Orthodoxy is not Christianity. Part 2

2024 Author: Seth Attwood | [email protected]. Last modified: 2023-12-16 15:55

So what is Orthodoxy?

In fact, real Orthodoxy is not a Christian cult, as the ROC is trying to convince us today, but a pagan cult of sun worshipers. Why sun worshipers? Well, after all, we have a symbol of the Sun all around and everywhere! Remember the cross over the entrance to the altar of St. Isaac's Cathedral. There is the sun in the center. And this is a mosaic in the center of the hall, I alone see the symbol of the Sun there, or what? Otherwise, clever people will come running around again and start screaming that I am delusional and it is time for me to see a psychiatrist.

And this is a view of the palace church in Peterhof. On all crosses there is the Sun.

And there are many more similar examples, when solar symbols are used in the design of Orthodox churches. On many temples, the sun is depicted in the center of the cross. Here is another palace church of the Catherine Palace in Tsarskoye Selo.

And I have already cited the most illustrative example when I was talking about Yaroslavl, but I will cite it again.

This is a belfry with the Church of the Pechersk Icon of the Mother of God, on the main dome we see a Greek, that is, a Byzantine cross with equal ends, and on the other domes there are simply symbols of the Sun in their pure form, not even crosses!

Am I the only one who can see it? Does anyone else see this or do I have "glitches"?

The fact that all these symbols have not yet had time to be replaced once again suggests that the substitution took place relatively recently, in the middle of the 19th century, not earlier.

What do the candles that Orthodox Christians light in their Temples symbolize? She symbolizes Divine Light! This is an analogue of the small Sun, which the Orthodox lit at night in order to maintain their connection with God the Heavenly Father. At the same time, candles were made exclusively from beeswax, which bees receive from nectar and pollen of flowers, which are all the same energy of the Sun, captured and transformed by flowers and bees. The darkness of the night enveloped the Earth? We light a candle, and God the Father continues to give us Divine Light through the candle fire. Dust and smoke enveloped the earth after a planetary catastrophe, hiding the Sun from us? We light the candle again so that the Divine Light illuminates everything around us, and we can feel that God the Father has not left us.

Why was the original Orthodoxy just a pagan cult? For this it is necessary to understand what the term "pagan cult" itself means. At the same time, there is no need to refer me to the old texts of the New Testament, allegedly in the ancient Greek language. Paganism, pagan, this is exactly our, Russian term, and not the ancient Greek one. Why exactly it was used in translation is another question.

If you look at the official interpretation of the meaning of the word "paganism", then almost everywhere it will be written something like:.

That is, even according to this false definition, we see that the Orthodoxy that we see among the early Romanovs, judging by the way of their life and the design of the palaces, is precisely the polytheism that we today are presented as "Greek myths", artificially transferring them into the depths centuries. And in one of the works of Nosovsky and Fomenko on the New Chronology, it is mentioned that in one of the old Temples of Suzdal, on the ancient painting of the dome, Jesus Chrysos is depicted surrounded by 12 Apostles, but these Apostles are depicted with symbols of the ancient Greek pagan Gods.

But the explanation of the meaning of the word "paganism" is false, since exactly the same is meant by the already existing term "idolatry". And where we meet the so-called "synonyms", in most cases there is a substitution of meanings. Why invent two words that are so different to mean the same thing?

It is easy to see that both the word “pagan” and the word “pagan” are based on the root “language”. Another great collector of Russian folklore, Alexander Nikolaevich Afanasyev, discovered that there was a so-called "oral tradition" in Russia. People told the same stories or epics to him in different places, repeating the text word for word. The differences, if there were, were very insignificant. When he began to find out why this is so, it turned out that the grandfathers forced the children to memorize and retell word for word tales and epics even in childhood. This is what “paganism” is - the transfer of knowledge through language, through live oral speech.

There are two ways to transmit Spiritual knowledge. The first is from a Living Soul to another Living Soul, that is, from mouth to mouth. This will be the present Paganism … At the same time, the presence of paganism does not mean the rejection of writing and books, but they are used precisely as a means of transmitting information, information, and not Spiritual knowledge. At the same time, if you own the technology of Paganism, then in a critical situation you will be able to convey in this way even the information that was once recorded in books, which was done by our ancestors.

An alternative way, which was introduced by Yahweh, is the transfer of Spiritual knowledge through "sacred texts", that is, through scripture, a book. There is no direct contact between the Soul of the teacher and the Soul of the student. In fact, only information is transmitted, and not the attitude of its author to this information, which is actually very important for the correct perception, especially the knowledge of the Spiritual, knowledge of what is “good” and what is “bad”. Through a book, through information written on paper, it is much easier to confuse and deceive a person than through direct live communication. For this, the book tradition was invented, so that with its help it would be easier to mislead and deceive people. You see, it's written in the book! Yes, not in a simple book, but in a "sacred" one !!! The Lord himself dictated her to the prophet to such and such, how can you doubt her ?! And at the same time we cannot find out what the person who wrote this book actually felt. It is very difficult to hide your true feelings in direct live communication, very, very few can do it. But when writing texts, this is much easier to do, including by introducing the necessary distortions into other people's texts, which a person wrote sincerely, so to speak, from the Soul. No one will be able to repeat the sermon of Jesus so that it would have the same effect on people, but to correct his biography or to put into his mouth in the text what he never said is a completely solvable task.

This struggle between pagan or oral tradition and book tradition has been going on for quite some time. Remembering the New Testament. For all the facts that are stated there, Jesus was a representative of the pagan, that is, oral tradition! He himself did not write any scriptures. How did he pass on knowledge? He gathered people and read sermons to them. He talked with people or answered questions with parables, forcing them to turn on their brains and imaginative thinking in order to find the correct answers themselves. Moreover, did Jesus tell his disciples to write the "New Testament"? Not! He told them: "Go and teach the nations." Even according to the official myth, the books of the New Testament were written by Jesus' disciples much later than the events themselves. And most of the additional chapters of the "New Testament" are generally composed of the texts of Paul, who is the so-called "13 apostle" and who was not a disciple of Jesus at all, never saw him, and was not ordained by him (one of the sacraments of the Orthodox Church, which gives the right be a priest, preach and perform rituals).

Whom did Jesus drive from the Temples? Book dealers. With whom did Jesus constantly argue, and whose hypocrisy did he constantly denounce? Scribes and Pharisees, that is, representatives of another, book tradition. And precisely because Jesus undermined their authority, it was these scribes and Pharisees who ultimately organized the execution of Jesus.

So, dear Christians, your Gospel convincingly proves that Jesus Christ was precisely a pagan, the bearer of the oral tradition of transmitting Spiritual Knowledge. And it was your “priests”, that is, the scribes and Pharisees who guarded and guard the “sacred texts” given to them from above by their Lord Yahweh through the “prophets” created by him, who crucified Jesus on the cross. And then, for the edification of others, they placed his dead body on a cross, which they hung in all churches so that everyone could see and remember what you are doing with the children of the real God, who dare to oppose your Lord.

Rites, postures, phrases are painted, Who should stand where, what to say.

If you believe, do not ask questions in vain, Otherwise, they can nail them to the cross.

Jesus won his questions too

I wanted to get answers from the scribes, I tried to explain to people that there is no God in the books, And as a punishment for this he hung on the cross.

And then, for the edification of descendants, So that you don't dare raise your hand against the priests, In all churches in the most conspicuous place

They began to place the corpse on the cross.

And then we pray under that cross to the point of ecstasy, And we go to church in a friendly crowd, And no one ever thought, That Jesus is dead before us on the cross! Not alive!

Here's another photo I took in the Yaroslavl Museum.

All these crosses were found during excavations in Yaroslavl. At the same time, the showcase claims that they are all "Orthodox Christian pectoral crosses." But this is a forgery, since only one cross is a Christian cross, the largest in the center, a remake of the late 19th century, the only one depicting a crucifixion. On all the others, there is no hint of a crucified body. The amulet below, with a broken end, is not a crucifixion, but an image of one of the saints, since the cloak-cape, in which the holy elders are usually depicted, is well read. Moreover, some of the crosses are generally uniquely "Greek" equilateral. On some, if you look closely, you can see an eight-pointed Orthodox cross inscribed on top.

So that supposedly Orthodox cross with a crucifix is a fake, which was specially found larger and placed in the center of the showcase so that it would focus attention and no one doubted what kind of crosses were collected here. In fact, in real Orthodoxy, they have never depicted a crucified body on an eight-pointed cross! Moreover, as we have already seen in St. Isaac's Cathedral, they generally tried to depict him as little as possible. But we can observe the same thing not only there, but also in the Cathedral of Christ the Savior, which was recently recreated in Moscow. Moreover, it was recreated quite close to the original, since such photographs have survived.

This is a view of the Cathedral of Christ the Savior, the photo was taken in 1920.

Classic Byzantine Orthodox church of the pagan sun worshipers.

And these are color photographs taken in 1931 even before the temple was blown up, exterior.

And the inner view of … I don't even know what to call it, but this is definitely not an iconostasis with an altar behind it, although this is what is officially approved.

To be honest, it looks more like a tomb or mausoleum. A special separate room under a dome with a cross. Moreover, there are eight small domes with crosses in a circle. This is anything but an altar with an iconostasis. And if this is someone's burial, that it must be such an important and significant person that I’m even afraid to guess who it might be, if such a Temple was built for him … Of all the historical personalities, only the Most Holy Theotokos could be awarded such honors, Virgin Mary, mother of Jesus. For everyone else, including even kings and queens, a separate temple with a similar tomb is too cool, so to speak, out of order. But these are only assumptions that are based on the impression that this structure produces. I have no facts yet.

And this also explains why the Bolsheviks had to destroy this Temple.

Now the interior looks almost the same, but only outwardly, since all the interior, as I understand it, has been destroyed.

But what is important to us at the moment, we again do not see the crucifixion anywhere! Neither on the Orthodox eight-pointed cross, nor on the Catholic four-pointed. I don’t know if there’s an image of a crucifixion somewhere, but something tells me that if there is, it’s also somewhere off to the side, like in St. Isaac’s Cathedral. That is, the actual crucifixion in real Orthodox churches was portrayed as a kind of ordinary event in the life of Jesus, which was not emphasized. Not at all like in Catholic churches, where the image of the crucifix is always in the center or at the exit, but in such a way that it must catch the parishioners' eyes, so that they constantly see the dead body of Jesus on the cross.

And it doesn't matter what they tell you, because the visual image is the most powerful way of transmitting information, especially if you see it at the end, when you leave the temple. This is one of the fundamental differences between old Orthodox churches and Catholic ones; in real Orthodox churches, the crucifix never sticks out.

But even the Catholic image of the crucifixion is false, since in fact the cross has nothing to do with the crucifixion. No one has ever done a crucifixion because it is unnecessary work. The crucifixion was always made in the shape of the letter T, when a transverse element, a bar or a cut of a log was attached to the post in one way or another at the top. It is quite easy to be convinced that this is exactly the case, since medieval European artists in most paintings depict the crucifix precisely in the form of the letter T.

So the Catholic four-pointed cross has nothing to do with crucifixion. Medieval Western European artists knew very well how to depict a crucifixion, since in their time such a sacrifice was very widely used there. In some paintings, however, there is a tablet stuck in from above, which they try to pass off as the upper end of the cross, then as the upper element on the eight-pointed Orthodox cross, since this tablet is mentioned in the Gospel. But this is precisely a tablet with an inscription, and not an element of the crucifixion itself.

The very symbol of the cross is quite ancient, it is found in many cultures among many peoples and has nothing to do with the crucifixion. When the Jews created the Catholic Church, they mutilated the symbol of the cross, replacing it with a crucifix. And when in the middle of the 19th century, following the Royal throne, the Orthodox Church was captured, the dead body of Jesus was also placed on the Orthodox eight-pointed cross. Therefore, now in many churches, especially new ones, in the center hangs a similar false crucifix with an eight-pointed Orthodox cross. At the same time, they have become so insolent that in some places they also put a skull with bones, a symbol of human sacrifice, below.

It is precisely because of the seizure and substitution of faith that the so-called “split” occurs, which today they are presented to us as “the reform of Patriarch Nikon”, having been moved 200 years ago. In the events of the 17th and 19th centuries, there are many very similar events, which in places coincide up to a year. Troubles in Russia at the beginning of the 17th century, the cause of which, by the way, many researchers call a natural cataclysm, which led to a cold snap and several lean years. Similar events, including the deterioration of the climate, took place at the beginning of the 19th century, during which the Romanovs finally seized Moscow. The capture of Moscow by the Romanovs, with the support of the French, is today being presented to us as a war against Napoleon. The uprising in Kazan in 1615 surprisingly coincides with the "terrible fire" in the Kazan Kremlin in 1815. For some reason, no one is surprised that the monuments to Minin and Pozharsky, who allegedly led the militia to Moscow in the early 17th century, began to be installed everywhere only after the war of 1812, and before that no one remembered them for 200 years.

Moreover, this forgery was quite simple to implement, since Peter I carried out the reform of the calendar in 1700, replacing the Byzantine calendar, according to which the account was kept "from the creation of the world." At the same time, it is argued that then it was 7208 "according to the old style." But even in the most royal decree "On the celebration of the New Year" it was emphasized that the counting of years from the creation of the world was abolished for them due to the existence of a wide palette of opinions in determining the magnitude of the last era: "for many differences and counting in those years." Therefore, it is not at all a fact that it was exactly 7208, and not 7008. In this case, it is necessary to correct only one document, which links the two chronology, after which all old documents, memoirs and chronicles dated according to the "old style" are automatically moved to the dates necessary for the falsifiers. Therefore, when we read the documents of Muscovy about the Troubles, which are dated according to the old Byzantine style, since the Romanovs-Oldenburgs did not yet control Moscow, then when we recount it, we get the 1600s. And when we read the documents of the Romanov-Oldenburgs, we get the 1800s.

Hence, two reforms of the Church, one allegedly in the 1660s, which was carried out by Patriarch Nikon. the old Orthodox books and scriptures are banned, the existing editions are destroyed, and instead of them a new Synodal translation of the Bible is published, which was made from Catholic and Jewish texts.

Numerous letters from readers testify to the same. In the eighth part about the death of Tartaria, I quoted a phrase from an alternative version of the "Apocalypse", which one of the readers sent me: "and the Earth will be entangled in a steel web, and steel birds will fly in the sky … all the gullies and gullies will plow, but they will not fill up their fill." and asked to tell if anyone had heard something similar from their relatives. As a result, in two weeks I received more than forty comments and emails in which people reported that they, too, had heard this very phrase from their grandparents, that the Earth would be entangled in a steel web and iron birds would fly in the sky. Geography of communications from Moldova to the Far East. Some even recalled that grandfather or grandmother even mentioned that “iron birds with iron beaks will peck at people”, someone recalled the mention of iron horses. Several people also reported that this phrase is most likely from the prophecies of Cosmas of Aetolia.

A search on the Internet gave several very interesting links with mention of the prophecies of Cosmas of Etalia, for example this one. The prophecies, indeed, are interesting and deserve closer study, but I did not find this particular phrase along the steel web and iron birds. Later, they sent me a link to a PDF file with the texts allegedly of Cosmas of Aetolia himself, but to be honest, I just did not have time to view them.

But in the process of searching, I found another interesting link "THE PROPHECY OF THE HOLY COSMAS OF ETHOLIA AND THE ELDER PAISION OF THE ST. HORETS ON THE LIBERATION OF THE BALKANS AND CONSTANTINOPLE" According to the biographical note, Cosmas of Etolias lived in the years 1714-1779. At the time when Cosmas was born, the Balkans were under the occupation of the Ottoman Empire (Turks). Here is what they write about this period in the article:

“With his prophecies, Saint Cosmas was able to return to his compatriots, who had been languishing under foreign yoke for more than 300 years, hope for a national revival. Saint Cosmas's contribution to the future liberation from Turkish rule was enormous. Here are the words from the song that became the anthem of the Greeks who fought against foreign rule:

Saint George, as you know, was the patron saint of the army. And Saint Cosmas for the participants in the national liberation movement became a symbol of the struggle for the revival of Orthodoxy and the homeland, they were inspired by his prophecies, which awakened faith and hope.

The saint, of course, could not speak directly with his flock about national liberation. He used the words "desired", "desired". "When will the 'desired' come?" - the saint was often asked.

Here's how he answered this question:

In a footnote to this place, the following commentary is given: “The Romans are the inhabitants of the Byzantine Empire. Saint Cosmas was a consistent supporter of the restoration of the "Romeian Empire". How is it? Or maybe Cosmas was not a supporter of the re-creation of the "Romeian empire", but of reunification with the existing Romanov empire?

In other words, we have another fact that indicates that in the 18th century the Rome / Roman Empire still existed, and it was the Romanov Empire, since it was she who liberated the Balkans from the Turks in 1877-1878.

At the same time, when Cosmas in the 18th century advocated the annexation of the Romanovs to the Romanov Empire, it was still truly Orthodox, since the Romanovs still pretended to be Orthodox and hid their connection with the Jews and the god Yahweh / Janus. Substitution through "reform", as I wrote above, took place later, in the 1860s.

The fact that a lot of people heard the same phrase from their ancestors, and in different parts of the country, suggests that this text was very widespread. Many also point out that these were very old books that grandfathers valued and tried not to show them to anyone or give them to anyone. Some even point out that it was not the Bible, but the Psalter (psalms, prayer book) and the Lives of the Saints. The historical note on the synodal translation of the Bible informs about the prohibition and burning of already published copies of the "New Testament" and "Psalms":

One of the readers even reported that in the old book "Lives of the Saints" there is a mention of Cosmas of Aetolia.

All this together proves once again that there was another, very different version of the Orthodox sacred books that went from hand to hand, and in the 1860s a very revised version of the Bible was released under the guise of the Synodal Translation.

When you read the description of “Nikon’s reforms”, exactly the same thing happens there: “The books were corrected, printed and sent to dioceses. The patriarch demanded that in the churches, upon receiving the newly corrected books, they immediately begin to serve according to the new books, and the old ones should be put aside and hidden. Corrected ceremonies were introduced along with the books. " That is, in the 17th century Nikon allegedly brought order both in the rituals and in the "scriptures", but 200 years have passed and this order had to be restored again, releasing a revised translation of the Bible, while banning and destroying previously issued copies? I believe that the real replacement took place precisely at the end of the 19th century, and not in the 17th century, since the old forbidden books have survived to our time in quite a large number.

At the same time, they are trying to assure us that Nikon's reforms only brought order, eliminating discrepancies between the Moscow and Greek Churches. Well, we crossed ourselves with two fingers, and now we need three. At least from the school history course, most people remember only this. That is, they are trying to convince us that it was such an important issue that people because of this were ready to die, but not accept the proposed changes?

Let's see what the other side, the Russian Old Believer Church, reports about Nikon's reforms:

“The changes in the books were followed by other church innovations. The most notable of these were the following:

- instead of the two-fingered sign of the cross, which was adopted in Russia from the Byzantine Orthodox Church together with Christianity and which is part of the Holy Apostolic tradition, the three-fingered sign was introduced;

- in old books, in accordance with the spirit of the Slavic language, the name of the Savior "Jesus" was always written and pronounced; in new books this name was changed to the Greekized "Jesus";

- in old books it is established at the time of baptism, wedding and consecration of the temple to walk in the sun as a sign that that we are following the Christ-Sun … New books introduced a workaround against the sun;

- in old books in the Creed (8th term) it reads: "And in the Spirit of the Holy Lord, True and Life-giving"; after corrections, the word "Istinnago" was deleted;

- instead of the augmented, that is, double Alleluia, which the Russian Church has been creating since ancient times, a triangular (that is, triple) Alleluia was introduced;

- Divine Liturgy in Ancient Russia was performed on seven prosphora; the new "directors" introduced five prosphora, that is, two prosphora were excluded."

Now this is more interesting. First, here we see another indication that the Orthodox before the reform were precisely sun worshipers. Secondly, the change in direction is more important than the number of fingers. There are two types of the main swastika, right, according to the Sun, and left, against the Sun, while the difference between them is rarely clearly explained.

You can often find the statement that the "right" swastika is good, and the "left" is evil. This is due to the fact that it was the left swastika that was used as one of the symbols in Nazi Germany. For the same reason, they are now trying to officially ban the swastika.

In fact, any symbol is not good or evil. It all depends on the meaning of this or that group of people in this symbol. The negative attitude towards the swastika, which is special on the territory of the former USSR, is associated with a negative attitude towards Nazism and their crimes, which is subconsciously transmitted to the symbol they used. At the same time, among other peoples, these symbols had a completely different meaning. Firstly, most researchers agree that this symbol is very ancient and is found all over the world. (the largest collection of historical evidence: the album The main solar symbol - ed.) Also, most agree that this is exactly the solar symbol, that is, denoting the Sun and its continuous movement around the Earth.

Regarding the left and right direction of the swastika, there are the following opinions:

"Direct and reverse forms of the swastika - male and female, solar and lunar beginning, clockwise and counterclockwise movement, and also, apparently, two hemispheres, heavenly and chthonic force, rising spring and setting autumn sun";

“If the Kolovrat rotates clockwise (right-sided swastika), then this means vital energy, if against (left-sided), then this indicates an appeal to Navi, the world of ancestors and Gods (that is, death). In addition, in Indian beliefs, the left and right swastikas denote feminine and masculine energy, like yin and yang: right-handed is masculine energy, left-handed - respectively, feminine. It is quite possible to assume that in the ancient world, the Slavs also had such a distribution."

On Orthodox churches and icons, both left and right swastikas are present in huge numbers, which, again, once again indicates that Orthodoxy is a cult of sun worshipers. And from the point of view of sun worshipers, it is the right swastika and the movement "along the salt" that will symbolize the Sun and movement into the future, but the left swastika means movement into the past, as stated in the last quote, an appeal to the world of Navi, where the souls of the dead live but not yet again incarnated ancestors. That is why the left swastika is often found on tombstones, monuments, as well as in the design of cathedrals or their parts, which are dedicated to the world of Navi, that is, for communication with deceased ancestors.

Therefore, the change in motion to the opposite course of the Sun is not accepted by the Old Believer Church and is justly considered by it as an attempt to replace the solar cult with the lunar one.

But the change in direction is just one reason, albeit more important than the number of fingers to be baptized with. In fact, under the guise of "reform" and "correction of mistakes," the Orthodox worldview is being replaced by the Christian religion for slaves. That is, essentially the same thing that happened in the USSR during Gorbachev's "perestroika", which ultimately led to a complete change of ideology and the collapse of the USSR.

Dmitry Mylnikov

Author's articles on Kramol:

"How Tartary Perished". Part 1 Part 2 Part 3 Part 4 Part 5 Part 6 Part 7 Part 8

"The Wonderful World We Lost." Part 1 Part 2