The Law of Universal Gravity is another deception

2024 Author: Seth Attwood | [email protected]. Last modified: 2023-12-16 15:55

As a character from the Soviet film classics said: "Isn't it time, my friends, for us to swing at Isaac, do you understand, mmm, our Newton?" I think it's time. Newton considered one of the greatest scientific minds in the history of mankind. It was the "Mathematical Principles of Natural Philosophy" that laid the foundation for the "scientific worldview", which smoothly grew into militant materialism, which became the basis of the scientific paradigm for centuries.

The right to uniqueness of truth was argued "Exact knowledge" about the phenomena of the surrounding world. The foundation of this very "irrefutable, accurate knowledge" was the "Law of Universal Gravitation" named after Isaac Newton. It is precisely on the foundation that we will hit! Let us show that there is no law of gravitation in nature, in fact does not exist, and the entire building of modern physics was built not even on sand, but on a swamp abyss.

In order to demonstrate the inconsistency of Newton's hypothesis of the mutual attraction of matter, a single exception is sufficient. We will give a few, and we will start with the most visual and easily verifiable - with the motion of the Moon in its orbit. The formulas are known to each of the high school courses, and the calculation is available to the fifth grader. The data for the calculation can be taken even from Wikipedia, and then checked against scientific reference books.

According to the Law, the motion of celestial bodies in orbits is due to the force of attraction between the masses of bodies and the speed of bodies relative to each other. So, let's see where the resultant of the forces of attraction from the Earth and the Sun is directed, acting on the Moon at the moment when the Moon flies between the Earth and the Sun (at least at the moment of a solar eclipse).

The force of attraction, as you know, is determined by the formula:

Here

G - gravitational constant.

m, M - body masses.

R is the distance between bodies.

Take from the reference books: the gravitational constant, equal to about 6, 6725 × 10⁻¹¹ m³ / (kg · s²).

The mass of the moon is 7, 3477 × 10²² kg.

Mass of the Sun - 1, 9891 × 10³⁰ kg.

Earth mass - 5, 9737 × 10²⁴ kg.

The distance between the Earth and the Moon = 380,000,000 m.

The distance between the Moon and the Sun = 149,000,000,000 m.

Substituting this data into the formula, we get:

The force of attraction between By the earth and By the moon = 6, 6725×10^-11 x 7, 3477 × 10²² x 5, 9737 × 10²⁴ / 3800000002 = 2, 028×10²⁰ H

The force of attraction between By the moon and By the sun = 6, 6725×10^-11 x 7, 3477 10²² x 1, 9891 10³⁰ / 1490000000002 = 4, 39×10²⁰ H

Thus, according to rigorous scientific data and calculations, the force of attraction between the Sun and the Moon, at the time of the Moon's passage between the Moon and the Sun, is more than 2 times higherthan between the Earth and the Moon. And then the Moon should continue its path in its orbit around the Sun, if the same "Law of Universal Gravitation" was true. That is, written by Newton the law for the moon is not a decree.

We also note that the Moon does not show its attractive properties in relation to the Earth: even in the time of Laplace, scientists were perplexed by the behavior of sea tides, which do not depend on the moon in any way.

One more fact … The moon, moving around the Earth, would have to influence the trajectory of the latter, dragging the Earth from side to side with its gravity. As a result, the trajectory of the Earth should be zigzag, the center of mass of the Moon-Earth system should move strictly along the ellipse:

But, alas, nothing of the kind was found, although modern methods allow this displacement towards the Sun and back, at a speed of about 12 meters per second, to be reliably established. If it really existed.

No decrease in body weight was found when immersed in super-deep mines. The first attempt to test the theory of gravitation of masses was undertaken on the shores of the Indian Ocean, where, on the one hand, there is the world's highest rock ridge of the Himalayas, and on the other, a bowl of the ocean filled with much less massive water. But, alas, the plumb line does not deviate towards the Himalayas! Moreover, supersensitive devices - gravimeters - they do not find a difference in the gravity of the test body at the same height over the mountains or over the seas, even though there may be a depth of several kilometers.

And then the scientific world, in order to save the established theory, invented a support for her: they say the reason for this is "isostasy" - they say, under the seas are more dense rocks, and under the mountains - loose, and their density is exactly such as to fit everything to the answer required by scientists. It's just a song!

But if only this in the scientific world was the only example of adjusting the surrounding reality to the ideas of highbrow husbands about it. There is also a glaring example. invented "elementary particle" - a neutrino, which was invented to explain the "mass defect" in nuclear physics. Even earlier, the “latent heat of crystallization” was invented in heating engineering.

But we got distracted from "Universal gravitation" … Another example of where the predictions of this theory cannot find in any way is the absence of reliably installed satellites in asteroids. Clouds fly across the sky asteroids, but none of them have satellites! Attempts to launch artificial satellites into asteroid orbit ended in failure. First attempt - probe NEAR - the Americans urged on to the asteroid Eros. Wasted. The second attempt - the HAYABUSA probe ("Falcon"), the Japanese sent to the asteroid Itokawa, and nothing came of it either. There are many more similar examples, but we will not overload the text with them.

Let us turn to another problem of scientific knowledge: is it always possible to establish the truth in principle - if ever at all? No not always. Let's give an example based on the same "universal gravitation". As you know, the speed of light is finite, as a result, we see distant objects not where they are at the moment, but we see them at the point from which the beam of light we saw started. Many stars, perhaps, do not exist at all, only their light is coming - a hackneyed topic. But gravitation - how fast does it spread? Laplace was also able to establish that gravity from the Sun does not come from where we see it, but from another point. After analyzing the data accumulated by that time, Laplace found that "gravity" travels faster than light, at least by seven orders of magnitude! Modern measurements have pushed the speed of propagation of gravity even further - at least 11 orders of magnitude faster than the speed of light.

There are strong suspicions that "gravity" spreads instantly at all. But if this actually takes place, then how to establish it - after all, any measurements are theoretically impossible without any error. So we will never know if this speed is finite or infinite. And the world in which it has a limit, and the world in which it is infinite - these are "two big differences", and we will never know what kind of world we live in! This is the limit that is set for scientific knowledge. To accept this or that point of view is a matter faithcompletely irrational, defying any logic. Just as no logic lends itself to belief in the "scientific picture of the world", which is based on the "law of universal gravitation", which exists only in brainwashed heads, and which is not found in the world around us …

Now we will leave Newton's law, and in conclusion we will give a vivid example of the fact that the laws discovered on Earth are completely not universal for the rest of the universe.

Let's take a look at the same moon. Preferably on a full moon. Why does the Moon look like a disk - more like a pancake than a bun, which shape it has? After all, it is a ball, and the ball, if illuminated from the photographer's side, looks something like this: in the center there is a flare, then the illumination falls, towards the edges of the disk the image is darker.

The moon has a uniform illumination in the sky - both in the center and at the edges, it is enough to look at the sky. You can use good binoculars or a camera with a strong optical "zoom", an example of such a photo is given at the beginning of the article. It was shot with 16x zoom. This image can be processed in any graphics editor, increasing the contrast, to make sure that everything is so, moreover, the brightness at the edges of the disk at the top and bottom is even slightly higher than in the center, where it should be the maximum in theory.

Here we have an example that the laws of optics on the moon and on earth are completely different! For some reason, the moon reflects all the incident light towards the Earth. We have no reason to extend the patterns revealed in the conditions of the Earth to the entire Universe. It is not a fact that physical "constants" are constants in fact and do not change over time.

All of the above shows that the "theories" of "black holes", "Higgs bosons" and much more are not even science fiction, but just delirium, more than the theory that the earth rests on turtles, elephants and whales …

Links

- Article "Newton's law of universal gravitation".

- "Spillikins and wicks of universal gravitation."

- "Lunar anomalies or fake physics?"