The kingdom of the absurd: Why was logic removed from the educational program?

2024 Author: Seth Attwood | [email protected]. Last modified: 2023-12-16 15:55

Who would have thought that such a seemingly harmless subject like logic could become both a stumbling block and an instrument of ideological struggle? However, the last hundred years have testified precisely to this.

Logic as a hostile element

For a start, just an excursion into history:

Logic was taught in all grammar schools of the Russian Empire since 1828.

In the country of victorious dialectical materialism, teaching logic was abolished everywhere in 1921 (the author of the classic textbook Chelpanov was fired from the university "for the impossibility of teaching from a Marxist position"), all those who disagree were put on a "philosophical steamer" and sent away from the triumphant Marxist dialectics.

That is, the truth of one of them necessarily means the falsity of the other, and vice versa.

Law of sufficient reasonStates that any thought, in order to be valid, must necessarily be substantiated by any arguments (grounds).

Moreover, these arguments must be sufficient to prove the original thought, that is, it must follow from them with necessity (the thesis must necessarily follow from the grounds).

Now imagine these laws being executed by modern globalists and mass media. Doesn't it appear? Correct, because their statements with the laws of logic are absolutely incompatible.

Logic as the enemy of "high-like-like"

Modern information warfare is characterized, among other things, by an explicit and undisguised struggle against the laws of logic. They are being actively replaced by the "high-like" law.

The bright and memorable name of this law is associated with the former British Prime Minister Theresa May. It was she who aggressively and persistently introduced this concept instead of the usual methods of proving and evaluating evidence.

How does high-likes work?

So, any accusation that is necessary at the moment is taken, preferably against Russia, Putin and everyone who is against fighters with bright faces.

To prove it, you need:

Everything. The proof took place.

Don't believe me? This means that you are on the same page with the accused.

Do you mind? So you admit the accusation.

Are you laughing? This means that you do not admit your guilt, which makes your crime even more serious.

The modern world is often called postmodern. This concept includes deconstruction (in fact, destruction), and the rejection of clearly defined concepts, and the introduction of virtual reality, in which the difference between the real and the imaginary disappears, when the basic meanings are replaced by simulations and "simulacra" ("copies without the original") …

And in this kingdom of the victorious absurdity, logic becomes absolutely alien and, moreover, a harmful instrument, which, as the time goes on, the more, a struggle is declared, not for life, but for death, right up to complete destruction.

For subjects who possess logic do not lend themselves well to manipulation, it is difficult for them to explain why a pan on their heads is needed and why everyone should jump in a crowd, shouting at the same time different chants - from "Muscovites to Gilyak" to "who does not ride, he is for the temple."

This is the kind of tomorrow that globalists create for all of us.

However, for many fighters with the regime, even the opportunity to observe this postmodern and post-human world in real time among the neighbors on the globe does not create a single brake on their own participation in the promotion of anti-Russian postmodern ideas by the "highley-like" method.

Everyone can remember examples on their own. Unless, of course, you have not abandoned logical ways of thinking.

This is such a dangerous discipline, this logic!