Anglo-Saxons push us into slavery, promising freedom

2024 Author: Seth Attwood | [email protected]. Last modified: 2023-12-16 15:55

The West realizes that Russia has every chance of becoming a world leader again.

A person differs from animals, even the most developed and genetically close to him, in reason: the ability to set goals, that is, to independently set goals, find means to achieve them and consistently apply various efforts to achieve what was conceived.

For the sake of comfort, refusal of responsibility for qualitatively new and therefore, possibly, erroneous decisions, for the sake of the possibility of instinctive action according to once and for all established stereotypes, a person is increasingly giving up reason for the sake of living "out of habit." Thus, the human mind paradoxically wages a constant war of self-destruction, of abandoning oneself, to such an extent that the cliché of psychologists, standard before bullying, has become the call to “get out of the comfort zone,” that is, beyond the established habits, and start rethink your life.

However, in general, a person is not yet able to provide himself with such a level of comfort as to give up reason and self-development and return to the animal kingdom. Probably, successes on this path, due to their unnaturalness, can only be one-time - and be accompanied by monstrous catastrophes, a drop in living standards and population size (in miniature, we saw such a catastrophe in the collapse of the Soviet Union and, probably, in a generation, we will see it as a transformation of a tolerant The European Union to the European Caliphate).

To realize the capabilities of his mind, a person needs freedom: without it, he simply will not be able to set goals for himself and achieve them. Therefore, freedom is not only the main value, but also the greatest human instinct.

It is the striving for freedom, the constant "test for strength" of all and every boundaries that directly distinguishes a person from the animal world.

Even the desire for knowledge is not our unique feature and is typical, for example, of rats. Scientists from different countries have repeatedly repeated the experiment confirming this - with the same shocking results. The rat populations created ideal, heavenly conditions, on the periphery of which there was a most unpleasant "hole into the unknown" for them, at the end of which the rat that had climbed through it was killed. After a while, not a single rat remained in paradise: one by one they all left to explore the unknown - and died. At the same time, the video recording recorded that the rats crawled along an unpleasant manhole for them, shaking with fear and literally screeching with disgust and horror at the unknown, but could not stop: they were driven forward, in this case to death, by the inexorable instinct of knowledge.

Let us agree that in humans this instinct is expressed incomparably weaker - or, at least, it is successfully suppressed by reason.

Therefore, our direct difference from the animal world is the desire for freedom, even if (like in rats with knowledge) to the detriment of ourselves: only freedom allows us to realize our rationality.

100 years ago, our revolution, destroying the ossified and dependent on external competitors class society, opened the way to freedom for the whole world. For all the fierceness of the war with the West (and the so-called "civil war" was in our country, as now in Syria, 90% war with Western intervention), the dictatorship of the proletariat was much more democratic than modern and opposing bourgeois democracies, and provided incomparably more freedom to an incomparably wider circle of people. (Liberals and monarchists foaming at the mouth deny this because they innocently do not consider people who are given freedom by socialism and even a simple striving for it).

The Anglo-Saxons managed to privatize the idea of freedom, like many other things - and, having privatized, perverted and, in fact, destroyed it: today, being "free" in the Western, liberal sense means being a maddened slave of deeply ideologized and completely denying reality bureaucrats.

And the more closely we communicate with the representatives of the “free” West, the more amazement we discover our freedom, even if constrained by numerous fetters and barriers - freedom to think, freedom to be aware, freedom to speak, freedom to act. The obstacles to our freedom are outside of us and therefore are recognized by us and are surmountable; among representatives of Western civilization, the obstacles to freedom are deep inside: they have become essential features of their personalities and therefore are not recognized and, accordingly, cannot be overcome.

When reality begins to demand that they be overcome, even under pain of death (as we saw, for example, in the migration crisis in Germany), a representative of Western civilization resolutely and consistently denies reality, reaching, as we recall, even completely sincere apologies to their own rapists.

However, the problems of the West remain his business until he attacks us, and, strictly speaking, are beneficial to us, as they improve our competitive position relative to him.

In order to realize the meaning of our own life, in order to expand the degrees of our freedom, we must first of all understand its essence. After all, freedom is not a right formally enshrined in law.

Freedom can be informal and, moreover, directly contradict the written laws. The price of the legally enshrined rights is easily seen from a comparison with the reality of the text, for example, the Constitution, be it ours or the American one.

The main thing in freedom is the reality of the opportunity to use this or that right (or refuse it, if there is a desire for that).

Indeed: what is the freedom of choice and self-expression worth when you have no job (that is, a source of livelihood and a way of self-realization), a roof over your head and housing? What is freedom of movement worth if you are knee-deep in a swamp?

What is freedom of speech worth if no one is guaranteed to hear your word, and if they do, they will not understand?

Freedom is just a surplus of infrastructure for the realization of the corresponding rights.

When, as was the case in the Soviet Union, you were given all the opportunities to get the best education in the then world, they kept your health (yes, even by force - compulsory medical examinations and intermediate medical examinations), and then provided a choice of life path - depending on your inclinations. Of course, not flawlessly, with big problems and flaws, as in any social mechanism, but the state and society were aimed precisely at this.

And the young man (and already in his mature years) had a constant choice of opportunities. He could go to the family and engage in personal affairs. He could become a specialist, or try to be a scientist, build a career in a public, party or military line. He could realize himself in blackmail or dissidence.

Of course, society supported and encouraged far from all of these opportunities and many of them were punished in one way or another, but there were much more real freedoms, real opportunities than was officially recognized.

The social catastrophe of the destruction of our country, the undermining of our civilization sharply reduced the possibilities of real choice and, accordingly, made our society much less free than the Soviet Union was, at least after Khrushchev.

However, striving for freedom and expanding our capabilities (and the crisis of the West allows us to once again become world leaders in man's eternal striving for freedom), we must remember the main thing: freedom is not rights and not declarations.

Freedom is an excess of infrastructure. And the one who does not provide himself (and ideally others) with this surplus, dooms himself and his children to slavery.