Don't touch Rurik

2024 Author: Seth Attwood | [email protected]. Last modified: 2023-12-16 15:55

In fact, all versions of the official history require serious systems analysis. And the personality of Rurik is no exception.

The personality of Rurik is not to be said to be controversial or controversial. Not at all. Its historical existence is not disputed by almost anyone. There was also Rurik, there was also the Rus of Rurik. The so-called Norman theory of Rurik's arrival in Russia is being disputed. Some historians quite seriously state that Rurik is a Rostov prince and it was from Rostov that he was called to reign in Novgorod. Nevertheless, the Norman theory, like rust, has eaten into the metal of Russian self-consciousness and erodes it from the inside. We will not repeat ourselves here. And the Norman theory, and a number of other theories of the accession of Rurik in Russia, we all know poorly, poorly. There is simply one question that worries and worries thoughtful people: why is the theory of its Norman origin so zealously supported for so many years. Everyone already knows even that the Varangians, read the warriors of the Rus, and the whole Baltic belonged to them. They are not Swedes or Norwegians, and they are not Vikings. Well, yes, full of those, let's leave. As we remember, Rurik arrives in the Novgorod region with his retinue. Only about the number of squads there is very little information. How many warriors did the Falcon have to take with him in order to fulfill the obligations and aspirations of the people entrusted to him? There are two options, or a lot, since no one knew what to expect from the "insidious Russians", or enough only to solve problems, relying on the loyal population and the existing administrative apparatus. On boyars, princes and merchants. That is, Novgorodians invite Rusich, the grandson of Gostomysl, and fully render him not only glory and honor, but also support in all directions. Almost so, but not so. Everything fits together in this theory, except for the inability of the population of Russia at that time to solve administrative and state problems on their own. You know, they are kind of half-people who just can't find a common language with each other. Rave. Written language has existed for a long time, and this is one of the main indicators of the education and culture of the people. Why then were they invited to rule Rurik? Or is there a completely different meaning behind the obvious fact of his arrival? What could be another reason, fundamentally different from the hackneyed versions of traditional official history? What can you rely on in order to develop a different point of view on an accomplished historical fact? Not really much. The past is skillfully hidden from us and is seen as a faint reflection of reality and nothing more. There are really inquisitive minds of our time, alternative historians, and they, relying on specific artifacts, sometimes give out quite convincing versions of historical events. Academician V. A. Chudinov, for example, proved the family ties between Rurik and Truvor. It was on the basis of these family ties that Ivan the Terrible allowed himself to declare that his family was descended from the Emperor Augustus himself. Remember the famous phrase from the movie "Ivan Vasilyevich changes his profession": - We are Rurikovich. But the main thing is not this, the main thing is completely different, the main thing is that all of Europe once belonged to the Russians. Rus Yar with its capital in Arkona. Sidorov G. A. also speaks about this. We will not delve into the works of these two alternative scientists. It is assumed that a prepared audience is reading this article. Let us dwell on only two points: the whole of East Germany, according to the German historians, is a cemetery of the Slavs and the existence of Arkona on Ruyan Island (the epic island of Buyan) is already being disputed by few people now. What do we see in fact? We see that an influential prince, named Rurik, arrives in Russia and his loyal military leader arrives at the head of his squad Oleg, later nicknamed the Prophet. What kind of need prompted the Novgorodians to take such a step? This time. And the unification of Russia is two. And here questions begin to pour in, one by one, to which answers are not always found. The first question is why, after the triumphant "unification" of Russia, this statehood soon fell? Well, what was there? Oleg nailed the shield to the gates of Byzantium, and Svetoslav utterly defeated Khazaria. It would seem that after the gathering of the Russian lands into one fist and the formed statehood I do not want to live for centuries, so no, after a short time by historical standards, everything went to hell. In Russia, a coup, the Jewish geek Vladimir comes to power, and dashing years begin on our land. Why is that? How does everything in Russia turn upside down in such a short time? How could the Power, which Byzantium itself paid to give, lose not only its influence, but also its political system? A riddle, if only we will be in captivity of the official version and theory. A mystery, if you adhere to the Norman theory. Only now, even our President, no, no, but he will drop, - de, it is impossible to adhere to only one version and rely on only one theory. So he knows a lot more than we do. We often have to rely only on our intuition, ingenuity and ability to systematic analysis. Why doesn't anyone pay attention to what was happening where Rarogh came from? After all, he comes practically from Eastern Europe. Apparently from the Grand Duchy of Lithuania, the last outpost of the Rus in Europe. So there was a loss of one more territory of Russia? If we only assume that Rurik appears on the Novgorod land as a result of a retreat in the war with the Latins, then the consolidation of the Russian lands can be explained quite convincingly. Remember in the Great Patriotic War, "there is nowhere to retreat, behind Moscow"? Wasn't this the same thing here, there is nowhere else to retreat, behind Russia? Oh, how we love everything epoch-making and majestic. Not so long ago, the opinion that Rurik and his Varangian squad, and actually all the Varangians, were some kind of "brothers" of that time, collecting tribute and "protecting" the city, and weighing them. Having put a "gatehouse" on the version, I did not attach much importance to it. Then I suddenly realized that I had received an answer to a question to which my mind did not find that an appropriate and convincing answer, but simply a reasonable answer. Why, after such successes of Oleg the Prophet and Svetoslav, when it would seem that Russia was not only invincible, but also beyond the reach of the enemy's ideology, she fell as soon as Svetoslav “went to his ancestors”? Would our Vedic princes have given Vladimir to seize power in Kiev, and actually turn over everything that we already know? If only not just the Varangian squad arrived in Russia, but large regular troops. Then everything can be. Another mystery, after the death of Rurik, his son Igor remains in the care of Oleg. Oleg, being Igor's guardian, dismisses the legitimate Kiev authorities. No one has ever had a vague question about how they allowed Oleg so easily to kill the Kiev prince, not two ephemeral Askold and Dir, one whose name was deleted from historical sources? Was there anarchy and confusion in Russia? Did the benefactor Rurik stop this and unite Russia? Now someone will scream heart-rendingly: - Don't touch Rurik! Of course, the official historians will try to echo it, it is not permissible to encroach on the "holy of holies"! Only here is where to encroach, when all around lies. Further, only logic, multiplied by the processing of a huge layer of information and a simple comparison of facts. Rus Yar in Europe has been conquered. Arkona fell. There is a replacement of statehood and ideology. Rus Yar, losing territory, rolls back to the East. On this wave, Rurik appears on the territory of the Rus of the Slavs. Having sufficient military forces, he puts the Novgorod lands under control in a short time. Why is it so fast? It’s just that in Russia, the Slavs were already being introduced with might and main the Jewish ideology, and it must be admitted that it was being implemented quite successfully. Almost all Novgorod merchants adopted this ideology. Therefore, Rurik did not cost anything to take power into his own hands. The overthrown ruler of Russia Yar, who lost vast territories of Europe and lost the war to Rome, is back on horseback. How can we not recall Shakespeare's: - "Poor, poor Yorik". Or is it Yurik? Here's your grandmother and St. George's Day! The English tradition keeps the memory of Rurik (Yorik). Rurik, Rarog, Sokol, how can you not be touched by such laudatory names? And the people called Yurik derogatory? In any case, the first change of the dynasty did not take place in the time of troubles in 1612. She in Russia of the Slavs began to prepare with the arrival of Rurik on these lands. Further, like clockwork, Oleg, having seized power in Kiev, puts under control the main cash flow: the path "from the Varangians to the Greeks." The main trade route is squeezing out the main trade route from Russia, so to speak. Further, acting on the tasks of Rome and the Vatican, bends down Byzantium, so much so that it pays a huge tribute. Banal weaning of the dough. More abruptly than in the 90s it will be. The Western Catholic Church, unable to break the backbone of the Eastern Orthodox Church head-on, is doing it with the hands of the Russians. Svetoslav takes away the last financial flows of Byzantium, defeating the Khazar Kaganate. But who will point me to the Jewish root in the word - Khazars? Only there is no need to express the version that these were the same Scythians-Rus, who only converted to Islam and Judaism. The Jewish (Khazar) Kaganate is Byzantium. Well, God himself ordered our ancestors to shake the money bag. Well, it is, by the way. I am not alone in this version. Kadykchansky has an article where, independently of me, he expresses the point of view that what is commonly called the Khazar Kaganate is Byzantium. The world is ruled by symbols and money. They ruled yesterday, they rule now and apparently so, and they will rule tomorrow. Sadly. You accept Vladimir and did not twitch because in everything there were the same views of him and Svetoslav, acre of one, religion and faith. Svetoslav died, and then the Jewish Malkin fostered, who was now so idealized, that this "red sun" with an ax from the chronicles and from the mind cannot be cut out. And, whatever one may say, but still a "saint". With the coming to power of Vladimir, the first change of the dynasty took place. They camouflaged it under the Rurik dynasty. Chudinov V. A. is right. about the fact that there was Russia Yara and its last ruler Rurik, there was the Russia of the Slavs, where he retreated (the ruler is unknown?), and there was the Russia of Mary (the ruler is unknown?), stretching from the Volga to the Pacific Ocean, later called Tartaria. The fall of Arkona, the arrival of Rurik, the removal of the Kiev prince, the emergence of Kievan Rus, the enslavement of the Rus of the Slavs, the seizure and destruction of Rus Mary. Here is the chain of cause-and-effect relationships of the seizure of the Russian World from the Atlantic to America. And this is for some incomplete thousand years. Or is it much less? It seems that, having thrown out the "Middle Ages", we will get the correct chronology. At the present time, the Russians are using us as they want, giving us the "ideology of reveling in greatness." Great Race, Great Rus, Great Rurik and blah, blah, blah. And while we revel in our "greatness" and are dripping with sugary saliva, the last pieces of the Russian world are being pulled apart by the jackals of the world government. And what about Rurik? And what about Rurik? Don't touch Rurik!..