OPG in philology. Part 2

2024 Author: Seth Attwood | [email protected]. Last modified: 2023-12-16 15:55

OPG in philology. Part 1

Svetlana Leonidovna! On the Internet (on the site "KRAMOL"), one visitor, having read in the first conversation your words that the word CAPITAL means a CRIMINAL CRIME, decided to verify this for himself, and, having turned (on the Internet) to dictionaries and reference books, there is no such meaning found!

S. R. - Yes, this is no wonder!.. I quoted the "Latin-Russian Dictionary" a hundred years ago - 1914. Readers cannot even imagine the enormous scale of modern forgeries in dictionaries and reference books. He is monstrous! And deception can be detected by comparing with old sources. I have long seen inconsistencies between words and their explanations or translations, but I thought that these were some mistakes, accidental inaccuracies. And she could not imagine, like any normal person, that someone deliberately distorts the dictionaries, that there were "experts" who took such a sin on their souls - to mislead millions of people: readers believe the dictionaries, and there - FALSE. And not simple, but some kind of outrageous!

Here you are, in the old dictionary about CAPITAL (see).

("The Latin-Russian Dictionary. Compiled by O. Petruchenko. Edition 9, revised, Moscow, publication of the Partnership “V. V. Dumov, Heirs of Br. Salaevs ", 1914)

Or more examples: falsification of the original meanings of the words and (nowadays they almost pray for both). - privation (lat.) - deprivation, deliverance. - leave without cover, without clothes. In (lat.) - without. Vestire (lat.) - to dress, cover.

Or: (lat.) Dolor - pain, sorrow, grief, grief (compare: Via Dolorosa (lat. Via Dolorosa, letters. Path of Sorrow ») - a street in the Old City of Jerusalem, along which the path of Jesus Christ ran to the place of the crucifixion.

Sadness, grief, grief … Can you imagine that all these dollar (and not only dollar) millionaires have saved up on their heads?.. You will not envy. (Today's linguists are lying when they say that the word dollar comes from the German Taler.)

It is quite obvious that such falsifications in dictionaries were carried out to please the capital and capitalists (criminals). I would like to say very loudly to those compatriots who still, so to speak, have not made a choice: Citizens, have enough CONSCIENCE! Do you want your child to know Russian well and fit into capitalism? It can't be! The Russian language (an expression of the spirit of the people) and capitalism are INCOMPATIBLE! And you HAVE to make a choice: either the Russian spirit, conscience, unity, creativity - or capitalism. (That is why genetic Russophobes are trying to ALWAYS KNOW or REPLACE the uncompromising people in Russia, not amenable to capitalization.) And those who have adopted capitalism are trying to live by it - they have already LOST the evolutionary cosmic perspective, but have not yet realized that they have sold their soul …

A. R. - On television, in newspapers, on the Internet, you can find a lot of materials where professionals (for example, Academician A. A. Zaliznyak, Professor V. V. Zhivov, etc.) threaten the so-called amateur linguists with a finger: “Do not dare to meddle on our scientific territory, you do not understand anything in philology! " I would like to say in response: on the roads, for example, both amateurs and professionals drive around in cars, moreover, “amateurs”, usually, not receiving a dime for transporting people or goods, often cope with the task much better than other professionals. So it is in philology (yes, by the way, if you look closely, and in history, where "professionals" heaped whole mountains of lies).

S. R. “Let me remind you that the ark was built by an amateur, and the Titanic was built by professionals. In some cases, the word "professional" is already becoming indecent. Here's another example for you: in "A Brief Etymological Dictionary of the Russian Language". A guide for the teacher. Authors N. M. Shansky and others (publishing house "Prosveshchenie", Moscow, 1974) give the etymology of the Russian word URA (to the light!). Does anyone have a doubt that this is a Russian word?.. A joyful exclamation, a battle cry, which is born straight from the heart! But the word fell into the hands of "professionals". See the illustration (article from this dictionary).

It turns out that the Russian battle cry allegedly goes back to the German hurray.

A. R. - What nonsense!.. In this regard, I remember one anecdote: my husband returns home in the morning - tipsy, all in lipstick … His wife asks: "Where have you been?.." And he answered her: "Well, come up with something yourself, you are a smart woman! " Here is the official science (judging by those Mont Blanc lies that she heaped up) among the powerful of this world - in the position of such an intelligent woman: well, think of something that humanity is a lonely orphan in a lifeless universe, and a hen under a bush brought these Russians out five hundred years ago and everything they have is foreign and borrowed, and now obsolete, and they are already overheated and it is time for them to obscurate … We will have to upset genetic Russophobes: Russians, already having thousands of years of history behind them, are just beginning!..

S. R … - A FOLK SCIENCE is born before our eyes and with our participation! Together we expose the old, corrupt, selfish pseudoscience, occupation, paper science. How is it done, this paper science? (“We are important people on paper, We were, and are, and we will be” - remember, in the movie?) Parents occupy considerable positions. The child is placed in a prestigious university, then he immediately goes to graduate school, then - one thesis, another. The scientist is ready. Now he teaches, broadcasts, acts as an expert, works as a "duty genius", composes theories, according to which auxiliary scientists write manuals and textbooks. He does not know life, he does not understand anything in science, but in the skill of undercover intrigues he has no equal. And he is also a great master of falsification and tampering. Acts under the slogan: "If the facts contradict my theory, so much the worse for the facts." There is no way to pick it out from its warm place behind the plinth. And if we consider that there are thousands of such scientists, is our business really bad? Look, they just touched the academy - what a screech there was! “The state will lose science if it drives us out. The Middle Ages will come! " Etc.

There is only one way out - FOLK SCIENCE. And it is already being created by PRACTITIONERS! There is no need to fight against paper science: they will throw pieces of paper! We must CREATE YOUR OWN. And the process is already underway.

A. R. - An eloquent example from the field of cosmophysics … In 1994, a very important solar-system event took place: a train of plasmoids fell on Jupiter (even a computer does not know this "forbidden" word and underlines it in red). The world mass media of disinformation, as always, disseminated a false version of the event, calling the plasmoids the debris of the Shoemaker-Levy comet. An interesting experiment was carried out in the Novosibirsk Academgorodok during the events on Jupiter: Kozyrev's sensors registered the fall of another plasmoid on Jupiter INSTANTLY (which fundamentally contradicts the Theory of Relativity), and only after 43 minutes the light signal of the event came from Jupiter! Thus, an INSTANT (superluminal!) Transmission of information was recorded in the Universe. Empirical material of particular importance has been obtained. Researchers, as they write themselves, felt the GHOST of 750,000,000 kilometers separating the Earth and Jupiter (the newspaper "Science in Siberia", No. 44, November 1994). Official fundamental physics ranked the experimenters as pseudoscientists and the results (as usual) were hushed up. I deliberately cited this example in order to demonstrate to readers that there is an organized crime group not only in philology …

S. R. - Here's another example. Paper scientists have composed a story about the Mongol-Tatar yoke. Practitioners came, SPECIALISTS and began to ask uncomfortable questions. And how quiet it was before them! One paper historian wrote that the Mongolian horse horde conquered half the world (both Russia and China, and even to Japan was going to sail). And the practitioner asks: how can this be? The nomadic peoples never had great mobilization opportunities, and where did they forge their numerous weapons and horseshoes for their horses, if in Mongolia there is still no metallurgy (what kind of metallurgy in the steppes: to heat smelting furnaces with dung?). And how did the horde (and its carts?) Move across Russia, how did they overcome water barriers or on ice, if the steppe Mongols still afraid of water and they don't even step on the ice without sprinkling it with earth?.. And the ridiculous term Mongolo-Tatars itself is about the same as Croatian Hindus or Finno-Negroes. (See: However, the Mongols themselves do not really believe in the Tatar-Mongol conquest and are extremely suspicious of it. Because they do not see any confirmation of it at home, in Mongolia. For them, this is a purely bookish, alien theory brought to Mongolia by foreigners. (See:

And there are other specialists in line with their questions. Together they find out that the story was drawn on paper! Well, at this point, everyone amicably approaches the paper historian-overseer: WHO, WHEN, FOR WHAT PURPOSE DRAWED THE STORY THAT WAS NOT AND HIDDEN THAT THAT WAS? !! It is necessary to understand the new reality: for paper scientists there is NO SALVATION from true scientists. Because the true ones do not invent theories themselves, they receive them FROM THE HIGHEST SOURCE, along the line of the HIERARCHY. And there is no barrier to true knowledge.

Now the most important thing is to realize that our Russian science WAS ALWAYS PEOPLE. Only anti-Russian forces tried in every possible way to obscure this fact, to hide it. (There is a fact, but there is no CONSCIOUSNESS. And therefore, as it were, there is no fact.) In general, the Russian nature is characterized by the breadth of knowledge and interests. A “narrow specialist” who “knows everything about nothing” is not about us. Here are some examples.

1. ALL Russian writers were, first of all, the state and cultural builders of Russia, and the WORD was subordinated to the main task. And so they wrote only about what they knew well, what they understood, what they CARED about. Therefore, it is interesting to read them. (See "The Truth About the Russian Word", Part 2, Chapter 5.)

2. Linguistics as a science was unprecedentedly moved forward by broad specialists: Lomonosov, Shishkov, Dal. Lomonosov created the first scientific grammar of the Russian language. It was from practice, observations of the facts of the language that he derived the theory of three calmness, which he designated on the basis of SPIRITUAL criterion … He singled out as a HIGH calmness everything that related to eternity, the life of the SPIRIT, drew a clear boundary, separating the eternal from the transient, everyday. (Subsequently, the paper ones tried to break this system). Lomonosov discovered some of the internal laws of the Russian language, introduced many Russian words into the SCIENTIFIC and technical language. Collected the Lexicon of primitive words, collected the best Russian proverbs. The works disappeared after his departure … But the ideas are alive and have grown.

3. Shishkov was an admiral. But there was no better linguist in the 19th century. In fact, everything that we have of valuable today in linguistics and literature, we owe it to Shishkov. (But this is a too broad topic, I will not dwell on it for now. For more details, see the books "The Truth About the Russian Word", parts 1 and 2.) The Institute of Russian Civilization, OA Platonov published a wonderful book with the works of A. S. Shishkova "The Fire of Love for the Fatherland." There are also linguistic works there.

4. V. I. Dal was a naval officer and a doctor.

There are many examples. These figures are the greatest linguists. It was they who were pushed to the sidelines of both science and life by the paper prospectors-careerists. By the way, the words quarry and quarry have an affinity with the same French word, which means opencast mining. Indeed, a careerist obtains worldly goods "openly", in contrast to a criminal …

Since the phenomenon of FOLK SCIENCE is already CALLED with words, therefore, it already exists in the mind and is spreading. Now it is necessary to identify the CRITERIA that distinguish a true scientist:

1. He will never cause harm with his discoveries and inventions.

2. I am ready to work without pay, for the sake of seeking the truth. Unselfish.

3. It is easy to part with his theory or hypothesis if he finds that it does not correspond to the facts of reality. Honest.

4. Is an expert in several areas that seem to be far from each other. Able to synthesize knowledge and converge concepts. (In general, the wider the circle of his interests and the more he KNOWS TO DO WITH HANDS - this is a mandatory requirement! - the better. (For an explanation of this requirement, see the provisions of Living Ethics. The reason is energetic, scientific.)

5. The field of science in which he works as a result of his efforts it becomes easier for followers, clearer, BEAUTIFUL.

6. His words do not differ from his deeds.

And the most important thing is that he is included in the HIERARCHY and receives the highest knowledge through the HIERARCHY, which excludes serious mistakes. (Small ones, not very important ones, may be due to his imperfection. And who of us is perfect? Small ones he himself will understand and correct. Or colleagues from FOLK SCIENCE will help them see them.)

It is important here to keep track of all attempts to introduce parasitic individuals into FOLK SCIENCE. And there will be a great many such attempts. They are already in full swing now. What are the only attempts to "produce Russian from Arabic" or sing the language of the ancient pagan Rus, who were "destroyed by Judeo-Christianity", which, by the way, does not exist in nature: there is Judaism, there is Christianity, and "Judeo-Christianity" is an invention. The same thing happened with the “great ukrami”, according to the same patterns.

Note that the word MAN rarely uses the plural form (people), and the word PEOPLE does not even have a singular form (people). Why so?.. The textbooks on this subject written complete nonsense instead of scientific explanations. We are offered to consider these two words as related and call this phenomenon suppletivism, when two supposedly related words have different roots, which cannot be the case. The word MAN actually consists of two roots - MAN and AGE. What is a PERSON can be read in Dahl's dictionary: this is the highest eternal (!) I. The Sanskrit word CHELA means a disciple of a spiritual teacher.

In Little Russia (that is, in Ukraine, in the South Russian dialect), a big trouble happened, there it was possible to introduce a viral delusional Russophobic theory into the consciousness of the population, but it was possible because there was apostasy, the loss of the true Slavic path, hostility to the Great Russians, which inevitably was reflected in the language: Ukrainian also has the word CHOLOVIK, which means MAN. That is, it turns out that a MAN is only a man, and a WOMAN - a woman - is not a man. But LYUDYNA is there - this is the MAN. But Lyudyna is not even a person at all. This can also be seen from Dahl's dictionary: he cites an old Russian proverb: there are many people, but there is no man (that is, PEOPLE and MAN are not the same). In Latin, the related word is LUDUS (game, fun, trifle). That is, PEOPLE are those who play in life, amuse themselves, "make fun" (as they say nowadays, "breed suckers" - that is, those who are tuned in to decency), do nothing. A MAN is (I repeat) a DISCIPLE OF A SPIRITUAL TEACHER.

For the Little Russians, someone mockingly invented UKROV. In the textbooks there they began to write that the Ukrainian language was one of the foundations of Sanskrit! Where can Ukrainian be the basis of Sanskrit, even if they did not understand what it means about the word MAN! The same is being prepared for us, destroying enlightenment.

A. R. - Yes … A bloody drama broke out in Novorossiya - and because of the fate of the Russian language! It is VERY IMPORTANT for the people what language to speak! Let's recall the lines of Yaroslav Smelyakov:

Lords - and they disappeared

Instantly and surely

When accidentally encroached on

On the Russian essence of the language.

I think that through this nonsense with "ukrami" with a distant aim: they discredit the Russians too, because when you talk about the closeness of Russian and Sanskrit, you will immediately be reminded of ukrov with a smirk. (I advise readers to look at the Internet topic "Vedic toponymy of Russian rivers" or, for example, N. Guseva's research on the proximity of the Russian language and Sanskrit, etc.).

S. R. - And the one who came up with the word UKRA, and has no idea about the laws of the Russian language, of which the language of Little Russia is a part, of course! This is, quite obviously, someone ALIEN who was given the task - he came up with UKROV. Indeed, in this word, U is a prefix, and KR is a part of the root (). From such improvised material, the name of the UKRy was blinded - this is a mockery of the people of Little Russia! And in this case, the enemies relied on the ignorance of the Little Russians either of their history or their language. On this one could build anything, hang any nonsense!..

A. R. - You might think that WE KNOW - both the language and the history … Huh?

S. R. - The same is now being prepared in our country, the same scenario, the same plan of action!.. And they also rely on the fact that Russians do not know either their native language or their history. And this IGNORANCE is THOROUGHLY CONCRETED both in schools and in universities!.. They concretely concreted: a person, having memorized educational "revelations", begins to think that he KNOWS Russian! Well, if he knows, then why should he learn anything else.

An. Rusanov

OPG in philology. Part 1

Why don't they like Russian at school?

How the Russian language was crippled in the twentieth century

OPG in philology. Part 1

OPG in philology. Part 2

OPG in philology. Part 3

S. L. Ryabtseva "Sketches of the Living Russian Language"

S. L. Ryabtseva "Dialogue at a Desk"

S. L. Ryabtseva "Children of the Eighties"

S. L. Ryabtseva "The Truth About the Russian Word"