27 unexplained facts about our recent past

2024 Author: Seth Attwood | [email protected]. Last modified: 2023-12-16 15:55

Some questions that change the view of the recent past of our planet and create an alternative historical reality.

Generalization, the mother of learning

Good day everyone! I decided to summarize the information a little and systematize the data on the recent Flood, which took place in the very recent past, about 200-250 years ago. This Flood completely changed that world, and after it came the modern world as we know it. There will be a lot of bukaff below, so I apologize to the impatient comic book lovers.

There are already a lot of facts confirming this event and contradicting the official ones. But most of them are either private or are considered separately from the rest, locally, and as a result, it is difficult to put together the whole picture of what happened.

In the Tretyakov Gallery there is a picture, measuring 5, 4 by 7, 5 meters, which must be viewed at the maximum distance from the picture, so to speak in general. If we consider the particulars, then the whole idea of the picture is lost. Here is this picture….

So in our case, there was a very large-scale planetary event with a lot of details, these details are seen by observers, researchers, each in his own city or region, but it is impossible to see the whole picture as a whole. Let's try to fill this gap today.

This event in history is known as the St. Petersburg Flood of 1777, the Patriotic War of 1812, the American War of Independence of 1812, the Year without Summer, and many other historical events known to us from official history. But they all have nothing to do with reality, or are a special case of a common global planetary event.

So how does any investigator conduct a crime scene investigation?

From the general to the particular … from the particular to the general … First, facts are collected - traces, bullets, blood, drawing on the asphalt around the corpse, witnesses, prints, genetic material … Then laboratory studies are carried out, the trajectory of the bullet is calculated, the type of weapon is determined, and possible places from where there was shooting, motives, people interested, and so on.

What facts do we have:

1. Same architecture existing buildings, around the world, known as "antique", Europe, Russia, China, India, North and South America, Africa, Australia.

2. Ruined buildings, built in the same "antique" style, Greece, Italy, Egypt, France, Russia, America, Africa, Australia, Asia … The remains of which, there is now, and were in large numbers in the recent past, they were dug up and unearthed by archaeologists. These destructions are reflected in the paintings of the "ruinists" who depicted on their canvases the ruins of all kinds of majestic buildings and structures of cities, clearly visible with their own eyes.

3. “Sagging into the cultural layer”, to a depth of 4 meters and even more, are buildings and structures built earlier than the 19th century. Moreover, everywhere the "cultural layer" consists, as a rule, of a homogeneous material of sedimentary origin (sand and clay), under which there is often a fertile layer.

4. There is a wide spread over the timescale of the same type of architecture, up to several thousand years, and the architectural style, in general and in details, structural elements, practically did not undergo any changes over thousands of years, as if some standards were invented for thousands of years, which then did not change for hundreds and thousands of years, nothing was invented, new technologies, materials, styles, etc. did not appear.

5. Remains of canals and hydraulic structures, sometimes technically very complex (dams, sluices, aqueducts), and in a volume that exceeds the technical, financial, human capabilities in their construction, in places where, by definition, their presence is at least strange, sometimes simply superfluous. Climatically completely unfounded (for example, irrigation canals in the northern regions, in areas far from the present centers of concentration of settlements (Siberia, Arkhangelsk region, Karelia, the Caucasus, Kamchatka, etc.), aqueducts-water pipes in places where it is winter for half a year and very low temperatures at which the aqueducts will simply be destroyed). From a technical point of view, the finishing of these canals and structures, granite blocks, even in places that are far from the places where these granites are mined, their technical complexity (slopes of one or two degrees on tens and sometimes hundreds of km, taking into account the difficult terrain, sometimes even mountainous regions).

6. Remnants of vegetation, peat, sapropel, black soil, stained trees on the surface, in the ground, very shallow, and in areas where, according to the current climate, they should not be. (Severnaya Zemlya, Novosibirsk Islands, oak bogs in the northern regions). In areas of permafrost, which for the last hundred years have been retreating to the north, in the first year, vegetation, characteristic of more southern regions, begins to grow, and in the following years, this vegetation is replaced by the current one, characteristic of modern tundra, forest-tundra, etc. northern plants).

7. The presence of a large number of maps, with a high accuracy of plotting settlements, longitude and latitude, vegetation (forests in the north), rivers, canals, roads that, according to the OI, either do not exist, or were created or opened much later (for example, land roads from Moscow to St. Petersburg, built only in the 19th century, the canals connecting the Don and Oka in the region of Tula, the Volga-Don Canal, built only in the 20th century, in the Volgograd region, etc.). A large number of settlements in the North, along the Siberian rivers, in the region of Kamchatka, Chukotka, the coast of the Arctic Ocean. Coastline relief Antarctica, which only in the 20th century were able to see with the help of satellites, and the coast of which is under a thick layer of ice.

8. The presence on the surface and very shallow occurrence of homogeneous sedimentary rocks (sand, gravel, clay, limestone, boulders weighing up to tens of tons), the formation of their deposits in the amount of millions of cubic meters, in one place, oriented strictly from north to south in descending order, in stripes along the current and dry, rivers, ravines. Blocked soils in a volume that does not allow agricultural work to be carried out even in the 20th century, in the northern regions, especially in Karelia, Arkhangelsk, Leningrad, Pskov, Novgorod, Tver, Yaroslavl, Vladimir, Moscow, Vologda, Kostroma, Vyatka, and others). Moreover, in those areas where, according to the OI, intensive agricultural production has been carried out since ancient times, agricultural products were supplied, including for export), but at the same time, in the presence of a very poor vegetation layer, even in the 20th century (non-chernozem areas).

9. Total stripping down to granite foundations the entire north coast, from Sweden to Kamchatka (North of the Leningrad region, Karelia, Arkhangelsk region, and further to the east). In the complete absence of sedimentary rocks - limestone, sand, clay, vegetation layer, which is a couple of centimeters, and in the lowlands there are swamps full of peat, reservoirs with sapropel, in places meter accumulations of vegetative soil. Explainable uplift of the northern plate (and where did the sedimentary rocks go from the bottom of the sea during the uplift - the same meters of limestone and sand?), while the slope from north to south is not observed, moreover, all Siberian rivers beyond the Urals flow to the North !!! Those. in the direction of raising the slab?

10. The presence of a large number of salt water bodies, underground sources, from the Arkhangelsk region to Turkmenistan, from the Urals and to Altai. And also a large number of salty soils.

11. Strange orientation of the Deserts, especially Africa and America. All the deserts there are located on the side of the West Coast. Deserts in Asia - China, Mongolia, with salt water bodies, Karakum and Kyzylkum in Western Asia. Highly saline lakes in the Middle East - for example, the Dead Sea, which, according to the OI, come from precipitation or fresh rivers originating in the mountains (Aral Sea, Caspian Sea). Isolated from the Seas and Oceans, and in theory could not become salty from these sources. The half-salt lake Balkhash, located in the foothills, certainly could not feed on salt water from the mountains.

12. The presence of the North Sea fauna in the South Seas and lakes … North Sea seals (or rather their relatives), in Lake Onega, in the Caspian Sea, in Baikal! Fish species related to the North Sea species are flounder in the Black and Caspian Seas, herring in the Black and Caspian Seas, omul in Baikal, and many other species. Moreover, they all go to spawn in the rivers upstream, in the Don, Volga, Dnieper (i.e. to the north), as well as downstream from Baikal - to the Angara, but also to the north! Those. to the side where their relatives live in the Arctic Ocean! Which speaks of the unambiguous path where their ancestors came from - from the North.

13. Permafrost territory, in a strange way to the Urals and beyond the Urals, in latitude is very different, by thousands (!) km, which may indicate different reasons for its origin or its preservation. Moreover, the southern border of the permafrost is constantly retreating to the north, over the past 100 years, this border has shifted by hundreds of kilometers (from 250 to 500 km, to the north). Moreover, this fact applies to both Eurasia and North America. The absence of a permafrost zone at similar latitudes in the Southern Hemisphere, which indicates different reasons for its occurrence and preservation, not related to the angle of incidence of sunlight on the surface. If the current climate is unchanged thousands years, then in 300-500 years, such a movement, the permafrost of the Northern Hemisphere should have reached the Arctic Circle, at least.

14. Suspicious drying up of water bodies over the past 100 years, rivers, lakes, swamps and other bodies of water on land become very shallow, dry up, the amount of water is constantly decreasing, which leads to climate change. The rate of this drying up, if compared over the past 100 years, over hundreds of years would have led to the complete drying up of almost all closed water bodies, fed only by spring floods or precipitation.

15. The false inflating of the global warming hypothesis that globally It has nothing to do with the content of CO2 in the atmosphere or with solar activity, but is associated with only one thing - the presence and amount on the surface of the land (including in its thickness) of a substance capable of accumulating and giving off heat, namely water, in its different states of aggregation: liquid water and ice.

16. Rivers. Everything absolutely, from huge to small streams, rivers have gullies incommensurate with the current channel, the width exceeding the current one, from several times, to tens of times, larger than the current channel. The banks of these gullies are formed by the simultaneous flow of water, strictly along the course of the current rivers, the water level is much higher (by volume dozens of times), the current volume of water in the rivers, the level of the slopes of these rivers, their uniformity across the entire plane, a small number of ravines to the current river (insignificant destruction of slopes by ravines), their size (depth) indicate a small amount of time that has passed from the moment of their formation to the present day.

The presence of washed-out and swampy areas along rivers, the presence of oxbows (periodic changes in channels), at a great distance from the current channel, isolated reservoirs without external recharge (now drying up), along the rivers, suggests that in the very recent past the amount of water in all the rivers was immeasurably greater. Judging by the water erosion of the surface of the slopes and adjacent territories, it was several hundred years, no more. Very often there are perfectly flat, tens of kilometers long, rivers on flat territories, which may indicate their artificial origin, which were once canals. A strange formation of high banks with an opposite low bank, usually on the north or northwest side.

17. Rivers in settlements. In all settlements near the rivers, there are washed away territories, even on a hill up to tens of meters from the current level of the river. Even with a low opposite bank! Now these territories are parks, reserves, wildlife sanctuaries, stadiums, wastelands, industrial zones, building sites only in the 20th century. Moreover, they contain destroyed or heavily "sagging" historical buildings and structures, as a rule, rather large (Churches, Fortresses, Monasteries). Moreover, at a considerable distance from modern streets and even settlements, which suggests that they were once part of a denser building, or estates.

18. Ravines. On the plains, in places where there is insufficient water for their formation (small amount of precipitation, groundwater, reservoirs, etc.), there are a lot of ravines. Moreover, in terms of their structure and condition of the slopes, these ravines are very similar to the rivers that exist in the same area. The condition of their slopes, their structure practically do not differ from the plain rivers and what is said about the rivers above.

19. Fortresses, castles, kremlin. Until the 17th century, all over the world there was a huge number of fortresses, fortresses-stars, castles, monasteries, with high fortress walls, especially near rivers, reservoirs, kremlin (essentially the same fortresses), which in their structure were many times larger than their fortification purpose, according to the types of weapons used in those wars. Most of them are currently either completely destroyed, or according to the OI, in the 17-19th centuries they were destroyed by war (cannonballs), survived terrible fires that destroyed them in whole or in part. Moreover, most of them were known back in the 18th century, were plotted on maps, described in many later literary works. The costs for their construction, the presence in the 18th century, when already according to the OI there were no mass wars, the remoteness from the theaters of military operations of those years (for example, in Siberia, in the Northern cities), suggest that their purpose was clearly not for protection from raids.

20. Mountain towns and monasteries. In many places in the mountains there are remnants of mountain cities that can accommodate thousands of inhabitants. Crimea, Caucasus, Turkey, Middle East, America, Kazakhstan, Carpathians, etc. The purpose of these cities, their time of use, logistical inaccessibility, labor costs for their construction and transport inconvenience of location indicate that the reason for their appearance can only be the need to protect from something very destructive, the need to save a certain number of residents from some a cataclysm occurring or likely to occur below these cities, in the lowlands.

21. Sacred Mountains. All nations have sacred mountains. Moreover, it is very difficult to find an explanation of what is so sacred about them.

22. Holy springs. All over the world, especially in the highlands, there are ancient sacred sources, usually with religious overtones. Often these springs are located in the mountains or on hills, often on the territory of monasteries, also located on hills.

23. Kitchen. In many countries, the cuisine is replete with ingredients that do not match the growth possibilities of these crops in the region where it is located. Peppers and spices in fairly northern regions, where these crops do not grow now. National cuisines are replete with plants that were either introduced at a fairly late time, according to OI. For example, corn is native to America, in Moldova. The age-old culture of growing, processing and storing plants originating thousands of kilometers to the south or even from other continents, for example, American potatoes in Belarus, cucumbers, onions, cabbage, in European Russia (native to North Africa or Asia Minor). At the same time, there is a long tradition of culture of cultivation, use in food, processing and storage.

It is not clear how southern onions or cucumbers with cabbage were able to adapt to the harsh northern regions, and northern varieties appeared. Moreover, these cultures have a very ancient history. About 80 (!) Varieties pineapplegrown everywhere in Russia in greenhouses, but still, where does such a variety, the ability to cultivate and such preferences of local northern residents come from?

Southern wheat, the northern varieties of which, cultivated north of the Voronezh region, appeared only in the second half of the 20th century, was known and used in the cuisine of our ancestors since ancient times, and so on up to Arkhangelsk. Massive use, back in the 17th century amaranth in Russia, originally from South America, which was discovered in the same century a century earlier, and which managed to conquer such expanses Northern Country?

Tea, coffee, tobacco? The cuisine of some peoples, now considered a delicacy, could have appeared only from a very terrible lack of food, for example, the use of frogs in food by the French and Vietnamese, snails, etc., speaks of times, and long, when they may have been the only living creatures that can save you from hunger.

24. Architecture. Similarities in architecture, building materials and building technologies. Architectures on vast territories, at a distance of thousands of kilometers, and on different continents. Extreme technical difficulty in the design and construction of some buildings and structures with a complete (allegedly) lack of drawings, materials, technical documentation, technical and aesthetic perfection of the architecture of the 17-19th centuries.

In the northern latitudes, even until the 20th century, there were buildings and structures that were not designed for this climate. All of them, as a rule, hail not later than the 18th, early 19th centuries. These buildings were not provided for heating … So called summer temples, huge places of worship, designed without taking into account the cold and frost, in areas where even now up to 8 months a year, it is cold. Residential buildings with huge windows, having huge heat losses, also without heating (most of them were heated either by stoves attached in the 19th century, or during their reconstruction, changes were made and heating systems were created.

Most of the buildings were designed and built with flat roofs, which is extremely impractical for the northern regions, because led to roof leakage due to melting snow, and lack of precipitation runoff. Moreover, the second half of the 19th century, this short-sightedness has already been ruled out. Building are projected already taking into account the northern cold climate, with heating, with pitched roofs that have a slope for snow and rain, with windows smaller than a century earlier.

Almost all buildings built earlier than the 19th century have a deep “subsidence into the cultural layer”, and very even, which, according to science, did not lead to the destruction of the entire structure of the building. As a result, the first floors of the buildings ended up in the ground, and the basements on which these buildings were built disappeared. The aesthetic and technical design was violated, there was an additional opportunity for moisture to penetrate from the ground into the building itself, its walls, which leads to a violation of waterproofing and a more rapid destruction of walls in northern latitudes with a greater depth of freezing.

The loss of technology in building materials in the 19th century, a change in construction technology, the use of building materials (foundations and walls were previously built from limestone blocks, later from bricks; the brick was previously more durable, later less durable), the use of long products in the construction (obviously superior in characteristics to the rolling stock of the 19th and 20th centuries, for example, the metal structures of the base of the Dome of St. Isaac's Cathedral in St. Petersburg - the structure did not succumb to corrosion even after 300 years), etc.

25. Mega-settings of the 18-19th centuries. In the 18-19th centuries, a huge number of structures (canals, roads, railways, buildings and structures) were built in Russia and in the World, in terms of the volume of work performed, quality and construction technologies, places of their construction, remoteness from places of production of materials, construction time not amenable to logical explanation, not corresponding to the level of available and used building material, qualifications of builders (according to the OI, it was built either by serfs or by soldiers, under the guidance of an experienced European architect).

For example: the Nikolaev railway was built in the shortest possible time (less than 10 years, in places, even in the 20th century, very swampy, sparsely populated, in a climate with up to 9 months a year of cold weather, rains, snow and frost). Transsib - was built on time, about 10 years, in areas with a minimum population density, remoteness from places of production of rails, sleepers, etc.). At the same time, tens of thousands of kilometers of railways were built in the same period, surpassing similar works in the 20th century in terms of the volume of construction work.

26. Population. The main resource of any state is people. People are also the army that waged wars in the 18th and 19th centuries. This is the production of CX products for the army, builders, for sale within the country and abroad. These are workers in factories and factories, builders, service representatives, clergymen, doctors, teachers, etc. This and taxes for the treasury, from which, again, government spending is financed. And here's the problem.

According to available more or less official data, the population of the Russian Empire at the end of the 19th century was about 110-120 million … Human. Taking into account the population of Poland, Finland, Turkestan, the Caucasus. The official population growth is, as it were, about 2 percent a year, which is very strange and suspiciously small, given that the population of about 80% is a rural population, and families there were from 5 to 15 children, they also began to give birth very early. from 15 years old.

Those. For 20 years (even 35-40 years, the average life expectancy), from two parents there were already 3-4 heirs for each parent, and taking into account the fact that there were often grandchildren, by the death of the first parents, then the increase for 40 years was at least 100%.

But even with a 2% increase, the calculation in the opposite direction gives no more 15-20 million … people throughout the Russian Empire. If you also count 100 years into the past, then even that is about 500 thousand - a million. For the whole territory Russian Empire … Hence, the question arises about the possibilities of building what is described above, and the next point.

27. Expansion. At the beginning of the 19th century, there was a populated area from Kaliningrad to Vladivostok, from Arkhangelsk to the Pamir. Inhabited Siberia, along the northern sea route, along the Siberian rivers. There are thousands of inhabited cities in abundance on the maps, throughout the territory. There are dozens of villages and villages around each city (otherwise the city will not survive and even not appear). Total: tens of thousands of settlements by the whole territory.

Question: Why? Why do we need such a complex, dangerous and unpredictable expansion from a rather comfortable region of Southern Europe? 10-20 million people can easily disperse across Central Russia, while 5 million will live by the sea, enjoying the southern sun and fruits and wine. What or who should force people to leave their homes and go hundreds or thousands of kilometers, in an unknown direction, to the taiga, to Siberia, to the North? And the main thing why?

Well, let's say the Stolypin reforms of mass settlement Siberia (and by whom then was the Transsib built and for whom a dozen years before that), and by whom were the cities of Siberia inhabited, which allegedly hundreds of years before that have been living and healthy there? And let me remind you that the Stolypin resettlement was considered by contemporaries unique! Does this mean that such operations were not carried out on such a scale before?

So it turns out that in the 19th century, the whole territory of Russia has already been inhabited through natural expansion, the gradual settling of new territories, when the previous ones have already been developed and the population size allows you to look for new territories for agricultural activities, and only then a city appears there, which provides the village with everything you need, and most importantly! People will not go north, in worse conditions, if the south allows them to settle without problems!

Then it turns out that for natural expansion either hundreds of years, or the settlement was forced (and besides Voronezh with Peter 1, the OI does not show us any more such events, and this is not the North) … Either the climate during this expansion was completely different. And most importantly, the number of the population at the end of this expansion should not be 20 million people capable of dissolving in Central Russia. And at times, and maybe tens of times more.

* * *

This time, 27 points, I think, will be enough to try to estimate the scale, and add most of the puzzles of the picture called "Story" … Later I will try to give a more detailed article on each of these points with examples, questions, answers, conclusions. And also gradually add this list of questions with other points.

Good luck and Reason to everyone!