If insulin is a drug. That synthetic insulin is a poisonous drug
If insulin is a drug. That synthetic insulin is a poisonous drug

Video: If insulin is a drug. That synthetic insulin is a poisonous drug

Video: If insulin is a drug. That synthetic insulin is a poisonous drug
Video: Russian and Sanskrit are one and the same language. English subtitles. 2024, May
Anonim

Insulin is a drug! Diabetics are also made drug addicts! Synthetic insulin is a poisonous drug, just like many other medicines. It does not heal anything, just like all other medicines. He only keeps diabetes constantly active …

In this article, we will continue to understand what an insulin drug is, in order to finally determine its effect on our health and even, neither more nor less, on our fate. Here, perhaps for the first time, we will try to reveal, I'm not afraid of this word, the secret of the work of almost all synthetic drugs. As always, we will use only official, "scientific" data, not as an absolute truth, but as a kind of generally accepted standard.

In light of new data on the extremely toxic composition of insulin, a natural question arises: how, then, does it lower sugar, being so poisonous? After all, no one doubts the fact that after the injection of this substance, with a pungent smell of phenol, the blood glucose level is steadily falling. The composition is more similar to an explosive mixture, and the effect of the disappearance of glucose from the blood is observed. What is the mechanism of this phenomenon, and where do all the toxic excipients go after the main component has worked out? What is this main component actually made of?

Let's first turn to the official explanation of how insulin works. Just do not forget that hereinafter we will talk about the synthetic hormone insulin, since the principle of action and the role of the natural hormone is completely different. The natural hormone insulin serves only as an additional tool for the breakdown and better absorption of glucose, for the level of which the liver is responsible in our body.

The synthetic analogue, according to the theory, works in a completely different way, namely: it is believed that insulin itself regulates blood glucose levels, which contradicts medical data on the glycemic function of the liver …

It is believed that insulin performs the transport role of glucose in cells, after which it breaks down and is excreted from the body. This whole theory is based on one postulate - receptors, thanks to which, supposedly, metabolism occurs.

An interesting version, but with the theory of receptors, as usual, there are problems: why, in the second type of diabetes, these receptors first stop responding to a natural hormone, and then, bypassing all scientific theories, they perfectly interact with a synthetic analogue? They seem to be atrophied? Or are specific receptors not specific with what to interact with at all?

And with such basic contradictions, why should we believe in these and other guesses of scientists? Do other hormones in our body also work according to such diverse principles, or what? And does natural insulin also have decay products, or are they again under-talked about something and synthetics consist of something more complex and unnecessary? Let's figure it out.

Insulin - what is it? What content is hidden behind this slightly exotic title?

The encyclopedia says that insulin was invented about a hundred years ago by Frederick Bunting and named after the discovery of another scientist Paul Langerhans, who discovered the islet structures of the pancreas that produce the hormone insulin (from Latin insula - island). I must say that the whole history of the discovery of insulin is as fantastic and contradictory as it is typical for those "dark" times, but now we will not delve into it, but we will analyze it some other time, there are very interesting moments …

(You can read about other unexpected scientific "discoveries", striking in their imagination and primitiveness, in the article "Electric wonders of earthly science").

Just note that the insulin invented by Bunting is different from the present one, like heaven and earth. A modern synthetic analogue is obtained by fermentation of genetically modified yeast. Exactly so. Insulin is called "human", genetically engineered, and it is synthesized by mushrooms.

Yeast, which normally produces the most common drug in the world, is ethyl alcohol (alcohol), but insulin is made by GM yeast. And you don't even know right away whether to be delighted or surprised by this fact. Then the resulting GM-powder is diluted to the required concentration with various preservatives and water, and after that it gets to the consumer.

And if Bunting and Best were responsible for the quality of the first insulin, then they have nothing to do with the modern analogue, since the first insulin was taken from dogs and calves, which would not have been approved by modern allergists, and now, in general, they have taken up insulin synthesis yeast fungi. As the saying goes: "Evolution" is there.

Now let's move on from history to real practice.

Many, probably, do not even suspect that not only diabetics are saved with insulin - this unique, without exaggeration, drug. And if they do, then do they think about it?

Information by itself without comprehension and analysis is of little use. But when it accumulates and it can already be compared and analyzed, the result changes to the point of surprise. So here we will give literally a couple of curious examples of the unusual use of this hormone or a waste product of yeast, Genetically Modified Microorganisms.

Insulin is used by athletes as an anabolic to help them gain weight. He is especially loved by bodybuilders and other pumped-up monsters. But there is "the only" limitation - in order to avoid addiction - diabetes, you can not take for a long time and without interruptions, but otherwise, please, and it seems like it's even safe.

But there is no research confirming this "safety" and the athlete accepts such doping at his own peril and risk. And the risk from any doping is very serious, and sometimes fatal, no matter what semi-literate coaches and marketers may say. And if we take into account the toxic composition of insulin and that it is a full-fledged GMO product, then it is simply criminal to talk about the safety of this substance.

Next, we'll look at the even more insane, if not worse, use of insulin in medical practice. I assure you you will be impressed.

It seems that the contents of the ampoules with this hormone have some kind of universal properties. It's great, but why don't we know this, and why, then, are all diabetics not the healthiest and happiest people in the world? Maybe we are using it incorrectly and need to look at the situation differently? How else can you use it, you ask?

Well, we don't really need to increase body weight, but it would definitely not hurt to calm our nerves. Do you think a joke? Well, then you will not find more jokers than our doctors.

And the name of all this madness is very simple - insulin-komatous or insulin-shock therapy, when with the help of insulin the patient is driven into a hypoglycemic coma (the blood glucose level is critically and instantly reduced, which is accompanied by a sharp headache, tachycardia, a strong feeling of hunger, convulsions and, ultimately - loss of consciousness, up to death), and back out of it several times in a row.

And such tortures, according to doctors, should put their brains in place for people with nervous disorders. And according to others, this is just another method of killing unwanted patients in psychiatric hospitals, under a far-fetched pretext, veiled under the original method.

Further, I will simply quote the reference data. Read on, be surprised and rejoice that we have not gone crazy yet. But our rabid medicine has long since abandoned it and it does not hesitate to pass off its abnormal methods as discoveries and know-how, although it carries ignorance and cruelty from them from afar.

You can familiarize yourself with the unpleasant details of this method on specialized resources, but here is only dry, reference information, which you need to know about, because the conclusions from it are very curious.

“Insulinoma therapy, abbreviated as ICT, or insulin shock therapy (IST), is sometimes just“insulin therapy”among psychiatrists - one of the methods of intensive biological therapy in psychiatry, which consists in artificially inducing a hypoglycemic coma by administering large doses of insulin.

In 1957, as the use of insulin comas declined, The Lancet published the results of a comparative study of the treatment of schizophrenia. Two groups of patients were either treated with insulin coma or induced into unconsciousness with barbiturates. The study authors found no difference between the groups.

Insulinoma therapy was discontinued in the West, and the method itself is no longer mentioned in textbooks.

Let's step aside here a bit to explain what a barbiturate is.

Barbiturates (lat.barbiturate) are a group of drugs derived from barbituric acid that have a depressing effect on the central nervous system. Depending on the dose, their therapeutic effect can manifest itself from a state of mild sedation (relaxation) to the stage of anesthesia (narcotic coma).

Barbiturates were first introduced into medical practice in 1903. Soon, the drug was often used as a sedative and as the first sleeping pill.

In moderate doses, barbiturates cause a state of euphoria, close to a state of intoxication. Similar to alcohol, barbiturates can cause loss of coordination, unsteady gait, and slurred speech. Anti-anxiety and sleep are induced by high doses, and even higher doses cause surgical anesthesia.

However, with long-term use, barbiturates caused addiction and drug dependence, which led to a gradual abandonment of their prescription. Veterinarians use pentobarbital as a pain reliever and euthanasia agent.

Well, why do we need this, you say? What does all this have to do with insulin?

I will return and remind you: It was experimentally established that the effect of insulin and barbiturate in the treatment of schizophrenia is the same! And these are not my words, but the conclusions of scientists published in a very famous scientific journal.

So what is it that Bunting invented so interesting, and why did he so modestly withdraw from his own invention? As always, there are a lot of questions.

One thing is clear that insulin is anything but what we are told about it. Either insulin is not a hormone, or barbiturate is not a drug. Or both of these substances have similar properties. Consequently, the effect of lowering blood glucose lies behind completely different processes than is commonly believed.

Who cares, someone might say? And the difference is significant. It is one thing to reduce sugar, and quite another is to fry people's brains. And as it turns out, insulin has both of these properties to perfection. And if so, then we will try to enter from the other side. Let's try to understand what a drug is and how it affects a person. Maybe this will somehow help us in solving the insulin secret?

Reference: "A drug - according to the WHO definition," a chemical agent that causes stupor, coma, or insensitivity to pain. Almost all drugs directly or indirectly target the "reward system" of the brain, increasing by 5-10 times the flow of neurotransmitters such as dopamine and serotonin in postsynaptic neurons …"

To begin with, let us state the fact that insulin has, to one degree or another, all these properties described above. And in doing so, insulin burns a lot of glucose or lowers its level. And since glucose is a universal fuel for the body, we can say that insulin burns this fuel a lot, quickly and irrevocably.

And logically, a diabetic should have an incredible amount of energy, strength and positive emotions, but in fact, everything is within the usual, if not worse, and over the years there is also a number of pathological changes in almost all systems and organs, the reason for which, too serves as a toxic composition of insulin. And an increased concentration of blood glucose only aggravates the picture of the disease, but is not a determining factor in complications.

And if medicine were a little more critical of these aspects, then all this should have caused a lot of questions and the search for answers to them, but instead, for all the questions, there is one, simple and convenient "explanation":

“It's all to blame, supposedly sugar - high or low, and that's it. Hence the inability to solve any diabetes problem, since today all problems are solved by a selection of insulin doses and diet. But such a primitive approach, even if it is capable of lowering glucose levels, does not in any way exclude other serious complications caused by the toxic effects of insulin on the entire body, and primarily on the nervous, cardiovascular and excretory systems."

But that's not all. The worst is in the distant but inevitable consequences. And in order to understand this, you first need to figure out what is behind the effect of relief from taking chemotherapy?

The dopamine theory does not give a complete understanding, describing only the mechanism of biochemical interactions, involving here again the complex interweaving of receptors, hormones and neurotransmitters, but the molecules themselves are at least not a pleasure or oppression, except just chemical molecules and ions. And what feelings, sensations and emotions are in themselves, where they are and why this requires a lot of energy, remains unclear and raises other questions.

The surge in the level of chemical molecules in the body, no matter how they are called, is only a statement and a consequence of processes about which modern science knows practically nothing or pretends that it does not know, although at the same time, it itself openly admits that it does not know anything about 95% of the matter in the Universe, and only something is known about 5%.

95% are simply not perceived by our senses, but objectively exist, which has been experimentally proved by them more than once (see the Kirlian effect, the phantom effect of DNA, wave genetics, etc.), but stubbornly does not draw any conclusions from this. How, then, on the basis of 5% of knowledge about nature, can we talk about the truth of scientific, theoretical positions? Without taking into account 95% of information about the laws of nature and considering only the tip of the iceberg, we will never be able to understand the cause-and-effect relationships of any natural phenomena.

Image
Image

Synthetic insulin (a waste product of yeast that normally produces alcohol), being a foreign substance for us (in fact, a poison), causes similar effects, like any other drug or medicine. And all the consequences here depend only on the dose and duration of use.

Any diabetic is familiar with the sensations of an overdose of insulin, when in a state of hypoglycemia, firstly, any pain recedes, there is a slight tremor or muscle twitching, up to seizures, the perception of reality changes greatly, weakness, lethargy, drowsiness appear, and with a severe overdose, a coma occurs, after which, a person feels as if he was “born again” - thoughts are pure, the mood is upbeat, nothing hurts and other “delights”.

But this does not last long, because soon the usual state returns. Fortunately, I don’t want to repeat this. Therefore, very low sugars are much more dangerous than high ones and, above all, for the neurons of the brain! And the most basic symptom in case of an overdose is a heightened feeling of hunger, which clearly indicates a sharp loss of energy.

On the one hand, this is understandable, since the glucose level is very low and needs to be restored to normal, and there is nowhere to take it except from food. Hence the wild hunger. On the other hand, where does so much energy, already released from carbohydrates, proteins, fats, go to? Do we wonder why we eat at all? What happens to food when it gets inside and where does it eventually go?

If you refer to a medical certificate about this, it turns out that the entire digestive chain of transformations ends with the mysterious word "energy". And what this energy is, in essence, few people will be able to explain, because the concept is very vague and not clearly defined.

Reference: "Energy is a scalar physical quantity, which is a single measure of various forms of motion and interaction of matter, a measure of the transition of the motion of matter from one form to another …".

If suddenly someone does not understand, then energy is just a unit of measurement for something indefinite. For example: fuel, burning, releases energy or food turns into energy. And what is energy itself in essence - there is no explanation in science.

So, when this energy, for some reason, becomes very small, the body reacts to this with a strong feeling of hunger, in order to replenish the lost vitality and prevent the stop or slowdown of all life processes.

But where do these forces (energy) go if we did nothing but an injection of insulin?

This is where the essence of the harm of any powerful synthetic drugs lies. These toxic substances open the natural, energy psi-protection of a person, which is our real immunity, provoking the release of energy. Part of the energy goes to neutralize poisons, and the rest goes to the wind, in the literal sense of the word. First of all, this manifests itself in a serious weakening of the human immune system and rapid deterioration - aging - of the body.

Forced, large losses of energy, the body then has to recover for a long time, and if this is not done, the body, exhausted, will simply "burn out" and die, which happens with overdoses of many drugs and drugs.

Thus, insulin, like any other synthetic chemistry, triggers complex, destructive processes in the body, giving only a temporary therapeutic effect and as a side effect. Also, for the sake of completeness, do not forget to add to this highly toxic excipients, which only enhance everything, the above-described poisonous, depleting effects and in themselves cause all kinds of pathologies.

Of course, no one dies immediately from insulin, but any synthetics provokes a much more destructive effect - it blocks the evolutionary development of the personality, in fact, for the sake of which a person is embodied in a physical body.

But how, then, does all of this lower the amount of blood sugar?

For any chemical reaction to occur, it is necessary to change a number of parameters (dimensions) of the microspace in which it takes place. Powerful streams of primary matter, urgently released as a result of poisoning the body, just provide a change in these parameters (dimension).

Due to this, excess glucose or insulin (in hypoglycemia) is broken down, and all parameters of the body (homeostasis) return to normal. There is such a peculiar, daily "reboot" and reconfiguration of all systems.

And everything would be nothing, but at the same time a huge amount of life potential (opportunities) necessary for the creative and evolutionary development of the individual is wasted. But instead, we are forced to spend it on the splitting of poisons, which we ourselves absorb.

That is, we first poison ourselves, and then we ourselves neutralize this poisoning. Such - "monkey labor" or "shifting from empty to empty" - that is, a thing is absolutely meaningless, but very energy-consuming.

As a result, we spend most of our vitality on fighting "windmills", thereby accelerating the aging process and do not have time to think properly and understand why and why we live, turning our unique life into a wasteland … And only realizing all this having collected all the will and opportunities, you can try to turn the situation to your advantage.

This is how sugar is reduced to us, and with it the level of our development. Is the "game worth the candle", think for yourself. And although the annotation to insulin does not directly say that it is a poisonous drug, it does not cease to be one because of this, and its harm does not disappear anywhere.

You won't see this on alcohol labels either, but this is a medical fact. And, nevertheless, this does not prevent the sale of this nasty fetid liquid in grocery stores along with milk and bread, soldering and sending people to the next world by the millions. And some corrupt doctors even claim that alcohol is "healthy."

One should not be surprised then that the majority of modern drugs are typical drugs, and even in English the word drug sounds like "drag" - drug.

Do not forget that more recently, now illegal hard drugs such as morphine, cocaine, heroin and others, were freely sold in pharmacies and they were widely used in the treatment of almost all diseases. And this was also official medicine, backed up by science.

But talented marketers almost convinced us that today everything is supposedly different, and cough treatment with morphine and heroin was a mistake that remained in the past.

You can certainly take their word for it, but the surrounding reality gives rise, to put it mildly, to doubt their sincerity. Only the names of drugs and propaganda methods have changed, capable of convincing anyone and anything. And if we were not so ignorant and proud, we would easily recognize a sophisticated catch.

Or maybe it was not for nothing that the respected Sir Frederick Bunting so easily renounced the right to own his invention and never returned to this topic, because he knew that he had not invented anything good and new? And the beautiful and noble story of the discovery and giving away of a unique invention, in the name of all mankind, is it just a believable legend invented for gullible people? But the exact answer to this question, for the time being, will remain a mystery.

Recommended: