Nuclear strikes of the recent past

2024 Author: Seth Attwood | [email protected]. Last modified: 2023-12-16 15:55

Today the population is trained so that it will fall into the state of a frightened herd at the mere mention of a "nuclear bomb", not to mention the explosion itself or radioactive contamination. Various myths-hassles are also supported. For example, about the impossibility of using nuclear weapons in modern hostilities - it seems like this suicide will not benefit anyone. And so, it already seems to us impossible to plan massive nuclear strikes on our cities. And such plans are being worked out! Nuclear charges are already used in armed conflicts, and even against their own population (Destruction of the Twin Towers).

The darkness, depicting the terrible impact on all living things of residual radiation after a nuclear explosion, suppresses the will to resist. And yet, he excludes from our perception the very traces of the use of this weapon. We think it's too scary to be real. And how can you miss it? But it only works on ignorant people. But nuclear specialists live in a more real world. They, like all of us, do not feel radiation, but firmly knowwhere it comes from, how much it is in a particular place, and how it threatens. They are, as it were, more sighted people. Let us, too, gain this “special vision” and take a deeper look at the world. Moreover, to assess the curious facts given below, minimal basic knowledge is required. Have patience for half a page, a few terms and units.

Radioactivity - this is the instability of the nuclei of some atoms, manifests itself in decay, accompanied by the emission of ionizing radiation or radiation.

Types of radiation:

Should we trust dubious historical dates? If we consider that the dating by the radiocarbon method, which today is the most advanced and most scientific, is based on the half-life of the isotope "Carbon 14", which is formed in decent quantities as a result of nuclear explosions, then all radiocarbon dating can be recognized with scientific certainty erroneous … In this case, the entire timeline, especially the ancient one, begins to float. This is not difficult to explain. In short, the method looks like this.

There is a lot of nitrogen in the atmosphere. If irradiated, it turns into a radioactive isotope called Carbon 14, with a half-life of 5730 years. Radiocarbon is absorbed from the atmosphere by living organisms with air and food only during life. But when the organism has died, the supply of new carbon atoms stops, and it only has to decay, decreasing its number in 5370 years by 2 times, in 10,740 years by 4 times, etc. All that remains is to take a sample, incinerate it, weigh it and measure the radioactivity (as if there is nothing else to generate radiation). Further, simple algebra allows you to get the age of the sample. For the sake of fairness, it should be noted that recently, in some cases, "accelerator mass spectrometry" has been used, which makes it possible to directly determine the content of radiocarbon.

So, Willard Libby, the author of the method, back in 1946 decided to accept the ratio of carbon isotopes in the atmosphere in time and space as a constant. That is, it is always and everywhere the same. AND on this exaggerated axiom all our scientific dates are based. And all because there is nowhere, supposedly, to take intense radiation, except from space. It was found that, on average, about 7.5 kg of radiocarbon is formed in the Earth's atmosphere annually, with its total amount

75 tons. The formation of radiocarbon due to natural radioactivity on the Earth's surface is considered negligible.

However, it later became clear that only during the atmospheric nuclear tests until 1963, another 500 kg was added to the existing amount of radiocarbon.

As a result, it was decided that the dating of the 20th century should be considered unreliable. But what if nuclear fires have flared on earth before? And they were on fire! Even if you are hopelessly blunt, and you do not notice the nuclear lakes-craters at your feet, then the melted layers of soil at the bottom of the ocean (Levashov N. V. "Russia in crooked mirrors-2"), and destroyed nuclear strike the Indian Mohenjo-Daro is hard to ignore. What then was the "natural" level of radiocarbon, in fact, no one not known … A complete fiasco. The rating of the method is zero, the credibility of historical chronologies is zero. We stand at the beginning of the path - all right again.

Conclusion

A kind of vacuum has formed. N. V. Levashov in "Russia in crooked mirrors" no special events in the 19th century are written. But this book does not pursue the goal of a complete, thorough exposition of all historical events associated with Russia. Probably, not everything can be said. It is pointless to look for this information in the "Slavic-Aryan Vedas". Everything is ancient there. On the other hand, facts are becoming more prevalent. Something is wrong here … Something is not right at all. It's tempting to stick together a bunch of alternatives to our past. But would it be better to replace one lie with another? Therefore, all of the above is only an in-depth look at some of the sprawling seams created for us. illusions … Only small anchor points have been set, which I have no doubt about. But before making certain, unambiguous conclusions, we still have a long way to go to comprehend the reality in which we live.

Alexey Artemiev, Izhevsk