Falsity of the Molotov-Ribbentrop pact discovered

2024 Author: Seth Attwood | [email protected]. Last modified: 2023-12-16 15:55

In 1993, I published the book "The Katyn Detective", in which I showed that the "documents from the archive" that appeared in 1992, according to which Polish officers in the Katyn Forest were allegedly shot by Russians, are fakes, but I did not show this by analyzing their appearance (I have not seen them yet), and the falsity of the content of these documents - of what they reported. For example, "episode 95" from that book, already almost 30 years ago:

"95. An official has respect for figures in his blood, he reports with them, this is the basis of his punishment and gratitude. He will never round a figure without very strong reasons. Journalist, writer, historian - these please, these can 4, 5 thousand arrested officers of the Red Army, arrested before the war, easily round up "in about 50 thousand killed by Stalin." An official will not do that, and especially in this case. Look: Beria “writes” that he has 14736 officers and others in the prisoner of war camps, but only 14,700 offers to be shot; he has 18,632 enemies in prisons, and he proposes to shoot only 11,000. To bring such a letter to Stalin is to immediately run into the question: “Lawrence! What are you going to do with the remaining 36 officers and 7,632 enemies? Salt? Maintain them at your own expense? " And how will Beria explain to the administrations of the camps and prisons who exactly should be selected to consider cases at the Troika?

The official would exactly repeat these figures, if someone had to be kept alive, the "troika" would have left them. And no one would have any questions for him."

And so in that book I examined a couple of dozen such proofs of the falsity of only these "documents from the archive."

And only 17 years later, in 2010, Lieutenant General of Justice and State Duma Deputy V. I. Ilyukhin said that on May 25, 2010, he was asked to meet by a former KGB employee and a retired FSB general who knew him and asked to keep him incognito.

Ilyukhin met with him on the same day, and a source told him: “… that in the early 90s of the last century, a group of high-ranking specialists was created to forge archival documents concerning important events of the Soviet period. This group worked in the structure of the security service of Russian President Boris Yeltsin. Geographically, it was located in the premises of the former dachas of the workers of the Central Committee of the CPSU in the village. Nagorny.

And Ilyukhin checked the reliability of the evidence of falsification provided to him and actually turned to the Investigative Committee and the Prosecutor's Office with a statement to initiate a criminal case.

Soon after that, Ilyukhin underwent a medical examination, which showed that he was absolutely healthy … and died a few days later. The statement he made about this state crime remained without investigation, the persons he mentioned - without punishment.

I started this article so that a specialist can determine the falsity of a document by what exactly is written in the document. For example, any housewife, having read a recipe for borscht in a book of culinary recipes, according to which meat must be cooked in kerosene, will not hesitate to declare that this book is a fake, that there cannot be a real cookbook with such a recipe.

So, these arguments of my own about the falsity of these "Katyn" documents, I published later, in particular, in the book "Anti-Russian meanness". But in this aforementioned book, on the basis of an analysis of the text, I showed that the "Secret Protocol" presented to the society to the treaty between the USSR and Germany, called by that time the "Pact" "Molotov-Ribbentrop", was also a fake. I will not recall all the arguments that the text of the Secret Protocol to this treaty is false, I will take only one - "geographical".

“Without a doubt, it was fabricated by combining the second method with the third. That is, they took the text of the original protocol, truncated it in such a way as to change the meaning, and then called specialists from the KGB in forgery of handwriting texts and issued a fake. At that time, counterfeiters could not have acted otherwise. They, perhaps, would like to completely fabricate the text, but in addition to domestic witnesses, its meaning was well known abroad, for example, Churchill almost quoted this protocol.

Secondly, the scum are brainless, otherwise they would not be scum. (Won't you try to convince me that Gorbachev licked the ass of his party bosses all his life just to advertise pizza at the end of his career? The brainless idiot still does not understand why he flew from the post of the head of the greatest power in the world.) Scum - these are not people, but rather organisms, and they instinctively feel their mindlessness, therefore they are very afraid to invent historical texts for fear of doing stupid things.

And the company Gorbachev-Yakovlev got the following product:

“Secret Additional Protocol to the Non-Aggression Pact between Germany and the Soviet Union

In order to understand that this text is fake, you need to exert all your imagination and imagine yourself in the place of the executor of this document, say, Stalin or Molotov (after all, they had to execute it), or some head of the border detachment, who you need to tell the soldiers where to dig in the border posts. And try to mentally execute this protocol. If you have at least a little imagination, then you will understand that this nonsense cannot be fulfilled. And that's why.

Firstly. What is an “area of interest”? Can I trade, carry on communist or anti-communist propaganda outside my sphere of interest? Without clarification, “area of interest” is words that don't make sense. Sometimes in general contracts it is written that one party sells "goods", and the other pays for it. But with such an abstract wording, a specification must be added to the contract, which specifies exactly what kind of product, its quality, price, delivery and payment terms. Without such an explanation, a contract with an abstract product is not a contract - it can neither be fulfilled nor violated. That is, the "secret protocol" of Gorbachev-Yakovlev after the truncation of the text in the part where the parties stipulated what the "sphere of interests" was, became meaningless - this protocol can also be neither executed nor violated. And this immediately betrays a fake, and it is understandable why Gorbachev and Yakovlev threw out this part - it clearly (and you will see it later) did not correspond to the goal that Gorbachev and Yakovlev wanted to achieve with this fake - the "sphere of interests" did not provide for the capture of the named countries. USSR or Germany.

Second. Answer the question, in whose sphere of interests according to this "protocol" Lithuania is included, and in whose sphere of interest is Latvia, Estonia and Finland. You can not? That's just it! Neither Stalin nor Hitler were idiots like Gorbachev to negotiate a "consensus" without specifying what it was.

Third. Suppose that there was a territorial reorganization of both Poland and the Baltic states. Where is the border of the sphere of interest in the interval from the corner of the northern border of Lithuania at the point of its turn to the south and to the headwaters of the Narew River? This is a span of about 500 km, where are the border posts to be dug in here? Do not know? But Stalin and Hitler knew, because their ministers signed the wrong stupidity that was slipped to us under the guise of a "secret protocol."

Molotov and Ribbentrop made one mistake - they left a small gap in the border of the sphere of interests - only 30 km - did not take into account that the sources of the Narew River are in Poland, and not in East Prussia. And after 5 days, the German Ambassador to Moscow Schulenburg and Molotov signed an "Clarification" to the protocol, in which this gap was closed:

It turns out that Stalin and Hitler hurried to close 30 km (Pissa then flowed from East Prussia and flows into the Narew), and left 500 km? Of course not.

But these are arguments of logic, therefore, the meaning of such arguments is inaccessible to the average person. And so Yakov Dzhugashvili discovered a clear sign of the forgery of the Molotov-Ribbentrop pact - such that even a moron of intellectuals would understand it.

Looking at the film recording of the procedure for signing this agreement between the USSR and Germany, Yakov Evgenievich noticed that the text of the agreement is sealed with a wax seal (at 47 seconds it is clearly visible how the secretary drips with sealing wax onto the agreement from a burning stick and seals the sealing wax on the agreement with a stamp).

How the stamps were put on international documents - we look in more detail (documentary filming on January 10, 1941, the treaty on the Soviet-German border after Lithuania's entry into the USSR) from the beginning of the third minute:

But the fact is that the site contains scans of the "genuine" treaty and the secret protocol to it. And there is no trace of wax seals on these "originals"!

The scoundrels who falsify this "pact", most likely, simply did not see the originals - they did not see the wax seals - they falsified according to the drafts presented by Yakovlev or Volkogonov, and, of course, there were no seals on the drafts.

In any case, this observation of Jacob needs to be fixed on the Internet, which I am doing.