Dollar war tactics

2024 Author: Seth Attwood | [email protected]. Last modified: 2023-12-16 15:55

We are all well aware of the obvious immorality of the Anglo-Saxons in the world arena, including their disregard not only for people, but also for all different conventions, UN agreements and other norms of international law. However, at present (for a general understanding of the complete picture of the world), it is worth focusing on the financial enslavement of the entire planet under the proud flags of democracy, equality and free market relations.

As a prelude, it is worth mentioning that the World Trade Organization (WTO) is a UN agency, and violation of the principles of this structure's work is also a contradiction of the unshakable norms of international law. At the same time, the unilateral sanctions imposed on Russia are nothing more than a gross violation of global agreements. In addition, economic sanctions against us were not even discussed by the participating countries at the UN headquarters in New York. Point "sanctioned" strikes are being carried out on Russia not only as the main partner of the Customs and Eurasian Unions, but also as the center of the Russian civilizational model. In the same way as during the collapse of the USSR, the goal was not exclusively the socialist model of society, but Russian cultural identity as a whole. However, due to the greater power, respect, stability, but at the same time the closed nature of the Soviet Union, the power was destroyed not by aircraft carriers and not even by the dollar, but by the more unfortunate Hollywood [1], when the main incentives for the people to turn to the West were not the myth of "Star Wars", and the notorious jeans, gum, action films and pop music. The desire to chew the gum of the Soviet nomenklatura and its children unambiguously drove the whole country under the yoke of the imaginary American dream, because ordinary people always look and orient themselves towards the "stars" (compare the behavior of Russian top officials in the 1940s, 1980s and 2000s and values of the common people of the same periods). At the same time, our powerful economy did not depend one iota on the exchange rate of the dollar or any other currency due to the “double-circuit financial system” that persisted until the end of the 1980s, in which, in simple terms, the exchange rate against the ruble was the sole concern of the state, and not the entire population. This gave confidence in the future. And empty shelves in stores, inspired by the then "fifth column", began only in 1988. Knowing this, it becomes obvious that the work of our Central Bank, following the patterns of the US Federal Reserve System, from the very beginning threw a stranglehold on Russian financial, and most importantly, monetary institutions, in which the ruble's life support depends only on the will of unprincipled overseas bank tycoons. And now "they" are deciding when to carry out our bloodletting, and when to squeeze oxygen, because the Central Bank issues rubles only in accordance with the volume of purchased dollars. However, today we are less influenced by "Hollywood" and, thank God, aircraft carriers do not swim up, but "their" other weapon - the dollar - eats and splits us from the inside. How does this happen?

To begin with, let's define what the gold and foreign exchange reserve of Russia (gold reserves), the volume of which is about 400 billion US dollars, is. In the modern world, every country has this kind of savings. In fact, the gold part of our reserve is only 10%, but as for the currency, 40% of it consists of the dollar, another 40% - from the euro, and the remaining 20% - from empty "securities". Moreover, the € itself is also backed only by the American dollar. Well, since the US Federal Reserve, which is engaged in the uncontrolled issuance of "dirty green paper", is a private shop, in fact, all 90% of our gold reserves are not backed by anything, except for the bright stars and stripes promises to return or repay them someday. Based on this, a clear picture emerges where our Central Bank is de facto just a branch (agent) of the US Federal Reserve in Russia. Someone, of course, may be reassured by the thought that our gold and foreign exchange reserves are not the largest in the world. The Chinese, for example, is more than a trillion dollars, but such a comparison is actually not in Russia's favor - this does not cancel our dependence on the United States and does not make our economy stronger than the Chinese one. And the point is not that Americans may not want to repay debts to us (at least, these are just numerical values on monitors), but that on these deposits the American government charges only 2% to our budget every year. In other words, we give them $ 400 billion at an ultra-low interest rate, while the leadership of our country lends money to private banks at 6-10% (now at 17%), after which our citizens are forced to borrow money from Russian banks. at 20-30 percent per annum. It is also worth mentioning that if "in a good year" inflation in our country is, say, 10%, and in the States it is only 3%, then it is easy to calculate that from year to year we lose 8% from such charity (10-2 = 8) and America earns a full 1 percent at the same time. Without doing anything! At the expense of our economy, at the expense of you and me! This, in my opinion, is more like paying tribute in its most shameful sense. To me personally, this situation reminds me of the payment of taxes by residents of Novorossiya to the budget of Kiev due to the lack of their own banking system. That is, we live by the principle: "feed your enemy."

Thus, thanks to the ubiquitous presence of such gold and foreign exchange reserves, in fact, there is a worldwide payment of indemnities to America, which, due to this, has increased its external debt to $ 17 trillion. However, for countries that hold dollars and economies tied to the dollar system, financial forecasts will only get worse, only on the basis of the fact that the dollar itself is provided by the desire to issue it by private individuals. Consequently, the outstripping of the rate of output of $ over the volume of the global commodity mass reduces the purchasing power of the dollar itself and devalues all foreign exchange reserves in the world. Therefore, whether we like it or not, the described situation reflects our own weak will in confronting the world hegemon, on the battlefield of which we have no real strength not only to win, but even to give a weighty rebuff.

And now about what mechanisms they are fighting with Russia and what drives the growth of the dollar against the ruble. As for the means of dealing with us, the most obvious innovation here is only one - financial sanctions. For a detailed explanation of their essence, it is worth going back to 2008. In "War 888" [2] we did not follow the lead of our Western "friends" and with the price of Russian Urals oil of almost $ 140 in August 2008 we resisted the military attack of Georgia. Then the Americans, through certain manipulations with alternative financial instruments, namely with oil futures [3], to the detriment of their Arab partners and themselves (since somehow they had to compensate for the lost profits of the Arabs) for six months lowered the price per barrel to $ 34, but more they could not sacrifice themselves for more than half a year, and in the spring of 2009 the oil price "rolled back" to the level of $ 55-60, and over the next couple of years finally restored its former height.

Currently, the Anglo-Saxons operate on the same principle. In any case, the algorithm of their innuendo has common features. At the same time, it is necessary to understand that the global volume of oil demand changes insignificantly from year to year. And an ordinary person, not privy to economic wisdom, does not even ask the question why the world demand for fuel does not grow and does not fall, while the price of oil is sliding down several times. Based on the theory of supply and demand, it becomes obvious that the current decline in oil prices is not influenced by either demand or supply - as was the need in 2008 for about 30 billion barrels of oil per year, it remained approximately the same in 2014. Even on the contrary, with the arrival of winter, demand increases markedly, and the price, paradoxically, continues to fall. And it becomes clear that if the oil market can somehow still be manipulated with a decrease or increase in production volumes and, consequently, supply (which, by the way, OPEC countries again refused to do to their detriment), then you definitely will not "play" with demand. And then the same notorious futures, designed to reduce the price of energy resources by injecting colossal money into the oil market, are included in the game, which leads to a significant decrease in the price of fuel. Nevertheless, with such a decrease in prices for "black gold", the volume of foreign exchange inflows to our country also decreases, while Russian businessmen need foreign currency in the same amount to import new goods. Thus, a clear relationship between the decline in oil prices, the volume of supply of dollars in the Russian Federation and the decline in the value of the ruble is clarified. That is, the price of oil falls - the dollar is growing.

In addition, with the beginning of events in Ukraine, there is a sharp outflow of foreign capital from Russia. But the fact is that the withdrawal of capital does not take place "out of the blue." At some given moment in time, the powerful of this world give their investors an order to withdraw money from a particular country, who determine trends in the markets, chasing a herd of stock exchange rams. And behind them, like oracles, are caravans of cash flows. Such authority figures can be, for example, Warren Buffett, Donald Trump, Karl Icahn, Bill Aikman, George Soros. It is a mistake to believe that they are independent and independently manage their personal money. They define areas of investment, actually announcing the strategies of the American government or some financial groups. That is, the money in their hands is vulnerable, and when the opportunity arises, these investors can always be told what to buy and what to sell. And if they don’t listen, then the true owners of the money will take their “green” from disobedient investment funds.

And so, let's say, in the wake of Buffett, brokers start selling Russian assets. Our securities, of course, are sold for rubles, but to transfer them abroad, it is necessary to exchange rubles for foreign currency, thereby creating a demand for dollars or euros and increasing the supply of unnecessary rubles, which logically leads to an increase in the exchange rate of foreign currency in relation to the ruble … We also observed this in the fall of 2008 as a punishment for disobedience in the issue of Georgia.

Next, a new painful technique enters the scene - sanctions that prohibit Russian business from taking cheap loans in the West. Loans there are cheaper than in the Russian Federation for one simple reason - in the United States, as the "world forge of money", the interest rate at which the FRS issues loans to private banks is 0.5-2% per annum, and the Central Bank of Russia gives out to its banks at 6- 10% (from 16.12.14 - at 17%). Despite the terrible circumstance that our business is forced to receive loans in the enemy camp, businessmen can be humanly understood - any patriotism has a limit. And now they tell us: “That's it, Rusish Schwein, we won't give cheap money anymore, but do not forget to return the interest on the loans already received. And not in rubles, but in $, €, £ … "But they can immediately ask for the entire amount of loans to be returned! And now Russian business itself, in order to pay off foreign debts, begins to increase the demand for currency and increase the supply of rubles on the market, which ultimately further accelerates the growth of the dollar and euro exchange rates.

In such a scenario of the development of "currency" events, ordinary citizens in a panic naturally begin to stock up on imported goods, foreign vouchers for the future, or simply convert their savings into dollars and euros, also increasing the demand for currency and thereby increasing its rate. Likewise, an ordinary citizen, in an attempt to find a refuge to save earned money, himself provokes an increase in the exchange rate.

But that's not all. To buy foreign currency, people run to the exchange offices of private banks, whose cynicism leaves no room for humanism. Banks, together with their branches, sometimes collude with other banks, which makes it possible to announce to arriving customers that there is no currency available. This gives them the opportunity to raise the exchange rate by another penny on their own tabloids, knowing that people will not leave anyway until they exchange rubles for currency. Likewise, moneybags profit from simple human weaknesses and instincts.

Consequently, at the next political stage in the development of international economic relations, we are limited by the volume of inflow of dollars and euros to our country, thus draining Russian financial rivers. And only naive stupidity can make people think that everything that is happening now is the result of the laws of the market. No, friends, this is the apogee of capitalism, in which the rich want to become even richer from greed, and the poor from lack of will become even poorer. It is absolutely immoral to blame the helpless and defenseless strata of the population for this, but this is exactly what our liberals are doing, including in the leadership of the state.

For example, in the summer, Comrade Putin correctly speaks of supporting Russian business by reducing the cost of loans and keeping the ruble exchange rate at the expense of gold and foreign exchange reserves. But autumn is coming, and what we see:

First. The ruble is “released into free float”, but not abruptly, in one fell swoop, but smoothly, which ultimately leads to a massive purchase of the dollar by the population, and as a result, to colossal incomes only for bankers and currency speculators [4]. However, the result without using the tools to contain it is the same - 50-80 rubles per $.

Second. Since the beginning of March, the Central Bank of the Russian Federation has been raising the key interbank rate at which the Central Bank of the Russian Federation lends money to commercial banks. Well, and they, in turn, throw in their annual profit and let them into the people. And everyone seems to understand that the key rate for the implementation of the president's plans should be lowered so that Russian companies would be interested in import substitution. But no - in mid-December, the Central Bank of the Russian Federation once again raises this key rate to 17 (!)%, Thereby increasing it by 11.5% during the year. This means a complete stagnation of the Russian economy, where in reality import substitution of European goods with Chinese and Belarusian ones is taking place.

but in order to contain the all-Russian panic, it would be worth taking decisive steps: declaring a moratorium on payments on foreign debts and introducing a ban on the free movement of capital. And all this, of course, under the guarantees of state protection … But “someone” for some reason is not ready to make such decisions. Then the question arises: in whose interests does the Central Bank of the Russian Federation and Putin act - B'nai-Brit, Opus Dei, or maybe the Illuminati [5]? We are told that, first of all, in the interests of keeping the growing liquidity of the money supply and, accordingly, the level of inflation. But one does not have to be “seven spans in the forehead” in order not to understand the groundlessness of such statements. First, if the exchange rate rises by 100%, then the country needs to increase the amount of money in the market in order to provide the opportunity to buy rubles for dollars. That is, if earlier 35 rubles were required for 1 dollar, now it is 2 times more. Then why reduce the volume of money issue? Secondly, the nature of the non-zero interest rate in conjunction with the work of the US Federal Reserve, and with it the Central Bank of the Russian Federation, is arranged in such a way that if money is provided on credit at a certain percentage, then this percentage must be returned to the bank not in the form of bananas or bread, but again in the form of money. For example, the state through a bank gives the baker 100 rubles at 10% per annum. After a year, 110 rubles must be returned, but where can the baker get 10 rubles? Only by increasing the price of bread by 10%. This is inflation. Where will the buyer take 10 rubles to pay the baker for the bread? Only from the state, which should release an extra 10 rubles this year. And it's good if this year the baker has baked one loaf more than last year, then these “new” 10 rubles will be provided with something. But already today, the growth limits of the world market for goods are visible, that is, the mass of goods will not be able to increase in the near future, and the money supply will continue to grow, which makes goods more expensive and which again leads to inflation, or rather to monetary depreciation. Then how is the Central Bank of the Russian Federation trying to reduce inflation by increasing the key rate? The question is apparently rhetorical …

Ultimately, when the President says on TV that the high dollar rate only makes us better, he deliberately forgets to mention which of us is better. And it is better only for bankers (), since people in the next crisis noose are forced to go to the bank for money at any percentage; advertising business (), as the competition in the markets is fiercer; and, of course, the raw materials business (), since they have minimal needs for imports, and the payment for exports is in foreign currency.

Here's another thing. Financial groups closely associated with the Fed are interested in linking the world to the dollar system. Moreover, these groups are managed by the FedReserve. As a real alternative to the dollar system, a large economic structure called BRICS (Brazil-Russia-India-China-South Africa) is being created. It is assumed that this union will be able to "pull the blanket" over itself in the issue of confrontation with the hegemony of the United States and its subsidiary - the European Union. At the same time, not only the governments of the BRICS member states are working to create this new structure, but also the world's elites, oligarchs, and criminal communities are also interested in such an alliance. But this is not the worst thing. The problem is that they want to untie the total financial equivalent in this union from the dollar, but tie it to gold. And this is the last century. After all, the destructiveness of the gold stranglehold is no better than the dollar one, because financial groups at war with the Fed are responsible for the gold market on the planet, so I really would not want to play the role of a bargaining chip in such a confrontation, which in acute phases has more than once led to world wars. Over the past 40 years, the "gold" monopolists have plentifully pumped gold into China, but the Chinese are deliberately not going to peg the yuan to the gold standard, realizing that this could end for them, firstly, by dependence on monopoly gold sellers, and secondly, by reducing the rate of economic growth, which China needs "nosebleed" (otherwise it will lead to high social instability and civil war). It was this scenario that Russia worked on itself at the turn of the 19th and 20th centuries, which led it to the highest national debt in the world, three revolutions, the Russo-Japanese and the First World Wars. Thanks to Sergei Yulievich Witte, who was closely associated with the Rothschilds. In this regard, the news that Russia is reducing the volume of its foreign exchange reserve, but at the same time increasing the amount of gold in the country, cannot but be alarming. And we are not the only ones who have been doing this lately. Therefore, it may turn out that BRICS will be an ideological copy of the WTO only on the other side of the playing field. And to us "horseradish radish is not sweeter".

In this case, it will be reasonable to ask the question: what then replace both the dollar and gold? The answer is quite obvious. Despite the fact that the myth of a post-industrial society is zealously hammered into our heads through the media, it is necessary to remain realistic and clearly realize that industry and industry are eternal, and only technologies change, materials are improved and the quality and properties of products are improved. Therefore, in the matter of choosing a universal equivalent and means of providing money, it is logical to bet on a portfolio of the most demanded materials in industry and transport (palladium, gold, silver, oil, gas, uranium, diamond, aluminum, rhenium, vanadium, coal, and others). Moreover, it is necessary to provide for the possibility of supplementing or reducing the list of this portfolio by developing solutions at the international level, depending on scientific and technological progress. I am sure this is a completely fair and reasonable way out of the current situation in the world.

Be that as it may, the next ten years are that convenient period for us when we can very profitably play on the contradictions between financial groups, as Comrade Stalin did in his time, otherwise we will not escape surrender in a new world war, which is just about can provoke financial tycoons to solve their pressing problems in the continuation of the life of capitalism. But here, as they say: cadres decide everything!

And finally, it is worth paying attention to the situation with the currencies of other oil-exporting countries, which shows that, despite the global decline in oil prices, the fall of the national currency against the dollar occurs only in Russia. This once again confirms the hypothesis that the blow to our economy and the electorate is targeted. And such an attack not only leads to an even greater split of our elite (for filtering out an unreliable part of it, it’s even good), but also aimed at the outrage of the oligarchs and the whole society. The situation with the people is much more complicated than with the oligarchs. The challenge is to convince all social strata to tighten their belts. People will understand and tighten, but only if they see a just purpose for which they have to pull their bellies. If once again for the sake of the oligarchs and "flushing" the country down the toilet, then ultimately Putin will be swept away "from below". And if the goal is a rich and independent Russia, then they will not only tighten their belts, but will further raise the ratings of the commander-in-chief. Therefore, undoubtedly, the oligarchs and the entire unpatriotic part of the elite must be “put up against the wall” and “nationalized” by the Central Bank of Russia. Yes, in such a situation they may try to sweep the president from above, but the grateful people will no longer allow this. It's simple - either a strong Russia or its elimination. The third, unfortunately, is not given. And dragging out time in making volitional decisions only aggravates the situation with regard to the integrity and stability of the entire country, because this is a game on a foreign field, and we do not set the rules of the game. This is superfluous confirms the words of Mr. Brzezinski in the '90s: "The XXI century at the expense of Russia, to the detriment of Russia and on the ruins of Russia." This is war, citizens! And the basic principle of any war is always the same: "If you cannot resist, there are opposites!"

Mikhail Starostin

[1] Hollywood as a supranational weapon

[2] 08.08.08 - the beginning of the military conflict with Georgia

[3] The price of oil is formed by only a few banks through the mechanism of futures, i.e. contracts for the supply of not yet produced oil. This is 98% of the volume of all trades. That is, they bought future oil from different suppliers a long time ago, in their fat years. After the collapse of Lehman Brothers in 2008, which was specially slaughtered as a horror story, it took about six months to push the US government to include emission to the fullest with the ostensible goal of saving the same banks. Nevertheless, these six months had to somehow hold out and close the huge box office gaps. Strictly according to the mathematical model, the sale of futures began in such a way as to make maximum money on the market. Oil then fell below $ 40 a barrel.

[4] People and organizations, most often associated with banks or being their employees and having significant assets, take today ruble loans secured by their assets and at any interest and buy foreign currency, and tomorrow on the increased exchange rate, they sell currency for a larger amount of rubles, return the loan with interest and repeat this operation again

[5] Mysteries of the world economy: Rothschilds, Rockefellers, Vatican