Obvious incredible thrust

2024 Author: Seth Attwood | [email protected]. Last modified: 2024-01-16 18:34

Every day we are faced with the curvature of space, we even use it for our own purposes, but still, we do not allow ourselves to admit it. Let us be convinced of the obvious with an example, impossible (from a scientific point of view), natural thrust.

Introduction.

Clarifying the issues of correct perception of the world around me, I pursue a specific goal. Few people realize, but this is the path to power that you never dreamed of. The path is real and the most direct, in comparison with rituals, conspiracies and prayers.

It happens that I am reproached for this. Say, you can't easily give people information that evil people can misuse. But I do not think so. It would be bad not to return to the people what is rightfully theirs.

After all, a person is deprived of correct perception from childhood, and academic science plays an important role here. Therefore, the analysis of the questions described below is extremely useful to everyone.

I have been convinced many times that many people from birth have great opportunities, but do not have them. There is not enough will, not enough attention, but most importantly, they do not see the world as it is. Even if a person tries to use his power, he often acts on emptiness, which simply does not exist. But everything could be different.

So let's finally expose yet another worldwide deception.

Sit behind the stove with a stupid speech.

Foolish speech should be understood as a scientific explanation of the phenomenon of NATURAL DRIVING. Academics believe that natural cravings are created due to the pressure difference inside and outside the pipe(ΔP). And the first catch lies in the calculation formula, according to which we are offered to calculate all this with "mathematical precision":

where

delta R - the difference in pressure inside and outside the pipe;

WITH = 0.0342 (this is a fraudulent coefficient that attracts incorrect calculations to reality);

a - Atmosphere pressure;

h - pipe height;

T0 - absolute outside temperature;

Ti - absolute core temperature;

Thus, if nothing burns in the oven (the temperature inside and outside is the same), then the expression in brackets is equal to ZERO. Judging by the rules of school arithmetic, the pressure difference inside and outside the pipe in this case is equal to the same ZERO (when multiplied by ZERO, it turns out to be ZERO). That is, there should be no thrust. But life is not like that. There is always a draft in the chimney, as in the chimney of the gas water heater, and in the ventilation duct - both when the stove is heated and when it is cold. For those who are completely stubborn and distrustful, I will give you a poster:

That is, BEFORE the fire is ignited, the thrust should already be. For those who are still not sure that gas water heaters and any stoves "can be used" only if there is natural draft, I recommend watching this short video

The thrust without a difference in the external and internal temperature in the pipe not only exists, the deceitful academic lads even hold a special device for measuring it - it is called the ANEMOMETER. If these arguments are not enough, then you can conduct a full-scale experiment according to the pictures.

Ventilation in your own apartment;

Or cold on your own oven.

The above formula not only invites us to believe in the impossibility of natural draft without heating. Numerous scientific definitions, explanations and comments to it hide the main reason for this phenomenon. Since everywhere they say that the draft in the pipe caused by the difference in pressure inside and outside.

This is a no brainer - the movement of air masses is always caused by the difference in pressure. The main thing remains behind the scenes - what caused the pressure difference itself? We are told that the temperature difference.

But how can this be? After all, this algebraic expression should literally be read like this:

The value of the pressure difference is directly proportional to the value atmospheric pressure and pipe height … The dependence on temperatures here is indirect, but on the height of the pipe and the atmospheric pressure itself is the most direct and obvious. Why are they shyly silent about this in interpretations? Because otherwise the trick will not work.

The formula is incorrect, but it was nevertheless forced to insert the main reasons for natural thrust - the presence of atmospheric pressure and the difference in altitude. Indeed, without them, at least some approximate calculation cannot be obtained.

How gravity disappears in a pipe.

The picture shows a diagram of the action of the forces of atmospheric pressure, according to the ideas of modern science.

The force of gravity according to Newton acts on air masses in exactly the same way both inside the pipe and outside. Theoretically, it cannot disappear in any way in the volume of the pipe. But it practically disappears regularly.

This is how academics see the action of these forces. Where does the pressure difference come from if nothing is heated? All forces balance each other. So they resist, deny the phenomenon that we observe with our own eyes every day. They deny the presence of traction in an unheated stove, as if they do not notice the operation of ventilation in our houses. They have nowhere to retreat. Otherwise, academics will have to admit that space is not uniform, that pressure does not just change with a height difference … and, in the end, that gravity is a myth.

And here's a real diagram of how it actually works:

As you can see, in the proposed scheme there is no gravity, but there is another (real) reason for the difference in air pressure at different heights - the inhomogeneity of space. This scheme compares favorably with the academic one in that it corresponds to reality.

The picture is conventionally divided into three areas of high, medium and low pressure. In reality, the change occurs smoothly, but it is so much clearer. The essence of the manifestation of the distortion of space is that it always interacts with the substance that fills it.

If the dimensionality of space decreases, then it can be imagined as if the ruler (symbol of space) lying on your table suddenly shrank in its middle part and the distances between the divisions would become unevenly spaced (decreased).

Now imagine that a tabletop (a symbol of any substance) is forced to submit to this change - it will begin to shrink, increasing its density and specific gravity in the curvature zone.

So it happens in nature - zones of low dimension are forced to fill with denser substance, and zones of high dimension with less dense. This is most clearly shown to us by gases. It is the inhomogeneity of space, and not at all the force of gravity, that makes them compress towards the surface of the earth, forming a pressure difference.

Every man knows, but science denies.

The phenomena discussed above refute the existence of the universal law of gravitationas Newton defined it. Yes, he, in general, should not exist. His discovery is actually a set of certain assumptions. All attempts to confirm the hypothesis (in Latin, literally, an under-affirmation) about gravity by Newton himself look frivolous.

He made calculations based on the size of the Moon, Earth and the distance between them. However, his own formula says nothing about the size. Only mass is taken into account. But the density of the substance of the Moon and the Earth is still unknown to science. How, without knowing this, to get a lot? And Newton just took, and SUPPOSED that the density is the same. It's easier to count that way.

Then this hypothesis magically, for no reason, turned into a theory. And even became the law of UNIVERSAL GRAVITY. And the entire academic fraternity enthusiastically admires, as Newton's failure to assert was brilliantly confirmed later.

But this is a sheer lie. Nothing could be confirmed, since there were no direct or indirect indications of the actual density even of our Mother Earth. After all, the soil is deeper than 12 km. could not be obtained. Moreover, no one weighed any of the planets of the solar system on the "planetary" scales. They don't know anything! Only hypotheses, hypotheses, all sorts of assumptions, an avalanche of uncertainties, from which, on people tired of empty ringing, a ready, recognized and authoritative law immediately jumps out of a snuffbox like a devil.

About the same, how "brilliant" in fact Newton's misconceptions were confirmed, I will tell you in the next chapter using the example of how the learned brethren were shooting at the moon using just the law of universal gravitation.

And now I would like to finally destroy in your minds the doubt about the falsity of the academicians. The brain is like that - to the last resists, does not want to revise the established ideas. Maybe the writer was just cleverly manipulating convenient facts. Listen to everyone here.

In general, you may not believe me. It is enough to turn to any man who has laid out a stove or equipped ventilation at least once. Start talking to him about temperature and pressure differences, so he won't listen. He will say that EVERYTHING depends on the height of the pipe, and the temperature is the tenth question here.

And he will be right. Here is the ventilation diagram in the house. Everything here is depicted very close to academic misconceptions. Blue air (cold, of course) is sucked into a warm (well, who doubted) a house, and without any contradictions with science is drawn out with red arrows through the ventilation channels.

It can be assumed, of course, that the house is almost always warmer than outside. But everything becomes less rosy when we need to ventilate the basement or cellar.

The ventilation in the cellar works both in winter and in summer. After all, no one there rearranges the pipes depending on the season. But the situation with the temperature difference inside and outside changes to the opposite:

In winter, it is warmer in the cellar + 10 … + 4 degrees C (outside -20 degrees C). In this case, the draft works to extract warm air from the exhaust pipe (as in the diagrams from science).

In summer, it is colder in the cellar + 10 … + 15 degrees C (outside +20 degrees C). The draft continues to work for the exhaust, only cold air from the same exhaust pipe, in the same direction. You will not find such a formula among scientists, but natural ventilation of cellars, caissons, vegetable pits works in millions of houses and garages of our vast country. After all, the academicians are lying.

You will find understanding and peace when you finally come to terms with the curvature of space and get rid of the rubbish that was crammed into you in physics lessons. And then it will not seem strange to you that the height of the pipe is not quite the same as its length.

Space snipers, or how to hit the moon at the "tip of the pen".

And now "for sweet" I will tell you about the "successes" of theoretical calculations made on the basis of the "great" law of "UNIVERSAL" GRAVITY. Academicians have made so many lies that soon they will have to quote half of the text.

It all started with the fact that putting the first Soviet cosmonaut Yuri Gagarin into orbit, the calculation sector, armed with Newton's formula, was calculated by 100 km. (HUNDRED KILOMETERS) height. But the Russian man got out of it, somehow landed, and so that there was no shame for science, they blamed everything on the shortcomings of technology. Let the mechanics blush, they are no stranger to it. Incidentally, this is what they do today when Protons fall.

However, the bookkeepers quietly made corrections, introduced (as always) coefficients, and learned how to accurately put satellites into orbit (in spite of Newton). But the party and government of the Soviet Union raised the bar higher - they demanded to fly to the moon. And it was here that the entire "usefulness of brilliant discoveries" of European scientists, who over the centuries "anticipated the achievements" of space technology, "unraveled the secrets of the forces that control the movements of the luminaries", manifested themselves.

The calculation sector calculated, entered the verified coefficients, and on January 2, 1959, the unmanned interplanetary station "Luna-1" was launched directly into the moon. The main task was to reach its surface. They wanted to get into it, but missed a little - by 6000 (SIX THOUSAND KILOMETERS).

Who do you think is the last one this time? Newton? Academy of Sciences? No matter how it is! Unfortunately, no technical problems were found in the station's system. And scientists with some uncertainty considered the error in the cyclogram to be the cause of the trajectory failure. They hung up on the programmers.

Is it a lot or a little - 6000 km? It's like aiming at 2 Lunar hulls to the side. "Sniper" result. But what can you do, the formula is wrong, there is no universal gravitation at all. And corrections with coefficients alone will not fly far. Therefore, the "scientific poke" method is still the main one, both on earth and in space.

And this time the experience of adjusting the calculations to the actual trajectories helped our Soviet theoreticians again - they somehow pulled it by the ears. Already in September of the same year, Luna-2 hit the moon.

The Americans either had less experience, or more faith in the inviolability of the laws of physics. But from the first, second and third time, they could not bring anything at all beyond the curvature of space in the region of our planet. Their Pioneers were falling back. It took about 70 launches to aim. Not all were workers, some of them became precisely sighting.

And finally, Pioneer-4 broke out of this deflection. His task was to fly at a distance of 30,000 km. from the surface of the Moon and photograph its reverse surface. As a result, the American settlement sector still missed. The device flew 60,000 km. The miss was 30,000 (THIRTY THOUSAND KILOMETERS). That is, the Pioneer had to fly at a distance of 11, 5 lunar corps, but it turned out to be 23 corps.

The angular size of the Moon as observed from Earth is approximately ½ degree. Accordingly, the curvature of domestic space mathematicians was approximately 1 degree. And overseas bookkeepers twisted all 5 degrees.

For comparison: if a hunter shoots a bullet from a smooth-bore rifle at a distance of 50 meters, then he falls into a circle with a diameter of about 10 cm. This is a common thing and the angular deviation of the trajectory is no more than 1/10 of a degree.

And if he shot like our space mathematicians, then from a distance of 50 meters he would only hit a circle with a diameter of 85 cm. Pretty sour. Such a sniper can only hunt elephants. But if he had been "accurate" as overseas accountants, he would have gotten from a distance of 50 meters, only into a huge banner measuring 4.5 meters.

Of course, I understand that the spacecraft were launched not by direct fire, but in a rendezvous orbit. But have mercy, and they had much better means of ensuring accuracy. What about mathematics, altimeters, telemetry, time counters? What about 70 attempts? In any case, not to miss half the sky. In general, this is some kind of shame. At the time of hara-kiri, do yourself with a dull slide rule.

The mathematical prediction in the cases described has completely failed. As a result, they simply spat on Newton's formula describing UNIVERSAL GRAVITY and stupidly aimed.

And yet, I have great respect for people who, despite the efforts of the N'tons, various academicians, and theorists, by eye, on a whim, but nevertheless did what should not have worked out - they ended up in the moon. Heroes, creators, what can I say. Such people are always used by would-be theoreticians.

Conclusion.

Natural thrust is living proof of the possibility of using the elevation difference (dimension levels) for your own purposes. A pipe placed vertically is a perpetual motion machine that many only dream of, but it exists and works tirelessly for us in ventilation and chimneys. Unless its power density is not so great, although pipes in large boiler rooms already provide kilowatts of free traction.

The same phenomenon simply and clearly shows the falsity of the universal law of gravitation. The world does not live according to this law.

Natural cravings are another shame of academic science that everyone can see, and which they are trying to hide with all their might. And our shame with you lies in the fact that they still manage to deceive us. We see it with our eyes, feel it with our hands, and don't believe ourselves.