People who have lost their morality lose their land

2024 Author: Seth Attwood | [email protected]. Last modified: 2023-12-16 15:55

In 1238, voivode Evpatiy Kolovrat hurried with a detachment of 1,700 soldiers to help Ryazan, besieged by Khan Batu, but did not have time. Looking around the ashes, he decided to catch up with the enemy and engage in battle with a 150-thousand-strong horde. When Batu was informed about the attack, he sent a tumen (10 thousand soldiers) against him. The Russians held their own. Batu sent another tumen, the Russians resisted again. Struck by their prowess, the khan offered them money and positions.

They answered: "No!" "What do you want?" - asked Batu. "We want to die." After such an answer, the khan was forced to stop all the troops, rebuild it from a marching order to a combat one and move all his might against the Russians. And then a miracle happened. The 150,000-strong horde could not defeat a handful of people. On the third day of the continuous battle, Batu, suffering huge losses, surrounded the brave men with battering machines and threw huge stones at them. From the point of view of common sense, the act of the squad of Evpatiy Kolovrat is inexplicable, he is from the category of Russian miracles.

On July 17, 1941, in the Belarusian village of Sokolnichi, Chief Lieutenant of the 4th Panzer Division Friedrich Henfeld wrote in his diary: “An unknown Russian soldier was buried in the evening. He fought alone. He fired a cannon at our tanks and infantry. It seemed there would be no end to the battle, his courage was amazing … It was a real hell."

This unknown soldier was 19-year-old senior sergeant of the 55th rifle regiment Nikolai Sirotinin, who with a 76-caliber gun voluntarily remained to cover the retreat of his comrades. The battle lasted three hours, and even after damage to the gun, Nikolai shot the enemy with a carbine. A nineteen-year-old Russian boy destroyed 11 tanks, 7 armored vehicles and 57 infantrymen. In Sokolniki they heard about the atrocities of the fascists, especially in those villages where they suffered heavy losses and expected that revenge would be especially cruel here.

The Germans really drove all the inhabitants into one place, and then something happened that was probably not exactly an analogue in the entire history of the Great Patriotic War. They dug the grave themselves, covered the body of the Russian soldier with a raincoat, stood over it for a long time, and after burying it, fired a threefold volley. Passing the soldier's medallion to one of the villagers, the German colonel said: “Take it and write to your relatives. Let the mother know what a hero her son was and how he died. The feat of Nikolai Sirotinin is also a Russian miracle, and such miracles accompany our entire history.

Once Fyodor Tyutchev wrote: “You cannot understand Russia with your mind, you cannot measure with a common yardstick,” and this expression reflected the essence of the Russian people. The whole world knows that Russians are not Europeans, with their desire to put everything on the shelves, that they can live where others run away from, that they can win when others give up, that Russia and Europe are too different to live according to one rules. After all, one of the main features of the Russian mentality is sacrifice, this is when you "lay your belly for your friends."

Not for money and power, but for your friends. Modern Europe and sacrifice are incompatible concepts, sacrifice came to us with Christianity, and Europe is no longer Christian. Modern Europe has transformed into a very rational, calculated and paid society. The situation when an ordinary IT specialist from Lipetsk puts on a backpack, takes a taxi and goes to Donetsk to defend “his own people,” and I personally heard this story from this taxi driver, is implausible for Europeans.

They will never be able to understand the pain of Russia in the events taking place in Ukraine, and trying to explain it to them is like throwing pearls in front of pigs. Even if they listen to us, they do not hear, since we live in different moral planes. For Europeans, it is understandable to fight for national interests and resources, but to fight for “their own” is not clear. As never a Russian person will be able to accept the words of the President of the Council of Europe Herman Van Rompuy that “the concepts of people and homeland should go to the dustbin of history”, so Rompuys will never understand that apart from a united Europe there is also a single “Russian world”. Yes, in many respects dissolute, lax and childishly naive, but at the same time great, all-forgiving, disinterested and sacrificial.

And how could it be otherwise, if speaking in the same words, we put different meanings into them. We speak of gender as the equality of men and women, and Europeans as gender and social self-identification. For your information, today there are sixty-two gender types that legalize a wide variety of combinations, and not so long ago, one professor from Australia suggested introducing a sixty-third gender. This, no less, is a pig-man. We are sick of all this, and Europeans are proud of their tolerance, and it is impossible to convince them that all this is an abomination.

We are trying to protect our children from molestation, and in Berlin schools study the manual "Lesbian and pederastic lifestyles." For example, it encourages networking with local homosexual organizations, inviting their representatives to lessons, watching films, and participating in role-playing games. Some of them are: you are in a gay bar and you want to pull an attractive guy into bed; how to tell your mom about your desire to start a gay family; two lesbians are going to get married in a church.

How many of you are ready to keep at home the German "Handbook for Parents on Sexual Education of Children from One to Three Years", which talks about the need for mutual research and stimulation of the genitals of children and their parents? And in Germany this book has sold 650 thousand copies in 6 years.

We are told about the need to protect a child from abuse, and the natural reaction of any normal person is to support this idea. But in fact, we are talking about the total control of the state over families, about the denial of parental authority, about setting the rights of the child above the rights of the parents, and about the fact that violence is considered any actions in relation to a child with which he does not agree, but which compelled to fulfill. For example, take out the trash can, or, say, make the bed.

And how many of you know that pedophiles first spoke about the rights of the child, who proclaimed that children should have a legal right to have sexual relations with adults. In 1977, Pedofile Information Exchange even began publishing the Children's Rights magazine. And their logic is quite understandable - separate the child from the parents, then pull him out of the family, and then do with him what you want. There and then there will be those willing to use his soul or body.

Our "sworn friends" are literally hysterical about the lack of freedom in Russia, but the whole question is what kind of freedom we are talking about. Imagine a situation that there are two people next to each other and each has freedom of movement. But the first can only move in one direction, and the second anywhere. Which of them is more free? Of course the second. To clarify the situation, both are on the roof and are blindfolded. The first can move in the direction of the attic staircase, and the second anywhere. Which of them is more free? It's still the second.

Now tell me: how will such a free movement end for him. A hospital bed at best, a cemetery at worst. We understand this, but the Europeans do not. For example, for them, the freedom of a drug addict means using drugs wherever and whenever they want, but for us it means signing our own death warrant. Therefore, speaking about freedom, it is necessary to define what it is - freedom of sin, or freedom from sin?

Freedom in a European way is when crosses are cut down in Ukraine, and churches are desecrated in Russia and copulate in the middle of an art gallery. Freedom in a European way is when in Germany naked teachers and students conduct an open physical education lesson. Freedom in a European way is when a day of tolerance is held in French schools, while all male students and teachers change into women's dress, put on makeup on their faces and begin to “mow” like ladies, and all females do everything exactly the opposite, posing as men.

We are strange people after all. We are presented with absolute permissiveness on a silver platter, and we turn our nose away from it. It smells bad to us. And all this is only because, as Dostoevsky once wrote: "if one professes freedom without inner self-restraint, it leads to licentiousness." Another question is how to explain to the Europeans that all this does not suit us, because we are different.

How can you explain something to people who not only do not read Dostoevsky, but who have stopped reading books altogether? What language to speak with those who instead of "father" and "mother" today say "parent 1" and "parent 2"? We delicately send all these numerous democratic foundations out the door, and they climb out of our window. Where does this persistence come from? Do they have nowhere to put the money, or is it smeared with honey in Russia?

Our society is inherently conservative, because it was formed in a system of moral prohibitions. This taboo was a consequence of the adoption of Christianity by Russia as a life outlook. Christianity once and for all said what is good and what is evil, what can be done and what cannot be done. It was Christianity that brought up inner self-restraint in us, it was it that became the foundation of Russian spirituality, and, if you like, the foundation of Russian “obstinacy”.

Any conservative society strongly resists attempts to change it, especially from the outside. This is precisely what explains the fact that all those moral innovations that are taking place in Europe with a bang in Russia are encountering active resistance. However, if in such a society there is still a shift in social consciousness, a shift towards rejection of traditional values, then this leads to destructive consequences, since the basic, state-forming foundations are subject to changes. Changes are taking on an avalanche-like and unpredictable character, and society is rapidly turning into a chaotic biomass that exists according to the laws of force.

Judge for yourself. As soon as in Russia, with the direct, incidentally, participation of European liberals, the fundamental principles, namely GOD, KING and FATHERLAND, were discredited, the state collapsed, destroying tens of millions of its citizens in a bloody frenzy. As soon as in the Soviet Union, and again with the direct participation of all the same Europeans, the idea of state collectivism was destroyed, the state collapsed, giving rise to the "dashing nineties".

Don't you think that everything that is happening around Russia today, all this fuss around the protection of children's rights and the struggle for the freedom of sex minorities, the fuss over sex education and family planning, attempts to impose so-called European values is not an accident, but system.

Back in 1945, the director of the US CIA, Alain Dulles, realizing that Russians can only be destroyed from within, wrote: “We will pull out spiritual roots, vulgarize and destroy the foundations of popular morality. We will shake generation after generation in this way. We will tackle people from childhood, adolescence, the main stake will always be on young people, we will corrupt, corrupt, defile them. We will make them cynics, vulgar, cosmopolitans."

And here Mr. Dulles did not come up with anything new, he simply retold the Bible in his own words, which says: "A people who have lost their morality will lose their land." It is the Russian land with its resources that is the true goal of our European and overseas "friends", and all this chatter about the American dream, European values and Russian backwardness is just a way to achieve it. As soon as our traditional values are replaced by the so-called European ones, the moral foundation of the state will be destroyed and it will collapse, and only the lazy will not want to dig in its ruins.

It used to be said that "what is good for a Russian is death for a German." Times have changed, and today it turned out that "what is good for a German is death for a Russian." And death in the literal sense of the word, because all countries that demonstrate a flexible approach to morality are endangered, and the more flexible this approach, the higher the rate of extinction.

Therefore, when UNICEF calls on us to promote same-sex relations among children, when the Council of Europe lobbies for the interests of the Russian gay community, when doctors in the Stavropol maternity hospital offer women sterilization, when the Russian Family Planning Association (RAPS) advertises hormonal contraception and abortion, when they try to drag them into schools. Sex education, when the rights of children are put above the rights of parents, when Russian liberals defend "femen" and "pusi wright" - this is a demographic war.

A war in which every little thing is worth a thousand lives. As soon as the activities of LGBT organizations were legalized in Russia, the number of young people who consider same-sex relationships "the norm" and are ready to experiment in this direction increased. As soon as sex education was admitted to schools, the level of sexually transmitted diseases and sex crimes increased. As soon as the International Planned Parenthood Federation was allowed into Russia under the guise of RAPS, the number of abortions began to rise and the reproductive rate of women began to decline. As soon as the adoption of children by foreigners was allowed, open trade in them began. And much more.

But all these are those European values, about which all our ears have been buzzing, and which are so persistently trying to "sniff" us. "Suck in" through the European structures controlled today by the homosexual lobby, through the controlled media, Russian liberals and corrupt Russian officials. Judging by the pressure with which all this is being done, you and I are included in the “black list” for destruction, and the question is “either-or”. Either we will, like a herd of sheep, obediently go to the slaughter, or we will try to stop the spread of this liberal plague.

When the inquisitors asked Joan of Arc: “You consider your cause to be right, why did you urge the soldiers to fight? Wouldn't God intercede for a just cause? " The Virgin of Orleans answered them with the famous phrase: "For God to grant victory, the soldiers must fight!"

Author: Sergey Yurievich Belyakov, Associate Professor of Lipetsk State Technical University.