Forbidden History
Forbidden History

Video: Forbidden History

Video: Forbidden History
Video: The New Strategy The U.S. Is Using In The Info War Against Russia 2024, May
Anonim

Is it just because these versions and facts, which are used by supporters of alternative history, turn out to be something like closing technologies in other areas of knowledge? If a fundamentally new engine (hydrogen or running on some other, not yet invented fuel) turns out to be more economical and more reliable than a gasoline engine, then all technologies associated with oil production, refining, etc. will no longer be needed. And in the same way, if the same "inconvenient" facts, which the modern historical community brushes aside today, will it be possible to prove what will become of the official history clothed in many textbooks, manuals and reference books? And most importantly, how should one treat dissertations and abstracts on history, on the basis of which all leading historians have become professors, doctors of sciences and academicians?

Of course, among the scientists and researchers who defend their right to engage in this forbidden story, there are many eccentrics, and often charlatans. But there are a lot of really serious people whose works are worthy at least not to treat them with prejudice and thoughtfulness and evaluate them in the same way as any scientific hypothesis - without throwing them away, without even trying to figure them out.

Recommended: