What reinforces the global dominant anti-human concept?

2024 Author: Seth Attwood | [email protected]. Last modified: 2023-12-16 15:55

Surely everyone who studies the materials of the COB asked himself the question: "Why is the" world behind the scenes "not afraid of retribution, pursuing an anti-human policy?"

So we asked this question sometime. Understanding came only when they mastered the theory of management and were defined conceptually.

If you go straight to the point and describe briefly, it will look like this:

1. God gave freedom of choice and the ability to make mistakes, as well as the ability to find free will;
2. Most of the sin lies with the tempted rather than the tempting;
3. Karma (causal relationship).

Now in more detail.

So, the apparent impunity of the subject of global governance of the current dominant antihuman concept rests on three pillars. Let's consider each of them.

God gave freedom of choice and the ability to make mistakes, as well as the ability to gain free will

Objective circumstances:

• God is perfect and infallible (from a managerial point of view);
• We are not perfect and not infallible (from a managerial point of view).

Hence the consequence:

• Above we are given the right to make mistakes (see below about protection from 100% consequences);
• Gaining free will is not an instant process, but has its own duration.

Most sin lies with the tempted rather than the tempting

To understand this, it is necessary to consider how the interaction of the tempted and the tempted from the managerial side of the matter takes place.

Interaction between the tempted and the tempted

As you can see from the picture, until the tempted closes the circuit with his choice of “Accept”, it is possible to tempt for a long time and to no avail. There is such a saying about the world of animals, which well reflects the essence of the scheme in the practice of life - "The bitch will not want, the dog will not jump up." But as soon as the circuit is closed, sorry, brother, almost all the responsibility is on you.

The ratio of the share of responsibility of the tempted and the tempter

Examples:

1. When choosing a future husband for a family, a woman should understand the severity of the consequences of a wrong choice. it is she who closes the choice of three stages:

   • Shows that she is ready for family
   • The man responds and proposes
   • The woman agrees.
2. “Trust your neighbor, but do not let him be deceived,” says popular wisdom for a reason.
3. The devil could tempt Jesus as much as he wanted, but he was a steadfast companion. And also wise (see below for more on this).

Karma (causation)

Almost all karma is tied to the real morality of the individual and his capabilities.

• If God gave us something, it means that we deserve it (the difference between social and karmic justice is well defined).
• God gives us a burden only according to the strength with which we are able to cope.
• God has no hands other than us.

What follows from this?

• If something happens in our life, good or bad, then we deserve it. They have earned them either personally or as part of the society in which we live (the morality of the whole society is considered the most "laggard"). For God does not allow injustice and will always protect the righteous.
• God directs people to each other so that we can help each other, and not partake of the fruits of our evil. "I want mercy, not sacrifice." Therefore, it is necessary to accept and meet your offender with gratitude to His address and to the address of the offender, tk. this is a chance to understand something and change your morality towards good nature. The Jews also have a saying “It's good that I took it with money” - is it clear what it is about?
• If we do not cope (for various reasons) with the load that we deserve and which we can afford, then we reap the consequences of this.

There is one essential circumstance in this topic of karma, without a description of which the picture will be incomplete (and this is putting it mildly). What's the matter?

And the fact is that not 100% of the consequences of our actions go back to us. God always holds back some part of the feedback, i.e. protects us from the full gravity of the consequences of our unreasonable actions. Why? Because we are like little foolish children - we are imperfect and have the right to make mistakes (we cannot know everything and everyone in the world in order to fully calculate all the consequences of our actions, since we are very, very limited).

However, with the growth of the measure of understanding and awareness, for the same actions we have a measure of responsibility grows. Therefore, for what was forgiven in childhood, in adulthood you can get it so robust. And the more we understand and know, the higher the responsibility is on us - in the sense that God reduces the percentage that he withholds from all 100% of the consequences of our actions.

Consequences withheld from Above, depending on the level of understanding

Next, let's move on to how the subject of global governance uses all of this according to the anti-human concept.

1. The GP always offers some options and looks at the reaction of the society. If society accepts, then it itself is to blame. You need to think with your own head, and not engage in intellectual dependency. The basis of this approach is intellectual dependence, nurtured and supported through the dominant culture.
2. While working out the options of what to offer the society as a choice, the SOE takes into account the permissible load on the potential of the society to deal with the choice and cope with it even without the help of conscience. This is what provides the lowest share of responsibility in the fact that society again chose the option that worsens its current position (in the sense of moving towards Humanity).
3. Conscience is a mechanism that allows making the right choice even at a critically low level of development of understanding, because it is through Conscience that God will always make it clear to an individual what not to do if he really wants to because of his egoism or intellectual dependence (the crowd effect in a crowd-“elite” society), or if what needs to be done in spite of what he does not want because of his egoism, or intellectual dependence. Therefore, conscience is suppressed with the help of the pressure of the dominant culture.¹ various² ways³ and means⁴.

In the end, what happens?

- The responsibility for anti-humanity lies more with the sophisticated than with the tempters, i.e. it is at the expense of the sophisticated that this anti-human concept is kept.

At the expense of whom the anti-humanity is kept

Everything seems to be clear, it is necessary to abandon intellectual dependence and live under the dictatorship of conscience. But this is not enough, we must also be able to use our intellectual and creative potential in working with the choice that the tempter gives us. We are for a creative approach. How is it expressed? First of all, in conceptual authority and conceptual certainty. When choosing virtues in life, help others in this. How does this look like in an example?

Jesus and his conceptual certainty in creativity

Let's analyze one biblical story. In the wilderness, Satan tempted Jesus. How did Jesus respond to Satan? -

"Come with me"

The fact is that when the tempter offers a choice, there is always an algorithm behind the brackets that accompanies the entire process of interaction with which the tempter is trying to impose. It is possible for the tempted to get out of this algorithm only when he himself possesses conceptual certainty and can offer the tempter his choice.

Which is what Jesus did:

1. Instead of stupidly agreeing or rejecting Satan's proposal, and thus fall under his algorithm.
2. Jesus makes an offer to Satan, but already in a different algorithm - an alternative to the encompassing concept of virtue, in order to help Satan become a Human (i.e., to find a btw).
3. Satan clearly did not expect this and hastened to retreat.

Come with me

Still, the subject of global governance has its own problems. Now, after our reasoning, we watch the video and comprehend the information from it: