arms, with all earthly gifts), imperial rent (additional payment to citizens for the geopolitical independence of their country), fund-intensive rent (additional payment to citizens for the labor of their ancestors, embodied in the fruitful infrastructure of the country), etc.. P.

All these rents (additional payments to citizens for their labor) constitute the PROPERTY of ETHNOS, the property of the whole people. It is passed on by ancestors to descendants, it is ONLY FOR OWN.

If you dig a hole in Thailand, then for a completely equal volume of work you will get ten times less for labor than in England. Why? An excavator in England, even if technically does not differ in any way from a Thai excavator, USES A DEVELOPED INFRASTRUCTURE, which in essence is a national treasure, obtained over many centuries of struggle and hard work.

But what can I say, if any bench that you can sit on in the park for free is actually not free at all! It was bought and paid for for OWN citizens so that their own people could use it for free. As well as educational, medical, pension and other systems …

Sometimes the difference is multiple. And why? Where there are petrodollars, they still (indirectly) pull earnings up, even if you have no personal relationship with the oil industry. A pie merchant's earnings in a country with petrodollars will be an order of magnitude higher than in a country without petrodollars.

It would seem that the trader of oil pies has never seen this oil - but no! Its buyers turn out to be more generous, because they are directly or indirectly connected with high-paid oil workers …

In other words, the pie merchant has a part of his money for the pies, and the other - from the funds of ETHNO-ACCUMULATION, ETHNO-ACCUMULATED RENT. The rent that Russian ancestors gave to Russian descendants. That rent, which no one has the right to squander right and left, because the creators of this rent rest in their graves, and in principle they cannot sign powers of attorney for redistribution …

For example, the French died on barricades for three centuries, generation after generation, to create their own exemplary social assistance system. Why on earth would a Gabonese negro get into this system? Did his ancestors shed blood on those very barricades? And can't its weight become fatal for a system that cannot withstand the increase in load and will fail? (It happened in France) …

Let us take the question of urbanization, which is alien to the national motive. The Soviet government easily solved the housing problem in villages and small towns, but could not solve it in large metropolitan areas. Why? Did you build little housing? No, they built a lot. But the queue in a large city was constantly replenished with rural settlers (the process of urbanization of the USSR was going on) - and therefore could not get enough. If anyone wanted to go to a small town - an apartment with an improved layout was given free of charge and immediately - I myself know dozens of such cases from Soviet life. The villagers played the role of migrants in the process of urbanization. They aggravated and complicated the Soviet city life to the utmost and undermined the well-being of the townspeople.

So that you understand me, dear reader, I will explain to you with an example from housing and communal services. You own an apartment. But besides the private ownership of the apartment, you are also a participant in the so-called. "Condominium", i.e. "Co-ownership" of the local area, attics, basements, load-bearing structures, pipes and wires, etc. This is a common property of all residents and cannot be divided. You cannot privatize and tear apart the water supply system - the water supply system simply will not. It can be either general or none.

The Russians, as a people, also have property on the basis of condominium rights. This is the NATIONAL INDIVIDUAL PROPERTY that I am talking about. It was created by the Russian people and serves the Russian people, as in any other part of the earth - the national serves its collective creator.

A migrant - no matter how good he is (more often they are criminal, but even if they would be very law-abiding) - CONNECTES TO THE PUBLIC INFRASTRUCTURE, which is not designed for him. The rent from the Russian condominium begins to be divided into smaller shares, because many impostors have joined in. The result is well known to professional economists: salaries of Russian people are falling, the level of social security is declining, opportunities for self-realization and full-blooded life are reduced.

Here is the Voice of Russia message from the past, 2012: according to a study conducted by the Federal Migration Service and the same notorious Higher School of Economics, 50% of Russians believe that migrants are taking away their jobs. Here the answer is given narrowly, in a philistine way, after all, we are talking not only about workplaces (and the respondents subconsciously understand this), but in general - about social prospects. After all, everyone understands, if not a moron: if someone cheap and unpretentious is working nearby, then you, willy-nilly, will have to become docile and unpretentious, deprive yourself and your loved ones of those social gains that your ancestors achieved.

We are comforted. We are told - now, we will distribute medical policies to migrants, they will pay for themselves in hospitals, they will not be treated at the expense of Russian citizens … But this is cunning! Let them pay at their own expense - in their homeland for treatment! What? Can not? There is no such equipment at home, there are no such earnings? So it turns out - they got into the ETHNO-ACCUMULATION OF THE RUSSIAN PEOPLE … They got sick, got treated, and thank God, but the queues at the clinics became obviously longer, for example … And suddenly there were no more free beds … And the doctors are overworked - there are more patients …

No wonder they say - Russia is a generous soul! The Russian person disgusts prudence, and it comes to the ridiculous: I am sitting, an Armenian, and I am counting his losses, which he himself, from a generous soul, forgave and forgot. Mostly Russians are enraged by migrant rudeness and crime. Not only do uncultured people seize someone else's bread, they also beat in the face for this bread and salt …

Russians want to be respected. At the same time, the bread and salt itself already seems to be worth nothing, and the Russians (that’s the Slavic broad-mindedness of the soul!) Are out of the question.

But you understand that from the point of view of economic science, not only a criminal migrant will start his paw in ETHNO ACCUMULATION, but, alas, even a very polite and even extremely complimentary migrant.

He will grow, say, garlic, but he will sell it 10 times more expensive than in his native Korea. This means that 9/10 of the remuneration for his labor is not personal payment, but the ethno-cumulative rent of the Russian people! This is the money that the Russian people have grown for centuries from historical soil for distribution among their …

Everything costs money. And the road along which cars travel for free, and the park in which vacationers walk free of charge, and a bench on which people sit for free, and a lantern that illuminates the courtyard for free …

It’s impossible, like today's migrants, to “show up and not get dusty” on everything that’s ready-made, and argue that I don’t steal money, I earn money, they pay me for honest work … And why then at home you are paid less for exactly the same honest work? Didn't you think about it? Or is he less honest in your homeland? Or is he less labor in your homeland?

As an Armenian, as a person from the outside, who has been observing this outrage for a long time, I want to say responsibly: stop mocking the Russian man, stop exploiting his generosity and hospitality. You cannot turn a Russian gift into a Russian duty, into some kind of tribute. Enough to demand from Russians that they raise the standard of living of strangers by reducing the standard of living of their relatives.

And don't send more invoices for your charity to the Russians, gentlemen from the HSE! You are provided with a large living space for who knows what merits - so settle Tajiks with Uzbeks at your place! And then you go so that these unfortunate people work for you, and live - "somewhere with the Russians" …

V. L. Avagyan