Evidence of a planetary cataclysm in the works of Humboldt

2024 Author: Seth Attwood | [email protected]. Last modified: 2023-12-16 15:55

The recent planetary catastrophe is supported by the research of Alexander von Humboldt. Back in the 19th century, he argued that the North Pole was not so long ago in the Great Lakes region in North America, that Marco Polo lived in the capital of Tartary, and Kara-Kurum, and its inhabitants were no different from the cities and their inhabitants in Poland. or Hungary …

Humboldt tartar

I believe that I am not much wrong if I assume that most of us know the name of Alexander von Humboldt fairly well. Only bad luck. The surname is well-known, but not everyone can remember who Humboldt is and how he became famous. But in vain. Truly, Humboldt is one of the greatest minds of mankind, and we owe him much more achievements in science and technology than some famous, thanks to propaganda, scientists more like popular TV presenters.

“Baron Friedrich Wilhelm Heinrich Alexander von Humboldt (German Friedrich Wilhelm Heinrich Alexander Freiherr von Humboldt, September 14, 1769, Berlin - May 6, 1859, Berlin) - German encyclopedic scientist, physicist, meteorologist, geographer, botanist, zoologist and traveler, junior brother of the scientist Wilhelm von Humboldt.

For the breadth of his scientific interests, his contemporaries called him the Aristotle of the 19th century. Proceeding from general principles and applying the comparative method, he created such scientific disciplines as physical geography, landscape science, and ecological plant geography. Thanks to Humboldt's research, the scientific foundations of geomagnetism were laid.

He paid great attention to the study of climate, developed a method of isotherms, made a map of their distribution and, in fact, provided a substantiation of climatology as a science. He described in detail the continental and coastal climates, established the nature of their differences.

Member of the Berlin (1800), Prussian and Bavarian Academies of Sciences. Honorary member of the St. Petersburg Academy of Sciences (1818). (Wikipedia)

Perhaps the answer to the reasons why the scientific world does not appreciate and popularize the works of this scientist is insufficiently high, lies in a single slip of the tongue, which is present in many publications containing background information about him. Here it is: “He considered his main task to be“comprehension of nature as a whole and collecting evidence about the interaction of natural forces”.

Let me emphasize again: - "comprehension of nature as a whole …". And modern academic science is doing exactly the opposite. It divides and splits science into branches, sub-branches, sub-sub-branches, etc., due to which, in order to understand a simple process, dozens of narrowly focused specialists in various fields of science must gather at one time in one place, while everyone must speak, this is to hear everyone, and even understand. The task, as everyone knows, is practically insoluble. At least because of the different interpretations of the same terms, experts from different branches of science.

At its core, the modern organization of collecting, accumulating, systematizing and analyzing scientific data resembles the Babylonian pandemonium, in which everyone tries to shout louder, speak faster, and at the same time no one understands each other. In such a situation, science, and hence all of humanity, is doomed to degradation. A scientist physicist who does not understand anything in chemistry, mechanics, biology and mathematics will never be able to discover anything in his life, but he will cause tangible damage to science as a whole. Humboldt understood this well and systematically defended his convictions in the need for an integrated approach in the education of universal specialists with broad knowledge in various fields of scientific knowledge. And he himself was just such a universal, with an encyclopedic mindset, an excellent analyst, theorist, and a tireless practitioner.

This is that rare kind of scientist who does not sit in offices, but walks on the ground with his own feet, and touches everything with his hands. Without exaggeration, he traveled half the world, and surveyed thousands of square kilometers in both hemispheres of the Earth with the help of a large number of instruments, including those designed personally, moving on foot and by all available means of transport. For example, on horseback, he could ride more than a hundred miles a day. The result of his travels was scientific data collected by the instrumental method, which formed the basis of many discoveries and inventions.

Some of Humboldt's experiments shock us today. For example, he studied static electricity, or as they said at the time, electroplating, as follows: Dr. Schaldern cut the skin of the corpses of unclaimed deceased in a Berlin morgue so that Humboldt could study the effects of electricity on human muscles. And this is not the most unusual thing in his biography.

For example, beyond the scope of encyclopedias and reference books, fragmentary information remained that the baron was a career intelligence officer, and his travels were financed not only by the Prussian Academy of Sciences, but also by the Special Expedition of the General Staff of the Russian Empire. Simply, he is like P. P. Semyonov-Tyan-Shansky and N. M. Przhevalsky was also a spy who supplied building No. 6 on Palace Square in St. Petersburg, where the Ministry of Foreign Affairs was located, accurate maps and other valuable information of importance to military intelligence.

And the practical legacy left by Humboldt to descendants is simply impossible to appreciate. He left more than thirty major monographs alone, not counting other scientific works. Strange, but only six monographs have been translated into Russian. Unbelievable, but true: - The works of the Honorary Member of the St. Petersburg Academy of Sciences have not been translated into Russian! It is clear that this is not the only "oddity" in the biography of the great scientist, and here is one of the most mysterious:

On April 12, 1829, after a long preparation, which was supervised by a friend of the baron, Count Yegor Frantsevich Kankrin, who was then the Minister of Finance of the Russian Empire, Humboldt left Berlin for St. Petersburg together with companions Gustav Rose and Christian Gottfried Ehrenberg. But the ultimate goal of the trip was, of course, not the Russian capital, but Siberia and the Urals. More precisely, Emperor Nikolai Pavlovich demanded accurate and comprehensive information about the state of copper, silver and gold deposits. Probably, the assignment was so delicate that not only a highly qualified specialist, but a person with intelligence skills, could cope with it.

We can only guess about the reasons for such a strange undertaking, but the facts indicate the following: - The route of the expedition was determined in advance. From St. Petersburg to Moscow, and then Vladimir - Nizhny Novgorod - Kazan - Yekaterinburg - Perm. We got to Kazan along the Volga, and then on horseback.

From Perm, the scientists went to Yekaterinburg, where they spent several weeks, devoting time to geological exploration and examination of deposits of iron, gold-bearing ores, native platinum, and malachite. There, Humboldt proposed to reduce the water cut in gold-bearing mines by draining Lake Shartash near Yekaterinburg. Humboldt's authority was so great that his proposal was accepted, despite the protests of local mining specialists. Researchers also visited well-known Ural factories, including Nevyansk and Verkhneturinsk.

Further, we went through Tobolsk to Barnaul, Semipalatinsk, Omsk and Miass. In the Barabinskaya steppe, the expedition replenished its zoological and botanical collections. After arriving in Miass, where the celebration of the 60th anniversary of Humboldt took place, the expedition continued through the South Urals with a tour of Zlatoust, Kichimsk, Orsk and Orenburg. Having visited the Iletsk rock salt deposit, the travelers arrived in Astrakhan, and then "made a short trip across the Caspian Sea." On the way back, Humboldt visited Moscow University, where a solemn meeting was arranged for him. On November 13, 1829, the members of the expedition returned to St. Petersburg.

It is not known what information the expedition obtained for Nicholas I, but upon returning to Berlin, Alexander von Humboldt sat down to work, and wrote a colossal volume of work, consisting of three volumes, which is called “Central Asia. Mountain Range Studies and Comparative Climatology”. And here the most mysterious begins. The fact that Humboldt originally began to write his monograph in French, which was not his native language, is disconcerting.

The absurdity of the situation is eliminated only with the help of a single logical explanation. Let me explain. If the baron himself wrote this work of his own free will, would he exhaust himself with such burdensome and useless labors? Of course not. This means that he wrote under a contract, one of the clauses of which was a condition obliging the author to submit the manuscript in French. So then, the customer was the French?

Unlikely. After all, the expedition was carried out in the interests of the Russian government. And the last of the high-ranking Russian officials with whom Humboldt negotiated in Dorpat (now Tallinn) before leaving for Prussia was the director of the Pulkovo Observatory, Academician V. Ya. Struve. Probably, he acted as a customer for the writing of this work. Why, then, in French! And what language did all Petersburg and all the Russian nobility speak at that time?

This is where the answer to this absurdity lies. A very simple explanation easily puts all the incomprehensible moments in their place. True, the following logical question arises as to why the book was then published in Paris and not in Russia? I think there is a simple explanation for this fact. The answer may lie in the content of the expedition report itself. The Russian censors could easily have kept him out of print. But here's what else is interesting. In modern official sources, there is a mention of Humboldt's work called "Central Asia", but there is no such heading in the bibliography. Of course, this is an abbreviated name, which in the original looked like this:

Asie centrale. Recherches sur les chaines de montagne et la climatologie comparee (1843, 3 t.)

But in the official list of the scientist's works, this work is not listed. Why? This mystery did not leave indifferent my old friend from Poland, the historian Andrzej Wiazowski, who found the whereabouts of one copy of the surviving three-volume Humboldt book. As you can easily guess, this is the United States. More precisely, the University of Michigan library. (View digital copy)

Then, with the help of a special computer program, it was necessary to process the graphic images of the book in order to translate them into text format, for subsequent translation into Polish and Russian languages. (Read the research results)

However, the Russian translation of this book in 1915 could have been dispensed with. (View digital copy)

if not for one "but". In the Russian edition, already in the preface, it is said that the manuscript has been edited. And this was done, allegedly due to the discrepancy between the sufficient level of scientific knowledge of the translator from French. Like, as a result of the ignorance of P. I. Borodzic, a large number of errors appeared in the translation. However, today it is already clear to us that in this way the seizure of "seditious" information and the substitution of words were often made. Such, for example, as: replacing the words "Tartars" with "Tatars", "Katay" with "China", and so on. Therefore, without even conducting a detailed comparative analysis of both versions of the monograph, I believe that the work should have used the French edition of 1843, which Andrzej did.

And now, I will briefly tell you what we have, drawing attention to the lifetime French edition of the works of Alexander von Humboldt.

He devoted the lion's share of the time spent on the expedition to a detailed study of the "Tatar plateau" (Plateau de la Tartarie) - located between Altai and the South Urals. He writes a lot about "dialects of Tartarus", "Tartar language", "Tartar provinces". He confirms the reports of medieval travelers that "Altai" means "Golden Mountains", and thus proves that people living in Altai were called "Golden Horde". At the same time, he repeatedly claims that there has never been gold in Altai!

It seems incredible that even at that time Humboldt could easily measure heights relative to sea level. So he claims that the Tartar plateau and the area between the Caspian and the Aral Sea still continue to fall below the level of the world ocean, and here he gives free rein to emotions, and desperately exclaims:

People! It really happened! I saw it myself!

In one place, the author describes completely sensational details. He claims to be "today called the Tatars of the Mongols," and then uses the term "moall" or "Moallia" many times. The same ethnonym was applied to the inhabitants of Siberia by the ambassador of Charles IX, Guillaume de Rubruk, when he wrote reports about his trip to the court of Mangu-Khan (the son of Genghis Khan). There is no doubt that the same people had the name Mogulls, Manguls, Mungals and Great Mughals. And here is the main thing: - Humboldt wrote that he saw with his own eyes many bodies of dead moals (tartars) - and they all had a European appearance, which had nothing in common with the Mongols or the Turks.

I would very much like to hope that after reading this paragraph, the eyes of the majority will finally open. And the majority will understand the meaning of the large-scale conspiracy, the result of which was the concealment of the truth about the Great Tartary, and the implantation of the myth of the Mongol-Tatar yoke. Such colossal efforts and investments of astronomical sums are actually justified when it comes to legitimizing the criminal actions of corporations that usurped power.

If someone still does not understand what this is about, I explain:

Nobody will fight with their own. In order to force people to kill each other, it is necessary to divide the people into two parts, and to convince one of them that the other part is not his people, but his enemy. For this, a myth was created about wild nomads and barbarians from the East, who yearn for the blood of Slavic babies. Everyone who is to the east of St. Petersburg, especially beyond Moscow, all these are non-people who are criminally pitied and must be exterminated.

The inhabitants of the European outskirts of Tartary believed that there were no people beyond the Volga, and a fratricidal war began, in which their own were killed. And thanks to the catastrophe that wiped out all the cities east of the Urals from the face of the Earth, along with people, mammoths, metagalinaries and griffins, those who considered themselves "not tartars" won.

And who is now called barbarians, horde, Finno-Ugric, Mordor? So, it is very similar to the fact that we are now in the place of the "Mongol-Tatars". This is retribution for what our ancestors did. And although it was not their fault, but of the ruling Oldenburgs - Romanovs, the boomerang returned centuries later, and today they are treating us in the same way as we did with Tartary.

And in order for history not to repeat itself, you need to know the past, and learn from it. And to know the history, not so much is needed. It is enough only to have factual material (which cannot be completely destroyed or falsified), and rely on common sense.

And over time, what at first appears to be only a version is certainly confirmed by evidence, often contained in sources that are in plain sight. One of the most valuable such sources is undoubtedly Humboldt's "Central Asia". We think that it is only today that facts have been revealed that make it possible to doubt the reliability of the officially accepted chronology, but it turns out that Alexander Humboldt did not doubt that Strabo and Eratosthenes lived no earlier than a hundred years before him. He was convinced of this by the names of Siberian rivers, cities and mountain ranges, as well as their descriptions, which were given by various authors at different times.

Quite casually, he mentions "the exploratory expedition of Alexander the Great to Tartaria." What today seems to us an incredible revelation, for Humboldt was commonplace. For example, he claims that the North Pole was not so long ago in the Great Lakes region of North America.

In addition, he casually talks about Marco Polo, who lived in the capital of Tartary. And he says that Kara-Kurum and its inhabitants were no different from the cities and their inhabitants in Poland or Hungary, and there were many Europeans in it. He also mentions the existence of the Moscow embassy in the city. This indicates that despite the secession of Muscovy from the Great Tartary, diplomatic relations were nevertheless established. We observe a similar situation today, when, after the separation of some especially "free" from Russia, embassies of newly formed, previously non-existent countries appeared in Moscow.

But this is not the most important thing to learn from Humboldt. You can be endlessly surprised at the amazing performance of the members of the expedition, who in just six months have collected a gigantic archive of data on geology, topography, ethnography, history, zoology, and botany of vast territories. The main thing is read between the lines. A huge number of measurements of the heights and lowlands of the relief, the directions of the lines of the Earth's magnetic field and its strength, as well as calculations made on the opposite side of the planet in South America, allowing to determine the center of mass of the Earth, force us to come to the conclusion about the true purpose of the entire enterprise.

The listed facts indirectly confirm that Humboldt was well aware of the cataclysm that had occurred, and he had his own theory about its causes. He tried to find confirmation of his conclusions that it is possible to create a system for predicting future disasters.

Here are the conclusions made by Andrzej Wiazowski in his research, calling them the Humboldt Theory:

1. Strange atmospheric phenomena have been observed in Europe, China and Siberia. Both Europeans and Jesuits based in China send their astronomers to study these phenomena. The Chinese emperor also sends priests, and since then annual prayers have been held in Altai.
2. A swarm of meteors hits Siberia, South America and the North-East with "golden sand". Gold particles have a "vortex shape", which indicates that when gold was in a liquid state (before it solidified on the surface of the earth), it was exposed to some kind of vortex electromagnetic fields. Let me remind you that the meteorological service in the Russian Empire was created in 1725. What do you think for what? To broadcast weather forecasts? Do you understand the meaning of the word "meteorology"? And what then does the forecaster do? So that's it. Meteorological stations initially recorded all cases of meteorites falling to Earth. And since 1834, by decree of Tsar Nicholas I, they began to record changes in the Earth's magnetic field. And probably in connection with the results of the Humboldt expedition.
3. "Electric atmospheric currents" appear, which "introduce" "different metals" into the cracks of the mountains of certain rocks.
4. The "Great Caspian Lowland" appears, into which water from the Arctic is poured. Humboldt believes that it was below sea level, and naturally ocean water rushed there. A wave of floods from the Arctic Ocean flooded areas from the Caspian Sea to Lake Baikal, and the pressure of this body of water on the earth's crust in this area caused a temporary decrease in this area relative to sea level.
5. The resulting new internal sea destabilizes the rotation of the planet due to the fact that now the center of gravity of the planet does not coincide with the axis of rotation. Additional destabilization is causing a progressive sinking of the area beneath this Asian Sea, while simultaneously “pushing out” nearby mountain ranges.
6. Oscillations and changes in the magnetic field occur.
7. The axis of rotation is moved to a different location. It is caused by the imbalance of the planet as a gyroscopic system. It does not do a complete roll, as all rotating systems are stable. In addition, the mass of water on the planet and, to a lesser extent, magma in the depths of the Earth create inhibitory forces.
8. Then another wave follows. Water from the intra-Asian sea pours out through the Caspian Sea into the Black Sea. The process lasts for several years because during the first wave a dam arose from tree trunks brought from the north. It played the role of a valve that slows down the flow, due to the difference in cross-section, and, accordingly, reducing the water consumption. Similar phenomena could have occurred in the Kerch Strait and in the Bosphorus. Then the Mediterranean was protected by a whole cascade of "valves".
9. Changing the axis of rotation of the Earth causes a ten-year period of alignment of land and sea, so that the acting centrifugal force causes a series of weakening shocks, like "auto shocks" after an earthquake. The new equator has a larger diameter than the new Polar Chain. In some places, mountain ranges and mountain plateaus grow. In other places, the process is reversed. The area between today's Caspian and Aral seas is turning into a depression. The current Kumo-Manych depression between the Black and Caspian Seas, after a "failure" at a lower level, begins to grow again, which caused the closure of the strait between these seas.

Now you understand that today we are “reinventing the wheel” again. Everything that I previously wondered about, as well as I. Davidenko, A. Stepanenko, A. Lorenz, and many other authors (all respected researchers cannot be listed), was known two hundred years ago. Moreover, systematic observations were carried out over the course of changes on a planetary scale, the results of which are unknown to us today.

It may even be a good thing. Knowledge about the date of one's own death can hardly be considered positive. I, at least, would not like to know the future in advance.

Every day you need to live like the last, and not think about how many of them are still ahead. Anyway, we have a bright future ahead of us. We know this from school.