Now I will get THIS - and then I will stop doing THAT

2024 Author: Seth Attwood | [email protected]. Last modified: 2023-12-16 15:55

This post explains one interesting element in the behavior of many people with whom I have had the pleasure of communicating. I decided that in the articles "Now I will start over - and this time …" and "Now I this time - and I will start over …" this element was not described clearly enough, and therefore I focus on it special attention, and I would also like to close in general all this topic related to the TOTAL defect of our civilization, expressed in excuses like: “ now the conditions will change - and then everything will be different ».

The main answer to the implicit question of this topic is simple: ONLY internal changes made by the person himself lead to this very “different”, which he is waiting for. Everything else leads ONLY to the same thing as before, but with one or another variation of this repetition. That is, the chaos and chaos, from which a person wants to escape, will simply migrate to something else in his life, if one thing in it suddenly changes. The amount of his stupidity will remain the same, and therefore the amount of subsequent troubles from it will not change, only their form will change (and even then, if you're lucky).

Now specifically about today's topic. I am sure you have met such forms of behavior: “here I will have my own apartment, I will live there neatly and take care of it, and while I live in this rented apartment, I can live just to live and move out; I see no reason to take special care of her ", or: "Here will be a good reason, I will dress decently, but now you can walk in rags for now", or: "There will be a new car, I will drive neatly, but you don't have to try too hard on this one", or: “I’ll be in a good mood, I’ll communicate normally, and now I can get hurt and make myself stand out.” The reader gets the general idea … but is it? Let's check: if you really grasp the general idea, then in my purely personal opinion you simply have to see ABSOLUTELY THE SAME content in the following classic set from my communication experience:

“That would be fewer ordinary people, we would live differently, and the world would be better, and only then it would make sense to try to do something for people”, or: "The liberals are to blame for everything, if it were not for them, the country would not have collapsed, and since the power does not move, then I see no reason to do anything either, because there is a risk that they will merge my undertakings as well", or: "As long as Putin is participating in the elections, there is no point in voting," or: "While there is no money, I see no reason to start a project (or have children, or invest in a certain business, or donate to someone)", or: "I miss this and that, so when it is, I will start doing something useful." Well, the most lethal set, in which it is really hard to see THE SAME one:

"You are such a moron (fool, layman, lazy person, slob, etc.) that it is absolutely impossible to explain this idea to you", or: "You are to blame for this, and your problem is that …", or: “Why do I owe him (her) something? ", or: "The reason for my irritation is such and such a circumstance."

So what's the catch and why are all these phrases about the same? In all these phrases, in my opinion, a person's misunderstanding of the meaning of his life is expressed. The phenomena and circumstances surrounding him are tasks that are given to a person to work out his positive qualities, correct negative qualities and mistakes made earlier, to atone for the past (including working off his karmic heritage), to test his beliefs, to prevent possible mistakes and etc. In other words, EVERYTHING, downright ABSOLUTELY EVERYTHING, has an important meaning for a person and a general direction contained in such phenomena - the direction of development.

A simple situation: a “murdered” filthy apartment was received by a person so that he could learn order and cleanliness, and until he learns this, no matter what new apartment he gets, it will turn into a trash heap. A person expects that now he will move - and everything will be fine … but the result will greatly disappoint him, and even if he really gets rid of some visible problems, they will come out in a different manifestation in a new apartment. Or, say, a person complains about the townsfolk and believes that the overwhelming majority of all human troubles are from the unreasonableness of the townsfolk, but he forgets that these same townsfolk came to this world to work out their beliefs and attitudes to life, they take part in the Game in our "Sandbox" and create a certain order of things in the world in which they themselves live. By receiving feedback, people can observe the result of their "creativity". Does it annoy you? Well, this proves that you, too, are the same philistine, whose problem lies precisely in the presence of this very irritation, and it gives rise to a number of problems in this world that also irritate you, etc. As a result, if not in this, then in the next (or one hundred thousandth) incarnation you will still understand that you need to overcome the tendency to irritation and all your problems have only one root - irritation. If you were your soul so strongly developed, you would not be born on Earth. And since you were born, then, probably, you need to defeat the SAME set of shortcomings as that of the townsfolk you hate. And by the way, you annoy them too, because in addition to the SAME set of nonsense, you have one more thing: you deny your involvement in this world and consider yourself to be someone special. And this, AGAIN, is your problem.

You have been given life in this world with “commoners” so that you can solve some of your inner problems, correct some defective qualities of your soul.

Or, say, you think that a person is a fool, such a stupid fool that it is impossible to explain anything to him. Once you have such a situation that you have to explain a certain thought to a fool, then you NEED to understand something or learn something in the course of this interaction. Refusal to solve the problem will lead you only to the fact that you will solve the SAME problem again. Next time, instead of a fool, you will come across a professor of the Russian Academy of Sciences. You will be surprised, but you will not be able to convey the same idea to him. Moreover, in some cases the reason will be the inadequacy of the professor, and in some cases your misunderstanding of what you wanted to convey, but the general meaning is the same: YOU need to understand something during this meeting. For example, I already very many years ago noticed one feature of people, expressed in the fact that it is IMPOSSIBLE to explain to them their shortcoming, which is that any attempt to say about him BLOCKS the mind and they do not perceive you at all. Question: HOW can you explain to a person THAT drawback, WHICH BLOCKS any attempts to discuss IT? No way?

In fact, it is possible, but if a person, in your opinion, is a fool, then it is impossible. Your mistake will be that you blame him on your inability to solve the most difficult logical problem in which you need to find a way out of the paradox like "do not come to the water until you learn to swim." Only here is a more complex form: the flaw blocks the mind when trying to talk about it from the standpoint of the mind.

That is, in order to convey to a person a thought that will allow him to overcome his shortcoming, you must FIRST remove this very shortcoming that you want to help him eliminate, otherwise he will interfere with eliminating himself … Paradox …

You are an intelligent, enlightened person (so you think if you took on the role of a teacher of life), and you are faced with a stubborn man in the street who shows a bunch of flaws in thinking, which makes it simply impossible to explain anything to him. You can take the position that he is too stupid for you - and you have failed a simple task and the exam for enlightenment, or you can ACCEPT the rules of the game, UNDERSTAND that a person's flaws are a PART of his personality and that you need to convey information to him, CONSIDERING these shortcomings … A simple case: you see that a person is drinking alcohol, but any attempt to tell him about it will cause such a fit of irritation that he will not talk to you for another month. Can you wean him off alcohol? Certainly!

I have never been interested in situations when it is enough for a person to explain the harm of alcohol to make him quit. This is not interesting to me personally, and besides, all over the world there are a huge number of excellent lecturers who do it hundreds of times better than me, focusing precisely on those who just need to submit knowledge. I am interested in people who say something like: "The beer tastes even better when watching Zhdanov's lectures!" It is interesting just when a person KNOWS about the problem of alcoholism, and almost better than the doctors in the local clinic. And it is even more interesting when he belligerently perceives any, even the mildest, attempts to force him to quit. Finding workarounds in the labyrinths of someone else's consciousness was one of my favorite tasks, and very often I failed it, by the way. Why did you fail? Because at one fine moment I admitted in myself at least a drop of condemnation of him for the behavior of another person, a drop of anger, irritation, hatred, malicious intent. There was a period when this still did not affect the final result (see "Black and white methods of education and training", and even adjusted the brain of young talents very successfully, but then it stopped working AT ALL, from the word ALL. And I was forced to adjust the brain already to myself.

After practicing with the students, I took on myself … and realized that ALL people participate in the global historical process, and ALL of them here in the Sandbox have the opportunity to see their own shortcomings in the course of interactions, which need to be corrected. The so-called “commoners” are to blame for the troubles of this world just as much as you yourself, and your friends or relatives, and I, - we are all eternal souls here - are in equal conditions for working out our properties and qualities, to harden your individuality. The problem is not in the “common people”, but in the fact that you do not know how to live with them, and this is your problem, the root of which is somewhere in the depths of your attic, and each person has his own set of nonsense, which he must solve. If there were no ordinary people, then your problem in your head would have manifested itself differently and would have been expressed in irritation by someone else. Or do you think that the Third Reich also hated the townsfolk? And who was the object of hatred in the United States in the middle of the last century?

There will ALWAYS be scapegoats for the sick and imperfect minds of the "enlightened" or "intelligent" inhabitants of our planet, who happened to be here, apparently due to a misunderstanding.

If you consider yourself smarter than the layman, try to find a way to him that will help him get out of the paradox outlined above. Otherwise, you are trying to deal not with his real problem, but with its consequences. Therefore, a phrase like: "your problem is that you …", after which the average person immediately blocks and hides behind emotional protection is a demonstration of your own ignorance. You DO NOT know his problem, because if you knew, you would never say stupidity, which is the catalyst for the manifestation of this problem, thereby delaying the understanding of a person for days, and sometimes for years. And here you should see that YOUR problem is precisely that you self-confidently think that you know HIS problem. And from the outside it looks like this: there are two townsfolk and exchange absolutely the same meaningless nonsense in their content. Only one of them also considers himself reasonable. Well, sometimes the second too.

What other phrases are you interested in making out? Well, for example: "while I have no money, I will not take up this business." Here the situation is as follows: a person wants to take on a useful project, but he does not have the money to carry out his idea. So he thinks that he should first save up money - and only then he will be able to take on the project. In reality, everything is different: you should FIRST undertake a project, IF you are sure of its correctness (what is correct from the point of view of God, that is, fits into His Providence), and ONLY THEN you will receive money for its implementation, UNDER the CONDITION that himself morally ripe for realization. If you are not morally ripe, then there is a risk of bringing into the project those shortcomings that will destroy it, or bring more harm than good, for whatever reason, the "protection from the fool" is triggered - and something happens to the person that does not give him the opportunity engage in a project. Further, a person is given a check, during which he must show (to himself, of course, because God does not need to show anything, he already knows) his readiness for realization. We have just analyzed an example of a check above - a person is forced to rent an apartment and take care of it as his own (within the framework of agreements with the owners) BEFORE he receives the resources to build his house. If in rented housing he can create and maintain the order that he promises to himself in a new house, then he will receive resources for a new house, or even the house itself at once.

Take me for another example. I set out to create a whole village … why do you think I am writing these lines now, sitting in a rented apartment? Why is she the fifth in a row?

You, of course, do not know why, but I will give you a hint: it's not only the order that you need to learn how to create and observe, this has never been a problem for me before, although now it appears. The point is in a number of personality traits that need to be revised and reworked in the course of such a nomadic life. And all the circumstances around me clearly and unequivocally indicate what I should pay special attention to. Only a person of high morality and spiritual development can create a correct settlement, which I am NOT. Moreover, there should be several such people. Just like that, they can NOT appear, they need, I beg your pardon, to "grow" in labor conditions to arrange space. For this purpose, I am going to learn how to interact with different people in the course of joint work in my small "sandbox", which I am building now. In the course of this interaction, we must, in conditions of mutual assistance and mutual understanding, grow together to the required level of development, sufficient to create an entire village and competently manage it. But now I haven't even passed the exam in a rented apartment! But I know about those my problems that interfere with living in my own home, and such knowledge is already half the battle. For those who want to go a similar way with me (not necessarily forever, but just for some time at will), I even wrote instructions.

By the way, why can't you just take and build a village? Yes, you can, of course, but then you will build a typical village, where any houses, sheathed with plastic siding, stand anyhow and are fenced with a corrugated board, people hardly know each other and fiercely quarrel for 10 cm of "their" land, shitting at each other, and their dogs are shitting all over the village … or you will get another version of social sterilization in the spirit of ancestral settlements, in which the tragedies of human stupidity take on a different character, and where all the same scandals appear, only in a slightly different form. People drag their stupidity with them, and wherever they live, they will bring this stupidity with them. And you need to protect your project from these nonsense as much as possible, for which you yourself should first get rid of them.

Living conditions are EXACTLY those conditions in which YOU must see and eliminate your flaw, your problem, and maybe strengthen and improve your virtue, and you can ONLY do it YOURSELF. And say thank you to your enemies for exposing your shortcomings and poking your nose at your stupidity. And they also throws you interesting tasks on how to convey to a person the idea of those problems, the indication of which not only blocks, but also intensifies these very problems.

And there is a solution … and its simplicity is even more beautiful than its absolute efficiency. But I will tell it (within the narrow framework of my understanding) some other time. Not soon. As you can see, I myself still do not fully understand this life principle, but I see that it always works, where it is possible to apply it. I will learn better - I will definitely share.