Stalin's democratic rating is 90%. But Democrats don't like democracy

2024 Author: Seth Attwood | [email protected]. Last modified: 2023-12-16 15:55

Stalin is still supported by the democratic majority. And only the Democrats, on the contrary, contrary to their name, are not happy with this.

I have noticed more than once that pro-Western liberal democrats actually hate democracy. In Crimea-Donbass, the democratic majority is for Russia and against Bandera-Obama. But the democrats do not like it, they step on the throat of their own song and for some reason support the authorities and the opinion of the minority. That is, in reality they are anti-democratic.

In democratic Bandero-ucropia, not a single referendum was held, but the government was forcibly overthrown a year before the next elections. On the other hand, democratic referendums were held in the pro-Putin undemocratic Crimea-Donbass. But, the Democrats strongly opposed and did not recognize the results of the Referendums.

For more information about Crimea-Donbass, here I have collected public video statements of famous democrats on anti-Russian sites from Nemtsov to the most famous Israeli journalists that, indeed, in Crimea-Donbass, the ratings of Russia and Putin are approaching 100%.

But, this is in Ukraine. It's the same in Russia. Putin's rating is less than in Ukraine, but, nevertheless, it is also huge - 90%. But the democrats "do not notice" this and again advocate anti-democracy, trampling on their own principle and their own name. It's like, for example, Leninists would be against Lenin, Christians against Christ, astronauts against space exploration, chess players would not know how to play chess.

But, the most interesting for me is the democratic rating of the main enemy of the democrats - Stalin. Moreover, the explanation of Stalin's mega-popularity among the Bandenroabamites is completely absurd. They say that the older generation loves Stalin only because they were young in Stalin's time and a member was the last time in Stalin's time. But the young love Stalin because they did not live with him, they know nothing, how terrible it was, scary and disgusting to live with him.

But, they "do not notice" the main thing - everyone loves Stalin. Both old and young and middle-aged. Including those who had a member last time under the democrat Khrushchev, under the democrat Gorbachev, under the democrat Yeltsin and his prime minister Nemtsov. And where are the raised members for Khrushchev, Gorbachev, Yeltsin?

Regarding the high rating of Putin, the German Democrats say that it is the Russian TV that is to blame (although young people do not watch TV, they choose Putin). But, the TV certainly does not praise Stalin, and the rating is outrageous.

Sometimes the Democrats deny Stalin's high rating. Allegedly, a high rating is only on sites where Stalinists are clustered, therefore, the selection is biased in advance.

Therefore, attention! I present a rating from an unbiased community in classmates, which I noticed by chance just today. This is a group of lovers of humor and entertainment without any political meaning. There are jokes on any topic, animals, cats, all sorts of jokes, jokes.

Take a look at the screenshot from here

As of today, when I write this, on October 25, 2015, 13,000 Russian-speaking people have voted not only from Russia, but from all over the world, and the positive rating was 90%, and only 6% negative. The remaining 4% are neutral towards Stalin.

I emphasize the most important thing - it is not a political resource, not Stalinist, not communist, not Putin's. Just entertaining, and therefore, the poll result is objective.

There is a very important point in such a high rating. Such a rating of Stalin suggests that no mass repressions existed in reality. These are all lies.

If there really were tens of millions of repressed and executed people, as the Solzhenitsyn democrats claim, then how could the sisters, brothers, children and grandchildren of those who vote for Stalin en masse.who was cruelly punished by the murderous Stalinist machine of bloody red terror? No propaganda could convince that Stalin was good if a person knew personally or from the words of his own mother that a cruel mustachioed tyrant communed not just somewhere out there, but personally his brother, father, grandfather-grandmother

Moreover, several waves of pig propaganda swept through the name and memory of Stalin. First, under Khrushchev at the highest level at the 20th Congress of the CPSU, Comrade Khrushchev poured a bucket of slops on Stalin, and after him Solzhenitsyn and other politicians and famous writers, then under Gorbachev all the media from newspapers to televisions.

The same is true under Yeltsin and even under Putin. If the Internet did not appear, then I would still not know the truth, and I would also be an anti-Stalinist, which I was before the Maidan. I seriously believed in the "millions of victims of the Gulag." I just heard what the TV was saying and didn’t understand why he was lying if he wasn’t paid for it.

My innocence is confirmed by the comments of the Stalin-haters to this article of mine. One hater here on the blog is Vladimir Shulaev, the second in VKontakte is Lydia Konyukhova.

Both claim to have repressed relatives. There are about 6% of them. Or 1 in 17.

Vladimir Shulaev, at the end of his senseless stream of nonsense about Stalin, not related to my article, declares:

The anti-Stalinist Lydia Konyukhova wrote a similar thing in contact:

Don't believe me? Here is a link directly to the site of Echo of Moscow, there is also a sound file with this program. And this is not a slip of the tongue. He starts to issue mega-numbers in the 6th minute. He's really fucked up. The presenter tried to correct him if it was a slip of the tongue - it was not there. He insists on an insane figure, scientifically, it is one and a half billion, that is, 10 times more than all people lived then in the Soviet Union. All of them were repressed 10 times.

Ukrainian anti-Stalinists are also making great strides in Bandera mathematics. Here is the leading propaganda site Information Resistance (Information Opir):

In 1931, there were more Ukrainians in the USSR than Russians. 55 million disappeared in six years

Stalin-haters have at least a count on their heads. I wrote in this article above the answer to the moronic false argument that people were allegedly afraid to admit that someone was imprisoned or shot with them under Stalin, because it was dangerous to speak in a totalitarian country. My answer in this article is (I quote myself):

several waves of pig propaganda swept through the name and memory of Stalin. First, under Khrushchev at the highest level at the 20th Congress of the CPSU, Comrade Khrushchev poured a bucket of slops on Stalin, and after him Solzhenitsyn and other politicians and famous writers, then under Gorbachev all the media from newspapers to televisions

But the anti-Stalinist Vladimir Shulaev again writes a commentary on my article, as if he had not read my argument. I quote Shulaev:

… when they ask the relatives of the repressed, many do not speak out loudly about this, first of all … But did these great-great-grandmothers want and love to talk about what happened to their sons, husbands, fathers and other relatives? Of course not, were afraid!link to comment

Well, Mr. Shulaev is just stoned. Probably a great proto-ukr. Under Khrushchev, were they feared during the Khrushchev thaw, in the era of the debunking of the personality cult of Stalin at the 20th Congress of the CPSU in the newspapers and in the books of Solzhenitsyn? Under Gorbachev-Yeltsin, when Stalin was doused with slop not only radio, TV and newspapers, but even cats and dogs in the streets barked and meowed "Stalin is a tyrant!", "Executioner". Who could you be afraid of?

A source

Related Topics:

• I hate Stalin, I can’t eat. He fought on the globe, repressed from the portrait!
• Anti-Stalinists call drawings photographs. Schizophrenia or a lie?
• The main culprit of the Victory according to Hitler