It was under King Peas, or a little about antediluvian geography

2024 Author: Seth Attwood | [email protected]. Last modified: 2023-12-16 15:55

It's funny, we so often use some phrases in everyday speech, without even thinking about their meaning, and the history of their occurrence. This is exactly how everyone relates to the mention of some kind of fabulous Peas. Is he really fabulous? After all, there are not so many skeptics left who are convinced that there are myths and legends that have no real basis.

In fact, in every fairy tale there is a fraction of a fairy tale, and the King of Peas certainly had to have a prototype that existed in reality. The first thing that can be said for sure is that if he is a historical character, then he existed so long ago that no memory of him has survived. It is difficult to argue with this, but let's have the courage and venture to suggest that the traces of Peas in history still remain. Where are traces of real events and characters most often fixed? In hydronyms and place names. This is not controversial. Let's try to search for names associated with peas in Russia. There are quite a few villages, villages, lakes and rivers, but the most famous one is pea street in St. Petersburg.

This is the street. It rests exactly on the central building of the Admiralty, the spire of which is the official visiting card of the city (clickable photos).

What else immediately catches your eye? And the well-thought-out city planning cannot but draw attention to itself. "That's right"! - you will say - "This is a young city. It was conceived before the start of construction, and similar" Masonic tricks "in pre-planned cities - a dime a dozen!

Here you have a compass, here you have a truncated pyramid, where the eye is the spire of the Admiralty.

Maybe. But not a fact. True, if you believe that St. Petersburg was built by Peter the Great, then I advise you not to read further.

In this article, I do not pursue the goal of proving the fact (and this is a fact, not an assumption) that St. Petersburg is many times more years old than traditional historians claim. Simply, we take as a basis the understanding that people were not stupid in order to build a capital from scratch in the middle of nowhere, in a swamp. And the explanation of this stupidity by the construction of a "window to Europe" does not stand up to criticism, because even in the time of Peter the Great, sailors and merchants hated the road through this so-called "seaport". Not a single sea vessel in those days could break through closer to Kronstadt, where goods had to be loaded onto boats, so that they could then be transported around the city. The terms of construction are also "sucked from the thumb". Well, now let the builders with their modern technology and knowledge build at least something similar in the same time frame !?

In general, Petersburg was long before Peter, and most likely it was under water. Only when the Baltic Sea began to grow shallow, retreated a hundred kilometers, and the ancient antediluvian city was laid bare, which later Catherine diligently restored, while for some reason attributing all the merits not even to herself - to her beloved, namely to Peter and his retinue, which polls consisted of the aristocracy Holy Roman Empire, as well as civilized Germans, Dutch, French and Italians. There are a lot of inconsistencies, no one is even trying to reasonably explain them now. They blame everything on stupidity, arrogance and imitation of the enlightened west. Anyway. It's usually a matter of giving your own vices to everyone around you.

The fact that the city's layout is so perfect was the basis, an urgent need to create a myth about the youth of the city. It does not fit with a modern person, how you can plan without architects and surveyors, but at such a level that you get jealous. It is impossible to imagine that while cities were being built up chaotically, without any system, a city could already exist with perfectly straight avenues and streets, sewerage and water supply. Compare at least with the same Moscow. It's just "Shanghai". On its crooked curved streets you will break your head, and the compass will not help, so as not to get lost. It's the same with Kiev, Novgorod, Pskov, Yaroslavl, and with any ancient city. The construction was chaotic, spontaneous, in every way. And then suddenly something like that …

It is impossible to explain this discrepancy in the level of existing technologies. And what are the dimensions of the premises? Where else can you find this - the sizes of windows, doorways, ceiling heights, everything suggests that the buildings were designed for residents two and a half meters tall. Where are their remains? No. No, because organic matter is not preserved for the same time as natural stone. And if there was anything left, it had to be inevitably destroyed. Just as all geographical maps, manuscripts, tablets, parchments and other carriers of ancient writing were destroyed, which, by order of Peter, were taken from all over Russia by whole carts, supposedly for preservation and census. There was absolutely nothing left that could remind descendants of the country that existed in the place of present-day Russia before Peter.

In order to check the version of the "antediluvian" structure, there is one simple method that can indirectly confirm or refute the assumption. This is orientation in space. Everything that was built before the flood, including the Egyptian pyramids, was oriented strictly to the cardinal points. The very fact that the Egyptian pyramids are oriented towards the modern North Pole gives grounds to assert that they were built in our time, after the flood. More ancient structures, "look" at the western entrance to Greenland. Everything. Though the Chinese pyramids, even the South American ones.

The oldest temples, no matter whether Islamic or Christian, also have an orientation with a deviation from the direction to the North Pole of about 25 degrees. About. There, plus - minus, from 19 to 28 degrees. But the straight lines drawn on the sides of the antediluvian structures on the map have one common point of intersection - almost in the center of Greenland, in the territory that is covered with relic glaciers. This, by the way, is a convincing argument in favor of the fact that Mount Meru should be looked for in this place.

First of all, I decided to check where the top of the St. Petersburg "pyramid" is looking. "I went" along Gorokhovaya Street, through the Admiralty,

I "flew" over the "Old Customs" restaurant on Vasilievsky Island and, as expected….

… I ended up in Greenland. It may well be that King Peas could once live here, if we assume that Mount Meru, at the top of which there is a staircase to the divine Irian garden, is hidden under a layer of ice. And what name might be remotely related to Peas?

First of all, it should be noted that "mountain" and "pea" are cognate words. MOUNTAINS - that's what they have in common, it may very well be that it is not accidental. Some philologists even put forward a version that the Tsar Peas is God - the thunderer Perun. Like, peas - from the word roar, thunder. My memory about the Egyptian god Horus immediately came to my mind.

Horus, Horus (ḥr - "height", "sky") is a god in ancient Egyptian mythology, the son of Isis and, presumably, Osiris. That is, the same relative of the Sun God Ra, the same half-falcon (half-ruik), like our own God Khors.

Khors was the son of the Sun-Ra god and the brother of Veles Surevich. Ra was born from the face of Rod, he ruled the solar chariot for many thousands of years and carried the Sun to the firmament. But then he got tired and turned into Surya, a sunny mead and the Ra River. After Ra turned into a river, his son Khors began to rule the chariot of the Sun

Runa Horse

At first glance, the similarity of the sound of "Horse" and "Pea" seems somewhat attracted, but only at first. If you know by what rules charomutia occurs, that is, the mutation of words, when borrowing from one language into another, as well as over time, then this modification seems not so strange and strange.

Here is a variant of the use of the word "Horse" for comparison. In English, this is a horse. I do not presume to assert anything, but I fully admit the idea that there is some kind of relationship here.

Okay, let's go in the opposite direction, where will Gorokhovaya Street lead us?

And here is just a revelation. We ended up in the United Arab Emirates, right in Abu Dhabi.

The most important thing is what a district! Gor al Batin! Horus, do you understand? Is it just a coincidence? Honestly, from that moment on, I felt with my spinal cord that something would happen now. The left edge of the St. Petersburg "pyramid", like the central one, also bears a very telling name - VOSNESENSKY Avenue. I, as before, began to build a straight line, but this is a pretty big deal, because of the curvature of the globe, and the hand can simply tremble, therefore, you have to constantly check, adjust the direction so as not to go astray. From the first time I deviated a little and ended up in the capital of Greece. And then … oppa !!! Bah !!! Familiar streets! Do you know the center of Peter? So, if you know, then in the center of Athens you will feel at home!

In anticipation of the opening, I postponed the journey along Gorokhovaya Street until later, and rushed up from the top of the Athenian "pyramid" towards the unknown, although I was already almost sure that the lines would cross in Greenland.

What I found was a real shock. The street of Athens, in Athens, rested exactly on the spire of the Admiralty in St. Petersburg!

This discovery stirred up the memory, made analogies drawn, and the conclusion turned out to be overwhelming. Petersburg and Athens were built by THE SAME BUILDERS. It would be more accurate to say that they belong to a single culture. Judge for yourself:

Try to guess where both pictures were taken? right. Left - Petersburg, right - Athens. There is absolutely no difference. Except for preservation, which is not surprising, there are no earthquakes in St. Petersburg. Those. it is obvious that this is not borrowing, not imitation, this is not just one style, it is a complete identity, which is possible only in one case. The statues are cast in the same molds. They are precisely cast, because it is impossible to make two absolutely identical statues with a tool, unless you use a laser machine, computer-controlled, or a 3D printer. And we see as many as 10 statues that are absolutely identical, like tin soldiers. Four in Petersburg and six in Athens. Now it remains to answer one delicate question for Tradists: Which is older, Athens or Petersburg? If Athens is older, then why are they built according to a single plan, like modern cities? That means we need to move away from double standards - in Russia everything was built only recently, because the savages lived alone, and in Europe everything was built 3-4 centuries before Jesus Christ, because they are not savages, but very smart.

Scientists! Let’s already, decide: Either St. Petersburg and Athens are the same age, or it’s time for you all to annul your diplomas, for incompetence.

OK. Half the battle is done. It remains only to find out whether St. Petersburg was built in antiquity, or Athens in the eighteenth century. Good question, but we need to finish our walk along Voskresensky Prospekt.

And so … We got straight to Egypt, and not just to the backyard, but to Giza itself!

So the Petersburg pyramid and the Great Egyptian ones met.

Now it is clear that nothing is accidental. All these sphinxes all over Peter … It's not just that! It is so difficult that it does not fit in the head. How could the builders of St. Petersburg so accurately indicate the direction, and most importantly for what !? I think that this is not just a symbolism and a hint. It is necessary to look for a rational grain in this. It clearly does not smell, even mysticism and esotericism. The one who built it all knew how it all works. The only assumption that comes to mind of a modern person is that we are observing some kind of transfer of energy, or information, unknown to us. Although, maybe I'm confusing cause and effect. Perhaps, on the contrary, some unknown force subordinates to its own laws the vital activity of a person on Earth? and walk to the last edge of the "pyramid". The surprises are probably not over!

So, let's go! On the way, let's think about what lies behind the names "Voznesensky", "Gorokhovaya", and "Nevsky". The Ascension has something to do with the Egyptian pyramids. Pea - with the son of the sun Horus (Khorsom). And what about Nevsky? What is behind the name "NEVA"? My guess is this: Neva is a modified word "NOVA" (new). Those. The Neva is a new river. Why new? At what time could it be new? New from the bottom, or changed the course? Where, then, is the old channel? Some questions. However, we have already arrived somewhere:

Whatever this error was, my eye is not a diamond, or the builders of Nevsky missed, but Mount Kailash happened to be on our way. The most mysterious peak in the world. According to legend, in its depths mighty giants doze in a state of samadhi, a kind of ark, with "samples of inhabitants" of a vanished civilization. Although none of the Europeans admits that they saw them, it is completely unreasonable to deny that there is something there.

Brief summary: We have "in touch" the Egyptian pyramids, the territory of ancient Sumer, designated as "Horus", and Kailash. All this cannot be explained by chance coincidences.

Before us are clearly traced signs of a certain system, which is incredibly difficult for mere mortals to discern, let alone unravel. But we can't help but try it! We are not used to retreating! The newsreel "I want to know everything" will help us to solve it! Whoa! I forgot, there is no longer such a magazine. In our time, every new issue of "I want to know everything" was long-awaited! Today, only the moronic "Yeralash" is on the screens for children! He really contributes to the growth of erudition! He educates, of course, curious, science-hungry citizens! However … Sorry, I was distracted. My lengthy reasoning would have led to something, but it so happened that one of the comrades who had read my articles called from Penza and gave out so many amazing thoughts that it seemed you could drown. However, now I willy-nilly remember his words (Many thanks to you, mednik58). From Kailash, then you need to return to St. Petersburg, and look for new clues near the AD - MIR - ALteystvo.

These are three kopecks from the times of Peter the Great. This coin was called ALtyn. As in the word "admiralty" there is a part of "AL". What is "al"? If you go ahead, then the first thing that comes to mind is, again, the stories of traditional scholars, they say, there is nothing of its own in the Russian language, everything is borrowed. from Greek, Latin, Turkic languages and Estonian. Al, this is a supposedly Turkic word meaning "scarlet", "pink", "red". Examples: Alsou (name) - means rose water, Alatau - red mountain, Altai (red mountains), etc. And if you go from the opposite, but not on a break, but along a winding path, and assume that "AL" in Russian meant the numeral "THREE"? Look at the obverse of the coin, see THREE dots? This is THREE Copecks. With "Al" - sorted it out, now what is "TYN"? Imagine tyn?

Vertical stakes, these are … units! Then everything turns out smoothly, and this is not a bullshit at all, but a version that has the right to life. Three units are the same as altyn. Try to prove it's illogical! And now I propose to remember that there is Alatyr-stone. Yes, I am aware that this is an altar. Mysterious crystal in the stone hall of the Goddess Lada. But this word was also used as a name for the stones, which were placed at the crossroads of three THREE roads! The road diverges into three sides, on the alatyr it is written: "You will go to the right - you will lose a horse, to the left - honor ….", well, you know what to tell you. Now go back a little, look at the Admiralty area, what do you see? Three roads diverge from the stone-tower with a spire. THREE roads. From the hell-world of AL teystva! Was it an accident again? I propose this version. AL - tyr - is literally: "Three roads". What kind of road is it? ProTORerrnayu Tori-tyrit - indicate the direction, determine the road, the way. This is what the word "alatyr" can mean. "Admiral" from the same series, but a more precise concept. There is a specific indication of "hell", "world" and the number "three". Although AD can be the same number as AL and TYN.

Tyn - 1, ??? - 2, Al - 3., etc. And is it not from the word "tyn" that the English "ten" originated?

This is how a familiar word can sound like the ultimate puzzle. I have one more surprise for you. You've all been told that there is no place for women in the Bible. In the New Testament there is no one but Mary and the sinner Magdalene. And the saints are mostly men. And about angels and in general … There are only Michael, Raphael, etc. If everything is so, then who was this lady, for example?

Whoa! You need to show with your finger so that you are convinced that everything about angels is lying to you. You are welcome! A woman named Gabriel! And not an ordinary angel, but an officer! Archangel! Now let's remember who we have there on the Alexandria Column, next to the Admiralty?

It is useless to ask art critics who it is. You will be told only one word - Angel. It's like if you come for a salary, the cashier asks you: - "Who are you"? And in the answer: - "Man"! Well, wait, a man without a paycheck until you turn blue. So that's it. At the very top of the Montferrand column, not just an angel, but the Archangel Barachiel! This is how he was portrayed in the icons. Haven't you heard of this? And no wonder. There is not a word about him in the Bible. He is mentioned only in the apocrypha "Book of Enoch". And the apocrypha, they themselves understand what it is. Heresy. Time will pass and not a single priest will know this name. Why? What is the purpose of consigning this glorious fellow to oblivion … What? I'm laughing! Of course this is not "small". This is a gentle girl, can't you see? Here it is. A girl, with a cross in her left hand, crushing a snake. What did the artist tell us in this message?

And this is not your message either.

How many of you are ready to say with confidence that I understand what is in the picture? No. Because it is not necessary, not even necessary, to know this for everyone. There are specialists for that. Now go back to the aerial view of the cities. Seeing the similarities? But it is likely that it is not just external. Cities are the same printed circuit boards, even the parts on them are installed exactly like on electronic blocks. The same capacitors, chips, coils, diodes, triodes, septodes, etc.

Each element has its own marking, which can only be "deciphered" by a specialist. In architecture, buses, cables and pins are also easily readable. Cities and individual objects are definitely connected by common communications, such as roads, tunnels, orientation in space, rivers, canals, all this interacts as a single device, and the forces used for interaction, like the methods and purposes of this device, are a mystery for mere mortals, but easier than a steamed turnip for the initiated. They are among us, but we do not know anything about who they really are. But they are, otherwise by whose will all this "equipment" arose? And for them, marking parts like Archangel Varahiel is simple and straightforward. You all do not need to know it, but the specialists understand what and why. What types of energy are consumed and what are they used for, where are they used. It should be mentioned here that the "printed circuit boards" of the Earth are not on a plane, as in our devices, but they are three-dimensional. We see only the tip of the iceberg, and then, we do not understand anything. And in the depths, at different depths, there is a mass of voids, underwater rivers and lakes. And this is not counting the endless multitude of invisible streams that link the entire apparatus into a single structure of separate blocks.

Not far from the brave girl is another "marking", which clearly has an indication of something other than Barachiel, but there is one common element - the trampled serpent. In London, for example, all snakes live and live, and are on the arms and on the steeples of temples. In St. Petersburg, as well as in Russia as a whole, the markings indicate a defeated dragon. What does this mean? If we assume that the columns, steles and obelisks are systems of receiving and transmitting something, i.e. peculiar antennas, you can read some of their markings. She is one all over the world. See for yourself:

Trojan Column in Rome.

Vendome in Paris.

Qutuba Column in India. It is so old that the "marking has worn off" Its uniqueness is that it consists of pure iron, which is impossible to obtain even in modern conditions. It does not rust, and has always stood in place. Nobody knows where it came from.

Nelson's Column at Trafalgar Square, London. By the way, it was built by the Russians. It is believed that Nelson was generally "our employee".

Spain Square in Rome.

Enough. You have verified that the general part of the markings is uniform and universal. This is a full-length figure. The character itself matters, but this is the second part of the markings, which we cannot read yet.

St. Isaac's Cathedral is located very close to the Admiralty, which has a lot of analogues (the Cathedral of Christ the Savior, St. Peter's Cathedral in Rome, the Capitol in Washington, etc.), which is also no coincidence. All capacitors in the world have the same design, and these structures have the same purpose, and their own marking.

Here is the second type of marking for you - the rider on horseback. You can even write a book about this object. Here it is already obvious to everyone that the monument stood long before the birth of Peter the Great. This explains the fact that the figure itself was made by one sculptor, and the head, allegedly, was his student. Sheer nonsense. Who will entrust the head to the apprentice? A non-specialist can see that the pedestal has traces of repair. Seams are visible in front and behind, where pieces of granite of a different texture and color are joined. Above the front part of the pink granite is broken off and not restored. The hand is clearly replaced, it must contain a spear at least. In general, not a monument, but a victim of vivisection. It is also noteworthy that we have three stones on top of each other. Actually the stone itself is granite, the horse, which in the Old Russian language was the word "COMON" (hence the word "stone" in Russian and "common" in English), and Peter, which is also a stone. And one cannot leave a stone unturned - to destroy the monument to this mythical man. He is George, or Perun, Maybe God is YOUR (road to God, or God's way) Svyatogor, or Vyshen. Only not Peter.

This kind of marking can be traced on all "printed" boards, which have a design similar to St. Petersburg.

Marcus Aurelius in Rome.

Gammatelate in Padua.

Prince of Cheer (Slavs) Niklot in Schwerin, Germany.

So, the data that allow us to build a version that we all live in the system unit of a large computer is quite enough. If we draw an analogy with a computer, then it must inevitably have a hard drive somewhere, on which everything is recorded, from the first second of the system boot up to the present moment. Isn't it Kailash, an hour?