Where did the blood go that (r) taro-mo (n) heads

2024 Author: Seth Attwood | [email protected]. Last modified: 2023-12-16 15:55

After reading the article, leave (or add) the necessary letters in this title yourself.

The disputes between ordinary people and supporters of alternative history about this historical event of the conquest of the Horde of Russia continue with periodic intensity. But among alternatives, this topic is being raised less and less, since almost everyone understands everything.

There was Tartary with its provinces (Great. Moscow, Chinese, Independent, etc. Tartary). And there was a civil war, the return, the re-subordination of Muscovy back to the citizenship of Tartary, the elimination of the internecine wars of the princes. In fact, it was a war between the Russians and the Russians (or vice versa, which is the same thing).

This is known at the very top of the vertical of power:

I do not know for what purpose, but for example, in the synopsis of a single history textbook, the concept of "Tatar-Mongol yoke" was replaced by the phrase "Horde yoke". Either even modern historians have realized that something is wrong here, or that this term does not "call out" the eyes. A source

Battle of Kulikovo

Fragment of the icon of St. Sergius of Radonezh "Battle of Kulikovo". It clearly shows that the same warriors are fighting on both sides. And this battle is more like a civil war than a war with a foreign conqueror.

Of course, it can be argued that these are internecine wars of the princes of Muscovy, but sources say that this is exactly the (r) Tara and Russian regiments.

All these pictures, taken from both Russian and European sources, depict the battles of the Russians with the Mongol-Tatars, but nowhere is it possible to determine who is Russian and who is Tatar. Moreover, in the latter case, both the Russians and the "Mongol-Tatars" are dressed in almost the same gilded armor and helmets, and fight under the same banners with the image of the Savior Not Made by Hands. Another thing is that the "Spas" of the two opposing sides, most likely, was different.

There is a small town in Turkey called Söğüt. The town is small, but very important for the Turks. It is here that the Ottoman Empire is believed to have originated, which existed for over 600 years - from 1299 to 1922.

Next to it there is a small gallery of busts of almost all the founders of empires that are currently known in the world, on which the years of the existence of these empires are engraved.

Let's see who is represented there and how they looked, according to Turkish historians:

In the city of Shogut, Khan Batu is depicted in a sculpture. And as we can see, he is a man of European appearance. There is no smell of Mongols and Turks here.

Bust of Babur, founder of the Mughal Empire, Shogut, Turkey.

Bust of Attila, founder of the Hunnic Empire

Bust of Bumyn Kagan, founder of the Turkic Kaganate.

Bust of Alp-Tegin, the founder of the Ghaznavid dynasty in Afghanistan.

Bust of Pan, founder of the Hunnic Empire (300 years earlier than Attila).

Bust of Timur, the founder of the empire and the Timurid dynasty, with the capital in Samarkand

However, these can be considered modern images, although, as they say, no one pulled the Turks for "language," and they could easily nourish "emperors" of any eastern or Mongoloid type, but for some reason they did not. I wonder if the Turks suspect that by portraying the founders of all the empires of Eurasia as white people, Caucasians, they thereby violated all the "liberal" laws of democracy and tolerance, and committed a monstrous crime of "discrimination" against all other races. We hope that they did all this quite deliberately, so as not to sin against the Truth.

Of course, not all of these emperors belong to the "Tatar-Mongol" yoke. But all these people are related to the territories in which Tartary was spread.

We have already written about the images of Tamerlane in old paintings. I will give it as an addition

But the Mongols themselves succumbed to the worldwide opinion about their alleged ancestor and installed this monument to Genghis Khan at their place. Although, it is possible that no one asked them.

Considering what kind of military, production, and supply power you need to have in order to carry out campaigns, the capture of cities thousands of kilometers away - this must be a strong country, an empire with a high level of development and infrastructure.

In general, we can say with confidence that the Tatars in the concept of "Tatar-Mongol yoke" are tartars from Tartary. The letter was specially omitted, or it was not pronounced by foreigners (“er” is difficult to pronounce for many language groups). And so the word stuck in a distorted form. Moreover, on many maps the provinces of Tartaria are read as Tartary.

These are all indirect and external signs that the yoke from the Horde was not at all Tatar and not Mongolian. There are more convincing facts. To get down to them, let's pay attention to another interesting concept in the term "Tatar-Mongol yoke" - this is the word "Mongolian". Where did it come from?

Here is a brief history of the creation of Mongolia:

As you can understand, Mongolia is a former part of the Chinese Empire. An artificially created country. Can anyone give examples of whether this territory was mentioned as Mongolia before the beginning of the 20th century? Or maybe historians deliberately confused (or rather changed) the Mughals for the Mongols in the Tatar-Mongol yoke?

Country of the Mughals.

These are all the possessions of the great Mughals in a certain era.

History of Mughal possessions

Great Mogul on engraving

Mughal Empireor the Mughal Empire (the Persian self-name - Gurkâniyân comes from Timur's mansabaamir Gurkānī ("Khan's son-in-law")) is a Timurid state that existed on the territory of modern India, Pakistan and southeastern Afghanistan in 1526-1540 and 1555-1858 (actually until the middle XVIII century). The boundaries of the empire have changed significantly throughout its existence.

The name "Great Mughals" appeared already under the British colonialists, neither the founder of the Empire, nor his descendants called themselves that. The term "mogul" was used by the population in India to refer to all Muslims in North India and Central Asia.

We saw above what Timur looked like. Maybe these are the ancestors of the higher castes in India? Indeed, even now there is more Aryan in them than Negroid. And according to genealogy, it is believed that the north of India is the carrier of the halo group R1a1.

The founder of the Mughal Empire is the son of Humayun - Akbar (1556-1605). Akbar's reign (49 years old) was dedicated to the unification and pacification of the state.

Let's continue the logic. If Tatars are tartars. Are the Mongols perhaps the Mughals? Some ignoramuses from the academies of sciences took and incorrectly translated or interpreted a chronicle or historical document. And away we go … from textbook to textbook.

The most important question is, what cultural heritage did Igo leave on the western borders of his territory? It turns out that in three hundred years - none. And even more so, even Mongolian blood is not traced in the descendants of the inhabitants of Muscovy, Russia, Eastern Europe and subsequently Russia. From the word - absolutely!

The halo group of Mongoloids is the halo group "C" and "O". If Mongolian blood is not traced, then it is probably logical to assume that the Tatar-Mongols left the one that we have - R1a1:

As you can see, the halo group R1a1 is widespread except in eastern Europe and in those territories of India where the great Mughals lived. And captured the north of Mongolia. A source

If we consider the prevalence of the genus R1a1a on a global scale, then the main peak of frequencies falls on Eastern Europe. The highest frequencies of the haplogroup are found in Russia, Ukraine and Poland. The other two areas are South Siberia and Hindustan. In India, the highest frequencies are found mainly in the north of the country, and in the higher castes up to 40-50%. In Siberia, R1a1a is found among many indigenous peoples, but it is most common among the Altai - up to 40%.

Distribution of halo group "C", one of the branches of the Mongoloids. A source

The most extensive and numerous branch of C. On the North American continent, only among the Indians (with a frequency of about 8%) is the daughter branch C3b (P39) found. The C3d (M407) branch is found in Cambodia with a frequency of about 4%, as well as in other peoples of Southeast Asia with extremely low frequencies. The daughter branch C3e (P53.1) is found with a low frequency in Mongols, Evenks, Uighurs, Han people, etc.

The spread of the O3 male line is at its peak in China, where it is found among many ethnic groups. For example, among the Dulungs from the Yunnan province, the frequency of O3 reaches 100%, among the Achan, Bai and Yao, it is about 70-80%, and among the Well and Shui people, about 70%. Han people from different provinces (50-60%), wa, fox, miao, lahuo - about 50%. In general, the frequency of O3 in various peoples of China is at least 20-30%. In Southeast Asia in Sumatra (55%), Taiwan (50%), Vietnam (40%), on the island. Borneo (36%), the Philippines (35%), Malaysia (34%), Tibet (20-30%), Micronesia (15-18%), Cambodia (14%), on about. Bali (7%). In Japan, haplogroup O3 occurs with a frequency of up to 17%, in Mongolia (16%), in Korea with a frequency of up to 35. Source

So, even the genetics of the population of certain territories suggests that historians are not telling us what actually happened.

In conclusion, I suggest watching this informative documentary: