Table of contents:

Studies by scientists Vashkevich and Klyosov have shown: Russian is the oldest language in Europe
Studies by scientists Vashkevich and Klyosov have shown: Russian is the oldest language in Europe

Video: Studies by scientists Vashkevich and Klyosov have shown: Russian is the oldest language in Europe

Video: Studies by scientists Vashkevich and Klyosov have shown: Russian is the oldest language in Europe
Video: The Golden Age Of Russian Space Exploration 2024, November
Anonim

The headline is binding, so let's get it straight.

Part I. Nikolay Nikolaevich Vashkevich … First education - radio engineering, then inyaz, service in the SA as a military translator in Yemen. Then - linguistics, more specifically - Arabic studies, work and teaching at the university.

Vashkevich is an amazingly hardworking person. He wrote thousands of articles for a new etymological dictionary. This is not counting journalism and video lectures.

What is the main idea of Nikolai Nikolaevich's research? This is clearly indicated by the title of one of his books: "Systemic languages of the brain." Vashkevich believes that Russian and Arabic are originally embedded in the brain. And not only in the human brain, but even in animals and birds. Of course, the latter is in incomparably smaller volumes.

Image
Image

(In the diagram below, VH - hydrogen / helium, RA - respectively Russian and Arabic.)

Image
Image

How does a single human language work?

Alexander Sergeevich Pushkin finishes his poem “Imitation Arab ”With the following line:

We are exactly a double nut

Under one shell."

Pushkin is undoubtedly a prophet. However, in this case, it only records the fact of the incomparable affinity of the Russian and Arabic languages.

The fact is that everything, exactly everything - without exception, Russian proverbs and idioms, where we ourselves sometimes don’t understand, and why we say exactly that way - this Vashkevich explains through the semantics of the Arabic language. The same is with the etymology of words, for which we ourselves cannot find a satisfactory explanation.

For example, the word "honeycomb". In etymological dictionaries, nothing is written about the origin of the word. Or they put question marks, as in Wiktionary. And here is Vashkevich's solution:

„The Arabic word honeycombmeans “ well-worn ”. This word is derived from the Arabic root ST “ six ”. On this uncontested solution, the etymology of the word honeycomb ends. Everyone can count the number of honeycomb facets and make sure the solution is correct.”

Image
Image

Moreover, there is a whole group of words, the meaning of which is really revealed only from their reading in Arabic. We quote Nikolai Nikolaevich Vashkevich again:

It is clear that Arabic also has words that are not motivated by its speakers. Note that they mainly refer to religious vocabulary.

Here's an example from Vashkevich.

The Arabist does not forget to walk through the English language.

Finally, the example of Vashkevich based on well-known Russian phraseological units and sayings.

And one more telling example: the famous Kuz'kina's mother, whom they threaten to show. This is how Nikolai Nikolaevich explains it.

It must be assumed that the examples given are enough to be convinced of the really extraordinary, and most importantly, unexpected, if you follow the course of official history - the affinity of the two languages. But we didn’t have such close contacts between Russians and Arabs that such a wide mutual diffusion of words and meanings could take place!

Having asked the same question, Nikolai Nikolaevich, being an engineer, constructed his own answer: we consider the human brain as a processor, into which the Almighty put two system languages, Russian and Arabic. They are, as it were, rectangular projections of symmetrical points onto the axis of symmetry. And the rest of the languages, although of equal power, are oblique projections.

Then Vashkevich went deep into worldview issues, which we saw in the diagram above with hydrogen, helium, Russian and Arabic. Whether an Arabist is right in this regard is difficult to say. Most likely not, although there are many analogies drawn by him. Those. Vashkevich noted the correlations exactly, but the explanation is hardly correct.

Here, at the end of the first part, it should once again be noted the invaluable contribution of the scientist-linguist to the compilation of the many thousands of correspondence list of Russian and Arabic words-meanings. Moreover, not a single critic of Vashkevich, and he has a lot of them among his colleagues, not a single one questioned the accuracy of translations from Arabic into Russian. What are people criticizing? Scientists' denial of the principle of historicity in linguistics, as well as … not always the proper restraint in responses to the comments of some idiots.

So, the affinity of Russian and Arabic is shown. Now let's see where these nucleoli came from under a single shell. Without new entities invented by Vashkevich.

Part II. Anatoly Alekseevich Klyosov

Image
Image

Doctor of Chemical Sciences. IN USSR. Then, from the topic of the kinetics of biochemical reactions, he moved on to the topic of the kinetics of mutations.

And he became at the origins of the creation of a new discipline "DNA genealogy". Which is outwardly similar to the well-known population genetics, but the latter is more of a descriptive science, while the former is analytical.

Surely all readers are in one way or another familiar with the research and conclusions of Klyosov, so we will not dwell on the description for a long time, but we will immediately move on to the Aryan haplogroup R1a.

From the book of A. A. Klyosov "Entertaining DNA genealogy".

„… Finally, another wave of representatives of the genus R1 a went to the south and reached the Arabian Peninsula, the Gulf of Oman, where there are now Qatar, Kuwait, United Arab Emirates, and the Arabs there, having received the results of DNA testing, are amazed at the test certificate with a haplotype and a haplogroup R1a … Aryan, Proto-Slavic, "Indo-European" - call it what you want, but the essence is the same.

And these certificates define the boundaries of the range of the campaigns of the ancient Aryans. The calculations below show that the times of these campaigns in Arabia - 4 thousand years ago.

Currently, haplogroup R1a among Arabs reaches 9% of the male population, including in such famous clanslike the Kureish clan, from which the Prophet Muhammad (aka Muhammad), the founder of Islam, came from, and his clan is mentioned in the Quran.

I receive a lot of letters from "well-born" Arabs, who were shocked at first by their haplogroup R1a, they even hid it from others, but gradually it became prestigious.

An analogy with the highest castes in India, where haplogroup R1a reaches 72%.”

The statement above is something that directly relates to the topic of this publication. The carriers of haplogroup R1a reached the Arabian Peninsula.

But what are these carriers, who were they? Klyosov said this right before the above quote about the Arabs.

“After another thousand years, 4 thousand years ago they, proto-Slavs, went to the southern Urals, after another 400 years they went to India, where about 100 million of their descendants now live, members of the same genus R1a. The genus of the Aryans.

Aryans, because they called themselves that, and it is fixed in the ancient Indian Vedas and Iranian legends. They are the descendants of the Proto-Slavs or their closest relatives. There was no "assimilation" of the haplogroup R1a and there is no, and the haplotypes are almost the same, they are easily identified. Identical to Slavic.

Another wave of Aryans, with the same haplotypes, went from Central Asia to Eastern Iran, also in the III millennium BC, and became Iranian Aryans."

So, we fix: the Slavs (in the sense of the carriers of the indicated haplogroup) became the highest caste in India, and among the Arabs they form the famous administrative clans, up to the clan from which the prophet emerged.

However, Anatoly Alekseevich himself has repeatedly warned, they say, one should not deduce from this the presence of a certain proto-language.

"… To represent any of the ancient languages as" parent "for modern languages is an unjustified simplification."

And further:

“Sanskrit is not a descendant of the Pro-Russian language, if the language of the ancient Aryans is not called“Pro-Russian”. But in this case, the language, in order to become Russian, also went through many paths, far from always linear - it passed from the language of the ancient Aryans through the language of the Fatyanovo culture, then through the languages of the Baltic Slavs, the languages of the Wends, the languages of the Danube Slavs, and back to the Russian Plain, changing all this time in its lexicostatistical dynamics."

It is clear that Klyosov simply follows the geography of the migrations of the Proto-Slavs and quite logically assumes that the language has undergone changes over the centuries and millennia.

Now let's try, finally, to justify the title of the publication.

The following indisputable fact, shown by many researchers, seems mysteriously strange: Shishkov, Lukashevich, Kesler, Trubachev, Dragunkin, and our LJ companion alex_641, the author of wonderful articles about the European koine, including the sensational book "Logotron" - the fact of the existence of highly distorted versions of the Russian language in Europe.

These versions are today called the national languages of the countries of the Old World

Image
Image

Where can one get away from this fact? The position of Klyosov as a businessman is clear: if, based on the results of his research, he only mentions the primacy of the Russian language, then the cohens can take away the medal that he once presented! And orders for research can easily decrease. So let's not be hard on a scientist, especially since he can be deservedly proud of the results of the development of his discipline.

So, Klyosov, unwittingly, explained the origin of the affinity of the Russian and Arabic languages mentioned in the first part. Moreover, Anatoly Alekseevich proved that chronologically, first there were Slavs, and then some of them reached the place of residence of the Arabs and mixed with the local population, including the higher castes.

This is where that affinity comes from. It is logical to assume, given the huge amount of common semantics of the two languages proved by Vashkevich, that Arabic is the same Koine as European languages. Long ago converted Russian … By the way, according to Vashkevich, the just used single-root repetition ("long ago") is a characteristic feature of the grammar of the Arabic language. So after all, in Russian it has been preserved: so chicken or egg, eh, Nikolai Nikolaevich? !!

And it is no longer surprising that Sanskrit, corrected or not by Panini, so strongly resembles by its roots the same “great and mighty”! The same haplotype R1a, moreover, mainly in the higher castes. It is also clear that Svetlana Vasilievna Zharnikova (the name obliges !!!) was also right, who rightly asserted that rivers, mountains and lakes in the Russian North were first named, and only then, sometimes to the letter, the same names migrated to India.

So now we have every reason to know that the age of the Russian language is older than the age of Arabic, which is estimated at three thousand years

But Wikipedia, which reflects the opinion of the official academic science, strongly disagrees with this conclusion:

"The main part of this period (IX-XIV centuries) falls on the era of the formation, development and disintegration of the Old Russian language, which developed on the basis of Eastern Proto-Slavic dialects."

So who will we trust: our own conclusions based on the scientific data of the linguist Vashkevich and the biochemist Klyosov, or written in the barn (crossed out) on Wikipedia ??!

English, French, Spanish and other European languages, according to Wikipedia, are at best the early Middle Ages. Not surprising.

Even the notorious Latin, “archaic Latin”, without any serious evidence, “is attributed to the middle of the 2nd millennium BC. e."

Whereas, we recall that "The times of these campaigns in Arabia - 4 thousand years ago".

Hike of native speakers of the then Russian language. Which, after all, existed before the campaigns, didn’t it? !!

Recommended: