Cord clamping: obstetric sabotage

2024 Author: Seth Attwood | [email protected]. Last modified: 2023-12-16 15:55

Childbirth today is aimed at harming the health of the child to the maximum. By intent, this is done, or by ignorance: the question is secondary, the main thing is to strive to learn as much as possible about these methods - this is the only way to protect yourself from negative interference.

One of the most harmful practices is cutting the umbilical cord early. This cannot be done for at least two reasons:

1) Placental blood should flow through the umbilical cord from the placenta to the child. If the umbilical cord is cut off earlier than an hour after childbirth, then the child does not receive part of the placental blood. Because of this, the child may experience various health problems. In addition, placental blood contains substances that naturally enhance the self-defense ("immunity") of the child.

The umbilical cord is cut too early to weaken the baby's immunity in advance. After all, a healthy person is not beneficial to the medical industry.

2) Immediately after birth, the child is on a "double breath". That is, through the umbilical cord from the placenta, he receives oxygen and gradually, begins to breathe through his nose. If the umbilical cord is cut right away, the child will be forced to take sharp breaths, and this is painful, since the lungs are not yet fully activated.

This pain is sealed in the baby's subconscious, in the future this fear will negatively affect his life.

Anti-aging masks and preparations are made from the tissues of the placenta and umbilical cord. Therefore, doctors are interested in early cutting of the umbilical cord. After all, the sooner they cut the umbilical cord, the more blood will remain in the placenta, i.e. it will be fresh and more suitable for further use in the manufacture of drugs.

These anti-aging drugs are not cheap. (more details in the material: The mystery of the blood and cannibalism of the elite)

The income from the use and sale of tissue from the placenta and umbilical cord is one of the reasons why "medicine" so protests against Home birth. After all, during Home birth, the umbilical cord and placenta remain in the Family, which means that the medical industry will not be able to make money on these tissues.

If you will give birth in "maternity hospitals", then I strongly advise you to take the placenta and umbilical cord with you. Be prepared that doctors will come up with different horror stories, just not to give you these tissues. But, these tissues are part of the body of a woman and a child! And you should take them with you! It is important!!! Indeed, the umbilical cord and placenta are connected with a woman and a child at the Spiritual (Energy-Informational) level. This means that any use of these tissues by strangers can harm the health of a woman and a baby.

Recently, I began to receive signals from girls that after giving birth in "maternity hospitals / clinics", "doctors" refuse to give the placenta and umbilical cord under a variety of pretexts. Therefore, I want to tell you about what law you should know so that "smart people" in white coats - can NOT use the placenta and umbilical cord for their business.

In 2011, the law "On the Fundamentals of Health Protection of Citizens in the Russian Federation" was adopted. At the moment, this is the main law governing health and medicine in Russia.

In the second article of this law, there is a definition: "Medical intervention - performed by a medical worker in relation to a patient, affecting the physical or mental state of a person and having a preventive, research, diagnostic, therapeutic, rehabilitation orientation, types of medical examinations and (or) medical manipulations, and also artificial termination of pregnancy ".

Removing tissue from the placenta and umbilical cord is a medical intervention. According to the law, before the intervention, the physician is obliged to obtain YOUR permission to intervene, or your refusal to intervene. This is stated in Article 20, paragraph 1: "A necessary precondition for medical intervention is the giving of informed voluntary consent of a citizen or his legal representative to medical intervention."

Your consent to intervene, or refusal to intervene, must be in writing. This is evidenced by the same article 20, paragraph 7: "Informed voluntary consent to medical intervention or refusal to medical intervention is made in writing, signed by a citizen, one of the parents or other legal representative, a medical worker and is contained in the patient's medical records."

And also: "The patient - has the right to refuse medical intervention", in accordance with Article 19, paragraph 8.

These articles of this law - you need to know.

So, let's summarize. The placenta and umbilical cord are part of the body of a woman and a child. Without the woman's written permission, the withdrawal and further use of these tissues is FORBIDDEN !!! It is better that the child's father was at birth, so that immediately after the birth of the child, he took the tissues of the umbilical cord and placenta. For, health workers can persuade a girl / woman to leave tissue in the hospital. And a man is unlikely to lead to the persuasion of doctors.

Kirill Repiev

Previously, our ancestors at the birth of a child put it on the chest. When he begins to suck, the placenta departs. The placenta was hung over the baby's cradle in a bowl. After a while, the placenta was cut off and buried. A birch tree was planted above it if the child was a girl or an oak tree for a boy. The birch tree gives extra feminine soft feminine energy. Oak - strength and stamina. And all of our so-called modern advanced medicine can only kill the health of children. Now virtually all children are born sick. But there are many clever people who argue about the NOT need of a naturally created nature for childbirth and breastfeeding, the usefulness of vaccinations and many other "advanced" delusions of people who think modern civilization is the pinnacle of knowledge, higher than Nature and God.

Maria Dmitrieva

There are two moments when it is better to cut the umbilical cord quickly - the threat of Rh-conflict, another - entanglement, if it is tight and cannot be removed, and also - if the umbilical cord is short, then it is inconvenient to hold the baby and put the mother on her stomach, then you can cut it within 15 minutes.

Not all maternity hospitals conclude agreements with pharmaceutical companies, they are taken only by agreement - the same Faberlik collaborated with 4 Barnaul maternity hospitals, for example. In addition, not every placenta is needed, but healthy, if the waters were greenish, etc. - no one except you needs such a placenta.

Where they do not cooperate, it is easier to pick up. And if they are sent for biological products, then it is really possible to pick it up only if an application was submitted before the birth.

If in maternity hospitals, then let them at least wait until the umbilical cord turns white (this is about 20 minutes), which means that the blood pulsation has stopped. the only contraindication is the possible threat of Rh-conflict. then and only then is early cutting justified.

There is also an energetic pulsation - it is longer.

Even 25-50 ml of blood that a child does not receive from the placenta is equivalent to a half-liter-liter in an adult (in proportion to body weight).

Alla Kirzhaeva

My girlfriend giving birth in the rd was faced with this. When she and her husband began to demand that the placenta be given, such a stream of dirt and threats fell upon them that they retreated. And the most important thing is how they intimidate that they will call the juveniles.. In our city, there are real cases when they were summoned, the child was seized. The reason - the parents are sectarians because they refused vaccinations and demanded the placenta.

July dragon

Umbilical cord clamping: a monument to obstetric folly

So let's start with the definitions.

Immediate clamping of the umbilical cord: when the clamp is applied to the umbilical cord immediately after the baby leaves, separating the functioning placenta and depriving the baby of about 50% of the total blood volume.

There can be no excuse for this. Neonatologists say that immediate clamping and transection of the umbilical cord gives them the ability to quickly take the baby to the intensive care table, but there is absolutely no explanation why what is being done on this table cannot be done directly on the mother's chest while the baby is receiving his own blood belonging to to him by right. Some articles define "early" cord clamping within one minute of delivery.

Delayed (late) cord clamping: the time after which clamping is considered delayed varies in different medical sources from 30 seconds to 1 minute (according to arbitrary pediatric "rules", such as "wait a minute"), two minutes (Hatton et al., 2007), and if you if you are lucky and the staff are daydreaming or busy, then even three minutes.

Physiological (normal) cord clamping: when the child himself compresses the umbilical vein and arteries in various places in his body after reaching the optimal volume of blood, which is transfused into him from the mother. However, you will not see this term in most research because very few randomized trials are actively investigating the closure of a baby's own umbilical cord. This is the same process that occurs in all mammals born with an umbilical cord.

A baby's umbilical cord should not be pinched, even in exceptional circumstances such as a caesarean section, placenta previa, or any other "excuse". If a caesarean section or surgery is necessary, the baby, the umbilical cord and placenta must be removed as a single organ, and the placenta must be suspended like an IV drip above the baby so that the baby can gravitate towards it.

The normal physiology of cord clamping does not follow the human clock. It is controlled by other parameters, which vary depending on the circumstances. For a baby, the transition from life inside the womb to life outside the womb is difficult. Many of the most important physiological changes occur invisibly, and interference with this process can have serious consequences. However, when you read about in a textbook, you are told that clamping stops circulation in the placenta. Indeed, it is true. Cord clamping stops circulation! The clamp is not part of natural physiological design and should not be used.

Have you ever wondered why, when the baby's umbilical cord is clamped right in the hospital, two clamps are applied to it, and the woman's husband is asked to cut the umbilical cord between them? Yes, because if not for the second clamp, from the placental part of the umbilical cord, which did not get to the child, it would rush onto the table! Maybe my father would have questions about who owns all this blood, or maybe not. But what amazes me is that the professional staff at maternity hospitals do not see the barbaric nature of this practice. Why is their knowledge of physiology so scarce? Charles Darwin's grandfather, Erasmus Darwin, wrote already in 1801:

It is also very harmful for the child to bandage and cut the umbilical cord too early; The umbilical cord should never be touched, not only until the baby has been breathing for some time, but also until all pulsation stops. Otherwise, the baby becomes much weaker than it should be, because some of the blood that needs to go to the baby remains in the placenta.

He wrote this because immediate cord clamping began immediately after the transition of obstetrics to men from women who were considered witches. Even then, he saw that it was wrong.

Pay attention to how events have developed historically, and then decide how best for you to do!

Since 1773, most medical guidelines have maintained the integrity of the umbilical cord until the pulsation ceases.

Around 1913, immediate cutting of the umbilical cord became fashionable because drugs were already noticeably disrupting the normal course of labor. The drugs used at the time to anesthetize labor relaxed the uterus and mostly numbed the baby, while analgesics such as pethidine and chloral hydrate prolonged the pulsation of the umbilical cord. Because women were unable to give birth while standing or sitting, and were under the influence of drugs and in a supine position with feet in stirrups, profuse bleeding and blood loss became common phenomena that oxytocin began to combat. This was the era of shutting women down to unconsciousness, using forceps and essentially interfering with natural childbirth in any way possible. It was logical that obstetricians also took control of the umbilical cord.

Until 1970, most texts still said that the umbilical cord should be left until the pulsation ceases.

Around 1976, textbooks mandated that the umbilical cord should be clamped immediately or 30 seconds after birth, aligning theory with practice that had been going on for decades.

By 1986, textbooks stated that the optimal time for clamping the umbilical cord was not known, and in 1994, that the child should immediately suck the mucus from the respiratory tract after giving birth, and immediately clamp the umbilical cord.

Now, while there are a few lonely voices urging doctors to change their minds and return to the natural physiological closure of the vessels of the umbilical cord, many obstetricians-gynecologists are not inclined to stop the practice of immediate umbilical cord clamping. They do this in spite of the knowledge that there is no scientific and rational explanation for this. How many pediatricians and neonatologists have seen at least one child left without a cord clamp?

Most strikingly, some doctors seriously consider delayed cord clamping as "intervention" and immediate cord clamping as "normal."

And, of course, cord blood banks are trying to convince you to pay them to store the baby's blood, so as not to “throw away” all the blood that remains in the placenta and will otherwise be “lost”. They propose to preserve stem cells, special cells with a genetic program, capable, when transplanted in the future to damaged or diseased tissues and organs, to teach these tissues and organs optimal self-healing. Cord blood banks say why don't you pay us to store your baby's blood in case he gets cancer or something else and needs something that was not needed at birth? But in fact, all this "waste" should be passed on to the baby at birth to help lay the foundations for a better life. IF … after the child receives the full volume of his blood in the placenta, there is still something left, then maybe it makes sense to collect these remnants.

But first, doctors must acknowledge that the now accepted medical practice of immediate cord clamping is self-harm, a violation of the child's right to health, compared to the natural physiological closure of the umbilical cord to give the baby the best possible start in life.

Hillary Butler (New Zealand), excerpt, source