Fake history of mankind. Battle for Moscow

2024 Author: Seth Attwood | [email protected]. Last modified: 2023-12-16 15:55

Was there a battle for Moscow? After all, no military action in a snow-covered field is possible. The creation of a line of defense in frozen ground is impossible. The delivery of ammunition and food on virgin snow is impossible. Neither Russians nor Germans can sleep in the snow. It is impossible to fight in winter in tarpaulin boots and caps. The battles could go only for cities and villages (the Moscow region was supposed to turn into a scorched desert twice: during the retreat of ours and during the retreat of the Germans), but they are intact.

Why did Zoya Kosmodemyanskaya and others like her die, and did she really exist (like the Panfilov heroes)? What could a few hundred boys and girls, yesterday's schoolchildren, have done in the winter behind enemy lines? And how could they even penetrate the German rear? Dozens of kilometers in deep snow without skis, tents, elementary camping equipment, without hot food (and where did they get water?), With heavy backpacks behind their backs, spend the night in the snow without even having the opportunity to light a fire - after all, it was forbidden, and only getting warm vodka (I didn’t come up with it)? And the raids lasted for a week or longer. Is this on the shoulder of an 18-year-old (and even older) body?

The NKVD troops and the retreating troops, according to the Order of the Supreme Commander-in-Chief No. 0428 of November 17, 1941, were obliged to evacuate the population and burn all the surrounding villages. Why are they all as good as new and even the watchmen have survived, who "remember" how everything was? Neither villages nor population should have remained in the retreat-offensive zone. Only the ruins of stone cities that cannot be restored. And if this was prevented by the rapid advance of the Germans, then why did not Moscow fall?

Zhukov himself wrote that on October 7 all roads to the capital were open, there was panic and pogroms in the city, population flight, the government was evacuated, the infrastructure was mined, the Germans were in Khimki and Yakhroma. And then: the Germans could not take Moscow. And this is the story we have to believe? Where is the logic? And where, finally, is the German aviation, which even chased individual Red Army soldiers and wiped Stalingrad into dust?

The Red Army did not retreat near Moscow, since it (the Red Army) no longer existed by that time. The Wehrmacht grind freshly formed units, cadets, militias, etc., who approached from the east - everything that the doomed capital could put up against three tank armies. All this hodgepodge was not able to delay the Wehrmacht's car even for a month. The Moscow region was completely occupied, every house, since the concentration of German troops in this area of hostilities reached its maximum, because the front line shrank to the size of one city.

By the way, in his memoirs, Zhukov does not mention a word about the notorious "Siberian" divisions, probably because they did not exist in nature - this is a myth created by post-war Soviet propaganda. In order to somehow cover up the gaping hole in the history of the Second World War, namely: why the Germans did not take Moscow.

So why did the Moscow region survive? I think it is obvious to everyone that the Germans took food, warm clothes and houses from the population of the occupied territories, driving people out into the cold. Young people were driven into the Reich, prisoners and recalcitrants were shot, partisans and saboteurs, like Zoya Kosmodemyanskaya, were hanged. Retreating left scorched earth. Otherwise, we will have to admit that the Wehrmacht, in fact, was an institution of humanism and philanthropy on a par with the Salvation Army and the Red Cross.

I believe that in reality there was no war. It only exists in our heads. The traces of war are as "real" as the Egyptian and Mexican pyramids, Baalbek, Sacsayhuaman, the megaliths of Mountain Shoria, etc. - they exist, although no one built them. Front-line soldiers, from generals to privates, only "remember" the war as it was written in their memory by the Creator. And in this sense, the war is real for all of them.

The junction between real and fictional history takes place, in my opinion, in the region of the 50s of the XX century. The Creator has built us into the History invented by him. I do not know why he wrote the history of the Second World War (and not only it) with such blatant logical errors that do not allow the puzzles of this war to form an integral and consistent picture.

There is only one film about the defense of Moscow "The Defeat of the German Forces near Moscow" in 1942. Anyone who is interested in this topic, I advise you to carefully review it: you will see that all the shots in it are staged-shots of hostilities.

Why did the Germans (who filmed everything that entered the viewfinder) not shoot a propaganda film about their victorious attack on Moscow? Goebbels simply had to make such a film, but it does not exist. There is not even a German chronicle of this period, just like ours. Why?