Aqueducts - megaliths

2024 Author: Seth Attwood | [email protected]. Last modified: 2023-12-16 15:55

For some reason, I have not heard that anyone doubted that the aqueducts were built by ancient people without cars. I myself did not doubt this, because I thought that aqueducts are small and consist of small bricks connected with cement. But, somehow accidentally caught pictures and I doubted.

For example, the giant aqueduct "Pont du Garde" (or simply Pondyugar):

pictures are clickable!

Wikipedia:

If it was built by the Romans, then why without a binder solution - cement? After all, the Romans always used mortar for the construction of serious objects. But just the mysterious non-Romans did not use a binder solution. For example, during the construction of the largest ancient megaliths - in Baalbek, Pyramid Egypt, especially in Mexico, Machu Picchu and other places of the American continent, where there were definitely no Romans

You will be surprised, but the word "cement" itself is Latin (check at least on Wikipedia, if you don't believe it)! Latin is the language of the ancient Romans, if anyone does not know

Here's something else interesting:

Some sources indicate that the largest blocks weighed 6 tons. For example here Let's check if this is possible? After all, the source of information about 6-ton blocks is not serious.

Here is a picture from which you can estimate the size of the blocks in comparison with a person:

The corner blocks have visible dimensions - half a meter in height, 2 meters in length and 1 meter in width. Moreover, the volume of the block is 1 cubic meter. The density of the stone is on average 2.6 tons per cubic meter. That is, these blocks are approximately 2.5 tons each. So some could well have been 6 tons. And there are many thousands of these blocks from 2 to 6 tons. Yes, the height of a very high-rise building. And there is no cement between the blocks!

The slope of the aqueduct is only 34 cm per kilometer (1: 3000), and it descended only 17 meters vertically for its entire length of 50 km. How can you withstand such a slight slope of 0.03% from huge blocks?

By the way, these blocks protruding from the wall surface strongly resemble the protruding blocks in Machu Picchu (and other megalithic objects):

Quarries are also very unusual, from which many-ton bricks were mined for the Pondyugar aqueduct. ALL WALLS OF THE CAREER ARE CUT VERY EXACTLY. HOW CAN IT BE DONE WITHOUT GIANT CARS? And why?

Pay attention to the height of the part of the quarry cut in one fell swoop - about 2 human heights, that is, 3-4 meters, and there are no traces of a layer-by-layer cut of the rock. Half a meter, for example. Although, the blocks of the aqueduct are about half a meter thick.

And here is how the official historians draw the quarrying of stone in this quarry in the museum located next to the aqueduct:

Photo taken from here and there it appeared from here

As you can see, they fantasize that, allegedly, in the quarry, the stone was mined by half-meter steps. Layer by layer. Which would correspond to the possibilities of manual labor and primitive lifting mechanisms. But, in fact, no steps are visible on the walls of the quarry. It was cut off at once into several human heights.

Also pay attention to the relief of the trimmed surface. The pruning was carried out in straight lines several meters long and at a constant step of about 5 centimeters.

Obviously, some powerful machine was at work, piercing the rock with some kind of chisel or saw. Reciprocating motion, not a giant circular saw. The circular saw would polish the surface rather than leaving even grooves.

When cutting by hand with a hammer and chisel, the strips would be short - it is a few millimeters to several centimeters.

pay attention to inner right angle in a career:

How is it possible to make an inner right angle so even without machining? And why - this is a quarry, not a facade of a palace.

There are a dime a dozen such corners:

Here is the so-called "quarry house":

Taken from here

Here is a close-up of the surface of the quarry:

Taken from here - this is a page of the site of a modern quarry, but this page is dedicated to the history of the quarry and it says in French that these are traces of mining by the ancient Romans.

Nowadays there is also a modern stone quarry there. Here is one of his sites - there are a couple of photos of modern stone mining technology.

That is, the museum exposition corresponds not to the ancient technology of stone mining, but to the modern one adapted for manual labor:

And here is the sawing machine itself in this career:

And what we see - exactly what is attributed to the ancients in the museum - the stone is mined in small steps, and all these levels are visible on the rest of the rock! Especially on the left in the last photo.

Here is a schematic representation of modern stone sawing machines:

Maybe the same quarry is used in our time, because the walls are so even? No. Firstly, groups of tourists would not be taken to a modern quarry. It is hardly interesting for tourists to visit modern construction sites. But this is not the main thing. The main thing is that even the stone blocks on the aqueduct are also cut with the same striped relief:

And on the next block, the step of scratches is less than usual:

Here's the usual step:

all pictures are clickable.

(The last picture is rotated 90 degrees for convenience). That is, all these blocks were once part of the outer wall of the quarry.

Another reason for the fact that this is an ancient quarry is the coincidence with the size of the trimmed parts in the quarry in Baalbek:

The last photograph also shows numerous parallel grooves on the surface of the megalith with a step of several centimeters.

These are the walls of the quarry. And here is the surface of a megalith extracted from a quarry. Drumroll….

The researcher under the nickname vaduhan-08 found the same lines on the surface of the world's largest cracked Aswan obelisk in Egypt:

In this case, I do not mean large furrows about half a meter wide, but smaller uniform stripes.

Here are the close-ups of these furrows (I rotated the drawing 90 degrees):

The last photo shows the difference between the handmade section on the left and some high-tech drill.

Here's an even bigger shot:

The same relief of the processed surface of the ancient Inkerman caves in Crimea:

click to enlarge, otherwise the traces are hard to see

It turns out that the same traces are left by a modern drill:

Uryayaya!

Uryayaya!

Uryayaya!

(Taken from here

Ancient furrows are less distinct than modern ones, because weathering has spoiled them over thousands of years.

So, most likely, this was the tip of the cutting tool of the ancients. Depending on the combination of the shape, trajectory of movement and the speed of rotation of the rotating head and the size of the spikes, patterns from evenly distributed grooves can remain on the stone.

It is not possible to scratch granite furrows by hand.

Here are the same footprints on the surface of the giant ancient Longyu grottoes in China, discovered by accident at the end of the 20th century:

There is another ancient quarry in France, Bibemus. It's the same there:

Many lines are uninterrupted for several meters. Here is a close-up snippet:

Taken from here

More interesting views:

Some kind of three-fingered man in this very Bibemus. It is interesting that in an article about Pondyugar someone Yuri Semenov writes:

Unfortunately, he does not attach a photo of a hare. Maybe someone will find it? But obviously this is the same hare.

Here are a couple more photos from Bibemus:

Here is a close-up of the blocks of the Aqueduct in Segovia (Spain), where the absence of connecting cement is clearly visible, as in all megaliths:

Photo from here

This aqueduct has smaller blocks than Pondyugar - about half a meter thick and about a meter long. This can be seen from the photo next to the women:

Accordingly, the weight of these blocks is from 500 kg to a ton.

Somehow it is necessary to raise these megablocks to the height of a 10-16-storey building. And then this block must be inserted into place - right next to the neighboring block. And you need to move along the surface of the lower block. And it is necessary to do so that the tall and thin unstable structure does not stagger. Otherwise, everything will fall apart like a house of cards. At the same time, the block must be pushed in with very great force so that it snuggles tightly against the neighbor without a gap. It is not possible to do this on weight, since then you cannot pull the rope out from under the multi-ton block. Thousands of cut ends of the ropes do not stick out from under the blocks.

Here is the layout of the blocks at different levels:

Here it is in full:

pictures are clickable

Here is everything that is written about him in the Russian Wikipedia for today:

That's the whole quote. Vespasian lived 2000 years ago !!!

The slope of this aqueduct is also imperceptible - 1%. It is also not clear how to withstand it without modern measuring technology?

THE FORM OF AQUEDUKS IS NOT STABLE, IN DIFFERENCE FROM THE FORM OF PYRAMIDS

THE PYRAMIDS ARE STABLE - WIDE BOTTOM AND NARROW UP Above. IT'S DIFFICULT TO BROKEN THEM. AQUEDUKS ARE HIGH AND NARROW. APPROXIMATELY AS A PLYWOOD STANDING ON THE SIDE OR A BOARD CONSISTS OF UNGLUEDED CUBES. THIS IS A CARD HOUSE!

AND THE LENGTH OF AQUEDUKS FROM MOUNTAIN TO MOUNTAIN HUNDREDS OF METERS AND KILOMETERS. Moreover, SOME AQUEDUKS ARE NOT STRAIGHT AND CURVED

AQUEDUKS STAND IN THE MOUNTAIN SEISMOACTIVE AREA. AND THEY STAND THERE ON THE OFFICIAL VERSION OF A THOUSAND YEARS, AND ON THE UNOFFICIAL VERSION - MILLIONS

THEM, LIKE ANCIENT MEGALITES, HAVE MANY SQUARE HOLES OF UNCERTAIN PURPOSE:

More close-up:

For those who are not in the know, I am attaching several photos from all over the world with these holes.

This is underground Jerusalem:

This has nothing to do with the Romans, even in the opinion of official historians. Because at such a depth, construction was carried out thousands of years before the Romans.

And in this megalith, fossilized boards stick out.

The paintings of medieval catastrophists depict the ruins of the majestic buildings of an extinct civilization. Anatoly Venustov noticed in the comments that some of the drawings also depict some strange wooden structures stuck in stone blocks, most likely in these mysterious holes:

Take a look at this photo of the Ponyugar Arch:

In the protruding top blocks, square holes extend within the block at an angle of approximately 45 degrees, crossing 2 adjacent faces. And boards or metal profiles were attached in the lower block.

Here are similar square holes on the blank for the Alexander Column on Palace Square in St. Petersburg:

This is a fragment from a drawing by Auguste Montferrand, who, according to the official version, was the author and project leader for the construction of the monument. Details here

Here is the complete picture:

Exactly the same holes in Baalbek:

In Egypt (Aswan Quarry):

But, on the oldest aqueducts, there are also round holes and also of unknown purpose:

This is an aqueduct in Segovia. By the way, pay attention - the arch rests on nothing. If the stones of this long structure disperse from an earthquake or hypothermia, the keystone will fall down and the whole structure will crumble. But this damn aqueduct is 2 thousand years old.

Elements of polygonality are also sometimes encountered:

On many blocks, parallel lines are also visible - traces from the drill:

Unfortunately, I have not yet found information about the quarry where the material for the Segov aqueduct was obtained from. I wonder what marks there are on the walls.

It is necessary to distinguish the mysterious megalithic aqueducts from the aqueducts that are quite accessible for manual construction. For example, these are:

This is Aqua Alexandrina. Both cement and ordinary-sized bricks were used in its construction. Wikipedia:

This is the 18th century Aqueduct in Santiago de Queretaro (Meschica):

Again, nothing surprising.

This is a 17th century English aqueduct:

There is nothing in this design that is inaccessible to manual labor. Because it consists of ordinary bricks, connected with cement mortar. And all these simple aqueducts (except for Aqua Alexandrina) have a relatively young age of 200 - 300 years. And when the ancient aqueducts were built, consisting of large blocks weighing from half a ton to several 6 tons - science is not known. They are dated by the ancient Roman era, and then, by indirect signs. So, their real builders are not exactly known.

In Andrei Sklyarov's film "The Most Baalbek", Mrs. Dudakova complains that historians attribute the construction of Baalbek's megaliths to the Romans, but there is no documentation about the construction of such an epochal structure, although, according to her, in ancient Rome everything was thoroughly documented and many sources have survived to this day … But it's the same with aqueducts. Since they do not know exactly their age, it means that documents about their construction have not been found.

It's the same with the Egyptian pyramids. There are some primitive pyramids, built late and more destroyed. Others are complex structures of large blocks, built before it is not known exactly when, but they were preserved in better condition than newer ones.

Here is another "divine" aqueduct "Eagle" in Spain with an official age of about 2000 years:

Strange, but there is little information on the Internet about this aqueduct. I need close-ups of the blocks to figure out what's what. Maybe I was looking badly.

HELP TO FIND INFORMATION ABOUT THIS AQUEDUK "EAGLE"

Who could design such complex structures from an engineering point of view?

Who made the necessary, most complex measurements and calculations?

Who created the technology for such construction?

Where did the many thousands of engineers, foremen and workers of the highest qualifications suddenly come from, who were able to very efficiently, incomprehensibly accurately and reliably (for centuries!) to implement objects like which we are not able to build today?

According to modern historians, these three gigantic structures, located at a distance of thousands of kilometers, were built almost simultaneously. And they were built, as the "scientists" tell us, by slaves and legionaries (soldiers). So, cheap and cheerful. The main thing is to drive in more slaves and legionnaires, and the most complex structures will grow like mushrooms after rain! And we, so smart and civilized, are building houses that fall in just a few decades? Why could “Roman” legionnaires with slaves build colossal objects that stand for 2000 years, while our dams collapse in 30-40 years? It turns out that the "Roman" legionaries (ordinary soldiers) of those times were incomprehensibly smarter than today's "assistant professors with candidates"?

And another big question arises: where did the money come from for all this? No matter how large the "Roman" Empire was, it is very difficult to believe that it was able to finance the construction of these machines. We read that the "Romans" fought all the time and allegedly conquered someone, and such events are very costly in themselves! However, as we have already seen, at the same time many high-quality roads, well-equipped cities with baths, fountains, theaters and temples, as well as country villas, bridges and many other small and large aqueducts in almost all conquered countries were being built in the Empire. Where can a continuously belligerent country get the funds for construction around the world?

Where did the notorious "Roman Empire" get financial, material and human resources to carry out practically simultaneous, grandiose construction projects in different parts of Europe? Where did she recruit such a crowd, firstly, qualified specialists - managers, engineers, mid-level specialists, skilled workers, and, secondly, legionnaires and just slaves? This is what an "army" one had to have in order to continuously build structures of colossal complexity and scale throughout Europe!

And who and what fed all this crowd? Who guarded the slaves if the legionnaires worked with picks and shovels?

So, the conclusion suggests itself: it was NOT built by slaves and NOT soldiers!

And here is the little-known supposedly modern aqueduct, the highest in the world, Rockfavour:

According to the official version, the construction of the aqueduct was supervised by a young 26-year-old engineer Franz Mayor de Montrichet. It began in 1842 and ended in 1847. 5 years. In our high-tech time, the construction speed of such a gigantic and complex object is approximately the same. In such a time, you can only restore the abandoned aqueduct built by the ancient gods of Sklyarov.

It is 393 meters long, 82 meters high, and consists of three rows of arches. It is only rivaled by the aqueduct in Pont du Gard, which is 266 m long and 47 m high, allegedly built by the Romans 18 centuries earlier. And it also consists of 3 tiers.

So far, I have not found information whether cement has been used or is everything also on parole? If anyone knows, tell me in the comments.

However, if you look closely at its blocks, they are very similar to the Mesoamerican megaliths. Here is a photo of the aqueduct struts from ground levels:

Photo taken from here

As you can see, traditional Peruvian Machu Picchu and Ollantaytambo "nipples" on stones in all their glory. Here's a photo from Peru to refresh your memory:

In addition, the passage opening under the aqueduct supports is trapezoidal. This is the favorite form of the builders of Machu Picchu:

Here is the very first photograph of this aqueduct, dated 1861 by the famous photographer Eduard Baldus:

This is the third time that I notice that complex objects, which are attributed to an unlikely manual construction in the 19th century, were built just before the first photographs appeared. This applies to all controversial buildings in St. Petersburg (Alexander Column, St. Isaac's Cathedral), Vorontsov Palace in Alupka (it was built of superhard stone, with which the Egyptians even chopped granite. Details here

What's the point? We do not have photographs that would show that these objects are being built and not restored. Therefore, there is no reason to be sure that they were built in the 19th century. Somehow it turns out so well that they manage to build them just before the appearance of photography. And this applies specifically to structures that are too difficult to build without machines. For some reason, the construction of such complex objects stopped with the appearance of photographs.

But there are many photographs with restoration work.

The question arises. Why, for example, is the Pondyugar aqueduct not credited with weapons in the 19th century? Because Pondyugar has not been used for water delivery for a long time and therefore has not been restored. And Roquefavour is used and therefore had to be restored in the 19th century. Otherwise, millions of people will simply be left without water.

The desire of wonder-hating scientists to explain the ancient high technologies of stone processing with a modern remake is not new. Professor Igor Davidenko was the most successful in this, shaking at the same time every human face. Details here

To be continued

Look at the pictures for now

Author: Lev Khudoy