Pandemic as another mechanism of globalism

2024 Author: Seth Attwood | [email protected]. Last modified: 2023-12-16 15:55

In terms of its functionality, WHO is just a "health department" of an international public organization called the UN, but its powers are unlimited. If in the old days it could only recommend something, then an amendment to its own Charter of 2005 allows it to issue "orders" in emergency situations that are binding on all countries.

In 2005, it also introduced key changes in the definition of a pandemic - it canceled the previous criteria (the percentage of deaths among those infected), introduced the International Health Regulations (IHR) and a scale of six phases of the emergence and development of epidemics.

In 2009, WHO declared swine flu (A / H1N1) a pandemic, but the alarm turned out to be false, the vaccines purchased by the states were not useful, after the scandal, the scales were abandoned, and now they simply declare a pandemic “a situation of threat to public health at the international level” (Public Health Emergency of International Concern, PHEIC).

The reason for this is now not the danger itself, but only the risk of its occurrence; the decision is made solely by the IHR Emergency Committee; the criteria for introducing a pandemic regime no longer exist.

At the time of Pandemic 2020's announcement, there were only 16,000 infected and 4,600 deaths globally, and the official statement did not explain anything: “WHO is assessing this outbreak around the clock, and we are deeply concerned about both alarming levels of spread and severity and alarming levels of inaction. Therefore, we made an assessment that # COVID19 can be characterized as a pandemic."

At the same time, in Europe, the mortality rate from infection was less than 0.4%, with the exception of Italy, where the peak of mortality conditionally (adjusted for the ambiguity of estimates) was 6%; but this is half the 12% mark previously required to declare a pandemic.

The world that we know will cease to exist

On March 30, at the height of the coronavirus hysteria, the international media introduced the world to a man "who wants to stop the pandemic" - Larry Brilliant, which he spoke about back in 2006 at a TED conference.

Since 1984, TED conferences (from English technology, entertainment, design) have been held annually in the United States by an "American private non-profit foundation." TED's official mission is “ideas worth spreading”; speakers - status persons known to the whole world; the cost of a ticket for listeners reaches 10 thousand dollars, and for "wish to change the world" the winner is awarded a single prize of one million dollars.

TED is essentially a focus group for rolling out globalist projects and a platform for broadcasting new value attitudes. For example, in 2012, there was a well-known scandalous report by Bill Gates on population reduction through vaccines, and in 2018, a report by Miriam Heine from the University of Würzburg on the legalization of pedophilia.

Larry Brilliant's 2006 report was also revolutionary: he showed a video simulator of the failed SARS pandemic, described exactly what the next pandemic would look like and scared that “the disease will spread from country to country so quickly that no one can understand what kills them; and in less than three weeks the infection will spread throughout the world."

He called for the creation of an "International System for Absolute Early Diagnosis of Disease" on the basis of the existing "Global Public Health Information Network" (GISH). Its employees, using Chinese search engines (because “dangerous viruses do not have the task of appearing among the English, Spanish, French-speaking population”), by monitoring hundreds of thousands of sites in seven languages, “discovered the beginnings of an SARS pandemic, the WHO said. eliminated it."

But to create a new system, it will be necessary to increase the number of viewed sites to 20 million, and the number of languages to 70, create a function for confirming outgoing messages using CMS and instant messengers, satellite surveillance, visualization with excellent graphics.

And then there will be "an early warning system freely available to everyone in the world in his own language, transparent, non-governmental, not belonging to a particular country or company, located in neutral territory, with backups in different time zones and on different continents."

Larry even gave his brainchild “value” foundations, calling for “to make GISOS a part of our culture and society and the moral force of the world”, i.e. create a global system of Internet surveillance of the population, "big brother" and make it a new moral standard.

He said that "WHO has divided the development of the pandemic into stages, and we are now at the third stage of the pandemic threat, and when WHO confirms that we have moved to the 4th stage, the world as we know it will cease to exist."

His description of the post-pandemic future is worth citing literally: “If a pandemic occurs, a billion people will become infected. At least 165 million people will die. There will be a recession and depression in the world, because our just-in-time supply system and the tight tape of globalization will break, and it will cost our economy from 1 to 3 trillion dollars, and everyone will feel it harder than the death of about 100 million people, because an unimaginably large number of people will lose their jobs and medical benefits, and that the consequences will be simply unimaginable."

He lamented that “it's getting more complicated because traveling is getting easier. There will be no planes in the air. Will you fly an airplane with 250 strangers coughing and sneezing when you realize that some of them are carriers of a disease that can kill you, against which there is no vaccine or antivirus?"

So, according to the plan of Larry Brilliant, drawn up in 2006, the pandemic should cause the collapse of the economy and health care, self-isolation of states, impoverishment of the masses, a ban on mobility and the destruction of the air travel industry. 14 years have passed and his plan is being implemented.

Life after the pandemic

Another document entitled Scenarios for the Future of Technology and International Development (The Rockefeller Foundation, Global Business Network. May 2010) sheds more light on such accurate predictions.

It contains four predictions of Peter Schwartz, founder and chairman of the Global Business Network, using the developments of the RAND corporation - Lock Step, Clever Together, Hack Attack, Smart Scramble, the choice of which, according to the authors, civilization makes, depending on what role it plays. will devote to technology in his life.

The situation with the current conditional "pandemic" fits very closely into the Lock Step scenario, described as "a world of tighter state control from the top down and more authoritarian leadership, with limited innovation and growing resistance from citizens."

The start of this scenario should also be a pandemic of an unknown virus, then there will be a panic of people, a massive rush in pharmacies and stores, the purchase of food and medical masks, the bankruptcy of air carriers, the death of international tourism.

Further, the United States will abandon quarantine and will not prohibit flights, which will lead to an increase in the epidemic, but China and some other countries, on the contrary, will quickly introduce mandatory quarantine, instantly close all borders, impose mandatory masks on the population, and begin to check body temperature at the entrances to train stations and supermarkets.

The result of the pandemic will be the restriction of the movement of citizens, the constant wearing of masks, mandatory thermometry, the destruction of the international mobility of people and goods, the destruction of the economy, the creation of a system of total control over the movement of citizens, the state of their health and finances, and the strengthening of the power of national governments.

After the end of the pandemic, restrictions and controls will not be lifted, the world will become more manageable, which at first will be readily accepted by the frightened population, who have exchanged their rights and privacy for guarantees of security and stability.

States will expand the spheres of control over life, introduce biometric identifiers, tightly regulate vital industries, improve order and economic growth, but block entrepreneurial activity.

Developed countries and monopoly companies will increase the share of research and development while strictly protecting the associated intellectual property. Russia and India will introduce strict internal standards for the control and certification of IT innovations, and the US and EU will make a breakthrough in the development and diffusion of technologies around the world.

Planned innovations in a post-pandemic society include functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) scanners at airports and public places to detect abnormal behavior (antisocial intent); creation of new, "smart" packaging for food and drinks, taking into account pandemic threats; health screening as a prerequisite for leaving hospital or prison; telepresence technologies for population groups whose travel is limited; nation states' own independent regional IT networks that mimic China's firewalls with varying degrees of government control.

But over time, the severity of many rigid rules will cause inconvenience and discontent even among supporters of stability and predictability, which will cause revolts in countries against governments and their national borders.

As you can see, the scenarios are identical: the virus as a threat, fear as a motivator, total control as a falsely understood good. The result is unlimited power on a planetary scale for those who, in the scripts, bashfully call themselves philanthropists, but are the main directors.

In January 2020, the UN Secretary General named “the four world-threatening horsemen of the Apocalypse” - “the highest geostrategic tension, the climate crisis, the growing global mistrust, the dark side of the digital world” - and four Schwartzian scenarios from the Rockefeller Foundation project fit perfectly into them.

The right to a number instead of a name

Technologies play the main role in the scenarios - in 2017, the largest transnational structures (Accenture, GAVI, Rockefeller Foundation, UN, Microsoft, Mercy Corps, Kiva, ICC, FHI360, CITRIS Policy Lab, Copperfield Advisory, Chapman and Cutler LLP, etc.) the "ID2020 Alliance" was established. It is implementing the global project "ID2020" within the framework of the UN Sustainable Development Goals 2030.

The goal of the project is to endow every person on the planet with a digital identifier (ID), and the leadership of the Alliance intends to “act fast” and reach as many people as possible.

The Alliance Manifesto states that identification is a “fundamental and universal human right,” and the need for it is identified as the main problem for 1 billion people. Obtaining an ID (assigning a number to a person instead of a name) is presented by the authors as a basic, inalienable right of the individual, i.e. a new “value” is created, quasi-sacredness, which allows the concept to be removed from criticism and stigmatize opponents.

A single planetary system must unite and digitize the personal data of the inhabitants of the entire planet and assign each of them “their own unique life number”.

The ID must include all information about a person: passport, education, address, place of work, finances, health, biometrics, which will be stored in a distributed database using blockchain technology.

In a pilot mode, Project ID2020 has already successfully worked with the homeless of Austin and with refugees from Myanmar in Thailand.

The ID is the person's number, which overrides the person's name given at birth. At the Nuremberg Trials, following the results of World War II, assigning a number to a person was recognized as a crime against humanity that does not have a statute of limitations.

At the annual summit of the ID2020 Alliance in New York in September 2019, at the launch of a joint project with the government of Bangladesh, another important purpose of ID was announced - control over the compulsory vaccination of every person, which is carried out by GAVI.

The inevitability of total vaccination

The founder of GAVI (Global Alliance for Vaccines and Immunization) is the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation in partnership with the World Bank, WHO and vaccine manufacturers; its goal is the mandatory vaccination of every newborn child in the developing world.

The vaccine industry has been repeatedly caught by the hand in covering up the dangerous effects of vaccines associated with their constituents and toxic preservatives, such as autism, intestinal damage, neuromuscular deformities, cancer and sterilization.

The Rockefeller Foundation worked with WHO in 1972 to vaccinate against tetanus in Nicaragua, Mexico and the Philippines, and as it turned out later, human chorionic gonadotropin, or hCG, in the vaccine, in combination with tetanus toxin, causes abortion. Also, one should not forget the well-known fact that abortive materials are the basis of all vaccines, i.e. cells of killed unborn babies.

In January 2010, at the World Economic Forum in Davos, Gates announced that over the next decade, his Foundation will provide $ 10 billion (about € 7.5 billion) to develop and deliver new vaccines for children in developing countries.

In the same year, at a private TED conference, in a speech "Updating to Zero!" (as it became known to the media) Gates let slip that he intends to reduce the world's population by 10-15% with the help of new vaccines, health care and reproductive health services.

In 2017, there were materials in the media that "Bill Gates is funding the possibility of new pandemics in the world."

In October 2019, he demonstrated a pandemic simulator at Johns Hopkins Medical Center in Baltimore, Maryland (which performed the world's first sex reassignment surgery). At the same time, accompanied by the words that a "new flu" similar to the pathogen of the "Spanish flu" of 1918, starts in the east of China, "will kill 65 million people, so the world's governments should prepare in advance for this as seriously as for war." And soon, COVID-19 first appeared in Wuhan.

It is believed that Bill Gates has abandoned his dominant role in the computer industry and switched to "fighting epidemics", but it is becoming increasingly clear that at this stage he is merely bringing about the convergence of two key mechanisms of social control.

Probably, now he will begin to reduce the population with the help of a long-prepared "antidote to viruses", the introduction of which, at the request of the WHO, will be mandatory for every person; …

In January 2020, in a discussion on epidemics hosted by the Massachusetts Medical Society and the New England Journal of Medicine, Bill Gates revealed that from time to time, a deadly new disease emerges somewhere, after which it begins to sweep across the globe. The danger is growing due to the fact that pathogenic microorganisms mutate more and more rapidly, the military is engaged in the development of infections, and the virus leaks from the laboratory, and bioterrorists are ready to attack. It is also bad that people are very fond of traveling by plane, jumping from continent to continent for a few hours.

As you can see, the key positions are the same again.

The current "coronavirus pandemic" is not the first attempt to bring humanity under control: 11 years ago, the failed "general new great plague" - the "swine flu" epidemic in Mexico (A / H1N1, the mildest variant of influenza in history) was just a "zeroing in" that allowed the authors to see all the gaps in the script and successfully work on the bugs.

Then the developed countries ended up simply donating unnecessary vaccines to WHO (France - 91 out of 94 million doses purchased, Great Britain - 55 out of 60 million, as well as Germany and Norway). In other words, governments paid for the production of dangerous vaccines, and WHO donated them to poor countries as a philanthropist, despite the fact that the greatest threat in poor countries is now posed by cardiovascular diseases, not viruses.

But vaccination is also a mechanism for the chipping of the population that is being prepared at the global level, and Bill Gates hastened to justify himself in the media that the nanomicrochip injected into a person will “only allow answering the questions of whether a given person has been tested for the virus, and whether he was given a vaccine."

New architecture of the world

WHO Director-General Dr. Tedros said the world must move towards digital money because physical paper and coin money can spread diseases, especially endemic ones like the coronavirus.

To store digital money, a digital platform is enough, and to manage a digital wallet - remote access to the contents of a chip, on which all personal information of a person (ID) will be recorded, including data on his vaccinations and finances.

The transformation of a person into a digital personality will make him extremely vulnerable, depending as much as possible on the masters of the world - holders of digital resources, and he will be ready to exchange his independence for security guarantees.

By the way, one of the four scenarios described by Schwartz provides for the revival of feudalism as a result of the decline in the potential of the state, and the authors of the global project “Digital Economy” have been talking about digital feudalism as a concomitant factor in its implementation since 2017.

On March 26, 2020, a virtual (for the first time) emergency G20 summit was held, which was dedicated to the fight against the COVID-19 coronavirus pandemic and its impact on the global economy.

On the eve of it, former British Prime Minister, UN Special Envoy for Global Education James Gordon Brown called for "to overcome the double medical and economic crisis caused by the COVID-19 pandemic" to formalize a "global emergency body" with enormous powers - the world government - and include the UN in it, as well as replenish for this purpose the accounts of the World Bank and the International Monetary Fund.

Earlier, Brown made a similar appeal in the context of the economic crisis of 2008, and the WHO, on behalf of which he speaks, is already referred to as part of the world government.

The main task of the global elite, which in this case is Brown, is obvious - plunge the world into horror and panic in the face of the threat of an invincible epidemic, whipping up psychosis and creating a situation where people themselves will demand a "big brother."

In addition, the fight against the pandemic promises good dividends: the G20 countries have agreed to invest $ 5 trillion in the economy to overcome its consequences.

Speaking at the summit, UN Secretary General Antonio Guterres continued this line, saying that in order to defeat the coronavirus, the leaders of the G20 countries must develop a joint "wartime" plan: suppressing the spread of the virus, minimizing economic consequences and building a more sustainable global economic system in the future. …

Against the background of mysticism and sacredness

The epidemic in Italy did not leave the news strips of the world media - "overcrowded morgues, unable to cope with the load of crematoria, church bells ringing continuously for the dead, military trucks carrying 65 coffins with bodies for cremation somewhere along the frozen streets of Bergamo" panic and horror in the minds of people.

The pandemic regime proclaimed by WHO and the introduction of quarantine in nation states have aggravated the information pressure on people: in the limited space of dwellings, TV and the Internet become the main source of knowledge and emotions, and the mass consciousness turns off logic, like a rudiment.

By a "strange" coincidence, at the end of 2019, the TV series "Messiah" was aired, which demonstrates the arrival of the Antichrist in our world. And social networks have filled the signs of the "last times", which "have already opened, confirmed, manifested."

All these details also hypnotize society and deprive them of strength - what's the point in resisting if everything has been predicted long ago and just starts to come true?

Shock is a great way to lose self-control. The adoption of obviously "illegal" laws is a convincing basis for a person's refusal to resist the absurd.

The quarantine that has suddenly fallen on humanity in all nation states has a single nature and a single scenario: border closures, masks, gloves, restriction of movement, one-time destruction of medium and small businesses, instant scrapping of education, total destruction of the economy.

Roughly the same, only without the forced wearing of masks and nationwide house arrest, Russia has already gone through the period of the notorious "perestroika".

The authorship of the scenarios and their goals are clear, only the scale has changed: before, only Russia was weak - today, together with it, the whole civilization.

The multiple shocks that society is experiencing today anywhere in the world, at some point, according to the laws of physiology, should lead to exceeding the threshold of sensitivity and depriving it of the ability to resist. And then it, calming itself with the eternal "a bad peace is better than a good war", will be ready for all the imposed conditions, if only this nightmare finally ends, And, as in modern post-pandemic China, society will agree to color-coding of personal QR codes that are now mandatory (red, yellow, green - depending on the level of infection); resignedly will be scanned at the entrance to the shopping center for "antisocial intent"; will hand over his "fingers" and other biometrics to the general database; will accept the fact that he will no longer be able to fly and travel outside the country - after all, "general security is more expensive"; will be totally vaccinated and will drive away from himself, like the plague, those who do not do this (although it is clear to anyone that it is just the vaccinated person who is dangerous, as a carrier of semi-living bacteria); will completely switch to digital education and telemedicine - "after all, the virus is constantly mutating, it is impossible to defend against it and you need to think about the safety of everyone."

And then, when the countries locked within their borders, each on its own territory, rigidly and consistently rebuild the most regulated digital world within the framework of the issued instructions, the last, global "orange revolution" will take place, which will abolish national sovereignty and create a "single free planetary state with a wise and a gracious ruler."

However, this is said not only in the globalist scenarios.

Today, all of humanity, perhaps, has almost been convinced that, by default, it is itself to blame for everything, and now it must atone for its guilt by unconditional obedience. And the process of subordination will begin with the transition to the delivery of groceries, medicines and food exclusively on the Internet, the purchase of new video games, movies and online courses on the network, the re-profiling of all ateliers for sewing medical masks and their state licensing (if masks are now a state monopoly, then they are with us forever ?).

Under the noise of horror stories about the "terrible coronavirus", global capital is rapidly enriching again and introducing total digital control over everyone.

Especially for the "Century"