What do the letters mean? 3. Consistency. "Tsul" and "Wholeness"

2024 Author: Seth Attwood | [email protected]. Last modified: 2023-12-16 15:55

We asked ourselves a serious question in the last topic. You can't answer it right away, you need to think about it. In the meantime, there is sawdust in our head, let's do something simpler for now. For example, let's reveal the meaning of the letter "Ts", which is much easier.

After a moment's reflection, only two words with the letter "C" come to mind, having a global and at the same time concrete meaning: "Purpose" and "Wholeness". After a second minute of reflection, you suddenly realize that words are not just one root and originate from each other, they are connected by a single meaning. Everything that in a global sense exists and has a name in this world is whole, otherwise it does not exist in the form to which it is attached by its name … A table is a table, as long as it is intact, a broken table will not be able to perform its functions, which means that it will no longer be a table. Mug - there is a whole mug, if the mug is broken, it is not a mug. Instead, there is "shard_mug_1", "sediment_mug_2" and so on. The fragments of the mug are not able to perform the functions of the mug itself.

If we take one of the legs from the table, will it continue to be a table? If he can then maintain balance, why not, because he will continue to contain objects. If we saw off a piece from the surface of the table, it will still continue to be a table, albeit a smaller one. It will cease to be the same, but it will remain a whole table. We make a knot for memory, integrity is the ability of an object to perform its functions to the fullest.

But an egg appeared on the table. It serves for the storage, development and growth of a small living creature. This is its meaning. As soon as the need for an intact egg disappears, a living creature breaks it from the inside or outside. The shell collapses, the egg loses intact, forever. It will never be an egg again, even if you glue it together. It fulfilled its purpose and collapsed.

It's easier with a table. If you break it, you won't be able to put anything on it, it will cease to be a table. However, from its parts, we can assemble it again, and it will again become a table, it will again be able to perform its functions. And here's a million-dollar question for you: will it be the same table or a different one? Come on!

Let's solve a difficult problem together.

The table will clearly not be the same, even if it is assembled from the same parts as the previous one. Something will change in it anyway: the scratch is here, the screw is not there, the tablecloth is torn. Okay. So this is a different table. Yah? What part of it has he become different, has he ceased to be a connection? Stopped holding objects? No, it's the same. Some nonsense. The table has clearly changed and at the same time has not changed at all. And here the question arises in a completely different way: what the hell is a “table”? Indeed, we have been fighting for the third chapter in a row and cannot understand what it is, what does the word "table" mean? What is the concept of "table" in relation to the object that it denotes? Name, name, something else?

It is unlikely that "table" is the name of an object. If we give the table in the kitchen the name "Dima", and the table in the living room the name "Masha", we can remember them, we can distinguish them. With these names, we will single out them from the total number of others, perhaps exactly the same tables. These tables will become special for us thanks to the names "Dima" and "Masha", but because of this they will not cease to be tables, and their purpose will remain as it was: to stand and contain.

About 12 years ago I came across a book with a bright title "Book for Heroes" by Vladimir Tarasov. It was quite popular in our circles, and it was simply impossible not to read it. In it, I came across a very simple and ingenious thought: "The meaning of existence lies beyond this very existence."That is, you cannot independently assess your own life in a global sense. You cannot, being in a box, know what this box is intended for. Only the one who created the box and uses it knows its meaning and why it is needed. Only an outside observer can determine the meaning and purpose of an object in the process of close "relationship" with it.

Who is the outside observer for the table? We. We and only we assign to objects their duties and functions, determine the meaning of their existence, and for this we name them accordingly. We sat down in a clearing, laid out a kerchief, put a loaf with a can of condensed milk on it, and, calling the "structure" a "table," began to eat. And try to argue that this is not a table. Accommodates? Certainly! The tablecloth lies on the grass, lies and connects. The body formed a container as a tablecloth. Table! How to drink to give, table!

When we create a table, we do it in order to place objects on it, and therefore we call it a "table". It will contain objects, this is its function, it was laid even at the stage of "design". When we create a chair, we do it in order to indicate a place where we can put ourselves, and therefore we call this object "chair". The chair will tell us where to sit, this is its function. It's like that. What is the logical conclusion from these two simple sentences? Can't keep up? =)

Again.

"Stol" - "Connection (WITH) body (T) forms (O) receptacle (L)". What's this? The "table" is a function of the object. This is his purpose. To be connected, to be a body and through this to contain objects.

"Chair" - "Connection (WITH) body (T) points to (Ooh) receptacle (L)". What's this? “Chair” is the function of an object, its purpose, this is why it was created. To be connected, to be the body, and to point to the receptacle.

We create items for specific needs and name them accordingly, so that it is clear what they do and why they were created. This is absolutely healthy and correct logic. This is not from constantly impending amnesia, this is not for us, this is for posterity, so that when they are born, they already know that:

Saw - saws. The roof closes. Banner - tightens. And the spoon, God forgive me, lays down.

Among simple household items, there are dozens of explicit examples, implicit (those for which the purpose is revealed only with knowledge of the meanings of letters) - hundreds. And all of them were created and named as they are named, with only one purpose: to fulfill the duty assigned to them and fulfill the purpose indicated in their name.

"Bit" - "Affection (D) forms (O) receptacle (L); forms (O) body (T); image (O)". A chisel is a chiseling tool for those not in the know. Chiseling is the process of making grooves, slots, or holes for some further practical purpose. That is, it is obvious that these "holes" will be used as a receptacle for something, for this they are made, that is why they are called so. The purpose of the chisel is to form (O) receptacles (L) with the help of action (D), which subsequently form (O) bodies (T). And as long as the chisel exists and it can be called a chisel, it will fulfill its purpose, inherent in the name of its creator - to form containers for future bodies.

"Paul" - "Persistence (P) forms (O) receptacle (L); created (B)". The floor is a permanent image of the receptacle in which everything in the house is located. This is its purpose: to constantly contain, to place objects on itself. And while something is standing on it, lying or lying around, it can be called a floor, because it performs the function assigned to it by its creator: to constantly contain.

We were scouring all day in the workshop, and then we hung the structure on the wall and called it a shelf, why? Because we attached a semblance of a floor to the wall, now there is a “floor” on the wall, a permanent container, and you can put something in it. This is the purpose of the shelf: to constantly be on the wall and place everything that is put on its surface.

Let's go back to our letter "C". She's probably already tired of waiting while we're discussing her here. What were we talking about there? Oh yes, integrity is the ability to perform their functions to the fullest.

Okay. There is something wrong with the boy Misha, he does not do his homework, he does not run down the street, does not play pranks, and, in general, looks pale. Misha fell ill, he was no longer healthy. He lost his functionality and the ability to fully be a little boy: run, jump, harm, eat too much and what else little boys are supposed to do. Misha is no longer whole. To make something whole again, you need to fix it. For Misha to become whole, he needs to recover. What is done to a person when he is sick? That's right, he is being cured, healed, healed, made whole. That is why healers exist: to return broken people back to their integrity. How great is everything in our language, right? Has ceased to be whole, come on, heal.

Fine. Misha recovered, healed. Now it’s time to get started again. To study diligently, to grow in moderation, to work for the good of oneself and the Motherland, to help loved ones and not so much, in general, to be a healthy person again, capable of performing their functions. Misha worked, he was happy with life, and then he took it and fell in love with the girl Masha. Well, this is a simple matter, it happens to everyone. Misha does not understand that this is happening to him, because a month ago no strange sensations arose, but here he does not find a place for himself, he became restless, reacts to everything differently and feels differently. But you and I know that the boy Misha just wants to be with the shy Masha everywhere and, if possible, forever. He developed an irresistible desire to be near the object of adoration. The need to become and be one with this person. But he himself is not one of the most daring ten, but for the first time he does not even know what to do, and this contradiction tears him apart from the inside. And the mood is at zero, and the birds get bored, and the sun is hot. But the boy Misha is unable to endure any longer, plucking up courage and saying to himself: "Whatever happens," without a word he comes up to Masha and kisses her … Misha kisses Masha. Kisses! Becomes one with her. And the girl Masha is frightened, blushes, but she is already happy too, she, too, has become one with the boy Misha. And then the birds are chirping, and the sun is brighter, and the sea is knee-deep, and the world becomes different. How beautifully and precisely our language is complex, isn't it?

The boy Misha recovered and matured, passed the A-grade exams and received a diploma. Now Mikhail is looking for a job to match his knowledge, skills and wishes. The girl Maria supports him in all endeavors, advises and helps in finding work. Not agree to a small salary, find a good team with a warm atmosphere, so that it is not far from home, so that the boss is not harmful, and so on. Mikhail wants to find a good job, and he has no plans to give up on the way to it. He set himself such a goal. And this goal motivates Michael, his every act, every thought. The target has captured him and cannot be delayed. He views everything in his life through the prism of achieving the goal - to become one with the work that he is looking for.

Have you noticed that in previous cases, when Misha fell ill and fell in love, everything was exactly the same? Life presents him with tasks, and Mikhail becomes restless, becomes obsessed, as if he has lost something. From that moment on, he ceases to feel whole. And he begins to look for that part of himself that is missing, that part with which he needs to unite in order to find his whole again. And when he finds, this part that he was looking for becomes his own part, a part of his own life. For this purpose he becomes a single whole. And our language directly indicates to him the ways of solving problems, the ways to achieve vital goals. Sick - heal, fell in love - kiss, set a goal - achieve it, become one with it.

Become one with the desired part, connect with it. Become happy, because: "Happiness" - Connection (WITH) With " part »

Do you still think that our language is great and mighty?

© Dmitry Lyutin. 2017.