The Law of Sealed Mouths

2024 Author: Seth Attwood | [email protected]. Last modified: 2023-12-16 15:55

This video describes the danger of cannibalistic juvenile bills, recently adopted by degenerates from the State Duma. The video and sound quality is very poor, but hardly anyone made a complaint about the quality of the radio message on June 22, 1941. The situation is not much better now.

For the sake of completeness, below is an article by Yulia Yakovleva from RBC daily, covering yesterday's round table "Protecting family sovereignty from new juvenile technologies."

Civil activists, already aggressively opposed to juvenile justice, have become more active after the recent adoption by the State Duma of two bills with "dangerous fragments" and the introduction of a draft on social patronage into the plan for the summer session. Parental emotions are so far held back by the support of Vladimir Putin, but public figures do not rule out going to the Constitutional Court and holding mass rallies if it turns out to be only in words.

The reaction to the adoption by the State Duma and the Federation Council at the end of March of two bills, dubbed "juvenile" in society, was a heated discussion that took place yesterday on Okhotny Ryad. The platform was a "round table" meeting initiated by the working group on the protection of families and children from juvenile technologies at the Communist Party faction in the Moscow City Duma and social activists.

We are talking about amendments to prevent the sale of children, their exploitation, child prostitution and the production of child porn, a project was also discussed regarding "limiting the dissemination of information about minors who have suffered as a result of illegal actions."

Lawyer and specialist in international law Nadezhda Ermolaeva considers the disadvantages of the adopted bills that the measures prescribed in them are taken in packages. Against the background of correct and necessary norms on the inadmissibility of child pornography and violence, there are vague formulations that can violate the way of raising or procreation. For example, trafficking in children. This can be summed up as surrogacy, - explains Ms. Ermolaeva. - It is assumed that the interpretation will be left to the mercy of the guardianship authorities. It is difficult to imagine the level of corruption that this measure could generate. When it comes to the removal of children, people will have no time for adherence to principles."

The chairman of the All-Russian Parental Resistance Maria Manikonyan criticizes the bill in the part that speaks of the need for "sex education" - increasing the child's competence in sexual matters in order to avoid pedophilia. "Any normal person understands that this is a breakdown of the child's psyche, a violation of moral prohibitions," she said. According to Ms. Manikonyan, ignoring new approaches will be regarded as a violation of the rights of the child. “If you did something at your own discretion, your child is taken to an orphanage because you did not ensure his rights,” the activist explains, noting that the movement opposes juvenile justice (as evidenced by the collected 260 thousand signatures across the country).

State Duma deputy Nina Ostanina told RBC daily that a draft law on social patronage was also discussed at the round table, the consideration of which is already scheduled for the summer session. “This is a direct interference in the life of a family, an opportunity to seize a child for improper upbringing and hand him over to so-called professional parents who receive a salary for this,” said the communist. “I am categorically against it, since nowhere does a child live so comfortably as with his own parents.”She noted that this issue is a rare case of her solidarity with the authorities, the president and the children's ombudsman Pavel Astakhov are of the same opinion.

“This law does not touch upon family problems, which are dealt with by the Criminal Code. The patronage is called upon to control each family, receives a tool for this, - said the head of the project "Juvenile justice in Russia - we are against!" Andrey Zigulya. - A representative of social patronage can come to the house and find a reason to establish a violation. Peeled wallpaper or lack of food in the refrigerator may affect his decision."

Mr. Zigulya drew attention to the fact that the state intends to spend 250-400 thousand rubles for the maintenance of one foster family, which looks strange against the background of "beggarly benefits" for children. He also expressed hope that Vladimir Putin will keep his recent promise and will not sign the bills in their current form. If this happens, the parents intend to appeal to the Constitutional Court and hold protest actions.