Fake history of mankind. Russia from 1900 to 1940

2024 Author: Seth Attwood | [email protected]. Last modified: 2023-12-16 15:55

The author offers a critical look at the events that took place in Russia from 1900 to 1940

Let me make a reservation right away: this article is intended for a reader with a critical mindset. To the rest, it will seem complete nonsense. And yet I believe that such a point of view on the origin of humanity has the right to life. To those who will reproach me for unsubstantiated chatter, I want to object: human logic is a powerful and accurate tool for cognizing reality, provided, of course, that the latter is linear. In my previous article, I offered readers a hypothesis that humanity was created by a certain Creator 200 years ago. After some thought, I decided to adjust this period downward. I believe that humanity appeared on the planet at the turn of the 30s - 40s of the 20th century, and possibly even later. That is, the age of our civilization is less than 100 years old. I will try to explain why I think so on the example of the history of Russia. The events that took place in the Russian state from 1900 to 1940, if you think about them even a little, look incredible, even fantastic. It was from the moment of the Russo-Japanese War that Russia began to rapidly lose its population and economic potential. Only now, with the advent of the Internet, it has become possible to cover this era with a single glance.

The points:

1.1900-1905. The capture by Russia (or lease, if you like) of the Chinese Port Arthur and the Russian-Japanese war.

The big mystery: Where did Russia (and Japan as well) get the armored fleet, with what money and where was it built, and with what funds was it maintained? And this is a very expensive pleasure. And who served him, if even in our enlightened age it is not easy and sometimes impossible to teach a conscript sailor to handle ship's weapons and equipment within the framework of 3 years of service? And in general: were such technologies possible at that time?

2. The first Russian revolution of 1905-1907.

3. World War I 1914-1918.

4. February Revolution of 1917

5. October Revolution of 1917.

6. Civil War. Red and white terror. 1918-1922 years.

7. Industrialization of the USSR 1920-1940.

8. The famine of 1921-1922 and 1932-1933.

9. Political repression of the 1920s - 1930s.

Aren't there too many events for one people in 40 years ?! What an incredible, simply phenomenal political and physical activity of people. Especially against the background of the current political apathy of the population. But a lot of things have happened to us over the past 24 years:

1. The collapse of the USSR.

2. Robbery of the people in the form of monetary reform.

3. The second robbery of the people in the form of voucher privatization.

4. The third robbery of the people in the form of Yeltsin's default.

5. The first Chechen war.

6. The second Chechen war.

7. Finally, GDP.

So what? Someone took to the streets, took up arms? No, we swallowed it all, rolled up our sleeves, tightened our belts and live on.

So what caused such incredible events that happened to us at the beginning of the 20th century? In the footage of the chronicle, we see crowds of people seized with revolutionary enthusiasm and fiery orators (who, by the way, no one hears except the front rows). Who are all these people? What do they do for a living? What do they eat, what do they use to move around the city? And who dismissed them from work for the rally? Who released the soldiers from the barracks? Any anarchy in society very quickly rests on one single question: WHAT WE WILL EAT, GOD? Only a peasant after the rally can return home and dine on what the subsistence economy has sent (until the armed townspeople robbed, of course).

From 1900 to 1922, if history is to be believed, the Russian state was simply reduced to dust. Banal but vital questions arise: who fed the people during this great turmoil, how were the cities supplied with food? There were no refrigerators. How was meat, fish and milk stored and delivered, only in winter? How did the financial system work if the money of tsarist Russia ceased circulation after 1917: general exchange in kind for at least 5 years or settlements in gold? The papers that the Soviet government issued since 1919 were neither in form nor in essence money. History is silent about this. Where did the peasants' surplus food come from in the absence of equipment and fertilizers, and even in the conditions of the civil war, when both Whites and Reds were robbed, and the peasants were forcibly mobilized? How did Ukraine and the Volga region survive the famine and how did these regions recover after? Anyone who considers these issues insignificant, let him try to work on the land and produce "surplus" food. Industrialization is also impossible on the enthusiasm and slave labor of prisoners alone: did you buy factories from Americans and Europeans? Where did you get so much gold? Loans? On the example of the last years of our recent history, we see that deindustrialization is doing much better for us. Where did all these factories come from under Stalin, if for the last 20 years the whole country has not been able to debug the work of the VAZ alone, which we inherited from the USSR, and even foreign managers are unable to help us? If all the factories were bought abroad and deployed by foreign specialists in the shortest possible time, there is still no time left to create the mighty military potential of the USSR before the Second World War. And he was created. I believe that all industry appeared on the planet at the same time as us. Neither the Americans, nor the Europeans, nor we could create it from scratch in principle. Also, the movement around the country of huge masses of people from the Baltic to Kamchatka at the beginning of the 20th century is beyond comprehension. Someone was expelled, someone left in search of a better life. Where did the people have the funds to move and settle in a new place? And the state too. Even now it is difficult to do it, but then, in a destroyed country? All this suggests that these supposedly historical events never happened in reality. The borderline between real and fake history lies somewhere very close to us. Give it by hand.

I think that my hypothesis is no more fantastic than the Big Bang theory, Darwin's theory of evolution, the biblical history of the creation of the world or the "scientific" emergence of life from dead matter.. Perhaps, in my common sense there will be even more. The fact that our whole story was invented by someone or something does not cause me any doubt: there are already overwhelming facts. Wondering where it fits in with reality? I propose this era in our past as an option. We exist in a reality that has only two time dimensions: the Present and the Past. The future exists only in our imagination. The past exists in our memory and in the material trail that man and nature itself leave on the planet. Also, reality can have two options:

1. Reality is linear; its properties do not change over time. It can be compared to a straight road which is in full view if you look back.

2. Reality is nonlinear, that is, its properties change over time. It is like a winding road that, if you look back, disappears from us around the bend and reappears, but already another, one that we have never passed.

In the first version, we have a chance to understand our history at least a little. I do not assert anything, I just propose to think about the obvious things, and then, upon closer examination, they may turn out to be far from obvious.

They will reasonably ask me: what to do with our great-grandmothers and great-grandfathers, whom we remember and love? It is logical. And I remember my great-grandmother. I can only assume that our great-grandmothers and great-grandfathers were materialized in this reality at a certain age with an induced memory of their past. After all, they say that they all moved from somewhere and that many of them are orphans.