About the "New Year" and other jokes of the two-headed heraldic power. Searching for the truth with readers

2024 Author: Seth Attwood | [email protected]. Last modified: 2023-12-16 15:55

They wrote to me: Hello, Anton! Here you write: "On the 8th day, the Jews circumcised Christ (born on December 25 according to the solar calendar), it turned out exactly on January 1, and Tsar Peter I said to the Gentile Slavs:" Happy New Years to all of you and New God! ", and commanded to celebrate this calendar date as a great holiday.

Then you have: "The irony and sarcasm of the non-Russian tsar of all Russia was that he invented a new phrase - he combined the Russian word NEW with english word God, and it sounds like - "HAPPY NEW YEAR", but in terms of meaning - "WITH A NEW GOD" - Jewish SAVIOR!

This is probably not you who came up with all this! Because such a story has long been circulating "about the introduction by Peter I of the word YEAR". What is it based on, except for the coincidence in the sound of the English word God and Russian Year? Are there not enough homonyms (words with the same sound, but different meanings) even in one language?

Take the trouble, Anton, to read this article from etymological dictionary of the Russian language for 1989:

You are a writer, so you have to work professionally with the language! So explain now why did you decidewhat a russian word Yearoriginated from english God?

In addition, we know that the root "summer" is still preserved in modern Russian and is very actively used. And the words, for example, "good, good, good" - are they also borrowed from English, in your opinion?

It seems to me that to consider the word "Year" borrowed from English is overkill and even just nonsense! Although I agree with you in assessing the activities of Peter I. Only if in our generally truthful reasoning there will be complete nonsense and even serve as one of the weighty arguments, then such reasoning will not be perceived by many people. Maybe that's why they are imposing such tales on us? They muddy the water, devils. Or not, what do you think?

You know more, so explain it to me and the people! Either agree with me or, conversely, refute your own mistake.

Sincerely, Alexander.

Hello, Alexadr! There is good wisdom that reflects our reality: "Russian man with a hind mind krѣpok". Here you gave me a whole dictionary entry, but tell me, in 1700 or in the summer of 7208 from the SMZH (which was at that time) there were such etymological dictionaries? I mean the time when Peter the Great came up with the "New Year", and even with a CAPITAL LETTER? It was with a capital letter that they wrote it, like a word God, For example. Now, by the way, they write with small or use all capital letters. But that's not the point. The main thing is that Peter I introduced the NEW YEAR on the 8th day after the "Nativity of Christ", which was scheduled for December 25, respectively, on January 1, there was another Jewish event - "CIRCUMULATION OF THE LORD".

All this, of course, is a number of speculative deeds performed in ink on paper, but, nevertheless, according to legend, Christ was born on December 25, exactly on the "Christmas of the Sun" according to the mythology of the Slavs. On the 8th day he was circumcised and made By the Lord servants of God. It turned out on January 1. And woo-a-la - get the citizens of Russia a NEW GOD - the Jewish SAVIOR!

So, what do you personally dislike? The logic here is iron! And the word "godina", by the way, in Ukrainian means - hour.

Alexander: Well, here I am saying that this looks like an incorrect conceptual construction, that Year = God = God … Godin is the hour, I know! Here, in Belarus, it is the same. But this is again a time interval with the root "year". This is written in the dictionary entry that I have provided. The fact that the Year began to be written with a capital letter does not prove anything, all the names of the holidays are written with a capital letter. Why inflate an elephant out of a fly? I do not want to argue with you, but you somehow close your eyes to the information from the dictionary, do not refute them. And it would be interesting to hear a refutation if you are so sure that Year - from God.

The dictionary shows that the root "year" with temporal meanings is found in many Slavic languages. And here's another interesting meaning from Dahl's dictionary:

That is, the word "sometimes" did not appear earlier than the 18th century, in your opinion?

And is there even one more example when a borrowed word would have grown so much into the Russian language, became so popular, would have formed so many new words?

If you open Dahl's dictionary, there are a lot of proverbs and sayings with the word "year". Can't they all be more ancient than the expression "New Year"?

Regarding the coincidence of the New Year with the "circumcision of the Lord", I do not argue, as well as about the Julian and Gregorian calendars in general: this is some kind of ingenious fruit of the joint activity of the Catholic Church and Roman Hebrew (op) astronomers, whose goal is to Christianize (enslavement) of peoples.

Anton Blagin: You did not understand me, Alexander. Why should I refute the etymological dictionary, if it was written, most likely to justify what Peter the Great has already done ?! It’s like a negligent schoolboy juggling a surreptitious answer to solving a difficult problem. Moreover, what does the word have to do with "sometimes", pronounced in the old days by Russians as "year" or "year", to the calendar word "year" ? These are ononyms that you yourself mentioned. And there are many such words.

Alexander: I still think that the word "year" is a Russian word, including in the calendar sense, acting as a synonym for the word "summer". It is difficult for me to find only confirmation of this in the form of a concrete example from pre-Petrine literature. I think rather a word God originated from Russian Year … In this I believe more. After all, English was developed by scribes, what do you think?

Anton Blagin: I am completely unaware of who developed the English language. Maybe scribes too. And German and Dutch, with their word Gott - GodHow do you like it? And again, what is this joke? They have there in the West the meaning of our "New Year" - voiced and written in Latin as "New Yar", and Yar is a short spelling of the word "Yarilo", that is, the sun. Why is it not taken into account by you at all? But Yarilo is the deity of the Slavs! It turns out that the West accepted and still preserves in European languages our Deity - Yarilu, and through Peter I another God was lent to us - a Jewish Savior with an invented birthday on December 25, exactly like Yaril's!

App for comprehension:

Alexander: Why don't I take this into account? Very much even taken into account! I agree with it.

* * *

Another interesting dialogue I had on the same day with another reader who was impressed by my article "Initially, the temple domes served as money-givers for the" spirit of the Holy. "For a long time, atmospheric electricity was considered such!":

In that article, I gave a number of curious facts about architectural design. Orthodox churches … In particular, I talked about the domes of Orthodox churches and explained why the temples of Christ have, as a rule, golden domes, the temples of the Mother of God have a dark blue coloring of the domes and are decorated with large stars, like a New Year tree, churches to the glory of the Holy Spirit have the color of the outer walls light green, and the domes on the temples of the Intercession of the Virgin are painted in niello.

Reader Sergei wrote to me: "My father is in the past the rector of the temple (he served for 15 years), I will ask him about the domes right now! … Black is the essence of absorption, decay. I have not seen the black decoration of temples … any, (except for undercults!)."

Anton Blagin: I would not write anything if only one Church of the Intercession of the Virgin had black domes. This could be considered an accident. However, no, I saw black domes near many temples with the name "Protection of the Virgin"!

For example, the Old Believers' Church of the Intercession of the Most Holy Theotokos is in Kazan. The domes, as we can see, are black.

This is the Vladimir region, the village of Bogolyubovo. Before you is an architectural monument of the XII century, the Church of the Intercession on the Nerl River. The dome is also black.

Here is the Church of the Intercession of the Virgin in Izmailovo (Moscow). The domes are black!

Here is the Orthodox Church of the Intercession of the Holy Mother of God, located in Ukraine. As you can see, the domes are black there too!

Sergei: HM…. So it is not clear yet. … I admit that so … I just phoned my father, and this is what the picture is (according to the Izmailovsky Church of the Intercession of the Mother of God, I called there and found out everything on the spot). There are no black domes in Orthodoxy! My father is not just an ordinary priest, but also a historian, archaeologist, ethnographer. And he didn’t say categorically NO, as befits a researcher, he said that did not met (and he has more than rich experience, and by the way, it was he who advised me at one time to read Anton Blagin!

Anton Blagin: Let us then assume that I have discovered a REGULARITY, previously little known even to specialists! If in three or more places we see the same thing, moreover, in relation to the same type of churches or temples, then this is nothing but a regularity! This means that the domes of the temples of the Intercession of the Theotokos were painted with black for certain reasons, known to some, but not to others!

Sergei: undoubtedly, but what is this pattern? I see her in what goes substitution at the level of interconnections: the blue color (covering) of the domes of the temples of the Virgin in the case of COVERING is changed to black!

Cathedral of the Nativity of the Virgin in Suzdal and the Temple of the Intercession of the Virgin (on the Nerl River).

Anton Blagin: substitutions in Orthodoxy are ubiquitous, and they were done regularly! This means that true Orthodoxy has a historical inner enemy! The enemies of the faith have always been the priests of the highest rank, who, naturally, know more than anyone else, and who purposefully engage in distortions and substitutions of meanings, as it is written in the "Old Testament" of the Bible, in "Deuteronomy" - "little by little it is necessary to harm the goyim, if there is no possibility destroy them at once "(" Deuteronomy ", 7:22).

If you have read, two or three years ago I wrote an article about "Levoslavism", which we have today in fact instead of Orthodoxy … In the literal sense, "Levoslavia" is walking around temples or around the altar strictly against the path of the Sun across the sky relative to the eyes of the observer. Earlier, the Orthodox had a tradition - to praise God, walking in the direction of the movement of the Sun. This orthodox move was called POLON. The substitution of meaning in this tradition was made even before Nikon's reform. The then patriarch said: "Now we are walking not on the Sun and not after the Sun, but towards it!" Like, it should be so!

Sergei: I am aware of this substitution, I read it.

Anton Blagin: due to the fact that our enemies do this on a regular basis, I also gradually try to change the consciousness of people, but back, returning them to their original meanings, while pointing out the enemy's substitutions! Many, of course, are shocked by what I write about. After all, they have already managed to believe in semantic substitutions, made imperceptibly, little by little! Well, whoever knows about these substitutions, is interested in them and sees that I am exposing them and gradually neutralizing them - they are already furious!

Sergei: alas, only the individual needs the truth. Who lives in illusions, they are sausage from the truth not childishly. So let them rage! (The word "demon", when read back in two rows, gives the word "Sabe" (I, mine, me …) Now this is known as the EGO. The ego will not let you into the truth), what to take from these egoists?

At the end of this discussion, aimed at finding the truth in Orthodoxy, I want to tell you once again why the color of the domes of the Temples of the "Protection of the Virgin" is usually black. And I’ll tell you why on the icons "The Protection of the Virgin", on the contrary, there are attributes with white color.

Black domes on the temples "Protection of the Virgin" symbolize night, gloom, darkness, complete absence of solar color in the full Polar night, which begins on the dome of the Earth - the North Pole - on October 14. And on the icons depicting the "Intercession of the Virgin" the presence of white color in the form of a white cloth or white cloth cape symbolizes the first snow, which, as the popular omen says, usually falls on Pokrov.

Why does the first snow usually fall on Pokrov?

Precisely because darkness is thickening over the northern hemisphere of the Earth by October 14, sunlight becomes less and less warm, all conditions are created for snow formation.

That is why the "Protection of the Virgin" is white bedspread in the hands of the Mother of God on the icons and black domes at the temples in her honor!

December 30, 2018 Murmansk. Anton Blagin

Comments:

Admin: the domes of the Izmailovsky Church are copper (I suspect that in all the other photographs too). As a result of careless handling (they simply did not clean), they turned black. These domes were installed there in the 80s, before that the domes there were wooden without a color coating.

Anton Blagin: can't agree! As scientists say, you can think what you want, and practice is the criterion of truth. And practical experience tells us the following. In the case of the manufacture of roofs or domes of temples from copper, they are oxidized under the influence of atmospheric precipitation and humid air, acquiring a green color, not black!

A comment:

Anonymous: exactly! There is also the expression "under the cover of night", that is, there is cover of night and snow cover … But in general, it's screwed up, of course, Mom, don't worry! There is a temple of Christ the Savior, this is understandable, he is Yar, he is the Savior. But there is no church of the Virgin Mary, there is a church of the Nativity of the Virgin and a temple of the Intercession of the Virgin. But the "Cathedral of the Mother of God" is for some reason a church holiday. I personally got confused in all these colors of the domes. Anton needs to make a detailed "storyboard" of the domes by color.