Passion for Matilda or "what" was the hysteria of the Russian Orthodox Church? Chaplin cursed Russia !!! (video)

2024 Author: Seth Attwood | [email protected]. Last modified: 2023-12-16 15:55

So we watched the movie "Matilda".. Remembering the hysteria of the Russian Orthodox Church activists, I want to share what I took out of the cinema, at the end of the screening, and try to understand - what did the Russian Orthodox Church members dislike about this tape.. And not just not I liked it - everyone remembers the terrible obscurantist hysteria eRPetSean, caused by the Neanderthal - Pithecanthropus intellect of the followers of this sect.. But, by the way, let's analyze the essence of what is described by the story.

As I personally understood, in the course of watching, the young emperor (and the episode of his formation as a person is "exposed" in the tape) not weakly "got" under Kshesinskaya.. Like a steam locomotive.. And without options.. It was a "killer in a ballet tutu" - because of her, they shot and hanged themselves, for no reason … can partially match his condition with our hero..

"LIVE" NIKOLAI

I’ll digress for a while. I want to note - in the film, Nikolai is shown as just a young man … Yes, in general - a man and not an idol and an idol, which was first sculpted from him by Soviet historians, then by the Russian Orthodox Church, raising him to the rank of saints … In any case, no one could think about him as a person, it was either a cursed or exalted idol-world, a statue … And here we see a young guy, who, like everyone else, "plays a hormone" and is just such an age that one wants to fall in love with a young and beautiful lady.

This is the kind of Nicky that director Alexei Uchitel shows … Immediately I will note - I have a good attitude to Alexei's work, and I respect him, but in this film I did not notice any special artistic values or finds (this is my personal opinion) The film is quite popular, commercial, stereotyped, formatted - well, where can we go without it now! The only merit I think is what I outlined above - the presentation of the image of the last emperor, as a living person.

TRAILER

THE DEEP REASONS OF THE ROCOR'S OBLIGATION

Partially, the obscurantism of the Russian Orthodox Church can be explained by the fact that the blind pastors, being spiritless themselves (pseudo-spirituality), hopelessly lagged behind the constantly evolving universe (and it changes every fraction of a second) and, consequently, from the world and people. People have changed, become different, become "sighted", knowledgeable, having direct communication with God without their mediation.. People have learned to understand what is good and what is bad..

But sectarians and heretics from the Russian Orthodox Church continue to see them as a herd, which itself is not able to think (because they forbid), after all, one must blindly believe! So they care about the flock and not about people who have long been no longer sheep and rams - they are people and men! And they can recognize the essence behind those few bed scenes (without them, modern cinema about love is not a movie) which now you won’t surprise even children (if there is a question of hysteria in these scenes) In addition, the sanctimoniously hypocritically moralizing "shepherds themselves "(some of them) are no longer ashamed of their unconventional love of love (Maybe that's why they are so" poked "by the kind of true love, traditional?)

VICTORY OVER YOURSELF

Of course, you'd better see it for yourself, so I’ll say briefly and the main thing (we still have to disassemble the ROChnoe obscurantist-be-be) In general, having fallen under the childish charm of a "killer" on pointe shoes, Nikolai, in the end, still managed to make a choice. he did not in favor of passion (and there was a precedent to abdicate the throne even before accession not to him) but in favor of duty (to lead the empire, as his father bequeathed to him) his money (he is still of the august blood) And Nikolai tried to do so several times, but..

As a result, he conquered himself, conquered his passion, and this was the formation of the emperor as a person … Outwardly calm and quiet, inside it was a warrior of the spirit (who conquered himself - conquered the world) Nikolai gained strength, and with this ascended the throne, the heroic wife Alix, for whom he did not feel passion (she would not be close to compare with Kshesinskaya) and also not really love (at that time)

MOTHER

His mother helped him (her role is played by the ingenious Inga Dapkunaite) by telling him at a critical moment of choice about herself (citing as an example).. She also married not for love, but then fell in love with her husband (during her life together) and it was really a real, strong feeling, children were born, there was a happy family. And Nikolai made a choice, defeating himself, and therefore the invincible Kshesinskaya (the object of his passion)

SPIRITUAL VICTORY DOES NOT LIKE EVERYONE

So why did the ROC activists dislike the victory of Emperor Nicholas over themselves? After all, the young heir, "led into temptation" overcame this temptation (passion)! What is the problem here? Was it not victory over the passions, longed for by the holy ascetics of all times and peoples, including Christians? Was it not for this victory that they mortified their flesh in exorbitant labors, being in the desert for decades, subjecting themselves to inhuman trials..? But an ascetic is an ascetic, and an emperor is an emperor - each has his own cross, his own vocation, and in this case, the feat of the young heir to the throne (the choice made) is no less significant than the feats of the possessor of the Spirit away from the world.

THE BLIND LEADERS OF THE BLIND

Is it because the current ERPETSeans pray their egregor - ".. AND DO NOT LEAD US INTO TEMPTATION.." because they do not have the strength to overcome such a temptation? Victory is given by God, but God is not with them.. So what is the meaning of faith, if not in the victory over the passions? And why is the example of such a victory, the sectarians of the ROC anathematized and cursed? Is it because they themselves, and their weak flock, are not able to grow and advance spiritually?

These are approximately the thoughts that visited me while watching the picture and after it was finished. I repeat - I will not deliver this post with detailed analyzes of the film and the Russian Orthodox Church's obscurantism (everyone already remembers this quiet horror) with their usual Christ-loving curses and anathemas. that they have no right to burn and quarter, otherwise they would gladly, for Christ, drown half the country in blood …

But the Russian Orthodox Church … DROP THE PEOPLE AND RUSSIA !!

This is what the ever-memorable great RPTShny ghoul, his obscurantism, an incarnate demon, "about a Jew" Vsevolod Chaplin is talking about.

This is already the edge … I do not remember that Christ somewhere bequeathed to curse ALL PEOPLE !!! After all, the people are God-bearers.. And this is the Russian people! It is in the midst of this people that God dwells.. Not in temples with onions-poppies, not in fat-bellied, dark-haired, nosed, crafty priests, for sure! Not in censers and other accessories.. Where is this said in the scripture, they say, curse your people for watching a movie?

It is noteworthy that the people are cursed by the one who, on duty, is put for this people.. to pray

THE DIAVOL ITSELF, with the filthy lips of Chaplin, in his powerlessness CONDENES RUSSIA, its PEOPLE! (video below) And I think that the people will respond with their sharp rejection and overthrow of this parasite on their bodies - the ROC

Now I understand those who, in 1917, "dropped" crosses and blew up godless temples, destroying such Chaplins.. However, listen to yourself.. The blood in your veins is getting cold - the Devil himself says through the lips of "that Jew"

In fact, nothing will happen, and it cannot happen … If only with Chaplin himself … Because he said terrible words, but they do not have the power … They will have a reciprocal force - when his curse (quite rightly) falls on him himself, and his associates.

MARASMUS

The insanity of the situation is that Chaplin himself never saw Nicholas and did not live at that time. He read something somewhere, and made some conclusions for himself. I also read something somewhere, and made a little different conclusions. I don’t consider Nicholas a saint (although I respect him very much) I don’t think that he and his family were shot.. I am sure that everyone has their own opinion about this person, but that’s not the point..

HOW AR YOU, MISTER CHAPLIN? (not a comedian, exactly)

We all have different points of view about Nicholas, but we do not curse each other for this, that is the question! Because we are people … but who is Chaplin, this is the question.

QUESTION TO PUTEN

My friends, I am sure that even a madman would not think to curse those who watch a movie that he does not like (!!!) I would ask Putin - why are we being cursed by the clergy, WHO SHOULD PRAY FOR US? Which parasitize on the body of society! And they curse (!!!) that we watch a movie that they don't like? Isn't it time to arrange certification (for compliance with the positions held) and purge the ranks of this institution?

Here are my prophetic words - his curse will fall on Chaplin (the "return" will roll back) - you will soon see how something terrible will happen to Chaplin (in the near future), remember my words! (I saw.. something of the type - it will rot while alive, but cannot die..)

WHO DOES CHAPLIN CURSE?

Here the situation (for Chaplin) is very deplorable.. In his feeble mind, he cursed.. God Himself !!! And it's scary.. I think that Judas Iscariot (or his equivalent) is nervously smoking on the sidelines.. The mechanism is as follows.. Chaplin cursed people, those who do not know about the ROC and its obscurantism, and mostly young people (those who watches films) but this is the future of the nation.. Young, bright and pure, good and kind, having high hopes - God dwells in their pure souls..

ENVIRONMENT AND RESPONSE

And this is a part of the surrounding (in this case Chaplin) environment.. Each of us is surrounded by the "environment" with which we interact in one way or another.. It (matter in its various states) includes people, whether distant or near to us.. We interact with the environment, and the environment reacts to our actions in one way or another.. One of the main meanings of our life is to learn how to interact with the environment in such a way as to get the most useful from it for both for environment) response.

MORAL

Morality is not an emotional concept (this is not morality or aesthetics), but very, very pragmatic. Morality is knowledge, foreseeing the reaction of the environment to our actions, in the long term (eternal life) After all, if you know that you live forever, and that the environment reacts symmetrically on our impact, then a reasonable person will analyze, assuming the response actions of the environment, and a more careful approach to the choice, introduction of certain changes in the environment.

For a moral person, such a motto as "Take everything from life" is not relevant. Rather ours, Russian - "Happy is the one who takes a little" You will think a hundred times before doing something negative, because the environment will return the result of interaction, but it is unknown how and when.. It's like at night, in the dark, to bury anti-personnel mines on the field, and during the day to go for a walk in this very field, not knowing where you buried them in the darkness at night.

MEDIUM REACTION

The way Chaplin interacts with the environment is the height of ignorance, immorality and irresponsibility, even in relation to oneself. It will take some time, and the environment (and this is a part of God incomprehensible to us) will process Chaplin's message, and accordingly will symmetrically react to his interaction, having formed a response message. After all, Chaplin is also in research mode, interacting with the environment - this is how it (the environment) perceives it. Therefore, he will send a response corresponding to his request.

Wednesday will consider this as a request (Chaplin's) to study the nature of the response (to his interaction) reaction … Therefore, she will send him with love, as a courageous researcher, who in such an original way accumulates his experience (in the eternal life of the soul) of interaction with her.

CHAPLIN "DID NOT TREND"

The fact is that the demon of pharisaism (an ancient energy-informational essence) living in the egregor of Christianity, now suffers from complete seams (lack of the necessary recharge) and therefore he pulls his adepts (Chaplins) on the subject of "what a stsukin child, where is the food?" After all, Chaplin curses, in the name of God, relying on the power of the egregor (Chaplin's god is an egregorial energy-informational god - a demon). So Chaplin didn’t really get into (the author’s word) with his method of interaction.

NOW THE EPOCH OF OPEN COMMUNICATION OF GOD, YOUTH IS BORN WITH DIRECT COMMUNICATION CHANNELS (WITHOUT INTERMEDIARIES) AND POPA (servants of a parasitic intermediary structure) NO ONE NEEDS ANYONE, EXCEPT the dense and obscurant STARPERS dead) and here is pure physics

Yes, there is pure physics and no religious lyrics … It's like a type, to accelerate and bang your head against a concrete wall with a run - also research, interaction with the wall, for its reaction, also the experience gained … Well, okay, I'll say goodbye - my life, like you are in heaven, pack-packs, like Vima's dick.. Amen.

WATCH MOVIES here (screen copy, but quite passable)