Orthodoxy is not Christianity. Part 1

2024 Author: Seth Attwood | [email protected]. Last modified: 2023-12-16 15:55

I tried to write the text so that it would be accessible to most people, and not just supporters of one or another theory.

In the summer of 2014, while on vacation, my family and I once again rested in St. Petersburg. I have been to this city many times and I love it since childhood, especially since on the maternal side my roots are also connected with Peter. And every time you come to this city you discover something new, unexpected, incomprehensible. This was the case during the last business trip in November 2013, which resulted in an article about the lost construction technologies, and during the last trip with the family.

One day I was lucky to meet Anton, one of the administrators of the Kramol portal, who gave us a tour of St. Isaac's Cathedral. True, it was not so much an excursion as a joint study of the features of this unique structure.

In the beginning, we mainly studied the construction part and from it we smoothly moved on to architecture. I began to tell Anton that, according to St. Isaac's Cathedral, it has clear signs of a Byzantine temple, in many aspects more reminiscent of pagan ancient temples. As an example that there is a direct connection with Byzantium, I took Anton to show what clothes people are wearing on the bas-reliefs, as well as the Byzantine crosses (sometimes called "Greek") on the doors, which have the ends of the same size.

Once you have looked at the Byzantine cross, you must also look at the Orthodox cross. And then two unexpected surprises awaited us.

Firstly, it turned out to be very difficult to find an Orthodox eight-pointed cross. On the bronze bas-reliefs, as well as in the paintings and mosaics that adorn the walls and ceilings, there is no eight-pointed cross at all. Only two similar crosses were found, one above the entrance to the altar. Pay attention to the cross. This is precisely the cross, on which there is no body, while in the center we see the Sun.

The second eight-pointed Orthodox cross over the miraculous icon of the Mother of God, which is installed to the left of the main iconostasis.

Secondly, it turned out that there is not a single "Orthodox crucifixion" in the entire St. Isaac's Cathedral! According to what modern pseudo-Orthodox sites report, the correct crucifixion, in their opinion, should look like this.

So, if it was possible to find just an eight-pointed Orthodox cross in St. Isaac's Cathedral, then this image does not exist at all!

Moreover, the images themselves with the crucified Jesus were found with great difficulty. One in the form of a painting in one of the niches.

But here the cross is clearly not Orthodox, but rather Catholic, since among Catholics the crucifixion is depicted on the four terminal cross, although the image below is also not true, but more on that below.

The second image with the crucified Jesus is outside over one of the cathedral entrances.

Here, too, the cross is not an Orthodox eight-pointed, but four-pointed or even T-shaped.

In fact, according to the official historical myth, St. Isaac's Cathedral after its consecration was the main cathedral of the Russian Empire. And how did it happen that when decorating the main cathedral, the main symbolism is practically not used, and the crucifixion is generally shown according to other people's canons ?!

It is also interesting to look at these bas-reliefs of one of the doors, the inscription above which reads "we bow to your cross."

Please note that here, too, the cross is clearly not an eight-pointed Orthodox cross. It is also interesting that all the images tell the story of the execution of Jesus, but at the same time the crucified dead body of Jesus itself is shown only on the lowest right bas-relief, and then already in the process of being taken down from the cross. That is, they tried to avoid the images of a dead body hanging on a cross.

Later, during excursions to different palaces of St. Petersburg and the suburbs, I again drew attention to this feature of the old "Christianity". Not only the crucifixion with the dead body of Jesus, but in general Christian symbolism was practically absent in the residential and ceremonial premises of the palaces. At the same time, when we were on excursions in the palaces and castles of the Czech Republic and Germany, the picture there is completely different. The crucifixion with the body of dead Jesus catches your eye all the time. I even asked this question to the guide who took us around the Grand Palace in Peterhof. The answer was simply amazing: "It was not customary for the Russian tsars to use Christian symbols in the design of living quarters." This is the trick! Catholics and Protestants, therefore, it was accepted, but the Orthodox Russian tsars do not ?!

And what then was accepted by the Russian tsars? Let's get a look. By the way, we were told about this on the same excursion in the Great Palace of Peterhof. It turns out that it was customary for the Russian tsars to portray themselves in the image of Greek or Roman gods and to decorate their chambers with such images!

For example, here is such a painting in the Audience Hall, where Russian tsars and queens received visitors, including ambassadors of foreign states. This is a portrait of Empress Elizabeth Petrovna, in which she is depicted as a Greek goddess, and even with a bare chest.

The fact that this is exactly Elizaveta Petrovna is not reported by all the guides, but this is definitely her. You can compare it with her usual portrait, the similarity is striking.

Here is another notable image, but already of Peter I, where he is supposedly depicted with the goddess Minerva, she is Pallas Athena among the Greeks, the goddess of organized war, strategy and wisdom.

Note that this "Minerva" again looks suspiciously like Elizaveta Petrovna.

That is, it turns out that Russian Orthodox emperors and empresses are embarrassed to demonstrate their belonging to the Christian tradition, it is not customary for them, but to show in the audience hall their connection with the pagan ancient cult, and even with bare breasts, this is exactly …

There are several more remarkable portraits of Elizaveta Petrovna, but when she was still a child.

This is a portrait of Anna Petrovna and Elizaveta Petrovna. Quite so relaxed, in the spirit of the Greek goddesses, is not it? Further more, the interior of the sofa room is decorated with an even more interesting image.

Talking about the interior of the sofa room, our guide uttered a phrase that simply cut the ear: “Above the sofa, you see a portrait of Princess Elizabeth Petrovna at the age of six. Portrait somewhat unusualbecause the princess is depicted on it completely naked."

And it was precisely the word "unusual" that struck the ear! And here I have, as they sometimes say, a mosaic of scattered pieces. That's right, such a portrait will be "unusual" if we believe that the Russian tsars were Christians, which means that they had to adhere to Christian morality, which does not allow such "unusualness" and does not approve of it very much.

But, excuse me, here we are walking through the gardens of Peterhof, and admire the many antique sculptures of naked people, including children. Those wishing to take a virtual walk around Peterhof and the Grand Palace can see the links below:

Here we enter the Grand Palace and again observe many sculptures and paintings with naked people, including boys with protruding pussies. But all of this does not seem "unusual" to the guides. This is just a "fashion for antiquity", which, as it turns out, was subject to all Russian tsars. But when these kings in life begin to behave like inhabitants of ancient times, and in pictures to depict themselves in the same way, which in fact is just normal and natural, we are told that this turns out to be “unusual”! And it is "unusual" only because it does not fit into the false historical myth, according to which these kings must be Christians and observe Christian morality.

This is how we should have been brainwashed so that we do not see the obvious! All royal palaces, especially those built before the 19th century, are completely imbued with antique symbolism. All utensils, all decorations, sculptures, paintings. Is the Winter Palace, the official residence of the Russian emperors, adorned with symbols of the supposedly non-existent Roman Empire? But if it was customary to portray the emperors themselves in the form of Roman gods, then from what follows that the countless paintings that are hung in the halls of all palaces do not depict famous people of that time in the image of the same heroes of Roman or Greek myths? And are they really myths, or maybe this is our real story, which we are now simply being presented as myths, trying to fool our brains? And that is very convenient. If someone suddenly finds a document that describes the true events, then they turn out to be very similar to the events that are declared myths, so all these documents can be declared just another version of the presentation of the same myths.

And if we take into account the so-called “Catherine Shift”, which is 1168 years old, then the question can generally be posed differently. Was that mythical “ancient” Rome really, or is it a cleverly crafted myth that helps to distort the history of the Earth? Or maybe the real Roman, or rather the Roman Empire, since this is how it is read and written in Europe, this is the empire of the Romanovs? And is it not for this that in the Russian version of the word "Rome" the letter "o" was replaced with the letter "and", so that it was less similar and it became more difficult to notice the connection?

There is also one interesting point in ancient myths that few people know about. The fact is that there are two versions of mythology, one Greek and the other Roman. This is just a well-known fact. At the same time, the majority of ordinary people believe that they differ from each other only in the names of the gods. Well, the Greeks had Zeus, the Romans had Jupiter, the Greeks had Athena, and the Romans had Minerva, etc. In fact this is not true. There is one fundamental difference between these two mythologies, which is very important. It consists in the fact that in the pantheon of Greek gods there is no Two-Faced Janus, which is present among the Romans. At the same time, some of the researchers believe that Janus takes the second place in the pantheon of Roman gods, and some even argue that at the last stage Janus takes the first place among the Romans, since all the main services and sacrifices are Romans both before the start of the military campaign and after the victory held in honor of Janus.

What else is known about Janus?

It is interesting that this description is already missing, that Janus is the god of cunning, lies and deceit, but his two-facedness is very skillfully camouflaged. I especially liked the phrase "before the cult of Jupiter." How could it be? We were kind of told before that the Romans borrowed their mythology from the Greeks, giving the Greek gods other names. It turns out that the mythology was borrowed immediately with all the Gods, and the cult of Zeus, renamed Jupiter, did not immediately take? It seems that the myth about Janus continues to be actively refined right now, since in the books on ancient mythology of the 90s, the god Janus is described somewhat differently. But in fact, this is the very essence that we know from the Old Testament and the Torah as Yahweh, Lord of the Jews.

This may not be entirely clear to those who have not read my previous articles:

Cycle about the death of Tartary, from the beginning

or at least the final part

and also "The Wonderful World We Lost"

It was Yahweh-Janus who taught people the basics of a technogenic civilization, including metallurgy, for the sake of which he "gave" people fire. And he is not just the god who taught people the calendar. Why do you need a calendar? To know when to plant and when to harvest. But a calendar is only needed when you have a change of seasons. At the same time, there is an indication in the Torah that the change of seasons, that is, the constant alternation of winter and summer, began precisely after the Flood.

When a large object collided with the Earth, which caused the Flood, the Earth's axis of rotation also shifted. It tilted 23.43 degrees, or 66.6 degrees from the plane of the ecliptic ("the mark of the beast" with which Yahweh marked the Earth). It is because of the tilt of the axis on Earth that the seasons change.

In addition, in the description of the god Janus there is a direct indication of what all these triumphal arches are really needed for. Firstly, these are not arches, but a Temple in honor of the god Janus, since these "gates" exactly match the description. And secondly, it is not just a gate. This is a transport system, a teleportation gate that allowed Roman troops to move between them simply by entering one, and immediately leaving through others. But the "keys to the gates", that is, the control panel for the gates and the main transmitting-receiving unit of the structure, is located at "Yahweh", that is, at the alien civilization of invaders. Without this thing of theirs or the same ship that hovers over the gate and provides the teleportation process itself, the gate is just a pile of stones.

This is the temple of Janus in the city of Kursk.

This is the temple of Janus in Moscow.

This is the Temple of Janus in Paris.

So temples in honor of the main god Janus, which also perform a transport function, must be in every administrative center so that punitive units can arrive there immediately. In many "ancient" texts it is said that the troops left for battle through the triumphal gates, and returned from the battle through them too. It's just that it is not specified anywhere (or deliberately blurred out) that entering the gates in St. Petersburg, one could exit through similar gates in Paris or Washington.

True, it is possible that not all of today's arches can be used for this purpose, since not all of them correspond to the description. In addition, looking at different arches, I noticed that some of them have a special pattern on the inside of the vault, and it was done on old arches, but this pattern is not everywhere. At the same time, from a construction point of view, making a smooth ceiling is much easier than with similar "patterns". It is possible that these are some kind of resonators that are necessary for the operation of the device. Moreover, they clearly have a common focus point, which should be located high enough above the Earth, in the center of the arc. It is likely that the "transfer point" itself is located exactly there and for operation some kind of platform is needed to enter the top. The second option, that in the middle, as the description says, there was also a statue that just touched this focal point, and at the same time was the very "key" that unlocked these "star gates" and carried out the transfer from one gate to others.

A detailed selection of both the temples of Janus and just arches around the world can be viewed at Mikhail Volk

So the late Romanovs-Oldenburgs are just the Romans. And they worship the god Yahweh. Therefore, they built disguised temples in honor of Janus in all cities. Don't believe me? Will you believe Alexander Sergeevich Pushkin? Here is a fragment of the famous poem "Alexander", for which Pushkin fell into disgrace:

“And now you have returned to your sons, O our king, And the edge of midnight lit up with delight!

Incline a full look on your people of humility-

All faces shine with joy, love, Hearken - the good news is everywhere, Everywhere a proud clique of merriment is heard;

There is noise in the footsteps, triumph shines everywhere, And you are among the crowd, a deity of Russia!

Your squads fly to meet the leader of victories.

Old man, happy age forgetting Catherine, Looks at you with a silent tear.

You are ours, about the Russian tsar! leave the steel helmet, And the formidable sword of war, and our shield-fence;

Pour out before Janus I sacred the cup of peace,

And, crushing swearing with a mighty hand, Universe of autumn with the desired silence!.."

The official myth says that Alexander did not like the fact that Pushkin compared him to the god Janus. Oh, is it? After all, such a wonderful god, even more abruptly than Jupiter will be. Or maybe Alexander Sergeevich blurted out too much, which caused discontent? For example, I did not see the comparison, but saw a specific instruction to perform a ceremony in honor of Janus. It is not for nothing that they say: "Do not pronounce the name of the Lord in sue."

That's just not the Romanovs created the Autocratic Rasia (Ra - this means Ra shining with light, but more on that later). They seized power in it with the help of Yahweh-Janus, and then contributed to its collapse. In the same way, Gorbachev was promoted to the post of the leader of the USSR, in order to ensure its collapse in 1991. Therefore, the first Romanovs still pose as completely Orthodox (Greek mythology), as Gorbachev poses as a real communist. But when he had already strengthened in power, then the Greek (that is, Orthodox) Gods change to Roman (Romanov), and Janus-Yahweh becomes the head of the pantheon. And a little later, in the middle of the 19th century, it was decided to get rid of polytheism completely. A new version of the monotheistic religion, which we today know as "Orthodox Christianity", was created, based on Catholic Christianity. Apparently Janus was finally tired of figuring out which of the Roman Gods was more important, so they were simply abolished. And they announced a "reform of Orthodoxy."

Dmitry Mylnikov

Author's articles on Kramol:

"How Tartary Perished". Part 1 Part 2 Part 3 Part 4 Part 5 Part 6 Part 7 Part 8

"The Wonderful World We Lost." Part 1 Part 2