Why was the ether removed from Mendeleev's periodic system of elements?

2024 Author: Seth Attwood | [email protected]. Last modified: 2023-12-16 15:55

Ether in the periodic table. The world ether is the substance of ANY chemical element and therefore - of ANY substance, it is the Absolute true matter as the Universal element-forming Essence.

The world ether is the source and crown of the entire genuine Periodic Table, its beginning and end - the alpha and omega of the Periodic Table of the Elements of Dmitry Ivanovich Mendeleev.

In ancient philosophy, ether (aithér-Greek), along with earth, water, air and fire, is one of the five elements of being (according to Aristotle) - the fifth essence (quinta essentia-Lat.), Understood as the subtlest all-pervading matter.

At the end of the 19th century, the hypothesis of the world ether (ME), which fills the entire world space, was widely circulated in scholarly circles. It was understood as a weightless and elastic fluid that permeates all bodies. Many physical phenomena and properties have been tried to explain by the existence of the ether.

Foreword

Mendeleev had two fundamental scientific discoveries:

1 - Discovery of the Periodic Law in the substance of chemistry, 2 - Discovery of the relationship between the substance of chemistry and the substance of Ether, namely: the particles of Ether form molecules, nuclei, electrons, etc., but do not participate in chemical reactions.

Ether - particles of matter with a size of ~ 10-100 meters (in fact - "first bricks" of matter).

Facts. Ether was in the true periodic table. The Ether cell was located in the zero group with inert gases and in the zero row as the main system-forming factor for building the System of chemical elements.

After the death of Mendeleev, the table was distorted, removing Ether from it and canceling the zero group, thereby hiding the fundamental discovery of conceptual meaning.

In modern tables of Ether: 1 - not visible, 2 - and not guessed (due to the absence of the zero group).

Such a purposeful forgery hinders the development of the progress of civilization.

Man-made disasters (eg Chernobyl and Fukushima) would have been ruled out if adequate resources had been invested in the development of the true periodic table. Concealment of conceptual knowledge is going on at the global level to "lower" civilization.

Result. The truncated periodic table is taught in schools and universities.

Assessment of the situation. Mendeleev's table without Ether is the same as humanity without children - you can live, but there will be no development and future.

Summary. If the enemies of humanity hide knowledge, then our task is to reveal this knowledge.

Conclusion. In the old periodic table there are fewer elements, and there is more foresight than in the modern one.

Conclusion. A new level is possible only when the informational state of society changes.

Bottom line. Returning to the true periodic table is no longer a scientific question, but a political one

What was the main political meaning of Einstein's teaching? It consisted in the fact that by any means to block the mankind's access to inexhaustible natural sources of energy, which opened the study of the properties of the world ether.

If successful on this path, the world financial oligarchy lost power in this world, especially in light of the retrospective of those years: the Rockefellers made an incredible fortune, exceeding the budget of the United States, on oil speculation, and the loss of the role of oil, which was occupied by the “black gold” in in this world - the role of the blood of the world economy - they were not inspired.

This did not inspire other oligarchs - coal and steel kings. So the financial tycoon Morgan immediately stopped funding the experiments of Nikola Tesla when he came close to the wireless transmission of energy and the extraction of energy "from nowhere" - from the world ether.

After that, no one provided financial assistance to the owner of a huge number of technical solutions embodied in practice - solidarity among financial tycoons like thieves in law and a phenomenal sense of where the danger comes from. That is why a sabotage was carried out against humanity under the name "Special Theory of Relativity".

One of the first blows fell on Dmitry Mendeleev's table, in which the ether was the first number, it was reflections on the ether that gave rise to Mendeleev's brilliant insight - his periodic table of elements.

Chapter from the article: V. G. Rodionov. The place and role of the world ether in the true table of D. I. Mendeleev

6. Argumentum ad rem

What is now presented in schools and universities under the name “Periodic table of chemical elements of D. I. Mendeleev , - a frank fail.

The last time in an undistorted form this periodic table was published in 1906 in St. Petersburg (textbook "Fundamentals of Chemistry", VIII edition). And only after 96 years of oblivion, the true periodic table for the first time rises from the ashes thanks to the publication of a dissertation in the journal ZhRFM of the Russian Physical Society.

After the sudden death of DI Mendeleev and the death of his faithful scientific colleagues in the Russian Physico-Chemical Society, for the first time he raised his hand against the immortal creation of Mendeleev - the son of DI Mendeleev's friend and associate in Society - Boris Nikolaevich Menshutkin.

Of course, Menshutkin did not act alone - he only fulfilled the order. Indeed, the new paradigm of relativism demanded a rejection of the idea of the world ether; and therefore this demand was raised to the rank of dogma, and the work of D. I. Mendeleev was falsified.

The main distortion of the Table is the transfer of the "zero group" of the Table to its end, to the right, and the introduction of the so-called. "Periods". We emphasize that such (only at first glance - harmless) manipulation is logically explainable only as a conscious elimination of the main methodological link in Mendeleev's discovery: the periodic system of elements in its beginning, source, i.e. in the upper left corner of the Table, must have a zero group and a zero row, where the element "X" is located (according to Mendeleev - "Newtonium"), ie world broadcast.

Moreover, being the only system-forming element of the entire Table of Derived Elements, this element "X" is the argument of the entire Periodic Table. Transferring the zero group of the Table to its end destroys the very idea of this fundamental principle of the entire system of elements according to Mendeleev.

To confirm the above, let us give the floor to D. I. Mendeleev himself

“… If the analogs of argon do not give compounds at all, then it is obvious that it is impossible to include any of the groups of previously known elements, and a special group zero should be opened for them … This position of argon analogs in the zero group is a strictly logical consequence of understanding the periodic law, and therefore (the placement in group VIII is clearly not correct) was accepted not only by me, but also by Braisner, Piccini and others …

Now, when it began not to be subject to the slightest doubt that before that group I, in which hydrogen should be placed, there is a zero group, whose representatives have atomic weights less than those of group I elements, it seems to me impossible to deny the existence of elements lighter than hydrogen.

Of these, let us first pay attention to the element of the first row of the 1st group. We will denote it by "y". He, obviously, will own the fundamental properties of argon gases … "Coronium", with a density of the order of 0.2 in relation to hydrogen; and it cannot be in any way a world ether.

This element "y", however, is necessary in order to mentally get close to that most important, and therefore the most rapidly moving element "x", which, in my understanding, can be considered ether. I would like to preliminarily call him "Newtony" - in honor of the immortal Newton …

The problem of gravitation and the problems of the entire energy industry (!!! - V. Rodionov) cannot be imagined as really solved without a real understanding of the ether as a world environment that transfers energy over distances. A real understanding of the ether cannot be achieved by ignoring its chemistry and not considering it an elementary substance; elementary substances, however, are now inconceivable without the subordination of their periodic legitimacy "(" An attempt at a chemical understanding of the world ether ". 1905, p. 27).

“These elements, in terms of their atomic weights, took the exact place between halloids and alkali metals, as Ramsay showed in 1900. From these elements it is necessary to form a special zero group, which was first recognized by Herrere in Belgium in 1900.

I consider it useful to add here that, directly judging by the inability to compounds of the elements of the zero group, the analogs of argon should be delivered earlier than the elements of group 1 and, according to the spirit of the periodic system, wait for them to have a lower atomic weight than for alkali metals.

It turned out to be so. And if so, then this circumstance, on the one hand, serves as a confirmation of the correctness of the periodic principles, and on the other hand, clearly shows the relation of argon analogs to other previously known elements. As a result, it is possible to apply the analyzed principles even more widely than before, and wait for the elements of the zero row with atomic weights much lower than those of hydrogen.

Thus, it can be shown that in the first row, the first before hydrogen is an element of the zero group with an atomic weight of 0.4 (perhaps this is Yong's corona), and in the zero row, in the zero group, there is a limiting element with a negligible atomic weight, not capable of chemical interactions and therefore having an extremely fast own partial (gas) motion.

These properties, perhaps, should be attributed to the atoms of the all-pervading (!!! - V. Rodionov) world ether. This idea was indicated by me in the preface to this edition and in the Russian journal article of 1902 … "(" Fundamentals of Chemistry ". VIII ed., 1906, p. 613 et seq.)