The threat of globalism

2024 Author: Seth Attwood | [email protected]. Last modified: 2023-12-16 15:55

Globalism is not just a phenomenon, globalism is a concept that some idiots seized on on the eve of the global crisis, who naively consider themselves the mighty of this world, within this concept they see the strengthening and preservation of their position at the top of the pyramid of power, throughout the entire territory of the globe of a single new world order. This threat did not arise suddenly and not immediately, it was ripening for a long time, for a long time there were perverted minds among mankind who dreamed of being the rulers of the world empire, about giving orders and determining the fate of the entire population of the Earth, in order to be the only ones who make history the world. At one time, Marx and his followers said that capitalism at the end of the 19th century. entered its last stage - the stage of imperialism, when the whole world was divided among several leading European powers, who created blocs and unleashed a world war among themselves for the final redivision of the world. However, he was wrong. Neither the First World War, nor the second did not bring the final redistribution and did not become the end of capitalism. Something else happened. Instead of the concept of a world empire created by one or several culturally close nations, another concept and another path won out - the path of creeping penetration of uniform standards around the world, the path of collusion of elites, the path in which the main factors determining the most important decisions are not the interests of nations, not political or ideological considerations, but the financial interests of the most important players in the world market, the interests of transnational corporations, crushing the will of the governments of individual countries and the identity of peoples. The concept of globalism penetrated both the USSR, which gave up its positions without war, whose population bought into the promises of a capitalist paradise, and China, which, although nominally remained communist, has long and with might and main played by the rules of the capitalist market, playing a vital role in the world economic system. … At one time, Francis Fukuyama, impressed by these changes, even wrote about the "end of history", meaning by this the final approval of the neoliberal Western model on the entire planet (in recent years, however, he has somewhat changed his ideas).

What is the basis of the concept of globalism and the Western "democracy" society built under a single blueprint for the entire planet? The main thesis on which the concept of globalism is based is this: all people are driven by the same needs. This thesis is certainly wrong, as I have repeatedly shown in other articles on this site. Let's break this thesis into several and consider their fallacy separately.

1) People are driven by needs. I mean, everything that people do, on the basis of which they make decisions, what determines their motives and is of value to them - it all depends on their needs. This thesis is absolutely absurd and takes place only for people with an emotional perception of the world that was characteristic of the outgoing era. However, it is so deeply rooted in the mass consciousness that, for example, ardent communists, habitually mumbling that capitalism sucks, and that a world revolution is needed, unambiguously, etc., habitually repeat this very thesis about the determining role of needs. Let's figure out what the "need" is. A need is an object of necessity or desire, which explicitly or implicitly pushes a person to get the object and thereby satisfy the need sitting in it. Satisfying a need brings an emotionally thinking person into a blissful (happy, enthusiastic) state and is perceived by him as an achievement. A man devoured - happy. He relieved his need and emptied his stomach - he was also happy, etc. A feature of modern society is the idea of permissiveness in the ways of satisfying needs, while at most of the time interval of the third stage of civilization in different cultures there were “right” and “wrong”, not approved needs, as well as ways of satisfying needs, for example, various prohibitions imposed by the church, tradition, etc. Naturally, fools immediately start yelling that “all that a person has always strived for is to satisfy his needs, and, now, finally, the wonderful Western democracy gives everyone such an opportunity - if you want - smoke cannabis in the entrance, if you want - enter into same-sex marriages, etc. " At the end of the stage, individual needs, driven by egoists, come into conflict with the interests of society and lead it to destruction, as I already wrote about this in the 4-level concept. And this fall of traditions conditioned by national cultures, etc., opens the way for globalism. Obsession with needs leads to the phenomenon when needs begin to be controlled, shaping them, directing them in the right direction, tying a person to certain needs, and, pulling the strings of needs, manipulate his behavior, his mood, his assessments, etc. a person is not an overseer with a whip, etc., but his own needs inherent in the brain, his attachments, brought up by skillful educators and hammered into the subconscious. As I noted earlier, a person who lives by needs and sees the meaning of life only in them is flawed and incomplete. This man is certainly unreasonable and like an animal. After all, what is the (latent) need inherent in the brain? A need is a desire to possess something, to achieve something, information about which is already available. A person cannot want what he does not know about. A person's desires are formed only on the basis of his knowledge of the world, on the basis of ideas about things, etc., only having ideas and knowledge, a person then hangs up tags, places pluses and minuses, begins to want and love one thing and hate and despise another. As I have written many times before, a person who is emotionally thinking, fixated on the pursuit of emotional comfort, etc., is always looking for simple ways, looking for simple and pleasant solutions instead of the right ones, he will always prefer illusions that lull his unreasonable ego instead of the truth, and Thus, the emotionally thinking beast itself runs to the catcher who has spread the networks of advertising and mass media, created a global network of deception and manipulation of consciousness.

2) Needs are universal. In a sense, the needs are the same for all people and, in general, must be given by nature. This thesis is even more absurd than the first. As I wrote earlier in the same 4-level concept, the development of civilization is guided and is the main property that determines the level of this development, culture, that is, the totality of intangible achievements, knowledge, norms, ideas about the functioning of certain institutions, philosophical systems, religions, scientific theories, etc. Culture is what makes a person as a biological individual a person as capable of understanding something in the world around him, working, setting goals, thinking, wanting to be a being. Cultural layers, layering one on top of the other, push him further and further in terms of expanding his abilities, increasing knowledge, deepening solutions to certain problems, etc. A person's needs are a function of his cultural baggage, hammered into his head, which is the legacy of all history of civilization. It is quite obvious that only a complete fool can talk about the existence and natural predetermination of such complex "needs" as, for example, the construction of synchrophasotrons or the breeding of aquarium fish. There are no separate needs, there is only a culture that determines these needs. Within the framework of a single culture, the needs of people are balanced, they, perhaps, invisibly for some, are coordinated in such a way that they ensure the stable and normal functioning of society, with the destruction of culture, when people lose their usual guidelines, when there is an atomization of individual needs and their separation from the principle of social expediency, the destruction and degradation of society begins. Within the framework of the concept of globalism, to replace national cultural systems, with their unique ideas about needs, a single system is imposed, or rather, just a set of needs, and since such a system of needs must be universal and simple (otherwise it is simply impossible to profitably exploit it, making a profit), needs based on the most primitive animal instincts are used, the phenomenon of mass culture is formed, standardized and of the same type, leading to the dullness and degradation of its consumers.

World education, represented by globalists and united on the principles of universal needs, is impossible. Three points can be highlighted here.

1) Temporary. Firstly, and this is the main thing, the time frame for the development of civilization and humanity within the framework of the old system of values has already come out. As I already noted in the 4-level concept, behind a certain line the positive aspects of a certain value system, its constructive and unifying potential ceases to dominate and gives way to tendencies of destruction. Our civilization has already crossed this line. All development within the framework of the old system of values has been exhausted, new problems cannot and cannot be found within this framework, new tasks cannot be set. Cultural systems and traditions, which previously ensured a stable state of society, are crumbling, we see this most clearly in the countries following the globalization process - the countries of the West, the USA and Western Europe, the whole complex of which should be discussed in a separate article. Since the 1970s, these countries have been experiencing a stable demographic crisis leading to the extinction of the indigenous population, the invasion of migrants who have already completely replaced this population in many sectors of the economy has led to the fact that the nations of Western Europe have actually lost their economic independence, and a distinctive feature is that migrants who come to Western Europe do not at all become French, Germans, British, etc., they do not assimilate, preserving their specific cultural traditions, religious attitudes, etc. This process almost exactly copies what what happened 1600-1700 years ago in the Roman Empire before its shameful and crushing collapse. The process of extinction is accompanied by moral decline and decay, prostitution and drug use are legalized, juvenile delinquency is becoming a real scourge, and pedophiles are found among priests (not to mention minor problems born of irrepressible development of needs, such as total obesity).

2) Spatial. The very idea of uniting humanity by creating a world market and linking countries with the bonds of trade is utopian. As I already wrote, for example, in the article "on nationalism", the uniting potential of different value systems and different types of society is not the same. The more progressive the value system, the more potential it has. If in the era of the dominance of the power system of values (antiquity), the natural unit within which the unification of people was ensured was the city (city-state), then in the era of the emotional system of values it is already a nation. But - nothing more than a nation. Further expansion of society beyond the borders of the nation within the framework of an invariable emotional system of values governed by economic levers cannot lead to anything good. This does not in any way increase the efficiency of the economy, but, on the other hand, it leads the market to destabilization. Within the framework of one, even a relatively small, but developed country, it is quite possible to create an economic system and infrastructure that ensures the production of all basic necessary goods, up to spaceships and nuclear weapons, and this economic system will be quite stable, stable economic ties will exist in it. production chains, etc. As soon as all production is outsourced to TNCs, problems arise. Guided by considerations to optimize costs, TNCs begin to transfer funds from one country to another. It is quite obvious that there cannot be the same economic situation in different countries, in the USA - some conditions for organizing production, in Russia - others, in China - still others. Obeying the herd instinct and, like shoals of fish, rushing from one country to another, corporations and owners of financial assets destabilize the established economic (and not only economic) situation in these countries, provoking crises, poorly predicted fluctuations in stock indexes, market problems, etc. As I wrote above, one of the consequences of globalization was a sharp increase in the flow of migrants driven by this artificially created inequality, and one of the leaders in this process is, unfortunately, Russia, stupidly, under the leadership of a handful of traitors and supporters of the West, copying all suicidal movement of the so-called. "developed" countries. The world economy today, with its open market, is like the Titanic without internal bulkheads, ready to sink after a single breach.

However, it is not just about the economy. The essence of cultural traditions does not at all consist in the differences in traditional needs and preferences of certain peoples, but also contains deeper components that cannot be objects of profit, cannot be reduced to primitive needs and desires. Many peoples have retained a rich cultural potential that can be fully realized and perceived only in a society consisting of intelligent people. Only on the basis of a reasonable approach, only on the basis of the criteria of truth can a culture be formed that will be common to all mankind and can include all the most diverse and richest reserves accumulated by it over its long history. Within the framework of the emotional system of values, the stupid animal consumer worldview, the cultures of different peoples cannot be united, they can only be erased, discarded, destroyed, etc., they can be replaced by a common primitive standard for all, attempts to impose which we and we are observing at the present time. Instead of integration, an attempt is made to erase and standardize, an attempt is made to forcibly remake and primitivize the human personality, which is no less harmful in its potential than the replacement of natural language with "Newspeak" described by Orwell. Naturally, such a policy of the West generates resistance from all bearers of those "wrong" cultures and traditions, and one can be sure that they will win this war.

3) The dead end of development along the way of increasing needs in principle. The very thesis that the more goods, the better, and, as a consequence, that the more goods are produced, the better, is absolutely idiotic. As I wrote in the article "Criticism of the Market Economy", one of its features is that people work against each other. People in a free market economy, with its unlimited vectors of needs, will spend energy and money to harm each other. Corporations will throw people out into the streets to cut costs, but the government will be forced to pay benefits from their taxes and fight unemployment-related crime, drug addiction, etc. fight against counterfeiting and piracy. An economy whose principle is to maximize profits is absurd. It produces a huge pile of superfluous goods that are imposed on customers, or they are voluntarily purchased by them without absolutely any need whatsoever. A huge amount of goods is harmful, but a huge amount of effort and resources is spent on their production. A huge number of fakes and cheap substitutes for better quality goods are produced, which is not justified by anything other than the desire to minimize costs. Any opportunity that exists to deceive a buyer, legal and, in many cases, illegal, is used, and it is completely unprofitable to sell a quality product, in the merits of which a typical average layman, zombified with advertising and attracted by beautiful tinsel, will not figure it out when he comes to the store. The principle of indulging in needs and maximizing production leads to ever-increasing inefficiencies and waste of resources that cannot last long. The problem is not that there is little oil and gas, the problem is not that the area of fertile land is limited, etc., the problem is that a person, arrogantly blinded by his needs and stupidly sure that he lives here only in order to satisfy them, all resources are deliberately spent irrationally, deliberately not recognizing any independent value, apart from taking and devouring, deliberately takes the position of a pig under an oak tree, and, like this pig, will not value anything that does not see direct benefits … A person, not being reasonable, not understanding the consequences of his stupid actions dictated by momentary needs, every minute creates for himself problems that he not only cannot, but also does not want to foresee. Even perfectly aware that habitual tactics are suicidal, a human consumer very badly comes to the idea that he needs to stop being a stupid animal and realize the destructiveness of actions to satisfy his "needs". For example, the phenomenon of the greenhouse effect is well known, and the effect of the accumulation of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere was easy to predict, but the United States not only refused to sign the Kyoto Protocol, but more than that, the Bush administration began to shut up scientists to hide the real data on climate change, already resulting from the accumulation of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere. Alas, in a society of need-driven idiots, it is difficult to be smart and act rationally. If you don’t do a stupid thing trying to get immediate benefit, it will be done by a moron who does not understand and does not want to understand the harm from his act. You will not litter the atmosphere - another will litter it. You will not cut down the forests - another will cut them down. You will not fish in the ocean - it will be caught by another until there is not one left. Raw materials, in conjunction with environmental, etc., crises caused exclusively and only by a dull logic of consumption, will hammer the last nail into the coffin of Western civilization.