Discrediting the institution of the family

2024 Author: Seth Attwood | [email protected]. Last modified: 2023-12-16 15:55

In the modern world, a new juvenile reality has come into its own. She is already striding at a broad pace across the Russian land. It would seem that not so long ago Western countries were countries with a traditional family and family values. When did the fracture occur, and why so quickly? Why is it that many of our fellow citizens do not care at all, and they, like blind kittens, do not notice the alarming speed with which this crusade is approaching now for our souls?

Recently, the citizens of our country through the media (which is why I pay so much attention to the issue of public control over the information space) has been persistently imposed on the stereotype, the essence of which is that the family is a threat and, moreover, is the main source of violence against children. We understand that the so-called human rights defenders are not really interested in the fate of children, but are fulfilling a certain order, known to all of us.

Discrediting the institution of the family, this basic unit of society, "human rights defenders" of various stripes, along with some statesmen, are actively promoting juvenile technologies that Western countries "kindly" offer us.

WHERE THE WIND IS BLOWING

They started in the West, as we do now, under the banner of a “struggle for children's rights,” in the course of which officials gradually “forgot” that there are also parental rights. The same is happening in Moscow right now. Seven genders have already been legalized in Europe. They look like the same men and women, but socially they are already completely different individuals. The struggle of minorities (and if we look at the root of this issue, we will understand that it is more correct to say - under the guise of a struggle of minorities) for equality came to the conclusion that minorities not only "achieved" this equality, but in a number of cases completely suppressed real men and women. The latter, by the way, in Europe have already ceased to be called straight, since this, you see, offends minorities, now they are designated by the new buzzword "straight". Interestingly, the English adjective straight has two different meanings: narrow and strict. But in this context, oddly enough, both fit, in my opinion. When we hear about gay marriage, we usually think of two gays or two lesbians. But everything is already much worse and more terrible! So, consider: men, women, gays, lesbians, bisexuals, then transvestites and transsexuals. They all have already achieved, as noted earlier, the right to marry, and get married in local churches. Collapse!

Now in the USA and Europe there is a question of full legalization of not only same-sex, but as many as thirty (!) Types of marriage between representatives of all these new "sexes". Normally oriented men and women are gradually being repressed as something obsolete, almost primitive.

The next step towards the extinction of the ethnos is the right to adopt children by such ugly "families" (personally, I do not find it possible to write this holy word without quotation marks in this context). And this height has already been taken, and now the next step is being discussed - the right of such parents over time to marry (!) Their adopted children, brought up by them in their homo-traditions. This issue is already widely discussed in Norway. It is also very common there to discuss the temporary exchange of children (the mind is incomprehensible!) Between the same "advanced" families for sexual exploitation. Moreover, they can change both their children and adopted ones. Northern Europe - it is, as usual, ahead of the rest of the planet, and therefore soon expect such enthusiasts of the "new family" and here.

Accordingly, the future position of the Russian juvenile system regarding the rights and responsibilities of parents in traditional families and their influence on the development of children as individuals and, of course, its attitude to the sexual orientation of children is quite predictable. We must not forget about what the juveniles of the entire planet are striving for, and this, as almost everyone already knows, is the elimination of the family as such. Not only traditional, as a union of a man and a woman, but the family in general. How close are they to that goal?

Following Scandinavia, France is already in the process of legalizing same-sex marriage. At the same time, children selected from traditional families will, if they still approve there (as it is, in fact, it is) this initiative, massively transferred to education in such homo-families. Much is already being done to reorient children from traditional boys and girls to non-traditional ones. For example, in Sweden there are several orphanages where a child can no longer be called "he" or "she", they are called in a neuter gender, and the dolls these children play are devoid of signs of masculinity and femininity, and everything is done under the auspices of good intentions "Full-fledged" homo-upbringing. It is forbidden to use the words "Mother" and "Father", and in the documents only the designations "Parent N1" and "Parent N2". And this, as logic persistently suggests, is not the finish yet.

IF ASTRID LINGDREN WERE ALIVE …

It is hard to believe that all this is not happening in a fantastic horror film, generated by the painful fantasy of a madman, in which, as the time goes on, the more terrifying, but in the homeland of the greatest children's writer Astrid Lindgren, on the wonderful, kind and bright fairy tales of which more than one generation of happy children all over the world has grown. It is good that she did not survive to this day and does not see what is happening with the children in her native land. And there is no one to help them, even the kind-hearted Carlson would be powerless against juvenile evil, and the cheerful and resourceful Pippi Longstocking, who would surely have fallen into despondency. If you just for a moment turn on your imagination and transfer Lingdren's narrative into today's juvenile reality, then it would be reasonable to assume with one hundred percent probability that the parents of both of our favorite heroes would be deprived of parental rights for the improper treatment of children, and these children would be seized for a whole list of violations.

Judge for yourself: due to parental oversight, the child flew on horseback (over the city!) In secret from everyone on a very dubious subject with a propeller, which was unlikely to undergo regular technical inspection. In addition, the Kid, in violation of all juvenile norms, repeatedly, unaccompanied by parents or other legal guardians, went into the house of Carlson, this man of a strange appearance and indefinite type of activity, completely stranger to him, stole jars of jam and packs of cookies for him, ran with him, risking his life, on the rooftops. Evil parents for a long time did not allow the child to have a dog (unthinkable cruelty), and also forced him to eat when he lost his appetite from grief, and to drink bitter medicine when he was ill, because they, again, did not pay enough attention to his health and the prevention of colds. To top it off, they hired a mentally ill nanny without even bothering to ask her for a certificate from a psychiatric dispensary. Not parents, but animals!

What can we say about another frivolous would-be father, who, apparently, on burning vouchers, for reasons of economy, went on six-month tourist trips, leaving his daughter, by the way, a pubertal girl, completely alone in an unguarded large house located in an unsafe private sector, forced to be homeless, beg, dress at random, and interrupt than God will send, violate all the norms of the regime, nutrition, hygiene, etc. etc.

In general, Kid and Pippi Longstocking would definitely be placed in an orphanage, then Kid would be given up for adoption into a bisexual and homosexual family, and several transvestite families would have been torn to shreds for the right to raise Pippi Longstocking with her rich imagination and passion for dressing up …

All this would be funny, if, of course, it was not so sad. Unfortunately, the tales of our cloudless childhood are in the past. And what will happen to our children? It depends on each of us. But only if we do not stay idle. Today, in the minds of Russian society, there are two approaches to protecting children. This is a liberal one, which is practiced in Europe, where a child is taken away if his upbringing does not correspond to some (sometimes very dubious) norms. Moreover, this is not some kind of small-town amateur activity, but a clear, consolidated position of the Council of Europe. And there is our Russian experience, traditions rooted in the depths of centuries. This is respect for elders, the indisputable authority of adults and at the same time a sensitive, attentive attitude towards children, towards their feelings, development, and comfort. "All the best for children!" or “Children are our future” - these are the most common family slogans of the Soviet era. The example of the Soviet Union of the twentieth century clearly shows that when a traditional family is under state protection and it receives proper support and assistance, including material assistance, this family becomes the basis of a great, powerful state.

THE SCARY TRUTH ABOUT JUVENALKA PREVENTIVE SANCTIONS

The Western system is a system of destruction of moral values that promotes permissiveness. What is especially terrible about juvenile infection? Its indefiniteness, ambiguity, blurred wording. What is meant by "the fact of family trouble"? The absence in the house of food that is harmful, in the opinion of the parents, but so desired by the children, such as chips and cola? Or, perhaps, a ban on uncontrolled use of the Internet, the refusal of parents to buy their child the latest model of a cell phone? Who will define what it is - "normal upbringing and development"? Who will determine the rate? And what if sex education with all its "charms" such as gender equality, propaganda of homosexuality and homosexual marriages, school lessons on the use of a condom and masturbation is declared the norm, as is already the case in Europe? Or if a decision is made that the "normal" child should do whatever he pleases, even if it is to the detriment of normal development?.. One signal is enough (or even a mention of it without any evidence) - and now social patronage is on your doorstep.

Now, even in Moscow, juvenile inspectors are scouring, trying to determine families who will be imposed on social patronage. How exactly these specialists will identify families in need of social patronage is not specified in the Russian juvenile status. Whether this will be a door-to-door round, or experts will be guided by messages from educational institutions, or statements from neighbors - it is not known. So, no matter how much one wants to believe otherwise, it is possible that the so-called "preventive measures" can affect every family without exception - there are too many unknowns in this juvenile equation. In an equation that equalizes all of us in front of a terrible juvenile grin.

It is quite obvious that the state must ensure any child the right to life, health, education, and if an inadequate parent poses a threat to the child, he may be deprived of his rights. But we have had this system since Soviet times, there is an institution of guardianship and trusteeship bodies. It would be wrong to argue with the assertion that sometimes this system fails, like any other system of any state. At the same time, some of our "especially advanced" citizens have already, rather by inertia, since the time of perestroika, firmly believe that everything abroad is by definition better than ours, domestic. These people naively, and, of course, sincerely believe that “if the juvenile comes, she will put us in order, and there will be no alcoholic parents, drug addicts and other asocial elements, but they are happy, so smart and educated, of course, and no one dares to touch a finger …”What to say to this?

Perhaps, to answer a question with a question, asking their opinion on the subject of what exactly will make the new system, now a juvenile one, work perfectly? If you think about it, there will most likely be more abuse and corruption, because this system itself is just as deliberately and "sharpened" for corruption, endowing its inspectors with truly unlimited powers that they acquire due to the lack of specific formulations of basic concepts and, accordingly, uncertainty in the interpretation of its norms.

HOW THE CHILDREN ARE CAPTURED FROM THE FAMILIES

Juvenile officials, these new directors of children's (and parental) destinies, like sales managers in a classic commercial structure, always have a plan (!) To remove children from their parents. And the salary, of course, depends on its performance.

This is what has been happening in Europe for a long time, children there for the state are a kind of product that can generate income, everyone is enriched from the movement of children, just like from the logistics of goods. At the same time, it is believed that all parents are inherently dangerous by definition, and everyone should be watched over. That is, there is a presumption of parental guilt. The slightest excuse is being sought (and, of course, found) to take the child away, and the burden of proving their innocence lies with the parents (according to the same legalized presumption of guilt of the parents).

And, finally (and then some people were already quite waiting), thanks to the juvenile system cursed by thousands of unfortunate mothers all over the world, this someone can already get to prosperous families, including here in Russia. So, since May 1 in Moscow, all (!) Families are legally considered suspicious and therefore require mandatory supervision by guardianship officials. Moreover, money was found for this total surveillance of the parents, and considerable money.

The concept of "social orphans" has been introduced - these are children with parents who find themselves in a difficult life situation. Moreover, as noted earlier, there are no clear standards for when a family ceases to be prosperous and becomes dysfunctional. And if there are no standards, then a juvenile official will arbitrarily decide the fate of your family. And he can just, as they say, just in case, remove the child from the family. And then let the parents prove their right to raise their own children at least for the rest of their lives. All this is already here, here in the center of Russia.

We must also understand that many of our families, fearing to receive the shameful stigma of “dysfunctional family” from others, will prefer to remain silent about this terrible disaster and will not (according to our traditions) wash dirty linen in the hut, involving the public in resolving this issue. And it is necessary to do this, and preferably urgently! The child is confiscated for 90 days, and during this time the guardianship authorities collect dirt on you. They use everything - rumors, denunciations, and imposed "testimonies", including interrogations of young (!) Children.

Have Anastasia Zavgorodney, a Russian mother living in Finland, the juvenile social services of Finland took four children, including an infant, without trial or investigation. The reason for the seizure of the children from their own mother was allegedly the story of an older girl at school that her father slapped her in the butt. An unverified statement about one spanking - and the life of a large family is derailed. Today, all the children of Anastasia Zavgorodnyaya have been transferred to different foster families, and the mother herself is deprived of the right to see her babies! And such families in Europe number in the thousands.

WE CANNOT, DO NOT WANT AND SHOULD NOT COPY A WESTERN SYSTEM

The example of mothers who have suffered from juvenile arbitrariness allows us to raise the question of the advisability of introducing juvenile technologies in Russia, which are now actively promoted in the State Duma of the Russian Federation. We understand that blind imitation of the West in matters of protecting the family, motherhood and childhood can deal a crushing blow to the main social institution of any sovereign country - the family.

Of course, mentality plays an important role. In Europe, intra-family relations are different. There, almost no one, unlike most of our families, lives for the sake of children. Has your son turned 18? Be kind, support yourself now! People of retirement age go to clubs of interest, travel a lot. We are completely different. It is customary for us to help children with the institute, with the purchase of housing, grandmothers sit with their grandchildren, giving the children the opportunity to work and study. And we need to strengthen this feature of ours, including the Orthodox tradition of mutual assistance. All the peoples of our country are united by the main basis - the Family. We cannot, do not want and should not copy the Western system, in which even due to some temporary problems, for example, due to illness, one can lose children. We have a different way of solving difficult life situations. We have a different morality.

Nevertheless, social patronage has been working in some districts of Moscow for about two years. And not everyone knows about it. And then the authorities, without consulting their parents, decided that from May 1, this system will operate in other districts of the capital. Based on the example of the previous Russian experience, juveniles, as they themselves believe, do not fully cope with the task, because many people simply stopped opening doors for them.

Now, under the beautiful flag of “early detection of social orphanhood,” it is planned to hire third-party non-profit organizations (NPOs) at the expense of the city budget, which will, like spies, follow us and “know everything about every family,” as the leaders of the Ministry of Social Protection say. Moreover, these hired structures have already found 360 thousand (!) Children in a potentially disadvantaged state in Moscow. This is already every fourth child. And if you add bonuses to them, then they will easily write down every second baby as “dysfunctional”.

We, parents, want a dialogue with the authorities. We are against the introduction of dubious Western models in our country by directive, only by the decision of officials. All projects that concern each family must be discussed publicly, must be explained in detail at all levels! Further, a broad public discussion of all these issues is required with the obligatory participation of parents. Establish local parenting councils to evaluate all new family-related projects. And, most importantly, until the results of this discussion, the juvenile invasion of our homeland, covered by the plausible sign of "caring for children", should be suspended.

Otherwise, the model that has now been introduced in Moscow will certainly spread to the whole of Russia. And finally, we must not forget about its corruption and criminal components. At the moment, before our very eyes, through the legalization of juvenile invasion, new opportunities are being created, ways of trafficking in children to replace the recently lost business of adopting children abroad.

The forces of public structures should carefully check for the presence of foreign agents among those monitoring our families, these hired non-profit organizations. Collect data on their founders, who, in addition to generous foreign investment in the destruction of Russia, will soon begin to receive huge amounts of money from the city budget? Are these the officials who are most actively lobbying for this terrible reform?

Irina Volynets