What do the letters mean? 2. Decoding. Roots

2024 Author: Seth Attwood | [email protected]. Last modified: 2023-12-16 15:55

"Stol". How much of this word. How much unknown has appeared in it in the last few paragraphs. And also this "solid sign" at the end, now what to do with it? Let's just ignore him for now, but remember that he is here, has not gone anywhere, and is closely watching our actions. Together with him, we will send the table itself to rest for now.

And in his place we will take a couple of new sailors: "Gorb" and "Grot". I will not torment you, I joked at my leisure and found a couple of new values. "G" is Movement, and "R" is Process. You can check, everything worked fine for me. For example, all words ending in "-ga" are moving or are directly related to the movement. However, what I advise you, we found the methods and ways of finding values together, so go for it. And I won't tell you anything about the letter "B" yet. Just out of harm. The new test subjects "Gorb" and "Groot" have different meanings, but at the same time they contain three identical letters that have a very specific and understandable meaning, which means it will be easy with them.

We need new examples for new cases. We have already loudly stated that the letters in a word are in "a strictly defined order, and each letter for each separate word takes its ideal position." This means that only by comparing words similar in spelling, but different in meaning, we will be able to find out what is the connection between adjacent letters, why each letter stands in the place where it stands, and what the order of the letters inside the word generally affects …

So. We are interested in the connections of letters within these words. Let's try to decipher with simple human sentences. We have two kinds of letters: vowels and consonants. This means that the sentences will be black and white, consisting of only two parts of speech. What two parts of speech can meaningful sentences that have no context consist of?

1. Nouns + verbs. The most logical and simple. This link can answer all questions in any situation in the most complete way. The ball floats. Masha is crying. The river carries the ball away.
2. Nouns + adjectives. Simple but incomprehensible. The link does not indicate actions, but only characterizes them. The ball is rubber. Masha is lazy. The water is wet. It looks like a picture frozen in time. It won't work.
3. Nouns + participles. Nice, logical, simple, understandable. Indicates actions and characterizes them at the same time. Floating ball. Crying Masha. A drowned ball. Ideally. There is a whole story behind each sentence that you want to know: “What happened? And why? How did this happen?"
4. Verb + verb. Stripped down, although the meaning does not escape. But it doesn't suit us. It turns out that an abbreviation consisting of several verbs will consist of either only vowels or only consonants. Do you know a lot of such words?

Okay, now let's think about how sentences consisting of a noun and a verb are built. This is obvious, yes, but it just needs to be noted in order to understand this structure and talk to it at its level. A noun is a thing. A verb is an action. By adding an object and an action in one sentence, we get a certain action of the object, or some action on the object. That is, words and their meanings, being in one sentence, begin to interact. For example, we have Masha, an ordinary girl. And there is the verb "crying". Putting these two words in one sentence, we will notice that the ordinary girl Masha from the picture has become alive, now Masha is performing an action, Masha is crying. And moreover, there were questions for Masha. Why is Masha crying? What happened to her? Does Masha always cry? For what purpose is Masha crying? Questions have appeared, but, alas, this proposal does not answer all these questions, it only answers a specific question: what is happening with Masha at the moment? She cries.

Now let's apply the same logic to our situation. There are two words in the sentence, which means that the abbreviation word will also consist of two letters, a vowel and a consonant. For example, "Yes". The word "Yes", consisting of two letters, as well as a sentence of two words, does not express anything except one definite meaning: a strict answer to a strictly posed question. "Is Masha crying?" - "Yes". Got the point? Linking a verb with a noun answers only one question, but at the same time asks many more.

Why is Masha crying? The ball is floating. The answer has been received. However, this answer was received only for context with the question: "Why is Masha crying?" The sentence “The ball is floating” itself answers only one question: “What is happening with the ball at the moment?”. Note, without context, the ball has nothing to do with Masha. Without context, the ball just floats, and Masha just cries. But we, wise by life experience, know that nothing happens without a reason. The reason appears immediately, as soon as we introduce another character.

"The river carries away the ball." This is a sentence of two nouns, characters, and a verb, the actual action. Such a proposal already answers two questions:

"What's going on with the ball at the moment?" … The ball is carried away.

"What is happening with the river at the moment in relation to the ball?" … The river carries the ball away.

Got it? We have two objects, and now they interact with each other. The river acts on the ball. The ball is under the influence of the river. One depends on the other, the ball is dependent on the river. One reason for the other. From the point of view of the river: it affects the ball, it carries it away. From the point of view of the ball: the river acts on it, it is carried away. As if on your own. However, the reason for this is the river.

In a sentence with two nouns and one verb, we get the interaction of two nouns through the verb between them. The source of the action is in the first place, then it is indicated what kind of action the source produces, and the last word is subordinate, what the action is being performed on or the result of this action. Yes, we can say that "the ball is carried away by the river", but this is unusual, this is from the point of view of the ball, this is from the point of view when the subordinate is in front of the subordinate. Not to say that this is not normal, but from the point of view of logic, it is a violation.

There are other options when the word order can change. For example, “the river carries the ball away” or “the river carries the ball away”, or “the ball is carried away by the river”. You can say that, and literary it is, maybe even beautiful, but this is again a violation of the logical sequence. The reason must be indicated before the action she performed and certainly the result earlier produced by her action, that is, as it happens in life. And the meanings in the sentence, and therefore within the word, should be transmitted from left to right, exactly as it happens in writing: letter by letter, word by word. Therefore, we dwell on the most logical option:

source of action (reason) → action → result of action (consequence)

We will use it when decrypting.

So. Nouns + verbs. There are always fewer verbs in sentences than nouns. The number of vowels in relation to consonants in the alphabet is in about the same proportion. Therefore, it would be logical to mistake vowels for verbs and consonants for nouns. Let's start simple.

The ravine is a wide and long ravine with slopes, a depression, a trench. It would be strange if it did not form movements. Brooks, for example. The meanings of all words with the root "log" also indicate precisely the movement that is formed, literally or figuratively, from a container (for example, "den") or due to it (for example, "gentle").

As already mentioned in the previous chapter, the jester with his whole appearance attracts attention, that is, he points to himself with his diversity. It was important for us to understand whether the instruction was directed in the right direction. Yes, everything is so, “it is the variety that indicates,” and not vice versa.

Now more complicated, let there be 4 letters, of which 3 are nouns and one verb. Sailors on deck, we will get to know them.

"Gorb" … An unusually protruding thing that is one with what it protrudes from. That is, this thing has moved forward, made a movement (D). On one's own? Something like that.

"Grotto" … This is such a horizontal cave. By the way, the word "coffin" is no worse, except for the associated emotional coloring, and according to dictionaries it also means a pit, only vertical. In other words, the coffin is what we now call the grave. Well, since despondency is a sin, let the "grotto" be an example.

Go.

or formed process "B". Seems not bad. It is only worth noting that the essence of the hump is in the letter "B", she is the main character here. The combination of "mountains" only indicates how this "B" is formed or is still formed.

As it is now? Two consonants next to each other at the beginning of a word. What are the variants of the connection in our language between two nouns standing next to each other at the beginning of a sentence? The connection can be either compositional or subordinate.

If we decide that the connection is a compositional one, then the adjacent consonants ("G" and "R") should be recognized as equivalent, and the adjacent nouns ("Movement and Process") are homogeneous. But in this case, nothing in the world will prevent us from rearranging them in places and it is fair to assume that the meaning will not change from this. But "roto" is not a "grotto", even a small child understands this. From a change in the places of signs, not just the spelling changes, the word itself changes, with all meanings, meanings, and so on. This means that the variant of a compositional connection disappears. However, this is not surprising, since one letter is in front of another, it means that it must have some kind of priority.

It remains to find out the "Movement of the Process" or "Movement of the Process", that is, how exactly one letter subordinates the other. Okay. Since "G" is before "R", it is logical to assume that the subordinate relationship is directed from "G" to "P". That is, the letter "P" is subordinate to the letter "G", since it comes after it. The process is subordinate to the Movement. The process is a derivative of Motion. Thanks to Movement (D), Process (P) appeared. The Process manifested itself in the Movement. Okay, but what does it all mean? Any ideas? Then let's step by step and with understanding.

How does the grotto appear? Hard. Okay, how does his smaller brother, the coffin, that we wrote off for despondency appear? We know that. The coffin is dug up by people to put the deceased there. Let's arrange the roles. Digging is definitely a process. The dug hole is already the result of the process, this is the “B” image. While we get "the process formed" B ". What do we have with the letter "G"? Where did she go, because we dug the hole without her. But she heads the word. They dug a hole, well done, but they forgot why they dug. In normal logic, the cause ALWAYS comes before the beginning of the process, the cause of the action always precedes the action itself. Without a reason, nothing will start and nothing will happen. So "Movement" (D) is the reason. The movements are different, in this case, the movement of a person to the next world entailed digging a hole. The movement of water or the earth's crust leads to the formation of horizontal holes - grottoes. If the "movement of the deceased" can still be considered far-fetched, then it is difficult to argue with water and the earth's crust, this is definitely a movement, and this is exactly the reason. What did we get in the end?

The movement led to the process that formed "B". When a person dies, he must be buried, these are the links of one chain that cannot be broken. One without the other is not even implied. The person has died, it is impossible not to bury him, the chain of obligatory events will be disrupted. That is, the process follows from the movement as a matter of course, therefore there are no vowels between them - actions that explain the appearance of the process (P). The movement launched a process that led to the formation of "B". The movement by its process led to the formation of "B". The movement of the process formed "T" (grotto) or "B" (coffin).

This is actually difficult, but I can assure you that this is the most difficult moment to decipher, and it must be understood, because the complexity of words sometimes exceeds all permissible limits, and without understanding the basics, it is impossible to decipher them correctly. Reread, not once or twice. Reread until you understand.

Vowels are verbs, consonants are nouns. So far, it has turned out well. Let's check on the control group.

A guest comes, if he doesn’t come, then it’s not a guest. Moreover, the guest is not just movement or walking. A guest comes to someone else's house, connects with this house, connects with the owners of this house, and only after that he can be called a guest.

“Yes, okay already the author, is it good to torture us? Already reveal this great secret that the letter "T" is a "body". Look, the "bodies" are connected here. Above here was the "Jester", it also fits under the "body". And your cheerful “grotto” is also a kind of body, isn't it? " Okay, okay, I give up, let it be your way. So we will decipher further, taking the letter "T" the meaning of "Body". And, indeed, it will be more convenient. Let's try!

Wow, how beautiful it began to take shape right away.

Since such a booze has gone, let's open the letter "D", it is simple and the meaning lies on the surface. The body is the source and cause of the process that points to the act. Action is the result indicated by the process and started by the body. Ideally.

Let's remember the "grotto". The first letter is the "reason", the second starts the education process, the fourth is the result. Thunder does not arise out of nowhere, first comes (D) a cloud, well, or some other source of thunder. The arrival of a cloud starts the process (P). As a result, (O) "M" is formed. It's the same with a thunderstorm.