The rate of soil formation on the example of dredging dumps

2024 Author: Seth Attwood | [email protected]. Last modified: 2023-12-16 15:55

The rate of soil formation is deliberately underestimated tens of times. This allows soil science as a science to keep pace with traditional history. This is corruption. But not all scientists are covered by it.

Material from rodline magazine.

In the Soviet university textbook "Soil Science", the chernozems of the Russian Plain, with an average thickness of 1 meter, are allocated 8-10 thousand years to form. The rate of soil formation for this period will be 0.1-0.12 mm per year. Some authors believe that the rate of soil formation decreases almost exponentially to some constant component, which, in turn, is almost an order of magnitude lower than the initial rate. Taking into account this opinion, the speed should be reduced by at least half, to 0.05 mm per year.

50 microns per year! The caliper will be a bit rude! Give them a micrometer!

I bend it !?

According to V. V. Dokuchaev (this surname is well known to soil scientists all over the world): "… the process of soil formation proceeds at a rate of 0.5-2 cm per century. The creation of an arable layer (18-25 cm) requires 2 to 8, 5 thousand.years. Earth is the only known planet that has soil."

Let's count, my dears: 0.5 cm = 5 mm, divide 5 mm by 100 years and get the same figure!

5mm / 100 = 0.05mm = 50μm

In this post, I want to show that such views are at least erroneous, if they are not the usual "order" from TI.

Let's remember about the dredge.

DRAGA (from English drag * a. Dredge; n. Schwimmbagger; f. Drague, noria de reprise; and. Draga) is a floating mining and processing complex for the development of watered mineral deposits (mainly placer deposits).

Draga looks like a ship

Maybe not all represent the drazhny "battle". And it, in terms of its consequences, may well be equated with those "backfills" with which many fragments of the true history of mankind are hidden from our eyes.

The dumps may even be picturesque, but lifeless. Such a caption was under this photograph:

Stones, stones, stones - all the soil was washed away during gold washing and carried away by the river. When can life appear here? Judging by the brisk grass in this picture, two or three years have passed since the work.

And here is a picture taken 10 years later.

Top view of the site I know 50 years after the technology left. About 40 years ago, I saw only young growth on these dumps. Now the vegetation on the "mainland" and on the dredging heaps is practically equal.

Maybe I'm confusing something? Does the UCHON * world disagree? - No, my dears, the Russian land has not become scarce for scientists and honest people. Let's give the floor to one of them:

SELF-RESTORATION OF PHYTOCENOSIS IN GOLD MINING AREAS

Author NIZKY SERGEY EVGENIEVICH

Journal BULLETIN OF ALTAI STATE AGRARIAN UNIVERSITY

Issue No. 7/2009

Great article! In it I saw my observations and agree with the author's conclusion that "… only 70 years after the cessation of human activity, the natural environment begins to approximately correspond to its natural state."

Sharing with Sergei Nizkiy his concern about the ugly and mismanaged activities of gold miners, I, nevertheless, by virtue of following my interests and goals, will replace one word in his conclusion.

And the conclusion will sound like “… already 70 years after the flood, the sea mudflow, the change of the poles, the cessation of human activity, the natural environment begins to approximately correspond to its natural state.

* CHON - special purpose parts