New Earth is really new

2024 Author: Seth Attwood | [email protected]. Last modified: 2023-12-16 15:55

Alexandra Lorenz examines the evidence of global cataclysms, which, according to her version, were not so long ago and, among other things, were the main reason for the death of Great Tartary. Even official science cannot postpone some anomalous natural phenomena for thousands of years.

The presented facts confirm the supposed model of events of the recent past, which Alexey Kungurov and Alexey Artemiev offer in their video lectures and articles.

New Earth is really new! Material from the site Novaya Zemlya is really new! Material from the site

New Earth is really new

If you happen to visit the shores of the Arctic Ocean, you will definitely feel it.

And let the leaden clouds hang, and the sea bristles with formidable shafts - here you can breathe easily and freely. It is not in vain that migratory birds return here and fish swim, this is their homeland. Theirs and ours.

When I walked on the fine golden sand of the vast Kara beaches, looked at the steep shores, marveled at the sea water transparent like a tear, the feeling that I was at home did not leave me. This inhospitable land keeps traces of a recent catastrophe, the one that destroyed Great Tartary - the homeland of our ancestors.

In the Arctic, as in a large refrigerator, all artifacts and traces are perfectly preserved. And it is no coincidence that almost no excavations and research are conducted here - scientists have a great chance to turn the whole history and natural science as a result of such expeditions. For example, here are the remains of the grave of De Long, an American explorer who ventured to the Arctic:

You see perfectly preserved boards and beams, although more than 130 years have passed. However, millions of years and even thousands are hard to believe. On the shores of the Arctic Ocean, poaching is flourishing in our time - the extraction of mammoth tusks. They stick right out of the ground!

A kilogram of a mammoth bone costs about 800 euros right in the Arctic, and if you take it out, then 4-5 thousand. The tusk weighs so much that a strong man can hardly lift it.

Everyone knows that mammoths are found in the permafrost and even dogs are fed with them.

Scientists shy away from a direct answer to the question - "How could mammoths survive even 9 thousand years?" But there is an even more unpleasant question for them - "How could it happen that the huge carcasses of mammoths were frozen instantly?" Any housewife knows that it is difficult to freeze large amounts of meat. You need a powerful freezer, otherwise the carcass will simply deteriorate. And if the carcass weighs several tons?

Obviously, the mammoths were frozen instantly, along with the grass in their stomachs and the mammoths in their womb. Moreover, in the American Arctic, these animals were torn to pieces, their bones were broken. Like a giant vacuum bomb exploded.

Until recently, there was a country - the Ivory Coast, then it was renamed into Cote d'Ivoire. From there, simply colossal quantities of ivory were exported. Did you also believe in the story that elephants from all over Africa went here to die?

There are traces of a great catastrophe everywhere, you just need to be able to see them.

Famous Sannikov Land - New Siberian Islands.

It's about. Bouhor Haya.

Dumbfounded takes. Giant water shafts crushed the rocks and instantly froze. Scientists again find it difficult to explain how this ice formed. Almost no research has been carried out, although it would seem that ancient ice deposits are a treasure trove for science! There are no answers to many questions. Why does the ice lie in two thick layers, measured in tens of meters? Why is the first layer clearly of marine origin, and the second of fresh water? Why is the upper layer saturated with air bubbles, while the lower one is almost nonexistent? And how did it happen that there is a decent layer of soil between the layers and at the top? Where is the meter, and where up to ten.

There are other more abrupt questions. For example, on about. New Siberia has such a cape - the Cliff of the Wooden Mountains. A strange name, isn't it?

Now there are no wooden mountains there, only sticks stick out from the layers between the ice, but in 1810 Matvey Gedenshtrom found them:

(32 - 64 m) 26.7 km

Where did the "resinous" trees come from on the islands of the Arctic Ocean, where even the tundra does not grow ?!

Here you should tire the reader with two quotes:

This is in case someone starts to say that these wooden mountains have lain for 9 thousand years, and over the past 100 years they have been washed away.

One might think that the Russian traveler Matvey Matveyevich Gedenshtrom has hallucinations, but this fact is confirmed by the Brockhaus and Efron Encyclopedic Dictionary. Matvey Matveyevich, in his travel notes from 1808-11, specifies:

Please pay attention to "hardened coals into stone". Their presence among fresh logs in fluff scatters the whole theory of the formation of coal. But it explains the numerous finds of the most incredible objects in the seams of coal. Coal is formed not for millions of years, but much faster.

It's the same with fossils. A friend of mine brought back a piece of petrified wood from Egypt. "There are a lot of them on the Sahara!" - he asserts. The churochka is clearly cut off with a saw, the cut and annual rings are visible. There seems to be amber in the cracks. Either there were hacksaws tens of thousands of years ago, or the tree turns to stone much faster.

Scientists are trying to explain the presence of "relic" ice on the New Siberian Islands by the Great Glaciation. But the presence of two layers of ice and, in particular, an interlayer between them and a cover from above on the New Siberian Islands, does not fit into this concept. If the ice was formed as a result of global cooling and formed an ice sheet, like the Greenland one, then how could soil or a cultural layer have formed on it during such a cold period? Let it plunged into the depths of the sea, but before it would have been swept in by meter-thick sediments, it would inevitably melt. After all, About the rate of accumulation of precipitation at the bottom of the ocean

And on the New Siberian Islands we have layers measured in meters!

It is also impossible to explain the presence of the upper layer of soil on the ice. Only a catastrophe could create such a miracle: a huge sea wave washed away the entire biosphere of Eastern and Western Siberia into the Arctic Ocean, and a sharp drop in temperature instantly froze the water, trees uprooted, and killed animals.

Then something incredible happened - part of the planet was covered with soil. Perhaps a hurricane of terrible force tore off the top layer of the earth from the northern part of Eurasia and covered the entire Northern Hemisphere with a train. Here is an explanation for the buried houses, lost civilizations, destroyed trees, which I already wrote about in the article "Ancient civilizations were covered with sand."

The biggest mistake of katstrophists is that they try to explain everything by one event. And on the example of the New Siberian Islands, we see that there were at least two disasters. There is another layer of ice of the same thickness. And it is with air bubbles, and obviously of fresh origin.

I think they were terrible showers. Modern people cannot even imagine such an amount of water in the form of precipitation. I once had a chance to witness a grandiose rain, when in a few minutes the soil was washed away from the whole area, completely, with the harvest. Bare sand remained. Lilo is not like a bucket, but like a waterfall. The fertile layer filled all the lowlands, ditches, ditches.

If this is increased thousands of times, it will be a global water catastrophe. Let's take a look at the Putorana Plateau.

You can see that a pitiful trickle has cut a cycloscopic canyon up to 2 thousand meters deep.

Someone tried to prove to me that such rivers could cut rocks for millions of years. No, they couldn't! Before our eyes, the climate, water balance, precipitation, average annual temperatures are changing. Rivers and marshes dry up, deserts form, whole seas disappear. Conditions in Eastern Siberia could not be unchanged for such long periods.

For some reason, in the case of Mars, scientists admit that giant erosion on the planet could have formed only as a result of the terrible force of streams (I already wrote about this in the article "Mars: a catastrophe that was not noticed").

However, in the case of the Earth, this possibility is completely rejected.

Perhaps the second catastrophe did not occur immediately, but decades later. Perhaps our ancestors knew about her and tried to prepare. Here is the Zmievy Ramparts along the river valleys.

Here is the Crimean shaft, which blocked the Crimean Isthmus from mudflows and the same shaft that separates the Kerch Peninsula.

Here is the answer to the unusual name - "New Earth". The fact is that the name of this island is difficult to explain by the fact that the Pomors who were engaged in sea fishing suddenly saw the outlines of an unknown island. Travelers always discovered new lands and found much more suitable names for them. And our ancestors living in the Golden Age used to call things by their proper names.

Here is the New Earth, after all, it is said - new!

Pay attention to old maps:

I have always been confused by the absence of the eastern shore of this vast island. They explained to us that this fact is explained by the presence of ice in the Kara Sea and the inaccessibility of the coast for research.

However, we see how carefully the western coast of the Arctic archipelago is drawn. Didn't the sailors make it to the opposite side? It is known that the Kara Sea in summer is never completely clogged with ice so that there is no way to get to the eastern coast of the NZ. Detailed mapping of the shores of not only the Kara Sea, but also of the more distant Arctic seas confirms that in ancient times sailors had access to these areas.

So what happened to the east bank of the NZ?

And he simply did not exist!

It can be seen from the diagram that there is a fault along the western edge of the NZ, and a depression on the eastern edge.

And here are the tilted layers.

The entire bowl of the Kara Sea near the confluence of the Ob is filled with organic sediments, and it is not in vain that gas is being extracted there. That is, as a result of the catastrophe, a huge mass of land, including soils, vegetation, fauna, the entire biosphere was washed away through the Ob and Yenisei basins, and other West Siberian rivers into the Kara Sea. The earth's crust in this area caved in and cracked. A rift formed, the plate turned and Novaya Zemlya rose from the depths.

The eastern part of the new archipelago was pressed by a mass of demolished soil. These were solid swamps, it was not possible to determine the coastline.

Over time, the eastern trough increased and a mass of mud slid into the sea. A low-lying coast was formed. Notice how black the NC is.

These are the ancient, fossilized remains of the Arctic continent Hyperborea, or as its real inhabitants called it there. But it is even more surprising that the NZ is covered with black earth. It's in the Arctic! Of course, this is no longer the black soil in which plants can be planted, living humus has been completely destroyed by the severe Arctic frosts. But this is black land!

And what is there to be surprised. Let's take a look at a fragment of Fra Mauro's map of 1459 (here and everywhere I warn you - there are no official dates) - the northern part of Eurasia, Great Tartary is a blooming land! (The map is traditionally inverted for that time - south from below) Rich cities, forests, rivers, wonderful climate.

It is no coincidence that paleontologists find the bones of tropical animals in Siberia. True, all this traditionally refers to millions of years. So calmer. Who cares that it was so long ago?

But science itself claims the opposite. Not historical, of course. For example, a forensics textbook says:

It is high time for the stories to begin to reconcile their findings with related sciences. Many of their conclusions cause amicable laughter in the ranks of specialists from other fields. Likewise, lawyers in their forums laugh at the "millennial" finds of archaeologists and paleontologists. They already know a lot about skeletons, they constantly exhume them.

I was recently amused by an article about the discovery of mammoth bones at the bottom of the Volga. Here you can’t say that the skeletons were stored in ideal conditions and therefore did not undergo decomposition. At the bottom of the river, any bones would quickly decompose.

But back to Great Tartary. Usually, talking about this grandiose country, the main question is bypassed - what destroyed such a powerful country? Why did she lose in the battle of Muscovy and split into provinces? Why was she mercilessly betrayed by her own areas, called in the past chords?

(Here I insist on the usual reading of this word for old maps - chord. Khord, not horde. From the word hor-circle, not horde-order.)

Undoubtedly, the fall of VT occurred due to the terrible catastrophe that befell it. In the annals they write that at a certain period "the horde was starving." They wrote about the "hordes" from Siberia, which appeared on the territory of Russia only in order to sow them with millet. So it is in the Ambassador's Book on Russia's relations with the Nogai Horde in 1557-1561. it was said:

The official history does not explain the reasons for the Great Nations Migration. But any sane person understands that more than serious reasons are needed in order to break away from their habitable place and for all the people to go to foreign lands. Gumilyov's version of a hundred-year drought is not supported by climatic history. There can be only one answer - a chain of global catastrophes killed the people who remained on the territory of VT, and made the conditions unbearable for a handful of survivors.

It's even hard to imagine what kind of situation our ancestors got into. A giant wave washed away everything, the once rich fertile country turned into a swampy desert, without soil, without trees, without animals. Long-term cold weather set in, endless winter. Perpetual twilight due to airborne dust. The sharp drop in pressure made breathing very difficult and made it impossible for the giants, those large people who used to coexist with the rest. The constant falling of solid precipitation covered everything around, so the ruins of cities turned into "underground passages".

It was during this period that mankind was forced to switch to eating fish and meat. In addition, degraded plants no longer provided the weakened organism with the necessary set of substances. The survivors left the country in waves. Rare daredevils and groups tried to establish life in new conditions. They were separated by enormous distances, the absence of roads. Shelters had to be built from the corpses of animals: tusks and bones of mammoths, their skins. Clothes - also made of skins and sinews.

Some areas were less affected. But deprived of the center, knowing that most of the BT residents had died, they continued to exist autonomously, trying to preserve the principles on which the BT was built, its culture and achievements. This is how the bloodless Tartary Independent survived in Central Asia, Katay in the Far East, Natolia in Asia Minor and other regions.

But this is already a topic for a large study. And the purpose of this study is not to prove the facts of distortion of history and concealment of the truth, but to find the reasons that prompted certain forces in the past to organize a global falsification of the past. These reasons will show us the way for the further development of mankind. Not the path of degradation, crises and the destruction of everything human, but the path to happiness for everyone and all together - the desired path along which we had to go.

Alexandra Lorenz