Dances around the Black Hole

2024 Author: Seth Attwood | [email protected]. Last modified: 2023-12-16 15:55

In this article, we will analyze the "scientific" note by Alexei Kachalin entitled "Scientists first tracked the heating and cooling of matter around a black hole" posted on the largest Russian media portal TASS. On March 2, 2017, this correspondent reported that American and European scientists were able to see the rapid heating and cooling of some matter around the Black Hole.

And this is despite the fact that, by definition, “Black holes, according to modern concepts, have such a gigantic mass that no types of radiation, including light, can escape from the grasp of their gravitational field. These objects do not emit anything and therefore it is impossible to see them …"

But let's take everything in order. In this short article I will clearly show that today's science has a very vague idea of the structure of the Universe and the nature of space objects. Of course, the fact that "scientists" use a lot of unknown words and tricky terms has long misled us and makes us think that "scientists" still know something, are honest and intelligent people, and we need to believe at their word.

After all, for a long time there were no opinions alternative to the opinion of scientists, and those that appeared were quickly discredited, hid and soon forgotten. Therefore, we had nothing to argue with the "scientists", and we simply had to believe them without any evidence of their rightness (just like in God!).

Such blind faith is called fanaticism and never leads to anything good either in science or in religion. I am deeply convinced that an adult should not believe in anything. He must know! Because faith without knowledge is an unnatural and harmful thing! And if you still carefully delve into the origin of the word "faith", then it will become clear that it means the concept of "knowledge", i.e. "knowledge". That. in fact, faith (knowledge) is knowledge. And faith in the church understanding of this word, i.e. knowledge without knowledge is a twist of some kind, a thing that is not natural, and therefore harmful!

The analyzed article is another example of how the "scientific" lads powders our brains, and actually makes us believe in stupid fables. Let's start right in order, from the first paragraph: “… The vortex flows of matter rotating around the funnel of a black hole can heat up and cool down very quickly by cosmic standards - within a few hours. For the first time, American and European astronomers managed to establish and track this feature, the US National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) reported on Wednesday …"

1. Here the author, without hesitation, immediately confronts us with the "fact" that there are certain "vortex flows of matter" in nature. But I could not find a definition of this term on the Web. Those. it can be considered that this term is not yet scientific. Accordingly, the very existence of such "streams" has not yet been proven by anyone, and is a hypothesis, i.e. guess! And in the note it is presented to us as a fact, which is not true!

2. Further, the author claims that the Black Hole has the shape of a funnel. But this is also only a hypothesis, because so far no one has been able to see the black holes, and even more so, no one has been able to fix any peculiarities of their "shape". This is also an assumption, a fantasy of "scientists" who decided that since matter flows there, it must be a funnel, like in a bathroom, from which water flows out. After all, this is so natural and familiar …

I do not mind scientists fantasizing. This is a completely natural and necessary process. I am categorically opposed to "scientists" lying to us and presenting their fantasies as proven facts, instead of emphasizing that these are just unverified hypotheses that require additional research and confirmation!

3. Further, Comrade. Kachalin, as if casually, repeats the words of the source of information that "streams of matter" revolve "around the funnel of a black hole." What does it mean here that matter rotates on the outside of the "funnel"? Not inside the funnel? Exactly? How did American and European astronomers find out? Did you see it through the telescope?

But no, it is impossible to see it through a telescope. Just guess? This is more like the truth. Then why did they assume that matter revolves around a funnel, and not inside it, like water flowing out of a bathtub? Was that just the assumption? Yes, they have the right to do so. But it must be communicated that this is only an assumption, not a fact. And this assumption is not based on anything yet!

4. More Comrade. Kachalin informs us in the same sentence that these rotating "vortex streams of matter", which by definition are not visible in any telescope, turn out to be capable of heating and cooling for several hours. Very interesting! And how did this come to be known? Again from observations through a telescope that cannot be seen because it does not emit anything? It's just great!

Not only do the "scientists" keep silent about the fact that the presence of the Black Hole where they indicate, this is only an assumption, not supported by anything; so they are still silent or simply do not know that a few trillion kilometers from us, in the constellation of Centaurus, there must be completely different physics and laws of nature, not the same as on Earth! (The laws of nature are different even on the moon!). Therefore, trying to determine something there by local methods is an obvious profanation.

Thus, almost everything that astronomers write is a common lie! Although, as you can see for yourself, the media are presenting this lie to us as another achievement of Western science, without even bothering to tell us that so far these are only assumptions, not based on anything. But they come from NASA, so we are forced to blindly believe all the stories of this deceitful organization …

Now we will quote the third paragraph: “… We know that supermassive black holes have an impact on their environment in galaxies. Powerful streams of "wind" emanating from the zone near the black hole can be one of the means of such an impact, "- quotes NASA as one of the researchers of the group, a professor at the California Institute of Technology in Pasadena (California) Fiona Harrison …"

1. Here, firstly, Professor Fiona Harrison informs us without a shadow of a doubt that Black holes have mass and can even be "supermassive". And this despite the fact that in reality neither Fiona nor anyone else has been able to see these objects of the Cosmos. In addition, their existence is also only an assumption so far and is based on Einstein's "Theory of Relativity", the falsehood of which has already been proven many times!

Today, there are no possibilities for remote determination of the mass of cosmic bodies, and even more so those that are not visible through any telescopes! Nevertheless, Western "scientists" astronomers constantly repeat the inventions about the massiveness and supermassiveness of Black holes, quite rightly believing that no one dares to question their clever, but senseless fantasies and conclusions.

2. Secondly, Fiona Harrison claims that Black Holes "have an impact on their environment," which is absolutely true and undeniable. But he immediately adds that "powerful streams of" wind "allegedly emanate from the zone near the Black Hole. First, it would be interesting to know what exactly "scientist" Fiona means by the word "zone" in relation to the Black Hole?

If this means a part of space, then it would be good to tell us how far this Zone is from the Black Hole? What is the extent of this Zone (radius or some other dimension)? It was also very scientific if the professor told how they manage to find a zone near the Black Hole, if the existence of the Black Holes themselves is still only a hypothesis? And how is the word "about" to be understood? Is it close, or far, or very far, or far away?

3. Third, it would be very appropriate for the author to tell us what Professor Fiona Harrison means by the word "wind" in relation to the vicinity of the Black Hole? Because if this is not clearly explained, then the impression is created of the complete incompetence of the "professor" in the topic under consideration and in science in general!

Because all the "wind" in the vicinity or in the "zone around" the Black Hole, by definition, must always be directed strictly in one direction - towards the center of gravity, and the effect on the "environment" is always the same: to carry away all material bodies with you to the Hole. It is very likely that, without still having a sensible scientific Basis, both NASA employees with their inflated "professors" and their numerous followers are completely entangled in the most elementary processes taking place in our Universe.

The fourth paragraph reads as follows: “This is the first time we have observed a rapid change (of temperature). We believe that this factor will allow us in the future to understand how such “winds” are formed and how much energy they are able to carry with them into the galaxy, "- clarified Harrison …"

In this paragraph, we finally found the apofigue of this little note, reprinted from nowhere by TASS correspondent Alexei Kachalin. Here "Professor" Harrison reports that the "winds" seen by astronomers through the NuSTAR hard X-ray telescope, in her opinion, are blowing not towards the Black Hole, but out of it!

And this assumption, which contradicts the definition of the object "Black Hole", "professor" also gives out, as well-known and not subject to doubt. Fiona only cares about how much energy they can carry with them to the galaxy. And everything else does not cause any questions for her and is considered quite acceptable!

This note clearly demonstrates to us that those people who are considered "scientists" at NASA, quite arbitrarily transfer into the category of facts any hypotheses that, in their opinion, can help them somehow explain the observed natural phenomena. For some reason, they do not think about the correctness of such actions and the reliability of the results, or they simply keep quiet. Apparently, they have not been paid for this for a long time.

The last two paragraphs represent the explanations that Kachalin decided to make, so that the message of Professor Fiona Harrison does not look completely scanty and idiotic. Although, the information written by Kachalin also represents solid assumptions and does not really explain anything at all. And his opinion about the accretion disk, which allegedly "glows brightly in the entire spectrum" from friction, is completely wrong.

The "accretion disc" is observed here and there only in the X-ray range. But, if its layers really heated up from friction against each other, then the glow could be observed in a wider range. Therefore, it would be more logical to assume that the so-called. The "accretion disk" most likely has nothing to do with Black Holes, but exists (if it exists) for other reasons …

Such "popular science" chewing gum allows itself to be published by TASS - the main information agency of Russia. Apparently, those Forces who really manage the information policy in the country are in no way interested in the fact that people somehow learn the truth about the nature around us, and indeed, receive reasonable information about anything!

* * *

Now I will tell you what scientists actually observe "around" Black holes and many other space objects. In this case, it will immediately become clear how much the fantasies (hypotheses) of "scientists" based on other similar fantasies actually cost.

In reality, Black holes do not have mass at all. Astronomers completely misunderstand the structure of the Universe and the essence of the space objects "Star" and "Black Hole". Our Universe is a space with continuously changing properties and qualities. This space is not empty, but filled with various "primary matters" (primary matters), which can interact with each other to a greater or lesser extent. Some scientists called the entire set of an infinite number of different primary matters Ether.

The entire space is non-uniform and naturally quantized in dimensionality into layers (it is spontaneously divided in accordance with changing properties). The term “dimensionality” does not mean the number of measurements to determine the coordinates of a point in space, but is a generalized, integral characteristic of the qualitative properties of space and makes it easier and faster to understand its theory of the Universe.

Each such layer was named "Space-Universe" and differs from other layers by its level of dimension, i.e. its quality characteristics. In addition, each layer also differs in that physically dense matter is synthesized in it from a different number of primary matter. In our Space-universe, all physically dense matter is synthesized from 7 primary matter. In the "upper" Space-universe, all physically dense matter is synthesized from 8 primary matter. And in the "lower" space - from 6 primary matters.

Adjacent Spaces-universes often merge with each other in a random way, and then a new heterogeneity is formed at the place of closure, which is a channel through which physically dense matter flows from the upper space to the lower. A black hole appears in the upper space at the point where it joins - this is the entrance to the channel between spaces. And in the lower space, at the point of exit from the channel, a Star appears.

Now it becomes clear that Black holes are formed not in the centers of the Galaxies (although they can there too), but anywhere, but precisely in those places where two adjacent Space-universes come into contact! And the number of Black Holes (the number of space closings) is not limited by any natural parameters or processes.

The flow of matter between adjacent Spaces-universes is a natural process. And, by the way, it is thanks to this process that we have a past, present and future!

More detailed information about these interesting natural processes can be found in the following books by Nikolai Levashov:

"The last appeal to Humanity", "Essence and Mind", "Inhomogeneous Universe"

Or, in a somewhat simplified form, you can read about it in the articles from the series "Science does not want to know".

Nikolai Levashov outlined in his works the most basic information about nature - only what we are able to understand today. But this information is quite enough to correctly interpret many natural phenomena observed on Earth and in Space, and to begin to study them successfully.

That is why Black Holes "attract" everything that is not "nailed to the floor", although they have no mass at all. This is just an entrance to the channel of closure, through which physically dense matter from our Space-Universe flows into the “underlying” space.

The reason for the flow of matter into the lower space is gravity. But in reality, gravity is not an unreasonable attraction of bodies to each other due to the possession of mass, but a fully justified, directional movement of all types of matter under the influence of a sharp change in the level of dimensionality at the point where adjacent Spaces-universes converge. It is the dimensional difference that is the real reason for the appearance of gravity anywhere.

The definition of a Black Hole given by science is quite correct, with the exception of mass. But it has nothing to do and is in no way confirmed by the "Theory of Relativity" invented by Einstein, the falsehood of which has already been proven many times! And what observers sometimes find in their telescopes are other natural processes that have quite rational explanations, if you know at least the basics of the Theory of the Universe by researcher Nikolai Levashov.

All these "winds", "hair" and various "rays", supposedly emanating from the Black Holes, are just streams of other primary matter that do not interact with "our" matter in any way, because they have no common qualities with them. Therefore, a huge number of streams of different primary matter, flowing in space and not interacting with the matters of our Space-Universe, remain invisible to us due to the imperfection of our senses and devices.

Some of these "alien" streams are detected in different ranges of electromagnetic waves with the help of devices, and then the "scientists" begin to fantasize, instead of getting acquainted with the most realistic hypothesis.