What do the letters mean? 1. Methodology. Comparative analysis

2024 Author: Seth Attwood | [email protected]. Last modified: 2023-12-16 15:55

Now that we start to have values that we are sure of, we can use them as crutches to find other values. To do this, we can take two similar words that differ in one or a pair of letters, and compare both variants of their meanings. That is, first compare the meanings of these two objects, and then compare the meanings of the letters of which they are composed. Or vice versa. Sounds like math equations, right?

For example, the ideal pair is "table" and "chair". In terms of their functions and meanings, both objects are simple, like felt boots. What do they have in common and what is the difference? Both have "C". Both are composed of something. Both are relatively "Hard", let's skip. The table, as we remember, is an "Image", that is, it can take absolutely any guise, as long as something can be placed on it. And the chair, does it have many options? No. The chair is a specific example of the general range of furniture items that can be seated. And there are plenty of them. Armchair, sofa, bench, bench and others. If you want, you can sit on the table, but it won't become a chair. That is, a chair is a strictly defined object. It is not an image. However, we assumed this anyway, since there is no letter “O” in the “chair”. The chair is not an "image", the chair is something else, and in this way it differs from the table.

Both are receptacles. Only the table can hold objects, and the chair can hold us. Yes, you can put objects on a chair too, and it won't stop being a chair. But it is designed specifically for the seat. Very good, got the point. A table for placing objects, a chair for sitting. Only someone animated can sit. An object cannot be animate. Hence, a table for objects, a chair for animate ones. And how do animate ones differ from objects? A stupid question, of course, but let's answer it seriously. Objects do not run, do not jump, do not have fun, do not enjoy life, they lie and do nothing. They are incapable of doing anything. They do not have the will and consciousness for this, capable of applying this will. The stone can fly, but this can only happen by the will of someone else's consciousness from the outside. Only if the fisherman Vasya decides to show his prowess and throw him wherever he wants. And the fisherman Vasya can do whatever he wants, for this he has both consciousness and will. What if the fisherman Vasya wants to sit down? He can sit on a tree stump, can't he? Quite. But the stump was not created in order to sit on it, the stump is not intended for this. What is meant? Chair, armchair, sofa, bench. All this is good, but tell me, which of these wonderful items appeared before everyone else? That's right, logic dictates that the chair. But how can a sensible fisherman Vasya show that THIS is a chair and can sit on it? We need to point this out to him! Chair - indicates a seating position. "U" is an indication.

We can say that far-fetched, although everything is logical. Can. So you need to check.

"Jester" … Let's omit the meaning of the letter "T", it doesn't matter here, and we don't know it, why worry about it. But we are confident in the letter "W", this is a variety. The jester is varied and colorful, this is his essence. What else does the jester do? He jokes, plays pranks, annoys, behaves defiantly. He does all this, and all this is his function, that is why he is called that. If something purposefully attracts attention, then in relation to other people, observers, it points to itself. Fits? And how.

« Mouth" … It looks like we have favorite words. The lips are connected and separated, sounds come out of them, they beckon with desire. Tell me, do they not attract attention? Yes, they were created for this! In the synonym "lips", we, even without knowing any other letter, can already safely say: they point to themselves. How to drink to give!

"Emptiness". Come on! Emptiness cannot be shown, that is true. Either there is nothing at all, or there is still something, and then it is no longer emptiness. But emptiness is also relative when there is no specific object. You can point to this emptiness. It is possible and necessary. Without indicating an empty space, one cannot say that something is not there. Without indicating emptiness, emptiness does not exist. Need the letter "U"? Needed, in no way without her.

"Bite" … Connection indication. Much more specific.

If you look at the ancient texts and the same church initial letter, there is no letter "U", but there is "Uk" and "Oak". Yes, this is more correct, but at the moment it is more important for us to understand the meaning of the method, the full meaning can wait for now.

© Dmitry Lyutin. 2017.