Devanagari - Old Russian language

2024 Author: Seth Attwood | [email protected]. Last modified: 2023-12-16 15:55

The state is usually built on a national idea, so the invaders are constantly working to disunite people and create new nationalities, tearing apart large states for this. And so that they do not mix back, new "empty" languages are created, for which the forces of Satan destroyed the first language and the semantic significance of its letters, and this destroyed the third signal system in people, which made the ancient language multifaceted and capable of evolution, since the formation of an endless the number of new words.

Empty languages have no meaningful letters, therefore, they set a limit to the speakers of this language in the knowledge of the surrounding world, since they lack the ability to create new concepts.

As an example, I would like to cite my own observation. Let's take our letter -o.

See how it, as a prefix, perfectly complements with its rounded closed way the meaning of just such a traversal along a closed loop! "About" - strengthening the image of the circle, colo. "Inspect" - look, starting from a point, in a circle, ending with the same point. "Stun" - you stop hearing around all 360 degrees. "To laugh at" - no matter how a person turns, he still remains the object of someone else's ridicule. Etc.

But in European languages the same sound - can be transmitted in different ways, but with the loss of imagery. Let's say in English. through -a with a consonant, in fr. via -au- or -eau- …

And even as a pretext, -o conveys the image of the same all-embracing: I was thinking about you. By the way, - grab - …

Durga Prasad Shastri, a world-renowned Indian Sanskritologist, when visiting the Russian city of Vologda discovered that he did not need an interpreter: the ancient form of Sanskrit turned out to be almost identical to the modern North Russian dialect … Sanskrit turned out to be just a modification of the language he mastered while wandering through the mountains of Borea. (Proceedings of the conference of the Society of Indian and Soviet Culture, February 22-23, 1964, Gazibad, Uttar Pradesh).

Northern Russia - Tver, Yaroslavl, Vologda, Kostroma … - lived apart for thousands of years, outside the movement and mixing of peoples, and its language practically did not change.

“Among the latter, remarkable is Durga Prasad Shastri, an Indian linguist. He, having visited the Russian “hinterland” several decades ago, wrote: “How I wish that Panini, the great grammarist of India who lived about 2600 years ago, could be here with me and hear the language of his time, so wonderfully preserved with all the smallest subtleties!..”"

In European and Indian languages there is no such means of preserving ancient language systems as in Russian. The time has come to intensify the study of the two largest branches of the Indo-European family and to open some dark chapters of ancient history for the benefit of all peoples”*.

(* Proceedings of the conference of the Society of Indian and Soviet Culture, February 22 - 23, 1964, Gazibad, Uttar Pradesh).

And not only Lomonosov, the president of the Russian Academy during the time of Nicholas I, Admiral Shishkov, spoke about the Russian language: “Whoever takes the trouble to enter the immeasurable depth of our language, and each of his words will refer to the beginning from which it flows, the one who goes further, the more clear and undeniable evidence of this will be found.

Not a single language, especially from the newest and European ones, can be equal to ours in this advantage. Our language is excellent, rich, loud, strong, thoughtful. This ancient one, original languagealways remains the educator, the mentor of the poor one, to whom he communicated his roots for the cultivation of a new garden in them.

Foreign word interpreters, in order to find the initial thought in the words they use, should resort to our language: in it is the key to explaining and resolving many doubts that they will look for in vain in their languages."

These wonderful and true thoughts, however, until now they did not have a sufficiently rigorous scientific justification, as well as the thoughts of the mathematician Lobachevsky about the higher organization of the Russian language in comparison with the European ones.

1. The Russian language had an ancient writing system before the appearance of Cyrillic writing, and it was common for many peoples, who later made up the Indo-European family of languages. The sign system of this writing was widespread throughout ancient Europe and served as the basis for the later appearance of many alphabets, runes and syllabic systems.

2. There is evidence that the Slavic languages were the basis on which all the most famous ancient Indo-European languages were formed: Latin, Sanskrit, Ancient Greek, and, consequently, all European languages. And this is not a hypothesis, but a fact established in accordance with the rules.

In addition, traces in all ancient languages have an Old Slavic layer. And with the correct reading, the most ancient languages begin to speak Slavic.

For example, in ancient Egyptian inscriptions, the image of a mouth means: the word "mouth", the sign "p" and the adjective "red".

In German, the word "red" also sounds like "mouth", and "mouth" like a mouth is only in Slavic, in Slavic words there is also the syllable "ro" - "pink" (Russian), "horny" (Ukrainian), "Rozowy" (Polish), and in ancient Greek the letter "ro".

Earlier, Indo-European studies (a branch of linguistics) did not have the opportunity to answer the question: “What is more correct? And what before? ", - and was limited in comparisons only by a systemic statement: if in German" t ", then in English" d "(" goth "-" year "- god," gut "-" gud "- good," mouth "-" red "- red, etc.).

The first applications of the resulting system of rules to other Indo-European languages bring amazing results. These languages, like the ancients, begin to speak Russian.

Distortions and "irregularities" fly off foreign words like a husk, exposing the most ancient layers of Slavic vocabulary and semantics (vocabulary and semantic content of the language).

Even in the Hebrew language, which according to assurances is the most ancient, there are borrowings from the Slavic, for example, the word "road", which no longer exists in any language group. And how can this be if we were not there yet? And how can this be if the texts where this word occurs are dictated by God himself?

This means that the existing views need a radical revision. That the system of rules of Indo-European word formation, leading to the indicated results, can no longer be ignored.

When the found rules are applied, the Ancient Greek “ecology” and “economics” turn out to be “vecology and vekonomics”, i.e. the sciences of the correct construction and calculation of the "century" (life), which fully corresponds to their meaning in the ancient Greek and Russian languages with a completely Slavic sound.

Old Latin "ether" correctly sounds like "wind", the Germanic epic "Edda" becomes "Veda", while repeating the plots of the Vedas, the sun "Ra" - "Yar", and "Arias" - "fierce".

The Portuguese “estupa” (stove) becomes just a “stupa”, and the “stage” imposed in the language turns into a familiar “stadu”, “estrano” becomes “strange”, which is what this word means in Spanish.

There is no letter F in the Russian language, it is "alien" to him, and comes across only in borrowed words. It turned out that it is alien, borrowed for other Indo-European languages, and it should be read as P, if the word is from Latin, and most often as T, if the word is from Ancient Greek.

When replacing "Ф" or "F" with "correct" letters, words, even very ancient ones, also begin to sound in Slavic: FRESH (fresh, English) turns into FRESN (fresh, unsalted, unleavened).

FLAME (flame) turns into FLAME, FAKEL into PAKLYA, FLOT into RAFT, which means that civilized humanity spoke practically in Russian even at the founding of the Great Roman Empire.

And, given that already surprisingly many words in ancient Latin absolutely coincide with Slavic speech (for example, “ribs” in ancient Latin sounds like “bones”, and there are such Slavic words in Latin as “stay-at-home”, “to inhabit”, "Will", "whip", "ax"), it is obvious that the history of migrations and invasions must be considered from this new angle, since no "borrowings" or "developments" of these coincidences cannot be explained - this vocabulary in Latin is the most ancient layer.

The foreign "files" that have filled our life (English FILE - row, line, file cabinet, file, saw) come from the ancient Greek "phila" (clan, row, detachment, tribe), but have an ancestor in the form of a Slavic "saw" (FILE = PILA), which is especially obvious from the words "profile", "profile section", "terrain profiling", which should be read as "cut", which corresponds to a longitudinal cut (cut), as opposed to a cross section.

An even more ancient Slavic sound is obtained from the English "FIRE" - "fire". It received an alien letter "F" later than ancient Greek, in which the correct letter "P" is preserved, and the word "PIR" gave the basis for all "pyrotechnics" taken from ancient Greek. However, the very ancient Greek "feast" had its source most likely the ancient Slavic "steam", since for the "feast" in the Greek the meaning of "steam room, sweat bath" has been preserved.

The multimillion-strong branch of the Slavic languages turned out to be the trunk of the Indo-European tree, but until recently it was believed that this subgroup was formed quite late, as a side branch at the turn of the new era (2nd century BC - 2nd century AD).

According to official ideas, the Slavic languages originated from the Germanic ones through the Lithuanian one. In accordance with this point of view, the Slavs appeared in Europe quite late, after the Lithuanians, simultaneously with the Goths and Vandals. That is, suddenly, out of nowhere, a multi-million people appeared, and even occupying a huge territory.

Therefore, the new point of view completely changes the ideas about the past of Russia, not only among us, but also among other peoples of Europe, which cannot but inspire hope for our future.

But most importantly, the proto-linguistic structures of the Old Russian language, the language of creation, most accurately, without distortion, translate the images of the unconscious into modern speech.

It turns out that in Russian you can raise such layers that are lost when translated into some Western language, not to mention these very …, one of them allowed himself the following phrase: “In translations into Russian, I like myself more.”

The Judeo-Christian religion and the kabbalized society offer us their saturation of ancient concepts. One of these concepts, the word "rich", which in the Old Russian language did not mean at all what is being put into it now.

The Rus called a person “rich” in whom there was a “god”, and the Vedic religion was engaged in the achievement of the state of God in a person. The task of man was “to become God,” that is, exactly what it is forbidden to be and even to think about it in the Judeo-Christian false religions.

It is necessary to speak separately about the role of the Latin language, littering Russian and other languages, but the attentive reader should note that Latin words denoting certain concepts, as a rule, have roots in which the opposite meaning is laid.

For example, the well-known term "empire" is actually translated as "undivine", compare with the English word "impossible" - impossible or "impotent" - incapable, etc.

The English-speaking and Russian worldviews are fundamentally different even in the images. In English, a speculator is a thinker, speculation is thinking, an affair is a matter. It can be seen even in the basis, in the conceptual sphere, what actions the national consciousness is ready to give priority to, what to be proud of.

Not achievements in the field of labor, not conquests in the field of science, not victories in spiritual life, no … speculation, that is, "methods of comparatively honest weaning and redistribution of funds" and scams.

The rapid process of degradation is associated with the loss of the native language - Devanagari (the ancient Russian language spoken by the souls of all people).

Occult invaders do not just change the language, they create artificial languages, some of which become harmful to humans.

There is a widespread tradition among the Russian population: to send gifted children to an English school, and at the same time, there is a tendency: promising children, having graduated from an English school, in life could not even graduate from college at times.

An analysis of English schools showed that, despite the predominance of gifted children, in terms of the number of students enrolled in universities, these schools had average indicators against the background of other schools in the city. This fact was not understood until the very moment when it became clear that the frequency characteristics of the sounds prevailing in the English language produce destruction in the human body, or rather, violate all the intimate processes of the brain responsible for creativity.

That is why the most sensitive and gifted children in English schools lose their supernormal abilities and turn into ordinary losers. And that's why the invaders made squalid, technical English international.

In childhood, of course, you can learn foreign languages, but not English. You can start it already in adolescence, when the human brain and his creative abilities have already taken shape.

Knowledge of the great Russian language will help to more accurately determine the territorial settlement of the Slavs, because you can use the method of topo- and hydronymics, that is, the method of studying the historical names of localities and rivers, which usually do not change, even if there is a resettlement of the people or the conquest of territory.

The settlement of the Slavs in the territory of modern Europe is confirmed by the following names: the settlement of Mikulin bor (aka Rarog, later Mecklenburg), the former capital of the encouraged conquered by Gottfried of Denmark (according to other sources, Gottrick of Denmark) in 808.

According to legend, the Russian tsar Gostomysl gave his daughter Umila to Godoslav, the prince of encouragement, whose capital was Mikulin Bor. And she gave birth to Rurik. After the raid on the city, the fate of Rurik is unknown.

At least until 844 (before the death of Gostomysl in the lands of encouragement in the battle with Louis the German), they had close relations and a military alliance with the Novgorod Slovenes. It also says a lot about the kinship of vigorous and Slovenian.

After the death of Gostomysl, Rurik, apparently, became the head of an ordinary Varangian squad, which traded in guards and robbery. This was the era of the campaigns of the Vikings and Varangians. And one must assume that Rurik's squad took part in many of them.

Rurik is a Varangian, but “Varangianism” is an occupation, not an ethnic name, that is, he is not a Norman, but a vigorous Slav, “Varangian-Rus”. By the way, his name comes from the name of the sacred bird of the Western Slavs - the encouragement of the falcon Rarog, the incarnation of the Firebog Semargl).

Here is the historical evidence of the chronicle: “Erke“Rurik”is not a Russian, because he, like a fox, prowled with cunning in the steppe and killed merchants who trusted him” (“Book of Veles” III, 8/1).

For thousands of years, the Orthodox faith has brought up honor and nobility in the Russians, therefore the Magi considered it necessary to indicate in the annals that Rurik, who has a princely position, is NOT a Rusich NOT IN THE FORCE OF NATIONALITY, BUT IN FORCE EXACTLY MORALCRITERIA.

The change of the dynasty had not yet led to the suppression of the clan, since Rurik, albeit not in the male line, is still the grandson of Gostomysl.

This royal family, which, according to ancient legends, existed for about 3000 years, and according to the official chronicles - from the 6th-7th centuries. n. e., stopped only in the 16th century, in the “time of troubles, when the Rurik dynasty was replaced by the Romanov dynasty.