Is there no warming? Who is behind the big climate scam

2024 Author: Seth Attwood | [email protected]. Last modified: 2023-12-16 15:55

It turns out that the horror stories about global warming are only part of a big war in the energy market.

The investigation film by Leonid Mlechin "Climatgate" exposed the swindlers from science who for many years frightened us with the apocalypse. The scandal erupted after hackers posted on the Internet the correspondence of scientists from the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. It is a very influential organization that tirelessly proves that economic development and industrial growth are increasing the emission of greenhouse gases into the atmosphere, which threatens all of us with global warming. But the release of 1,000 documents exposed an overt manipulation of public opinion. Even observational data were distorted.

And it’s all right if the scary stories of environmentalists didn’t affect the politics of many countries so much. For example, at the 2015 Paris Climate Conference, politicians agreed to reduce greenhouse gas emissions to combat global warming. First of all - carbon dioxide, which is formed when burning fossil fuels. “You can't say that carbon emissions are a disaster. Do not confuse with the emission of harmful substances into the atmosphere (nitrogen, mercury, etc.). Of course, it is necessary to fight against pollution of the atmosphere, hydrosphere and land, but carbon and global warming have nothing to do with it”, - the world-renowned geophysicist, Doctor of Geological and Mineralogical Sciences, Professor Alexander Gorodnitsky is indignant.

Radical ecologists insist: the world must switch to atomic energy, use the energy of the sun and wind. But what about the fact that fossil fuels emit as much carbon dioxide into the atmosphere as rotting plants? In other words, if humanity had returned to the Stone Age, nothing would have changed.

But for some reason they are silent about the fact that renewable energy sources are expensive. Green energy companies go bankrupt. The entire industry is in desperate need of subsidies, tax breaks, etc. But the demands of state support need to be justified, so environmentalists persist in repeating their horror stories. For considerable grants.

Now imagine for a minute: how in -40 ° C in Novosibirsk a school or hospital can operate from a solar panel on the roof? Environmentalists are in no hurry to tell that hazardous substances are not released into the atmosphere during mining. Coal-fired heat and power plants with outdated equipment without modern filters are dangerous. Scientists prove that carbon dioxide emissions can be reduced to zero, and combustion products can be used in industry. Why look for an expensive replacement for gas, oil, coal, when you can simply apply the achievements of science? Or the whole point is that this will leave ecology scammers without billions?